Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-l4dxg Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T00:10:02.551Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS AND CASE STUDIES: Indigenous Traditional Cultural Places in Environmental Impact Assessment: The Case of the Ch’u’itnu Watershed

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 July 2016

Thomas F. King  and
Heather Kendall-Miller
Thomas F. King
Affiliation:
cultural resource management consultant, Silver Spring, Maryland
Heather Kendall-Miller*
Affiliation:
senior staff attorney, Native American Rights Fund, Anchorage, Alaska.
*
Address correspondence to: Heather Kendall-Miller, senior staff attorney, Native American Rights Fund, 745 W. 4th Ave., Suite 502, Anchorage, AK 99501; (phone) 906-276-0680; (e-mail) [email protected] .
Get access

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Features
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 180 - 183
Copyright
© National Association of Environmental Professionals 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 National Register Bulletin 38, cited below, calls such places “traditional cultural properties,” but some indigenous groups and others object to “property” as suggesting commodification, and contemporary usage favors “places.”

2 36 CFR § 60.4.

3 Boraas, A.S., R.T. Stanek, D.R. Reger, and T.F. King. 2015. The Ch’u’itnu Traditional Cultural Landscape: A District Eligible for the National Register of Historic Places. Native American Rights Fund for Native Village of Tyonek. Report submitted to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers, the Alaska State Historic Preservation Officer, and others.

4 National Register of Historic Places. 1990. Guidelines for Evaluating and Documenting Traditional Cultural Properties, National Register Bulletin 38, National Park Service. Available at http://www.nps.gov/nr/publications/bulletins/nrb38/ (accessed January 24, 2016).

5 National Register of Historic Places Program. 1966. National Register Federal Program Regulations, 36 CFR 60.4. Available at http://www.nps.gov/nr/regulations.htm#604 (accessed January 16, 2016).

6 See 36 CFR 60.4(a).

7 The independent US government agency charged with overseeing federal agency compliance with Section 106 of the National Historic Preservation Act.

8 See 36 CFR 800.5.

9 Letter of April 3, 2015 to the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.