Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T06:19:12.390Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS AND CASE STUDIES: Changing Norms by Changing Behavior: The Princeton Drink Local Program

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 April 2016

Jessica M. Santos
Affiliation:
Office of Sustainability, MacMillan Annex West, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey
Sander van der Linden*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Woodrow Wilson School of Public Affairs and Andlinger Center for Energy and the Environment, Princeton University, Princeton, New Jersey.
*
Address correspondence to: Sander van der Linden, Department of Psychology, 421 Peretsman-Scully Hall, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544; (phone) 609-258-6935; (e-mail) [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

Unprecedented levels of global bottled water consumption present a major challenge for the environment and water conservation initiatives. Educational institutions are in a unique position to promote conservation behavior by signaling pro-environmental norms. To decrease disposable bottled water consumption on campus, Princeton University instituted an innovative “Drink Local” program in 2009. The program provides reusable water bottles to all incoming students and we analyze the program’s impact here by drawing on behavioral and social influence research. In particular, we hypothesized that by signaling that the desired “prototypical” behavior of Princeton students should be “sustainable,” students would be less likely to consume bottled water on one hand, and more likely to offer normative support for a campus bottled water ban on the other. Results from a quasi-experiment involving over 1,300 students confirm our hypotheses; students who received the reusable Drink Local bottles upon arrival to Princeton are significantly less likely to drink disposable bottled water and more likely to support a campus-wide bottled water ban. These results are promising for educational institutions who wish to promote water conservation behavior on campus and beyond.

Environmental Practice 18: 116–122 (2016)

Type
Features
Copyright
© National Association of Environmental Professionals 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anadu, E.C., and Harding, A.. 2000. Risk Perception and Bottled Water Use. Journal of the American Water Works Association 92:8292.Google Scholar
Azoulay, A., Garzon, P., and Eisenberg, M.J.. 2001. Comparison of the Mineral Content of Tap Water and Bottled Waters. Journal of General Internal Medicine 16(3):168175.Google Scholar
Ban the Bottle. 2015. Available at https://www.banthebottle.net/.Google Scholar
Beverage Marketing Corporation. 2014. Press Release: Bottled Water Continues Growing, New Report From Beverage Marketing Corporation Shows. Available at http://www.beveragemarketing.com/news-detail.asp?id=340.Google Scholar
Cialdini, R.B., Kallgren, C.A., and Reno, R.. 1991. A Focus Theory of Normative Conduct. Advances in Experimental Psychology 24:201234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Copes, R., Evans, G.M., and Verhille, S.. 2009. Bottled vs Tap Water. BC Medical Journal 51(3):112113.Google Scholar
Doria, M.F. 2006. Bottled Water versus Tap Water: Understanding Consumers’ Preferences. Journal for Water and Health 4:271276.Google Scholar
Doria, M.F., Pidgeon, N., and Hunter, P.. 2005. Perception of Tap Water Risks and Quality: A Structural Equation Model Approach. Water Science & Technology 52:143149.Google Scholar
Food and Agriculture Organization. 2013. Drought Facts. Available at http://www.fao.org/docrep/017/aq191e/aq191e.pdf.Google Scholar
Gallup. 2015. In U.S., Concern about Environmental Threats Eases. Available at http://www.gallup.com/poll/182105/concern-environmental-threats-eases.aspx.Google Scholar
Gleick, P.H., and Cooley, H.S.. 2009. Energy Implications of Bottled Water. Environmental Research Letters 4:16.Google Scholar
Goldstein, N.J., Cialdini, R.B., and Griskevicius, V.. 2008. A Room with a Viewpoint: Using Social Norms to Motivate Environmental Conservation in Hotels. Journal of Consumer Research 35(3):472482.Google Scholar
Gorelick, M.H., Gould, L., Nimmer, M., Wagner, D., Heath, M., Gashir, H., and Brousseau, D.C.. 2011. Perceptions about Water and Increased Use of Bottled Water in Minority Children. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine 165:928932.Google Scholar
Government Accountability Office. 2009. Bottled Water: FDA Safety and Consumer Protections Are Often Less Stringent than Comparable EPA Protections for Tap Water. United States Government Accountability Office, Washington, DC. Available at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d09861t.pdf.Google Scholar
Hu, Z., Morton, L., and Mahler, R.. 2011. Bottled Water: United States Consumers and Their Perceptions of Water Quality. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 8:565578.Google Scholar
Kollmuss, A., and Agyeman, J.. 2002. Mind the Gap: Why Do People Act Environmentally and What Are the Barriers to Pro-environmental Behaviour? Environmental Education Research 8:239260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kormos, C., and Gifford, R.. 2014. The Validity of Self-Report Measures of Pro-environmental Behavior: A Meta-analytic Review. Journal of Environmental Psychology 40:359371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mann, M.E., and Gleick, P.H.. 2015. Climate Change and California Drought in the 21st Century. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences 112(13):38583859.Google Scholar
McKenzie-Mohr, D. 2000. Fostering Sustainable Behavior through Community-based Social Marketing. American Psychologist 55(5):531537.Google Scholar
Mildenberger, M., Stokes, L., Savan, B., Kolenda, B., and Dolderman, D.. 2013. Beyond the Information Campaign: Community-Based Energy Behavioral Change at the University of Toronto. Environmental Practice 15(2):147155.Google Scholar
Miller, D.T., and Prentice, D.A.. 2016. Changing norms to change behavior. Annual Review of Psychology 67:339361.Google Scholar
National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration. 2016. Great Pacific Garbage Patch. The U.S. Department of Commerce, Washington, DC. Available at http://marinedebris.noaa.gov/info/patch.html.Google Scholar
National Association for PET Container Resources. 2013. Report on Postconsumer PET Container Recycling Activity in 2012. NAPCOR, Sonoma, CA, 13 pp.Google Scholar
O’Donnell, C., and Rice, R.E.. 2012. A Communication Approach to Campus Bottled Water Campaigns. Social Marketing Quarterly 18(4):255273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osbaldiston, R., and Schott, J.. 2012. Environmental Sustainability and Behavioral Science: Meta-analysis of Pro-Environmental Behavior. Environment and Behavior 44:257299.Google Scholar
Pacific Institute. 2007. Bottled Water and Energy Fact Sheet. The Pacific Institute, Oakland, CA. Available at http://pacinst.org/publication/bottled-water-and-energy-a-fact-sheet/.Google Scholar
Raj, S.D. 2005. Bottled Water: How Safe Is It? Water Environment Research 77(7):30133018.Google Scholar
Russell, S., and Fielding, K.. 2010. Water Demand Management Research: A Psychological Perspective. Water Resources Research 46(5):W05302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Saylor, A., Propoky, L., and Amberg, S.. 2011. What’s Wrong with the Tap? Examining Perceptions of Tap Water and Bottled Water at Purdue University. Environmental Management 48:588601.Google Scholar
Syme, G.J., Nancarrow, B.E., and Seligman, C.. 2000. The Evaluation of Information Campaigns to Promote Voluntary Household Water Conservation. Evaluation Review 24:539578.Google Scholar
Tankard, M.E., and Paluck, E.L.. 2016. Norm Perception As a Vehicle for Social Change. Social Issues and Policy Review 10(1):181211.Google Scholar
Thaler, R.H., and Sunstein, C.R.. 2008. Nudge: Improving Decisions about Health, Wealth, and Happiness. Yale University Press, New Haven, CT, 293 pp.Google Scholar
Tversky, A., and Kahneman, D.. 1974. Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases. Science 185:11241131.Google Scholar
van der Linden, S. 2013. Exploring Beliefs about Bottled Water and Intentions to Reduce Consumption: The Dual-effect of Social Norm Activation and Persuasive Information. Environment and Behavior 47(5):526550.Google Scholar
van der Linden, S. 2014. Towards a New Model for Communicating Climate Change. In. Understanding and Governing Sustainable Tourism Mobility: Psychological and Behavioural Approaches, S. Cohen, J. Higham, P. Peeters and S. Gössling, Eds. Routledge, 243275.Google Scholar
van der Linden, S. 2015. Intrinsic Motivation and Pro-environmental Behaviour. Nature Climate Change 5(7):612613.Google Scholar
World Health Organization. 2014. UN-Water Global Analysis and Assessment of Sanitation and Drinking-Water (GLAAS). Available at http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/glaas_report_2014/en/.Google Scholar