Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-hvd4g Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-29T20:11:19.612Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS AND CASE STUDIES: Flexibility in the European Legal Framework on Air Quality

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  20 March 2013

Mireille Bogaart
Mireille Bogaart*
Affiliation:
Amsterdam Centre for Environmental Law and Sustainability (ACELS), University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
*
Mireille Bogaart, Amsterdam Centre for Environmental Law and Sustainability, University of Amsterdam, ACELS/CvM Post Box 1030, Oudemanhuispoort 4–6, 1012 CN Amsterdam, The Netherlands; (phone) 0-20-525-3075; (e-mail) [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This article discusses the room for national maneuver (flexibility) in the implementation of two important European directives aimed at the improvement of air quality: the Ambient Air Quality Directive and the National Emission Ceilings Directive. Concrete examples of flexibility are time extensions for deadlines, the possibility for lowering standards, or the freedom to decide in which manner certain objectives like those for environmental quality are set. This flexibility is an important factor for the actual impact that these legal obligations could have on air quality. Evaluated is whether these directives are, considering the flexibility, actually capable of contributing to the environmental protection they seek to provide. The overall conclusion is that both directives set an inflexible environmental target and that a European level of ambition is being established.

Environmental Practice 15:62–71 (2013)

Type
Features
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 15 , Issue 1 , March 2013 , pp. 62 - 71
Copyright
Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2013

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Baaner, L. 2011. The Programme of Measures of the Water Framework Directive—More Than Just a Formal Compliance Tool. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law 8(1):82–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Backes, C.W., van Nieuwerburgh, T., and Koelemeijer, R.B.A.. 2005. Transformation of the First Daughter Directive on Air Quality in Several EU Member States and Its Application in Practice. European Environmental Law Review 14(6):157–164.Google Scholar
Beijen, B.A. 2011. The Implementation of European Environmental Directives: Are Problems Caused by the Quality of the Directives? European Energy and Environmental Law Review 20(4):150–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Búrca, G., and Scott, J., eds. 2008. Constitutional Change in the EU: From Uniformity to Flexibility? Hart, Oxford, England, 372 pp.Google Scholar
de Witte, B., Hanf, D., and Vos, E.. 2001. The Many Faces of Differentiation in EU Law. Intersentia, Antwerp, The Netherlands, 390 pp.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2002. Sixth Environment Action Programme: Environment 2010—Our Future, Our Choice. COM (2001)31 final. European Commission, Brussels. Available at http://europa.eu/legislation_summaries/agriculture/environment/l28027_en.htm.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2005, September 21. Thematic Strategy on Air Pollution(Text with EEA Relevance). COM(2005) 446 final. European Commission, Brussels, 13 pp. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2005:0446:FIN:EN:PDF.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2007, December 21. The IPPC Directive: Towards a Future Policy on Industrial Emissions. European Commission, Brussels. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/pollutants/stationary/ippc/index.htm.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2011a, March 14. Commission Staff Working Paper on the Implementation of EU Air Quality Policy and Preparing for Its Comprehensive Review. SEC(2011) 342 final. European Commission, Brussels, 9 pp. Available at http://ec.europa.eu/environment/air/pdf/sec_2011_342.pdf.Google Scholar
European Commission. 2011b, August 31. The Sixth Community Environment Action Programme: Final Assessment. COM(2011) 531 final. European Commission, Brussels, 12 pp. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2011:0531:FIN:EN:PDF.Google Scholar
European Court of Justice (ECJ). 1991, May 30. Commission of the European Communities v Federal Republic of Germany. Directive—Nature of the Measure Transposing It into Domestic Law—Air Pollution—Lead. Case C-59/89. ECJ, Luxembourg. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/smartapi/cgi/sga_doc?smartapi!celexplus!prod!CELEXnumdoc&numdoc=61989J0059&lg=en.Google Scholar
European Court of Justice (ECJ). 2005, November 15. Commission of the European Communities v Republic of Austria: Failure by a Member State to Fulfil Its Obligations—Articles 28 EC to 30 EC—Free Movement of Goods—Articles 1 and 3 of Regulation (EEC) No 881/92—Articles 1 and 6 of Regulation (EEC) No 3118/93—Transport—Sectoral Prohibition on the Movement of Lorries of More Than 7.5 Tonnes Carrying Certain Goods—Air Quality—Protection of Health and the Environment—Proportionality Principle. Case C-320/03. ECJ, Luxembourg. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62003J0320:en:HTML.Google Scholar
European Court of Justice (ECJ). 2007, June 27. Kingdom of the Netherlands v Commission of the European Communities: Approximation of laws—Derogating national provisions—Rejection by the Commission of a Draft Decree Advancing the Lowering of the Community Limit on Emissions of Particulate Matter Produced by Certain New Diesel-Powered Vehicles—Duty of Care and to State Reasons—Specificity of the Notifying Member State's Problem in Complying with the Community Limits on Concentrations of Particulate Matter in Ambient Air. T-182/06. ECJ, Luxembourg. Available at http://curia.europa.eu/juris/liste.jsf;jsessionid=9ea7d2dc30dd80032d4dcab64c68a884bdc867d19ba9.e34KaxiLc3qMb40Rch0SaxqTbN10?num=T-182/06&language=en.Google Scholar
European Court of Justice (ECJ). 2008a, July 25. Dieter Janecek v Freistaat Bayern: Directive 96/62/EC—Ambient Air Quality Assessment and Management—Fixing of Limit Values—Entitlement of a Third Party, Whose Health Has Been Impaired, to Have an Action Plan Drawn Up. Case C-237/07. ECJ, Luxembourg. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62007CJ0237:EN:NOT.Google Scholar
European Court of Justice (ECJ). 2008b, November 6. Kingdom of the Netherlands v Commission of the European Communities: Appeal—Article 95(5) EC—Directive 98/69/EC—Measures to Be Taken Against Air Pollution by Emissions from Motor Vehicles—Derogating National Provision Advancing the Lowering of the Community Limit on Emissions of Particulate Matter Produced by Certain New Diesel-Powered Vehicles—Commission's Refusal—Specificity of the Problem—Duties of Care and to State Reasons. Case C-405/07 P. ECJ, Luxembourg. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62007CJ0405:EN:HTML.Google Scholar
European Court of Justice (ECJ). 2011a, May 10. European Commission v Kingdom of Sweden. Failure of a Member State to Fulfil Its Obligations—Environment—Directive 1999/30/CE. Case C-479/10. ECJ, Luxembourg. http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=CELEX:62010CJ0479:EN:NOT.Google Scholar
European Court of Justice (ECJ). 2011b, May 26. Stichting Natuur en Milieu and Others v College van Gedeputeerde Staten van Groningen (C-165/09): Environment—Directive 2008/1/EC—Permit for the Construction and Operation of a Power Station—Directive 2001/81/EC—National Emission Ceilings for Certain Atmospheric Pollutants—Power of the Member States during the Transitional Period—Direct Effect. Joined Cases C-165/09 to C-167/09. ECJ, Luxembourg. Available at http://courtofjustice.blogspot.com/2011/06/joined-cases-c16509-to-c16709-stichting.html.Google Scholar
European Parliament (EP) and Council. 2000, October 23. Directive 2000/60/EC Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Water Policy. EP and Council, Brussels. Available at Official Journal of the European Union: Legislation (OJL) 327:1–73, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2000:327:0001:0072:en:PDF.Google Scholar
European Parliament (EP) and Council. 2001, October 23. Directive 2001/81/EC on National Emission Ceilings for Certain Atmospheric Pollutants. EP and Council, Brussels. Available at Official Journal of the European Union: Legislation (OJL) 309:22–30, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2001:309:0022:0030:EN:PDF.Google Scholar
European Parliament (EP) and Council. 2008a, May 21. Directive 2008/50/EC on Ambient Air Quality and Cleaner Air for Europe. EP and Council, Brussels. Available at Official Journal of the European Union: Legislation (OJL) 152:1–44, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:152:0001:0044:EN:PDF.Google Scholar
European Parliament (EP) and Council. 2008b, June 17. Directive 2008/56/EC Establishing a Framework for Community Action in the Field of Marine Environmental Policy: Marine Strategy Framework Directive (Text with EEA Relevance). EP and Council, Brussels. Available at Official Journal of the European Union: Legislation (OJL) 164:19–40, http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2008:164:0019:0040:EN:PDF.Google Scholar
Farmer, A., ten Brink, P., and Kettunen, M.. 2006. Taking Advantage of Flexibility in Implementing EU Environmental Law. Journal for European Environmental & Planning Law 3(5):395–405.Google Scholar
Fleurke, F.M., and Trouwborst, A.. 2011. Kolencentrales, robuuste verbindingen en EU-milieurichtlijnen: Balanceren tussen nationale en Europese doelstellingen [Coal plants, robust connections and EU environmental directives: Balancing between national and European targets]. Nederlands Tijdschrift voor Europees Recht [Dutch journal of European law] 12(3):95–103.Google Scholar
Groothuijse, F.A.G., Uylenburg, R., and Boeve, M.N.. 2011, May 30. Het omgevingsrecht geprogrammeerd: Verkenning van de juridische mogelijkheden voor het ontwikkelen en harmoniseren van een programmatische aanpak in het omgevingsrecht. [The environmental law programmed: Exploration of the legal opportunities for development and harmonization of a programmatic approach in environmental law structural assessment environmental legislation]. 2010/10. STEM [Structurele Evaluatie Milieuwetgevink (Structural assessment environmental legislation)], Amsterdam, 118 pp. Available at http://dare.uva.nl/document/334874.Google Scholar
Jans, J.H., and Vedder, H.H.B.. 2012. European Environmental Law: After Lisbon. Europa Law, Groningen, The Netherlands, 560 pp.Google Scholar
Keessen, A.M., van Kempen, J.J.H., van Rijswick, M., Robbe, J., and Backes, C.W.. 2010. European River Basin Districts: Are They Swimming in the Same Implementation Pool? Journal of Environmental Law 22(2):197–221.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA). 1989, November 30. Directive 89/654/EEC—Workplace Requirements—Concerning the Minimum Safety and Health Requirements for the Workplace [First Individual Directive within the Meaning of Article 16(1) of Directive 89/391/EEC]. OSHA, Washington, DC. Available at https://osha.europa.eu/en/legislation/directives/workplaces-equipment-signs-personal-protective-equipment/osh-directives/2.Google Scholar
Prechal, S., and van Roermund, V., eds. 2008 The Coherence of EU Law: The Search for Unity in Divergent Concepts. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 500 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rijksoverheid [Dutch Central Government]. 2010, September 30. Regeerakkoord VVD-CDA [CDA-VVD coalition agreement]. Rijksoverheid, The Hague, 46 pp. Available at http://www.rijksoverheid.nl/documenten-en-publicaties/rapporten/2010/09/30/regeerakkoord-vvd-cda.html (accessed September 28, 2011).Google Scholar
Scott, J. 2000. Flexibility in the Implementation of EC Environmental Law. In Yearbook of European Environmental Law, volume 1 Somsen, H., ed. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 37–60.Google Scholar
Somsen, H. 2003. Discretion in European Community Environmental Law: An Analysis of ECJ Case Law. Common Market Law Review 40(6):1413–1453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Treaty on the European Union (TEU), 2008, May 9. Consolidated version. Intergovernmental Conference of the EU National Governments, Brussels. Available at http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:C:2008:115:0013:0045:EN:PDF.Google Scholar
Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU). 2008, May 9. Consolidated version. Intergovernmental Conference of the EU National Governments, Brussels. Available at http://europa.eu/eu-law/index_en.htm.Google Scholar
Tuytschaever, F. 1999. Differentiation in European Union Law. Hart, Oxford, England, 298 pp.Google Scholar