Published online by Cambridge University Press: 29 December 2015
The U.S. Army Corps of Engineers’ Great Lakes and MississippiRiver Interbasin Study, released in 2014, evaluates strategies tolessen the risk of Asian carp and other aquatic nuisance species transferringbetween these ecosystems. Due to the voluminous nature of the report and mannerin which the results are presented, however, many important questions remaindifficult to answer, such as: How do the costs of the differentstrategies differ; and How would the costs be distributedacross various stakeholders? To help evaluate the results, thisarticle uses the study’s many estimates, considerations of netpresent value, and other tools to show how the costs of the alternatives differover a 50-year time period. This information can help inform policymakers aboutthe best way to move forward with a cost-effective strategy to deal with aquaticnuisance species.
Environmental Practice 17: 291–301 (2015)