Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-jbqgn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-07-04T19:00:09.607Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS AND CASE STUDIES: Landscape-Scale Green Infrastructure Investments as a Climate Adaptation Strategy: A Case Example for the Midwest United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 March 2012

Jeff Lerner  and
William L. Allen III
Jeff Lerner
Affiliation:
Private Conservation Consultant, Rockville, Maryland
William L. Allen III*
Affiliation:
Director of Strategic Conservation, The Conservation Fund, Chapel Hill, North Carolina
*
William L. Allen III, Director of Strategic Conservation, The Conservation Fund, 410 Market Street, Suite 360, Chapel Hill, NC 27516; (phone) 919-967-2248; (fax) 919-967-9702; (e-mail) [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Scientists overwhelmingly agree that the climate is changing and that the changes are largely due to increased levels of carbon emissions into the atmosphere that are caused by human activities. The recommended response from society to climate change involves two sets of activities: mitigation and adaptation. Adaptation includes activities that attempt to adjust or respond to changes to the environment caused by climate change. For wildlife, a consensus is forming around an approach to adaptation planning that would improve the ability of an ecosystem to resist dramatic changes to habitats; build resilience into the ecosystem to recover from extreme weather events and changes in temperature and precipitation that may cause increased floods, wildfires, insect outbreaks, etc.; and lastly build realignment into our ecosystems through wildlife corridors or other connections through matrix landscape types that allow species to shift their ranges and transition into new areas when the need becomes inevitable. This commentary outlines a climate change adaptation strategy for wildlife within an eight-state region (Minnesota, Iowa, Missouri, Wisconsin, Illinois, Michigan, Indiana, and Ohio) of the Midwest United States (US) focused on the design of an interconnected green infrastructure network of natural areas that helps refine future wildlife habitat conservation priorities while also providing other natural and human benefits to residents of the Midwest US. A landscape-scale green infrastructure network will be developed for this area within the next 18–24 months thanks to a grant from the US Fish and Wildlife Service to the eight Midwest states, and the strategy outlined here serves as the foundation for implementing effective wildlife habitat protection projects in response to climate change.

Environmental Practice 14:45–56 (2012)

Type
Features
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 14 , Issue 1 , March 2012 , pp. 45 - 56
Copyright
Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, W. 2012. Advancing Green Infrastructure at All Scales: From Landscape to Site. Environmental Practice 14(1) [in this issue].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, M.G., and Feree, C.E.. 2010. Conserving the Stage: Climate Change and the Geophysical Underpinnings of Species Diversity. PLoS ONE 5(7):e11554.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Association of Fish and Wildlife Agencies (AFWA). 2009. Voluntary Guidance for States to Incorporate Climate Change into State Wildlife Action Plans & Other Management Plans. AFWA, Washington, DC, 47 pp. Available at http://www.fishwildlife.org/files/AFWA-Voluntary-Guidance-Incorporating-Climate-Change_SWAP.pdf (accessed June 27, 2011).Google Scholar
Beale, C.M., Lennon, J.L., and Gimona, A.. 2008. Opening the Climate Envelope Reveals No Macroscale Associations with Climate in European Birds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 105(39):14908–14912.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Beier, P., and Brost, B.. 2010. Use of Land Facets to Plan for Climate Change: Conserving the Arenas, Not the Actors. Conservation Biology 24(3):701–710.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Benedict, M.A., and McMahon, E.T.. 2006. Green Infrastructure: Linking Landscapes and Communities. Island Press, Washington, DC, 299 pp.Google Scholar
Chaplin, S., for the Minnesota Prairie Plan Working Group. 2010. Minnesota Prairie Landscape Conservation Plan 2010: A Habitat Plan for Native Prairie, Grassland, and Wetlands in the Prairie Region of Western Minnesota. Minnesota Prairie Plan Working Group, Minneapolis, 55 pp. Available at http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/eco/mcbs/mn_prairie_conservation_plan.pdf (accessed June 30, 2011).Google Scholar
Chicago Wilderness. 2004, March. Green Infrastructure Vision: Final Report. Chicago Wilderness, Chicago, 74 pp.http://www.chicagowilderness.org/pdf/Green_Infrastructure_Vision_Final_Report.pdf (accessed September 1, 2011).Google Scholar
The Conservation Fund. 2006. BioMap Project: MA. Green Infrastructure Case Study Series. The Conservation Fund, Arlington, VA. http://www.greeninfrastructure.net/content/project/biomap-project-ma (accessed June 30, 2011).Google Scholar
The Conservation Fund. 2010. Determining Mitigation Needs for NiSource Natural Gas Transmission Facilities: Implementation of the Multi-species Habitat Conservation Plan (MSHCP)—Final Project Report. The Conservation Fund, Arlington, VA, 31 pp. Available at http://www.fws.gov/midwest/Endangered/permits/hcp/nisource/2011NOA/pdf/NiSourceMitigationFinalReportDec2010.pdf (accessed June 27, 2011).Google Scholar
The Conservation Fund. 2011. Implementing the NiSource Multi-species Habitat Conservation Plan: A Framework for Strategic Mitigation Using Green Infrastructure Network Design and Decision Support Tools. The Conservation Fund, Arlington, VA, 13 pp. Available at http://www.conservationfund.org/sites/default/files/The_Conservation_Fund_NiSource_Summary_2011.pdf (accessed June 27, 2011).Google Scholar
The Conservation Fund and Central Indiana Land Trust. 2009. Greening the Crossroads: A Green Infrastructure Vision for Central Indiana. The Conservation Fund, Arlington, VA. http://www.conservationfund.org/green-infrastructure-indiana (accessed June 27, 2011).Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P.R., and Mooney, H.A.. 1983. Extinction, Substitution, and Ecosystem Services. BioScience 33(4):248–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fitzgerald, J.A., Herkert, J.R., and Brawn, J.D.. 2000. Partners in Flight Bird Conservation Plan for the Prairie Peninsula (Physiographic Area 31), Version 1.0. Partners in Flight, Boise, ID, 52 pp. Available at http://www.blm.gov/wildlife/plan/pl_31_10.pdf (accessed June 30, 2011).Google Scholar
Forman, R.T.T., and Godron, M.. 1986. Landscape Ecology. John Wiley, New York, 619 pp.Google Scholar
Galatowitsch, S., Frelich, L., and Phillips-Mao, L.. 2009. Regional Climate Change Adaptation Strategies for Biodiversity Conservation in a Midcontinental Region of North America. Biological Conservation 142(10):2012–2022.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glick, P., Stein, B.A., and Edelson, N.A., eds. 2011. Scanning the Conservation Horizon: A Guide to Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment. National Wildlife Federation, Washington, DC, 168 pp. Available at http://www.treesearch.fs.fed.us/pubs/37406 (accessed June 30, 2011).Google Scholar
Groves, C. 2003. Drafting a Conservation Blueprint: A Practitioner's Guide to Planning for Biodiversity. Island Press, Washington, DC, 457 pp.Google Scholar
Hannah, L., Midgley, G., Andelman, S., Araújo, M., Hughes, G., Martinez-Meyer, E., Pearson, R., and Williams, P.. 2007. Protected Area Needs in a Changing Climate. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 5(3):131–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayhoe, K., VanHorn, J., Naik, V., and Wuebbles, D.. 2009. Climate Change in the Midwest: Projections of Future Temperature and Precipitation. Union of Concerned Scientists, Washington, DC, 24 pp.Google Scholar
Heller, N.E., and Zavaleta, E.S.. 2009. Biodiversity Management in the Face of Climate Change: A Review of 22 Years of Recommendations. Biological Conservation 142(1):14–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hunter, M. 1988. Paleoecology and the Coarse-Filter Approach to Maintaining Biological Diversity. Conservation Biology 2(4):375–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2007. Climate Change 2007: Synthesis Report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, Geneva, 104 pp. Available at http://www.ipcc.ch/publications_and_data/publications_ipcc_fourth_assessment_report_synthesis_report.htm (accessed February 8, 2012).Google Scholar
Johnson, D.H., and Igl, L.D.. 2001. Area Requirements of Grassland Birds: A Regional Perspective. Auk 118(1):24–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Joyce, L., Flather, C., and Koopman, M.. 2008. Analysis of Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Wildlife Habitats in the U.S. NCSE (National Conference for Science and the Environment) Wildlife Habitat Policy Research Program, Project 1B, Final Project Report. Rocky Mountain Research Station, Fort Collins, CO, 69 pp. Available at http://ncseonline.org/sites/default/files/1B_ljoyce_WHPRP%20Final%20Report%20Project%20for%20web.pdf (accessed June 30, 2011).Google Scholar
Karl, T.R., Melillo, J.M., and Peterson, T.C., eds. 2009. Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States. US Global Climate Change Research Program. Cambridge University Press, New York, 188 pp. Available at http://globalchange.gov/what-we-do/assessment/previous-assessments/global-climate-change-impacts-in-the-us-2009 (accessed February 8, 2012).Google Scholar
Massachusetts Department of Fish and Game, and the Nature Conservancy. 2010. BioMap2: Conserving the Biodiversity of Massachusetts in a Changing World. Massachusetts Division of Fisheries and Wildlife, Westborough, MA, 60 pp.http://www.mass.gov/dfwele/dfw/nhesp/land_protection/biomap/biomap_home.htm (accessed February 8, 2012).Google Scholar
Matteson, S.K., Kreitinger, G., Bartelt, G., Butcher, G., Sample, D., and Will, T.. 2009. Partners in Flight Bird Conservation Plan for the Boreal Hardwood Transition (Bird Conservation Region 12—U.S. Portion), Version 1.0. Partners in Flight, Madison, WI, 55 pp. Available at http://www.partnersinflight.org/bcps/plan/bcr%2012-us%20plan.pdf (accessed February 9, 2012).Google Scholar
Mell, I.C. 2008. Green Infrastructure: Concepts and Planning. FORUM Ejournal 8:69–80.Google Scholar
Millar, C.I., Stephenson, N.L., and Stephens, S.L.. 2007. Climate Change and Forest of the Future: Managing in the Face of Uncertainty. Ecological Applications 17(8):2145–2151.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. 2010. Minnesota Forest Resource Strategies. St. Paul, MN, 104 pp.http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/forestry/subsection/mnForestResourcestrategies.pdf (accessed February 8, 2012).Google Scholar
Murray, D.L., Cox, E.W., Ballard, W.B., Whitlaw, H.A., Lenarz, M.S., Custer, T.W., Barnett, T., and Fuller, T.K.. 2006. Pathogens, Nutritional Deficiency, and Climate Influences on a Declining Moose Population. Wildlife Monographs 166:1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
National Academy of Sciences. 2010. Climate Change and the Integrity of Science [Letter]. Science, May 7. Available at http://www.pacinst.org/climate/climate_statement.pdf (accessed February 9, 2012).Google Scholar
The Nature Conservancy. 2009. Climate Wizard. The Nature Conservancy, Arlington, VA. Available at http://www.climatewizard.org (accessed February 9, 2012).Google Scholar
NatureServe. 2010a. Guidelines for Using the NatureServe Climate Change Vulnerability Index, Version 2.0. NatureServe, Arlington, VA, 54 pp. Available athttp://www.natureserve.org/prodServices/climatechange/pdfs/Guidelines_NatureServeClimateChangeVulnerabilityIndex_r2.0_Apr10.pdf (accessed February 9, 2012).Google Scholar
NatureServe. 2010b. NatureServe Explorer: An Online Encyclopedia of Life. Version 7.1 [Web application, data current to August 2010]. NatureServe, Arlington, VA. Available http://www.natureserve.org/explorer (accessed June 27, 2011).Google Scholar
Sinclair, S., White, M.D., and Newell, G.R.. 2010. How Useful Are Distribution Models for Managing Biodiversity under Future Climates? Ecology and Society 15(1):1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Solomon, S., Plattner, G.K., Knutti, R., and Friedlingstein, P.. 2009. Irreversible Climate Change due to Carbon Dioxide Emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106(6):1704–1709.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Takle, E.S. 2009. Assessment of Potential Impacts of Climate Change on Iowa Using Current Trends and Future Projects. Iowa State University, Ames, 18 pp. Available at http://climate.engineering.iastate.edu/Document/Climate_Changes_for_Iowa_12.pdf (accessed June 27, 2011).Google Scholar
US Climate Change Science Program (CCSP). 2009. Thresholds of Climate Change in Ecosystems: Final Report, Synthesis and Assessment Product 4.2. US Geological Survey, Department of the Interior, Washington, DC. http://www.climatescience.gov/Library/sap/sap4-2/final-report/default.htm (accessed February 8, 2012).Google Scholar
US Fish and Wildlife Service. 2010. Rising to the Urgent Challenge: Strategic Plan for Responding to Accelerating Climate Change. US Department of Interior, Washington, DC, 36 pp. Available at http://www.fws.gov/home/climatechange/pdf/CCStrategicPlan.pdf (accessed June 27, 2011).Google Scholar
Weber, T., Wolf, J., and Sloan, A.. 2006. Maryland's Green Infrastructure Assessment: Development of a Comprehensive Approach to Land Conservation. Landscape and Urban Planning 77(1-2):94–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, T.C. 2007. Development and Application of a Statewide Conservation Network in Delaware, U.S.A. Journal of Conservation Planning 3:17–46. Available at http://www.journalconsplanning.org/2007/Volume3/JCP_V3_Weber.pdf (accessed June 24, 2011).Google Scholar
Weber, T.C., and Allen, W.L.. 2010. Beyond On-site Mitigation: An Integrated, Multi-scale Approach to Environmental Mitigation and Stewardship for Transportation Projects. Landscape and Urban Planning 96(4):240–256. Available at http://noss.cos.ucf.edu/papers/Weber%20and%20Allen%202010.pdf (accessed June 24, 2011).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wildlife Climate Change Working Group. 2008. Climate Change: Preliminary Assessment for the Section of Wildlife of the Minnesota Department of Natural Resources. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (MNDNR) Division of Wildlife, St. Paul, 57 pp. Available at http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/fish_wildlife/roundtable/2009/report_wccwg.pdf (accessed June 27, 2011).Google Scholar
Wisconsin Initiative on Climate Change Impacts. 2011. Wisconsin's Changing Climate: Impacts and Adaptation. Wildlife Working Group Report. University of Wisconsin and Wisconsin Department of Natural Resources, Madison, 53 pp. Available at http://www.wicci.wisc.edu/publications.php (accessed June 27, 2011).Google Scholar