Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T18:24:46.195Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS AND CASE STUDIES: Reasonably Foreseeable Futures: Climate Change Adaptation and the National Environmental Policy Act

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Aimee Delach ,
Noah Matson ,
Heather Murray  and
Claire Colegrove
Aimee Delach*
Affiliation:
Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, DC.
Noah Matson
Affiliation:
Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, DC.
Heather Murray
Affiliation:
Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, DC.
Claire Colegrove
Affiliation:
Defenders of Wildlife, Washington, DC.
*
Address correspondence to: Aimee Delach, Defenders of Wildlife, 1130 17th Street NW, Washington, DC 20036; (phone) 202-682-9400; (fax) 202-682-1331; (e-mail) [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

The National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) clearly has a role to play in how projects with a federal nexus prepare for climate change. To help agencies improve their consideration of climate change, the Council on Environmental Quality in February 2010 released the NEPA draft guidance, which addresses both emissions and the effects of climate change on agency actions and the affected environment. We analyzed every available final environmental impact statement (154 total) released in July 2011–April 2012, and found that very few incorporated the climate adaptation elements of the 2010 draft guidance. Even the environmental impact statements with the most attention to climate change adaptation considered the effect of climate change with respect to only a limited number of the elements of the affected environment, failed to fully compare the various alternatives, or used short,qualitative statements rather than full analysis based on the best available science. We explore the possible reasons for this and present recommendations for overcoming these obstacles.

Environmental Practice 16: 52–76 (2014)

Type
Features
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 52 - 76
Copyright
© National Association of Environmental Professionals 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anderegg, W.R.L., Prall, J.W., Harold, J., and Schneider, S.H.. 2010. Expert Credibility in Climate Change. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 107(27):12107–12109.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bass, R.E., Herson, A.I., and Bogdan, K.M.. 2001. The NEPA Book, 2nd edition. Solano Press, Point Arena, CA, 475 pp.Google Scholar
Executive Office of the President. 2013, June. The President’s Climate Action Plan. Washington, DC, 21 pp. Available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/image/president27sclimateactionplan.pdf.Google Scholar
Federal Register (Special Edition). 2002, July 1. Code of Federal Regulations: Protection of the Environment—Title 40 (CFR 40): Parts 1–49. Washington, DC, US Government Printing Office, 789 pp. Available at http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/CFR-2002-title40-vol1/content-detail.html.Google Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. 2007. Synthesis Report, R.K. Pachauri and A. Reisinger, eds. UN Environment Program, Geneva, Switzerland, 104 pp.Google Scholar
Karl, T.R., Melillo, J.M., and Peterson, T.C.. 2009. Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States. Cambridge University Press, New York, 188 pp.Google Scholar
National Research Council. 2010. America’s Climate Choices: Limiting the Magnitude of Future Climate Change. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 188 pp.Google Scholar
Sutley, N.H., for the Council on Environmental Quality (CEQ). 2010, February. Draft NEPA Guidance on Consideration of the Effects of Climate Change and Greenhouse Gas Emissions. CEQ, Washington, DC, 12 pp. Available at http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/microsites/ceq/20100218-nepa-consideration-effects-ghg-draft-guidance.pdf.Google Scholar
US Department of State. 2013. Keystone XL Draft Supplementary Environmental Impact Statement. Washington, DC. Available at http://keystonepipeline-xl.state.gov/draftseis/index.htm.Google Scholar
Woolsey, P. 2012, July. Consideration of Climate Change in Federal EISs, 2009–2011. Columbia Law School, Center for Climate Change Law, 43 pp. Available at http://web.law.columbia.edu/sites/default/files/microsites/climate-change/files/Publications/Students/Woolsey%20NEPA%20report.pdf.Google Scholar