Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-mzp66 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T22:38:18.019Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RESEARCH ARTICLE: Do Urban Regeneration of Brownfields and New Emission Efficiency Needs Conflict? An Economic Perspective

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  16 December 2009

Peter B. Meyer
Peter B. Meyer*
Affiliation:
The E.P. Systems Group, Inc., Covington, Kentucky
*
Address correspondence to: Peter B. Meyer, The E.P. Systems Group, Inc., PO Box 15124, Covington, KY 41015-0124; (phone) 502-435-3240; (email) [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The redevelopment of brownfield sites poses costs due to prior land uses and obsolete structural features, not just real or perceived contamination. Regeneration may require public subsidy, and the process may be further “threatened” by higher standards for building energy efficiency likely to arise with new climate change policies. New structural standards might undermine private reuse of old buildings on cost grounds. This article examines the potential conflict in terms of benefit trade-offs and the distribution of costs and benefits across current and future populations, examining impact assumptions and the approaches taken to risk of failure in emissions reduction, especially with regard to irreversible impacts. Two examples of pursuit of both objectives are considered: land-use planning and densification, including contaminated-land reuse; and new building standards and financing for retrofitting older structures for energy efficiency. It concludes that the conflicts are overstated and that complementarities are stronger, especially when viewed from a public sector perspective.

Environmental Practice 11:238–244 (2009)

Type
FEATURES
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 11 , Issue 4 , December 2009 , pp. 238 - 244
Copyright
Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bezdek, R. 2007. Renewable Energy and Energy Efficiency: Economic Drivers for the 21st Century. American Solar Energy Society, Boulder, CO, 53 pp. Available at http://www.ases.org/images/stories/ASES-JobsReport-Final.pdf (accessed June 15, 2008)Google Scholar
Creyts, J., Derkach, A., Nyquist, S., Ostrowski, K, Stevenson, J.. 2007. Reducing U.S. Greenhouse Gas Emissions: How Much at What Cost? McKinsey & Company and Conference Board, Chicago. Available at http://www.mckinsey.com/clientservice/ccsi/pdf/US_ghg_final_report.pdf (accessed June 18, 2008)Google Scholar
Energy Information Agency. 2008. Annual Energy Review 2008. Report DOE/EIA-0384(2008).Energy Information Administration, Washington, DC, 407 pp., Figure 2.1a. Available at http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/pdf/pages/sec2_4.pdf (accessed October 17, 2009)Google Scholar
Ewing, R., Bartholomew, K., Winkelman, S., Walters, J., and Chen, D.. 2008. Growing Cooler: The Evidence on Urban Development and Climate Change. Urban Land Institute, Washington, DC, 150 pp.Google Scholar
Friedmann, J., and Rangal, H., eds. 1993. In Defense of Livelihood: Comparative Studies on Environmental Action. Kumarian Press Library of Management for Development.Kumarian, West Hartford, CT, 231 pp.Google Scholar
Geller, H., DeCicco, J., and Laitner, J.A.. 1992. Energy Efficiency and Job Creation. Report ED922. American Council for an Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE), Washington, DC, 55 pp. Available at http://www.aceee.org/pubs/ed922.htm (accessed October 17, 2009)Google Scholar
Gouldson, A., and Roberts, P.W., eds. 2000. Integrating Environment and Economy: Strategies for Local and Regional Government. Routledge, London, 277 pp.Google Scholar
Laitner, J.A., Elliott, R., Neal, R., and Eldridge, M.. 2007. The Economic Benefits of an Energy Efficiency and Onsite Renewable Energy Strategy to Meet Growing Electricity Needs in Texas, Report E076. American Council for Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE), Washington, DC, 26 pp. Available at http://www.aceee.org/pubs/e076.htm (accessed July 14, 2008)Google Scholar
Laitner, J.A., and Kushler, M.. 2007. The Economic Benefits of an Efficiency-Led Clean Energy Strategy to Meet Growing Electricity Needs in Michigan. Report E07X. American Council for Energy-Efficient Economy (ACEEE), Washington, DC, 22 pp. Available at http://www.aceee.org/pubs/e07x.htm (accessed July 14, 2008)Google Scholar
Logan, J.R., and Molotch, H.L.. 1987. Urban Fortunes: The Political Economy of Space. University of California Press, Berkeley, 423 pp.Google Scholar
Makhijani, A. 1992. From Global Capitalism to Economic Justice. Apex, New York, 176 pp.Google Scholar
Meyer, P.B., ed. 1993. Comparative Studies in Local Economic Development: Problems in Policy Implementation. Greenwood, Westport, CT, 202 pp.Google Scholar
Meyer, P.B. 1995. Complementarity and Conflict between Community Values and Global Environmental Preservation. In Proceedings of the 11th Conference on the Small City and Regional Community, Wolensky, R.P. and Miller, E.J., eds. Foundation, Stevens Point, WI, 261–270.Google Scholar
Meyer, P.B., and Burayidi, M.A.. 1991. Is Value Conflict Inherent in Rural Economic Development? An Exploratory Examination of Unrecognized Choices. Agriculture and Human Values 7:10–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meyer, P.B., Williams, R.H., and Yount, K.R.. 1995. Contaminated Land: Reclamation, Redevelopment and Re-use in the United States and European Union. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 184 pp.Google Scholar
National Vacant Properties Campaign (NVPC). 2005. Vacant Properties: The True Costs to Communities. NVPC, Washington, DC, 19 pp.Google Scholar
Pagano, M.A., and Bowman, A.O'M.. 2001. Vacant Land in Cities: An Urban Resource. Brookings Institution Survey Series, vol. 8. Brookings Institution Center on Urban and Metropolitan Policy, Washington, DC, 9 pp. Available at http://www.brookings.edu/reports/2001/01metropolitanpolicy_pagano.aspx (accessed October 17, 2009)Google Scholar
Rufo, M., and Coito, F.. 2002. California's Secret Energy Surplus: The Potential for Energy Efficiency. Final Report, Xenergy. Hewlett Foundation and Energy Foundation, San Francisco, CA, 93 pp. Available at http://www.ef.org/documents/Secret_Surplus.pdf (accessed June 16, 2008)Google Scholar
Schnaiberg, A., and Gould, K.A.. 1994. Environment and Society: The Enduring Conflict. St. Martin's, New York, 255 pp.Google Scholar
Wernstedt, K, Meyer, P.B., Dixon, T., Yount, K.R., and Basu, P.. 2007. Liability and the Long Term: Effects on Sustainable Urban Regeneration in the UK and USA. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Managing Urban Land, Klapperich, H., Hanke, M. and Otparlik, R., eds. Stuttgart University Press, Stuttgart, Germany, 29–40.Google Scholar