Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:16:04.308Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RESEARCH ARTICLE: Institutional Barriers and Opportunities for the Implementation of Industrial Symbiosis in Greece

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  17 October 2016

Antonina Papathanasoglou ,
Maria Panagiotidou ,
Katerina Valta  and
Maria Loizidou
Antonina Papathanasoglou*
Affiliation:
Environment and Development, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece
Maria Panagiotidou*
Affiliation:
Environment and Development, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece
Katerina Valta*
Affiliation:
Unit of Environmental Science & Technology, School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece
Maria Loizidou*
Affiliation:
Unit of Environmental Science & Technology, School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Athens, Greece.
*
Address correspondence to: A. Papathanasoglou, National Technical University of Athens, Iroon Polytechneiou 9, Zografou 157 80, Athens, Greece.
M. Panagiotidou, National Technical University of Athens, Iroon Polytechneiou 9, Zografou 157 80, Athens, Greece.
K. Valta, Unit of Environmental Science & Technology, School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Iroon Polytechneiou 9, Zografou 157 80, Athens, Greece. (e-mail) [email protected].
M. Loizidou, Unit of Environmental Science & Technology, School of Chemical Engineering, National Technical University of Athens, Iroon Polytechneiou 9, Zografou 157 80, Athens, Greece.
Get access

Abstract

Industrial symbiosis (IS) aims to couple industrial development and environmental protection through the conservation of energy and resources. Conservation of resources is achieved through synergies with industries, which mainly occur through the reuse of waste and water. The promotion and implementation of IS highly depends on the policies adopted at the national and European Union levels. The present study explores the adequacy of the current institutional framework applied in Greece for the practical implementation of IS and highlights its strengths and weaknesses. Despite providing some opportunities for attaining eco-industry, the legislation also imposes restrictions. Specifically, the absence of a comprehensive and specialized legislation and the difficulty of implementing the current regulations effectively pose barriers towards the adoption of the IS model. Considering this, the present legislative and institutional framework needs to be further integrated, while coordination among stakeholders and simplified procedures should be applied so as to realize IS in Greece.

Environmental Practice 18: 253–259 (2016)

Type
Features
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 18 , Issue 4 , December 2016 , pp. 253 - 259
Copyright
© National Association of Environmental Professionals 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brunner, P., and Rechberger, H.. 2004. Practical Handbook of Material Flow Analysis. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment 9:337–338.Google Scholar
Chen, X., Fujita, T., Ohnishi, S., Fujii, M., and Geng, Y.. 2012. The Impact of Scale, Recycling Boundary, and Type of Waste on Symbiosis and Recycling. Journal of Industrial Ecology 16(1):129–141.Google Scholar
Chertow, M. 2000. Industrial Symbiosis: Literature and Taxonomy. Annual Review of Energy and the Environment 25:313–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chertow, M. 2007. “Uncovering” Industrial Symbiosis. Journal of Industrial Ecology 11(1):11–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chertow, M., and Lombardi, D.. 2005. Quantifying Economic and Environmental Benefits of Co-located Firms. Environmental Science & Technology 39(17):6535–6541.Google Scholar
Chertow, M., Ashton, W., and Espinosa, J.. 2008. Industrial Symbiosis in Puerto Rico: Environmentally Related Agglomeration Economies. Regional Studies 42(10):1299–1312.Google Scholar
Chopra, S., and Khanna, V.. 2014. Understanding Resilience in Industrial Symbiosis Networks: Insights from Network Analysis. Journal of Environmental Management 141(1):86–94.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Costa, I., Massard, G., and Agarwal, A.. 2010. Waste Management Policies for Industrial Symbiosis Development: Case Studies in European Countries. Journal of Cleaner Production 18:815–822.Google Scholar
Duchin, F., and Hertwich, E.. 2003. Industrial Ecology: Online Encyclopaedia of Ecological Economics, International Society for Ecological Economics, ed. Available at http://www.ecoeco.org/pdf/duchin.pdf (accessed December 24, 2014).Google Scholar
ECOSIND. 2006. ECOSIND – ECOSYSTEME INDUSTRIEL, une Stratégie de Développement Durable des Activités Industrielles. INTERREG IIIC Programme. Available at http://www.interreg4c.eu/uploads/media/pdf/ECOSIND_1S0053R.pdf (accessed July 23, 2015).Google Scholar
European Commission. 2007. Communication from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on the Interpretative Communication on Waste and By-Products. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52007DC0059 (accessed July 26, 2015).Google Scholar
European Commission. 2008. Directive 2008/98/EC of the European Parliament and the Council of 19 November 2008 on Waste and Repealing Certain Directives. Official Journal of the European Union L 312/11. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:32008L0098&qid=1412944785612&from=EN (accessed July 26, 2015).Google Scholar
European Commission. 2011. Roadmap to a Resource Efficient Europe. COM (2011) 571. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/resource_efficiency/about/roadmap/index_en.htm.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2014. Communication: Towards a Circular Economy: A Zero Waste Programme for Europe. COM(2014) 398 final/2. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX:52014DC0398R%2801%29.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2015a. Working Document on Circular Economy Roadmap. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/smart-regulation/impact/planned_ia/docs/2015_env_065_env+_032_circular_economy_en.pdf (accessed July 26, 2015).Google Scholar
European Commission. 2015b. Review of the List of Waste and of the Hazardous Properties. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/waste/framework/list.htm (accessed July 26, 2015).Google Scholar
European Parliament. 2013. Regulation EU/1293/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2013 on the Establishment of a Programme for the Environment and Climate Action (LIFE). Official Journal of the European Union. L 347/185.Google Scholar
Frosch, R.A., and Gallopoulos, N.E.. 1989. Strategies for Manufacturing. Scientific American 261(3):144–152.Google Scholar
Giljum, S., Behrens, A., Hinterberger, F., Lutz, C., and Meyer, B.. 2008. Modelling Scenarios Towards a Sustainable Use of Natural Resources in Europe. Environmental Science & Policy 11:204–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobsen, N. 2006. Industrial Symbiosis in Kalundborg, Denmark: A Quantitative Assessment of Economic and Environmental Aspects. Journal of Industrial Ecology 10(1–2):239–255.Google Scholar
Komnitsas, K., Valta, K., and Grossou, M.. 2007. Sustainable Development in the Greek Mining and Minerals Industry. In Proceedings of the SECOTOX Conference and the International Conference on Environmental Management, Engineering, Planning and Economics, A. Kungolos, K. Aravossis, A. Karagiannidis and P. Samaras, eds. Skiathos, Greece, June 24–28, 2007, 2767–2772.Google Scholar
Liu, C., Côté, R., and Zhang, K.. 2015. Implementing a Three-Level Approach in Industrial Symbiosis. Journal of Cleaner Production 87:318–327.Google Scholar
Lombardi, D., and Laybourn, P.. 2012. Redefining Industrial Symbiosis. Journal of Industrial Ecology 16(1):28–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mirata, M. 2004. Experiences from Early Stages of a National Industrial Symbiosis Programme in the UK: Determinants and Coordination Challenges. Journal of Cleaner Production 12:967–983.Google Scholar
Ministry of Reconstruction of Production, Environment and Energy (MRPEE). 2014a. National Strategic Plan for Waste Prevention. Available at http://www.ypeka.gr/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=2Y2%2b%2bPSM4P0%3d&tabid=238&language=el-GR (accessed July 28, 2015).Google Scholar
Ministry of Reconstruction of Production, Environment and Energy (MRPEE). 2014b. Non-Hazardous Waste. Available at http://www.ypeka.gr/Default.aspx?tabid=438&locale=el-GR&la (accessed July 28, 2015).Google Scholar
Ministry of Reconstruction of Production, Environment and Energy (MRPEE). 2015. National Waste Management Plan. Available at http://www.ypeka.gr/LinkClick.aspx?fileticket=xX4ZEfaIJVk%3d&tabid=238&language=el-GR (accessed July 28, 2015).Google Scholar
United Nations Environmental Programme. 2016. Declaration of the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment. Available at http://www.unep.org/documents.multilingual/default.asp?documentid=97&articleid=1503 (accessed August 13, 2016).Google Scholar