Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-v9fdk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T04:09:01.526Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

PERSPECTIVE: The NAEP and the 2002 Land Mine Resolution

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 April 2005

Get access

Extract

As figuratively as chess simulates military combat on a game board, land mines actualize consequences of combat on wartime battlefields and beyond. Global activism for years has protested land mine use because of its nonmilitary human consequences, but land mines also have environmental consequences. Though eclipsed by the human consequences, the environmental consequences of land mine use are patent, widespread, and unarguable: killing flora and fauna, obliterating habitat, and retarding ecosystem recovery in blast and fire zones. Such consequences legitimize environmental professionals' concerns about land mine use, just as the environmental consequences of potential nuclear warfare legitimized rigorous study of (clearly more severe) “nuclear winter” effects.

Type
POINTS OF VIEW
Copyright
© 2005 National Association of Environmental Professionals

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

US Department of Defense. 1996. Unexploded Ordnance (UXO): An Overview. Naval Explosive Ordnance Disposal Technology Division, UXO Countermeasures Department, Indian Head, MD, 22 pp.
US Environmental Protection Agency. 1997. Military Munitions Rule: Hazardous Waste Identification and Management; Explosives Emergencies; Manifest Exemption for Transport of Hazardous Waste on Right-of-Ways on Contiguous Properties; Final Rule. 40 CFR Parts 260, 261, 262, 263, 264, 265, 266, and 270 [EPA 530-Z-95-013; FRL-5686-4], RIN 2050-AD90; 62 FR 29 (12 February, 1997).