Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T20:32:36.784Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RESEARCH ARTICLE: Decision Criteria Development and Methodology for the Degraded Fish Population Beneficial Use Impairment in Wisconsin's Lower Menominee River Area of Concern

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2013

Benjamin J. Uvaas ,
Andrew H. Fayram  and
Kendra A. Axness
Benjamin J. Uvaas*
Affiliation:
Menominee River Area of Concern Coordinator, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Green Bay, Wisconsin
Andrew H. Fayram
Affiliation:
Office of the Great Lakes Monitoring Coordinator, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, Wisconsin
Kendra A. Axness
Affiliation:
Lakewide Management Plan and Area of Concern Policy Coordinator, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, Wisconsin
*
Benjamin J. Uvaas, Menominee River Area of Concern Coordinator, Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, 2984 Shawano Avenue, Green Bay, WI 54313; (phone) 920-662-5465; (fax) 920-662-5498; (e-mail) [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

The Lower Menominee River area of concern (AOC) is one of 43 such areas in the Great Lakes region that have been subject to historical degradation and recent remediation activities. An evaluation of the efficacy of the remediation activities relates directly to the assessment of various beneficial use impairments (BUIs) and their associated targets. We discuss development and assessment of the “degradation of fish and wildlife populations” BUI in the Lower Menominee River AOC both in general, as well as a specific case within a section of the Lower Menominee River AOC (Lower Scott Flowage). We discuss process and outcomes related to the involvement of the general public and technical experts, the development of assessment criteria, and provisional results of the evaluation. We developed criteria for fish species of interest, as established by citizens and technical experts, with reference conditions defined as electrofishing catch per effort in similar flowages within the Menominee River drainage. The target for the BUI was exceedance of the 25th percentile for each species from a distribution of comparable data from reference locations. Preliminary results suggest that relative abundance for most species exceeds this target, although additional surveys are considered necessary by the technical and citizen advisory committees before a final determination can be made. Species targets that are not met will provide guidance for species-specific habitat improvement or other management actions that will result in the removal of the BUI designation.

Environmental Practice 15:393–400 (2013)

Type
Features
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , December 2013 , pp. 393 - 400
Copyright
Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beard, T.D. Jr., Austen, D., Brady, S.J., Costello, M.E., Drewes, H.G., Young-Dubovsky, C.H., Flather, C.H., Gengerke, T.W., Larson, C., Loftus, A.J., and Mac, M.J.. 1998. The Multi-state Aquatic Resources Information System: An Internet System to Access Fisheries Information in the Upper Midwestern United States. Fisheries 23(5):14–18.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beran, B., and Piasecki, M.. 2008. Availability and Coverage of Hydrological Data in the US Geological Survey National Water Information System (NWIS) and US Environmental Protection Agency Storage and Retrieval System (STORET). Earth Science Informatics 1(3-4):119–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Environment Canada. 2012, September. Full Text: The 2012 Great Lakes Water Quality Agreement. Environment Canada, Gatineau. Available at https://www.ec.gc.ca/grandslacs-greatlakes/default.asp?lang=En&n=A1C62826-1.Google Scholar
Environment Canada and the Ontario Ministry of the Environment. 2011. Canadian Great Lakes Areas of Concern: Status of Beneficial Use Impairments, Overview, September 2010. Environment Canada, Gatineau, and Ontario Ministry of the Environment, Toronto, 4 pp. Available at http://www.ec.gc.ca/Publications/464B7CDC-7248-4B0B-93CC-295D73C76E34/CanadianGreatLakesAreasOfConcernOverview2010.pdf.Google Scholar
Goodall, J.L., Horsburgh, J.S., Whiteaker, T.L., Maidment, D.R., and Zaslavsky, I.. 2008. A First Approach to Web Services for the National Water Information System. Environmental Modelling & Software 23(4):404–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holey, M.E. 1984. Milwaukee Harbor Estuary Fish Survey and Toxic Substance Evaluation, 1983. Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Milwaukee, 142 pp.Google Scholar
Lyons, J., Piette, R.R., and Niermeyer, K.W.. 2001. Development, Validation, and Application of a Fish-Based Index of Biotic Integrity for Wisconsin's Large Warmwater Rivers. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society 130(6):1077–1094.2.0.CO;2>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (NYSDEC) and St. Lawrence River at Massena Remedial Advisory Committee (SLRMRAC). 2006, January. St. Lawrence River at Massena, New York, Remedial Action Plan Status Report. NYSDEC and SLRMRAC, New York. 133 pp. Available at http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/aoc/st-lawrence/index.html.Google Scholar
Ohio Environmental Protection Agency (OEPA). 2008, December. Delisting Targets for Ohio Areas of Concern. OEPA, Columbus, 85 pp. Available at http://www.epa.state.oh.us/portals/35/rap/DelistingTargetsOhioAOC_2008Revision.pdf.Google Scholar
Ricker, W.E. 1975, October. Computation and Interpretation of Biological Statistics of Fish Populations. Bulletin of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada 191, 400 pp. Available at http://www.dfo-mpo.gc.ca/Library/1485.pdf.Google Scholar
Schoenebeck, C.W., and Hansen, M.J.. 2005. Electrofishing Catchability of Walleyes, Largemouth Bass, Smallmouth Bass, Northern Pike, and Muskellunge in Wisconsin lakes. North American Journal of Fisheries Management 25(4):1341–1352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2012, September 7. Great Lakes Water Quality Protocol of 2012 Amending the Agreement between the United States of America and Canada. USEPA, Washington, DC, 75 pp. Available at http://www.epa.gov/glnpo/glwqa/20120907-Canada-USA_GLWQA_FINAL.pdf.Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). N.d. Menominee River, Michigan–Wisconsin Area of Concern [Map]. Great Lakes National Program Office, Chicago.Google Scholar
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR). 2013a, February. Lower Menominee River AOC Fisheries Data Roundup: Final Report. WDNR, Madison, 54 pp. Available at http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/GreatLakes/documents/MenomineeRiverFisheriesDataRoundupFinalReport.pdf.Google Scholar
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR). 2013b. Lower Menominee River AOC Citizen Advisory Committee Meeting Minutes. WDNR, Madison. Available at http://fyi.uwex.edu/aocs/menominee/citizen-advisory-committee/meeting-minutes/.Google Scholar
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) and Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ). 2011, December. Fish and Wildlife Population and Habitat Management and Restoration Plan for the Lower Menominee River Area of Concern. WDNR, Madison, and MDEQ, Lansing. 25 pp. Available at http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/greatlakes/documents/MenomineeRiverFWPlan2011.pdf.Google Scholar
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) and Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (MDEQ). 2012, December 30. Stage 2 Remedial Action Plan Update for the Lower Menominee River Area of Concern. WDNR, Madison, and MDEQ, Lansing, 66 pp. Available at http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/greatlakes/documents/RAP-UpdateLMR2012final.pdf.Google Scholar
Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources (WDNR) and Michigan Department of Natural Resources (MDNR). 1990. Lower Menominee River Remedial Action Plan. WDNR, Madison, and MDNR, Lansing, 228 pp. Available at http://dnr.wi.gov/topic/greatlakes/documents/MenomineeRiverRAPStage1Report1990.pdf.Google Scholar