Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-grxwn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-04T22:37:11.008Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS AND CASE STUDIES: Federal Agency Involvement in Western Renewable Energy Resource Decisions: Assessing the Views of Colorado County Commissioners

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 June 2011

Charles Davis
Charles Davis*
Affiliation:
Department of Political Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, Colorado
*
Charles Davis, Department of Political Science, Colorado State University, Fort Collins, CO 80523-1782; (phone) 970-491-6803; (fax) 970-491-2490; (e-mail) [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

This research addresses a key aspect of federal-local relationships in American federalism. How do Colorado county commissioners react in terms of supporting or restricting the development of renewable energy resource decisions under the control of federal agencies? Do they support the removal of legal obstacles to the construction of renewable energy facilities on federal lands under the jurisdiction of the United States Forest Service or the Bureau of Land Management (BLM)? And to what extent do they favor the prospective use of eminent domain authority by the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (FERC) to site interstate transmission lines across county boundaries? The results presented here suggest that commissioners are less likely to support the exercise of eminent domain authority if they are favorably predisposed toward clean coal or nuclear power and prefer a more gradual transition to the use of renewable energy resources. Commissioner resistance to the development of renewable energy facilities on federal lands is more likely to occur in counties with a greater percentage of BLM or Forest Service lands and with higher PILTs (payments in lieu of taxes) from natural resource uses.

Environmental Practice 13:1–7 (2011)

Type
Features
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 2011 , pp. 83 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abel, A. 2007, October 3. Electric Transmission: Approaches for Energizing a Sagging Industry. CRS Report for Congress. Congressional Research Service, Washington, DC, 25 pp. Available at http://ncseonline.org/NLE/CRSreports/07Nov/RL33875.pdf (accessed April 21, 2011).Google Scholar
Alm, L., and Witt, S.. 1996. The Rural-Urban Environmental Conflict in the American West: A Four State Study. Spectrum 69(4):26–36.Google Scholar
Brick, P., and Cawley, R.M., eds. 1996. A Wolf in the Garden. Rowman and Allenheld, Totowa, NJ, 323 pp.Google Scholar
Byrne, J., Hughes, K., Rickerson, W., and Kurdgelashvili, L.. 2007. American Policy Conflict in the Greenhouse: Divergent Trends in Federal, Regional, State, and Local Green Energy and Climate Change Policy. Energy Policy 35(9):4555–4573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Culhane, P. 1981. Public Land Politics: Interest Group Influence on the Forest and Bureau of Land Management. Resources for the Future, Baltimore, MD, 398 pp.Google Scholar
Davis, C., and Hoffer, K.. 2010. Energy Development in the U.S. Rockies: A Role for Counties? Publius: Journal of Federalism 40(2):296–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Durlin, M. 2009. Wind Setbacks: Local Governments Grapple with Where to Put Wind Farms. High Country News 43(3):1–3. Available at http://www.hcn.org/issues/41.3/wind-setbacks (accessed April 21, 2011).Google Scholar
Francis, J., and Ganzel, R., eds. 1984. Western Public Lands: The Management of Natural Resources in a Time of Declining Federalism. Rowman and Allenheld, Totowa, NJ, 305 pp.Google Scholar
Hopkins, L.D. 2001. Urban development: The logic of making plans. Island Press, Washington, DC, 312 pp.Google Scholar
Ling, K. 2009a. Electricity: FERC Seeks Rehearing on Transmission Siting Decision E&E Daily, April 2. Available at http://www.eenews.net/eed (accessed April 2, 2009).Google Scholar
Ling, K. 2009b. Electricity: MOU Accelerates Transmission Permitting on U.S. Lands. E&E Daily, October 28. Available at http://www.eenews.net/eed (accessed October 28, 2009).Google Scholar
Rabe, B.G. 2006. Race to the Top: The Expanding Role of U.S. State Renewable Portfolio Standards. Pew Center on Global Climate Change, Arlington, VA, 36 pp. Available at http://www.pewclimate.org/docUploads/RPSReportFinal.pdf (accessed April 4, 2009).Google Scholar
Rosenbaum, W. 2008. Environmental Politics and Policy, 7th edition. CQ Press, Washington, DC, 397 pp.Google Scholar
Simon, C., and Dobra, J.. 2003. Local Government Perspectives of Federal Land Management in Nevada. Land Use Policy 20(3):275–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Straub, N. 2009. Interior Moves to Fast-Track Solar Development. E&E Daily, March 12. Available at http://www.eenews.net/eed (accessed June 29, 2009).Google Scholar
Streater, S. 2009. Transmission: Obama Administration Faces 21st Century Grid vs. Public Lands Conundrum. E&E Daily, March 12. Available at http://www.eenews.net/eed (accessed March 12, 2009).Google Scholar
US Department of the Interior (USDOI). 2009. Payment in Lieu of Taxes (PILT) Program Summary. USDOI, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.doi.gov/pilt/summary.html (accessed March 21, 2010).Google Scholar