Hostname: page-component-669899f699-8p65j Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-05-01T11:36:10.442Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

RESEARCH ARTICLE: Co-Management of Natural Resources: Opportunities for and Barriers to Working with Citizen Volunteers

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 February 2006

Ryan Plummer  and
Susan M. Arai
Ryan Plummer
Affiliation:
Department of Recreation and Leisure Studies, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
Susan M. Arai
Affiliation:
Department of Community Health Sciences, Brock University, St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada
Get access

Abstract

Co-management is an innovative approach for managing the natural environment and providing opportunities for outdoor recreation. It combines the efforts of government agencies legally responsible for environmental quality with those of citizens and interest groups using such resources. This article documents the experiences gained from a co-management process involving the Tine River (a pseudonym) corridor in Ontario. The analysis focuses on revealing factors that fostered opportunities and presented barriers to the voluntary nature of the process. Sharing common objectives, the presence and characteristics of a network, and willingness to share information appear to create opportunities for continued involvement. Different perceptions of intent, particularly between nongovernment and government participants, and failure to fulfill commitments, appear to destroy opportunities for involvement by citizens. Implications from this study are particularly relevant to government agencies, which are identified in this particular case as being responsible for creating significant barriers to this new mode of operation through both past and current actions. Recommendations are made for environmental professionals to foster opportunities and limit barriers to working with volunteers in pursuing co-management.

Environmental Practice 7:221–234 (2005)

Type
FEATURES & REVIEWS
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 7 , Issue 4 , December 2005 , pp. 221 - 234
Copyright
© 2005 National Association of Environmental Professionals

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

REFERENCES

Ahn, T. K., E. Ostrom, and J. M. Walker. 2003. Heterogeneous Preferences and Collective Action. Public Choice 117:295–314.Google Scholar
Allen, W. 2001. Working Together for Environmental Management: The Role of Information Sharing and Collaborative Learning (PhD dissertation). Massey University, New Zealand, http://nrm.massey.ac.nz/changelinks/thesis_contents.html. Accessed January 9, 2005.
Arai, S. M. 1999. Voluntary Associations as Spaces for Democracy: Towards a Critical Theory on Volunteers (PhD dissertation). University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, 358 pp.
Arai, S. M. 2000. Typology of Volunteers for a Changing Sociopolitical Context: The Impact of Social Capital, Citizenship and Civil Society. Society and Leisure 23(2):327–352.Google Scholar
Arai, S. M. 2004. Volunteering in the Canadian Context: Identity, Civic Participation, and the Politics of Participation in Serious Leisure. In Volunteering as Leisure/Leisure as Volunteering, R. A. Stebbins and M. Graham, eds. CABI, Cambridge, MA, 151–176.
Babbie, E. 1998. The Practice of Social Research, 8th Edition. Wadsworth, Belmont, CA, 116 pp.
Backman, K. F., B. Wicks, and K. E. Silverberg. 1997. Coproduction of Recreation Services. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration 15(3):58–75.Google Scholar
Bennett, A. 1998. Sustainable Public/Private Partnerships for Public Service Delivery. Natural Resource Forum 22(3):193–199.Google Scholar
Berkes, F. 1997. New and Not-So-New Directions in the Use of the Commons: Co-management. The Common Property Resource Digest 42:5–7.Google Scholar
Berkes, F., P. J. George, and R. J. Preston. 1991. The Evolution of Theory and Practice of the Joint Administration of Living Resources. Alternatives 18(2):12–18.Google Scholar
Brabban, A. D., D. A. Nelsen, E. Kutter, T. S. Edrington, and T. R. Callaway. 2004. Approaches to Controlling Escherichia coli O157:H7, a Foodborne Pathogen and an Emerging Environmental Hazard. Environmental Practice 6(3):208–229.Google Scholar
Bullen, P., and J. Onyx. 2000. Measuring Social Capital in Five Communities in NSW. Journal of Applied Behaviour Science 36(1):23–42.Google Scholar
Byron, I., and A. Curtis. 2002. Maintaining Volunteer Commitment to Local Watershed Initiatives. Environmental Management 30(1):59–67.Google Scholar
Caldwell, L. L., and K. L. Andereck. 1994. Motives for Initiating and Continuing Membership in Recreation-Related Voluntary Associations. Leisure Sciences 16:33–44.Google Scholar
Carlsson, L. 1997. Scientists, Chickens, and Other Practitioners. The Common Property Resource Digest 41:1–4.Google Scholar
Carlsson, L., and F. Berkes. 2005. Co-Management: Concepts and Methodological Implications. Journal of Environmental Management 75:65–76.Google Scholar
Castro, A. P., and E. Nielsen. 2001. Indigenous People and Co-Management: Implications for Conflict Management. Environmental Science and Policy 4:229–239.Google Scholar
Charmaz, K. 2000. Grounded Theory: Objectivist and Constructivist Methods. In Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd Edition, N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, eds. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 509–536.
Chaskin, R. J. 2001. Building Community Capacity. Urban Affairs Review 36(3):291–323.Google Scholar
Chuenpagdee, R., J. Fraga, and J. I. Euá-avila. 2004. Progressing Toward Comanagement through Participatory Research. Society and Natural Resources 17:147–161.Google Scholar
Cnaan, R. A., and L. Amrofell. 1994. Mapping Volunteer Activity. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 23(4):335–351.Google Scholar
Cnaan, R. A., F. Handy, and M. Wadsworth. 1996. Defining Who is a Volunteer: Conceptual and Empirical Considerations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly 25(3):364–383.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. 1988. Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology 94 (supplement):S95–S120.Google Scholar
Coleman, J. S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA, 993 pp.
Curtis, A., and M. Van Nouhuys. 1999. Landcare Participation in Australia: The Volunteer Perspective. Sustainable Development 7:98–111.Google Scholar
Darwall, W. T., and N. K. Dulvy. 1996. An Evaluation of the Suitability of Non-Specialist Volunteer Researchers for Coral Reef Fish Surveys. Biological Conservation 78:223–231.Google Scholar
Dennis, S., and E. H. Zube. 1988. Voluntary Association Membership of Outdoor Recreationists: An Exploratory Study. Leisure Sciences 10:229–245.Google Scholar
Dorcey, A. H. J., and C. L. Riek. 1987. Negotiation-Based Approaches to the Settlement of Environmental Disputes in Canada. In The Place of Negotiation in Environmental Assessment. Canadian Environmental Assessment Research Council, Hull, Quebec, 7–23.
Foster-Smith, J., and S. M. Evans. 2003. The Value of Marine Ecological Data Collected by Volunteers. Biological Conservation 113:199–213.Google Scholar
Gaston, K., and J. A. Alexander. 2001. Effective Organization and Management of Public Sector Volunteer Workers. The International Journal of Public Sector Management 14(1):59–74.Google Scholar
Greenwood, D. J., and M. Levin. 2000. Reconstructing the Relationship between Universities and Society through Action Research. In Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd Edition, N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, eds. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 85–106.
Hall, M., L. McKeowan, and K. Roberts. 2001. Caring Canadians, Involved Canadians: Highlights from the 2000 National Survey of Giving, Volunteering, and Participating. Ministry of Industry, Ottawa, Ontario, 87 pp.
Hauck, M., and M. Sowman. 2001. Coastal and Fisheries Co-Management in South Africa: An Overview and Analysis. Marine Policy 25:173–185.Google Scholar
Henderson, K. A. 1981. Motivations and Perceptions of Volunteerism as a Leisure Activity. Journal of Leisure Research 22(4):208–218.Google Scholar
Imhof, J. 2001. Personal communication. Provincial Aquatic Ecologist, Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources, Guelph, Ontario, November 13.
Innes, J. 1998. Information in Communicative Planning. Journal of the American Planning Association 64(1):52–64.Google Scholar
Jentoft, S. 2000. Legitimacy and Disappointment in Fisheries Management. Marine Policy 24:141–148.Google Scholar
Katz, E. G. 2000. Social Capital and Natural Capital: A Comparative Analysis of Land Tenure and Natural Resource Management in Guatemala. Land Economics 76(1):114–132.Google Scholar
Kemmis, S., and R. McTaggart. 2000. Participatory Action Research. In Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd Edition, N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, eds. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 567–606.
Kooiman, J., ed. 1993. Modern Governance: New Government-Society Interactions. Sage, London, 280 pp.
Lane, M. B. 2001. Affirming New Directions in Planning Theory: Comanagement of Protected Areas. Society and Natural Resources 14:657–671.Google Scholar
Lincoln, Y. S., and E. G. Guba. 2000. Paradigmatic Controversies, Contradictions, and Emerging Confluences. In Handbook of Qualitative Research, 2nd Edition, N. K. Denzin and Y. S. Lincoln, eds. Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA, 163–188.
MacDonnell, L. J. 1988. Natural Resources Dispute Resolution: An Overview. Natural Resources Journal 28:5–19.Google Scholar
Maser, C., R. Beaton, and K. Smith. 1999. Setting the Stage for Sustainability: Principles and Concepts. St. Lucie Press, Delray Beach, FL, 257 pp.
Masters, J. 1995. The History of Action Research. In Action Research Electronic Reader, I. Hughes, ed. University of Sydney, Australia, http://www.scu.edu.au/arow/Reader/rmasters.htm. Accessed March 22, 2005.
McKay, P. 1997. Environment Canada Told to Cut Staff, Spending: Impact Compounded by Provincial Cuts and Harmonization. The Ottawa Citizen, 4 October, 1.
McNally, M. J. 1987. Participatory Research and Natural Resource Planning. The Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 4(4):322–328.Google Scholar
Meadowcroft, J. 1998. Co-operative Management Regimes: A Way Forward? In Co-operative Environmental Governance, P. Glasbergen, ed. Kluwer, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 21–42.
Mendoza, G. A., and R. Prabhu. 2005. Combining Participatory Modeling and Multi-Criteria Analysis for Community-Based Forest Management. Forest Ecology and Management 207(1–2):145–156.Google Scholar
Miles, I., W. C. Sullivan, and F. E. Kuo. 1998. Ecological Restoration Volunteers: The Benefits of Participation. Urban Ecosystems 2:27–41.Google Scholar
Mitchell, B. 1989. Geography and Resource Analysis, 2nd Edition. Longman, Essex, UK, 386 pp.
Mitchell, B., and D. Shrubsole. 1997. Practising Sustainable Water Management: Principles, Initiatives and Implications. In Canadian Water Management: Visions for Sustainability, D. Shrubsole and B. Mitchell, eds. Canadian Water Resources Association, Cambridge, Ontario, 1–25.
Newton, K. 2001. Trust, Social Capital, Civil Society, and Democracy. International Political Science Review 22(2):201–214.Google Scholar
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. 2001. The Well-Being of Nations: The Role of Human and Social Capital. Centre for Educational Research and Innovation, Paris, France, 118 pp.
Pinkerton, E. 1989. Attaining Better Fisheries Management through Co-Management Prospects, Problems and Propositions. In Co-operative Management of Local Fisheries: New Direction in Improved Management and Community Development, E. Pinkerton, ed. University of British Columbia Press, Vancouver, 3–33.
Pinkerton, E. 1999. Factors in Overcoming Barriers to Implementing Co-Management in British Columbia Salmon Fisheries. Conservation Ecology 3(2), http://www.consecol.org/vol3/iss2/art2. Accessed October 10, 2004.Google Scholar
Plummer, R., and J. FitzGibbon. 2004a. Some Observations on the Terminology in Co-operative Environmental Management. Journal of Environmental Management 70(1):63–72.Google Scholar
Plummer, R., and J. FitzGibbon. 2004b. Co-Management of Natural Resources: A Proposed Framework. Environmental Management 33(6):876–885.Google Scholar
Plummer, H. R., and C. L. Stacey. 2000. A Multiple Case Study of Community-Based Water Management Initiatives in New Brunswick. Canadian Water Resources Journal 25(3):293–307.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, R. S., and F. Berkes. 1997. Two to Tango: The Role of Government in Fisheries Co-Management. Marine Policy 21(5):465–480.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, R. S., B. M. Katon, and I. Harkes. 2001. Conditions Affecting the Success of Fisheries Co-Management: Lessons from Asia. Marine Policy 25:197–208.Google Scholar
Pound, B., S. Snapp, C. McDougall, and A. Braun, eds. 2003. Managing Natural Resources for Sustainable Livelihoods: Uniting Science and Participation. Earthscan/IDRC, UK, 256 pp.
Putnam, R. D. 1995. Turning In, Turning Out: The Strange Disappearance of Social Capital in America. Political Science and Politics 2(4):665–683.Google Scholar
Savan, B., A. J. Morgan, and C. Gore. 2003. Volunteer Environmental Monitoring and the Role of Universities: The Case of Citizens' Environment Watch. Environmental Management 31(5):561–568.Google Scholar
Schuller, T. 2001. The Complementary Roles of Human and Social Capital. ISUMA 2(1):18–24.Google Scholar
Schusler, T. M., D. J. Decker, and M. J. Pfeffer. 2003. Social Learning for Collaborative Natural Resource Management. Society and Natural Resources 15:309–326.Google Scholar
Sen, S., and J. R. Nielsen. 1996. Fisheries Co-Management: A Comparative Analysis. Marine Policy 20(5):405–418.Google Scholar
Silverberg, K. E., S. J. Backman, and K. F. Backman. 2000. Understanding Parks and Recreation Volunteers: A Functionalist Perspective. Society and Leisure 23(4):453–475.Google Scholar
Stankey, G. H., S. F. McCool, R. N. Clark, and P. J. Brown. 1999. Institutional and Organizational Challenges to Managing Natural Resources for Recreation: A Social Learning Model. In Leisure Studies: Prospects for the 21st Century, E. L. Jackson and T. L. Burton, eds. Venture, State College, PA, 435–449.
Wadsworth, T. 1998. What is Participatory Action Research? Action Research International, http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/sawd/ari/ari-wadsworth.html. Accessed March 10, 2002.
Whyte, W. F. 1991. Social Theory for Action: How Individuals and Organizations Learn to Change. Sage, London, 300 pp.
Winter, R. 1989. Action-Research and the Nature of Social Inquiry: Professional Innovation and Educational Work. Avebury, Aldershot, UK, 167 pp.
Yandle, T. 2003. The Challenge of Building Successful Stakeholder Organizations: New Zealand's Experience in Developing a Fisheries Co-Management Regime. Marine Policy 27:179–192.Google Scholar