Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T23:24:25.727Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS AND CASE STUDIES: Beyond the Information Campaign: Community-Based Energy Behavioral Change at the University of Toronto

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2013

Matto Mildenberger ,
Leah Stokes ,
Beth Savan ,
Brian Kolenda  and
Dan Dolderman
Matto Mildenberger*
Affiliation:
School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut
Leah Stokes
Affiliation:
Department of Urban Studies and Planning, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts
Beth Savan
Affiliation:
Cities Centre, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
Brian Kolenda
Affiliation:
Lenczner Slaght Royce Smith Griffin LLP, Toronto, Canada
Dan Dolderman
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada
*
Matto Mildenberger, Yale School of Forestry & Environmental Studies, 195 Prospect Street, New Haven, CT 06511; (phone) 203-432-5100; (e-mail) [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

For three decades, many environmental practitioners have used the information campaign as their tool of choice. Yet most simple information appeals remain ineffective and are rooted in an outdated understanding of human behavior. In this article, we report on policy lessons from the Rewire program, an innovative energy conservation campaign at the University of Toronto that has grown to reach over 12,000 community members in Canada's largest university. Drawing from the Rewire experience, which evaluated the program by using a mix of psychological, electricity, and qualitative metrics, we suggest cost-effective methods for delivering policy interventions in a complex institutional setting and explore effective methods to generate widespread changes in energy behaviors through a community-based social marketing approach. Campaign designers should move away from single-tool policy interventions to employ a coordinated set of tools and techniques that address a wide range of determinants of human behavior. By training community-based coordinators, campaign designers should also move away from hierarchical policy implementation and toward decentralized deployment of modular and locally adaptive campaigns. For behavioral change to make a meaningful contribution to energy policy, we emphasize the need for more regular dialogue between social science research and the community of energy conservation practitioners.

Environmental Practice 15:147–155 (2013)

Type
Features
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , June 2013 , pp. 147 - 155
Copyright
Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2013 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abrahamse, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., and Rothengatter, T.. 2005. A Review of Intervention Studies Aimed at Household Energy Conservation. Journal of Environmental Psychology 25(3):273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, I. 1985. From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior. In Action Control: From Cognition to Behavior, Kuhl, J. and Beckman, J., eds. Springer, Heidelberg, Germany, 11–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, I. 1991. The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 50(2):179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, I., and Madden, T.J.. 1986. Prediction of Goal-Directed Behavior: Attitudes, Intentions, and Perceived Behavioral Control. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 22(5):453–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allcott, H., and Mullainathan, S.. 2010. Behavior and Energy Policy. Science 327(5970):1204–1205.Google ScholarPubMed
Allen, J.B., and Ferrand, J.L.. 1999. Environmental Locus of Control, Sympathy, and Proenvironmental Behavior. Environment and Behavior 31(3):338–353.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bachman, W., and Katzev, R.. 1982. The Effects of Non-contingent Free Bus Tickets and Personal Commitment on Urban Bus Ridership. Transportation Research Part A: General 16(2):103–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldeira, K., Jain, A., and Hoffert, M.. 2003. Climate Sensitivity Uncertainty and the Need for Energy without CO2 Emissions. Science 299(5615):2052–2054.Google Scholar
Carrico, A.R., and Riemer, M.. 2011. Motivating Energy Conservation in the Workplace: An Evaluation of the Use of Group-Level Feedback and Peer Education. Journal of Environmental Psychology 31(1):1–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chan, S., Dolderman, D., Savan, B., and Wakefield, S.. 2012. Practicing Sustainability in an Urban University: A Case Study of a Behavior Based Energy Conservation Project. Applied Environmental Communication and Education 11(1):9–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cialdini, R.B. 2007. Influence: The Psychology of Persuasion. HarperCollins, New York, 336 pp.Google Scholar
Costanzo, M., Archer, D., Aronson, E., and Pettigrew, T.. 1986. Energy Conservation Behavior: The Difficult Path from Information to Action. American Psychologist 41(5):521–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E.L., and Ryan, R.M.. 1985. Intrinsic Motivation and Self-Determination in Human Behavior. Plenum Press, New York, 371 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deci, E.L., and Ryan, R.M.. 1991. A Motivational Approach to Self: Integration in Personality. In Nebraska Symposium on Motivation, volume 38: , Dienstbier, R., ed. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln, 237–288.Google Scholar
Dennis, M.L., Soderstrom, E.J., Koncinski, W.S., and Cavanaugh, B.. 1990. Effective Dissemination of Energy-Related Information: Applying Social Psychology and Evaluation Research. American Psychologist 45(10):1109–1117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De Young, R. 2000. New Ways to Promote Proenvironmental Behavior: Expanding and Evaluating Motives for Environmentally Responsible Behavior. Journal of Social Issues 56(3):509–526.Google Scholar
Dietz, T. 2010. Narrowing the US Energy Efficiency Gap. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 107(37):16007–16008.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dietz, T., Gardner, G.T., Gilligan, J., Stern, P.C., and Vandenbergh, M.P.. 2009. Household Actions Can Provide a Behavioral Wedge to Rapidly Reduce US Carbon Emissions. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 106(44):18452–18456.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Dunlap, R.E., Van Liere, K.D., Mertig, A.G., and Jones, R.E.. 2000. New Trends in Measuring Environmental Attitudes: Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues 56(3):425–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, P.R., and Kennedy, D.. 2005. Millennium Assessment of Human Behavior. Science 309(5734):562–563.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gardner, G.T., and Stern, P.C.. 2002. Environmental Problems and Human Behavior. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, 371 pp.Google Scholar
Hassett, K.A., and Metcalf, G.E.. 1995. Energy Tax Credits and Residential Conservation Investment: Evidence from Panel Data. Journal of Public Economics 57(2):201–217.Google Scholar
Hoffert, M., Caldeira, K., Jain, A.K., Haites, E.F., Harvey, L.D.D., Potter, S.D., Schlesinger, M.E., Schneider, S.H., Watts, R.G., Wigley, T.M.L., and Wuebbles, D.J.. 1998. Energy Implications of Future Stabilization of Atmospheric CO2 Content. Nature 395(675):881–884CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Homer-Dixon, T. 2000. The Ingenuity Gap: Facing the Economic, Environmental, and Other Challenges of an Increasingly Complex and Unpredictable World, 2nd edition. Knopf, New York, 496 pp.Google Scholar
Hovland, C., and Weiss, W.. 1951. The Influence of Source Credibility on Communication Effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly 15(4):635–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzev, R.D., and Johnson, T.R.. 1983. A Social-Psychological Analysis of Residential Electricity Consumption: The Impact of Minimal Justification Techniques. Journal of Economic Psychology 3(3-4):267–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katzev, R.D., and Johnson, T.R.. 1987. Promoting Energy Conservation: An Analysis of Behavioral Research. Westview Press, Boulder, CO, 218 pp.Google Scholar
Lackner, K., and Sachs, J.. 2005. A Robust Strategy for Sustainable Energy. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2:215–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, L., and Belsten, L.. 1979. Promoting Energy Conservation in University Dormitories by Physical, Policy, and Resident Behavior Changes. Journal of Environmental Systems 9(1):13–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClelland, L., and Cook, S.W.. 2006. Promoting Energy Conservation in Master-Metered Apartments through Group Financial Incentives. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 10(1):20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mceldowney, J.J. 1997. Policy Evaluation and the Concepts of Deadweight and Additionality. Evaluation 3(2):175–188.Google Scholar
McKenzie-Mohr, D. 2000. New Ways to Promote Proenvironmental Behavior: Promoting Sustainable Behavior: An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing. Journal of Social Issues 56(3):543–554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie-Mohr, D. 2011. Fostering Sustainable Behavior: An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing, 3rd edition. New Society, Gabriola Island, Canada, 192 pp. Available at http://www.cbsm.com/pages/guide/preface/.Google Scholar
McKenzie-Mohr, D., Nemiroff, L.S., Beers, L., and Desmarais, S.. 1995. Determinants of Responsible Environmental Behavior. Journal of Social Issues 51(4):139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Minkler, M., and Wallerstein, N.. 2011. Community-Based Participatory Research for Health: From Process to Outcomes, 2nd edition. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, 544 pp.Google Scholar
Newsom, T., and Makranczy, U.. 1977. Reducing Electricity Consumption of Residents Living in Mass-Metered Dormitory Complexes. Journal of Environmental Systems 7(3):215–236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osbaldiston, R., and Sheldon, K.M.. 2003. Promoting Internalized Motivation for Environmentally Responsible Behavior: A Prospective Study of Environmental Goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology 23(4):349–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pallak, M.S., Cook, D.A., and Sullivan, J.J.. 1980. Commitment and Energy Conservation. Applied Social Psychology Annual 1:235–253.Google Scholar
Perkins, H.W. 2002. Social Norms and the Prevention of Alcohol Misuse in Collegiate Contexts. Journal of Studies on Alcohol 14(Suppl.):164–172.Google Scholar
Ryan, R.M., and Connell, J.P.. 1989. Perceived Locus of Causality and Internalization: Examining Reasons for Acting in Two Domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 57(5):749–761.Google Scholar
Ryan, R.M., and Deci, E.L.. 2000. Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-being. American Psychologist 55(1):68–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Savan, B., Flicker, S., Kolenda, B., and Mildenberger, M.. 2009. How to Facilitate (or Discourage) Community-Based Research: Recommendations Based on a Canadian Survey. Local Environment 14(8):783–796.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steg, L. 2008. Promoting Household Energy Conservation. Energy Policy 36(12):4449–4453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stokes, L., Mildenberger, M., Savan, B., and Kolenda, B.. 2012. Analyzing Barriers to Energy Conservation in Residences and Offices: The Rewire Program at the University of Toronto. Applied Environmental Education and Communication 11(2):88–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vicente, K.J. 2004. The Human Factor: Revolutionizing the Way People Live with Technology. Vintage, Toronto, 368 pp.Google Scholar