Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T02:57:41.475Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perspective: Environmental Impact Reporting in Sweden: The Case of the Öresund Link

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

Erik Skärbäck

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Points of View
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 3 , Issue 2 , June 2001 , pp. 78 - 81
Copyright
Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2001

References

Notes

1. Statens Naturvårdsverk (Swedish Environmental Protection Agency), 1978, Öresundsförbindelser LANDSKAPSANALYS, Delutredning utförd för den svenska öresundsdelegationens expertgrupp för plan-och miljöfrågor, Meddelande 3/78, Stockholm, 192 pp.Google Scholar

2. Swedish Government, Ministry of Communications, 1978, Öresundsförbindelser, SOU 1978:8, Stockholm, 400 pp.Google Scholar

3. Vägverket Södra Regionen (National Road Administration Southern Region), 1996, Operations schedule, E6 route, Fredriksberg-Sunnanå, Item 1002, 05 24, Malmö, 200 pp.Google Scholar

4. Riksrevisionsverket, RRV (Swedish National Audit Office), 1996, Miljökonsekvensbeskrivningar, MKB i praktiken, Stockholm, 150 pp.Google Scholar

5. Swedish Central Government Offices, Ministry of the Environment, 1997, Kompensation för förlust av miljövärden (Compensation for the loss of environmental values), Ds 1997:52, Stockholm, 146 pp.Google Scholar

6. Lerman, P., 2000, “Miljöbalken utmanar den fysiska planeringen!” in Planering för landskap, E. Skärbäck et al., STAD & LAND, nr 166, Movium, SLU, Lund, 103–118.Google Scholar

7. Grip, E., Mårtensson, A-L., Skärbäck, E., and Åström, K., 1999, “Den som tar ska ge igen” Balansering—ett rättvist system för miljöhänsyn i samhällsbyggandet? (“Paying back” Balancing—a fair system for taking the environment into account in the construction process?), Sociology of Law, Research Report 1999:2, Lund University, 116 pp.Google Scholar

8. Forman, R. T. T., 2000, “The Spatial Solution with Additional Perspectives for Landscape Planning,” in Planering för landskap, E. Skärbäck et al., STAD & LAND, nr 166, Movium, SLU, Lund, 65–81.Google Scholar

9. Dieckhoff, W., 2001, Ökologische Ausgleichsund Ersatz massnahmen bei Eingriffen in den Landschaftshaushalt, Ein Vergleich schwedischer und deutscher Planungspraxis an Beispielen. Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Geographisches Institut, Bonn, 120 pp.Google Scholar

10. Grahn, P., 1994, “Green structures—The importance for health of nature areas and parks,” European Regional Planning (56):89–112.Google Scholar

11. Grahn, P., 1996, “Wild nature makes children healthy,” Journal of Swedish Building Research (4):16–18.Google Scholar