Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-24T17:49:43.191Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS AND CASE STUDIES: Accounting for Diversity in Environmental Justice Screening Tools: Toward Multiple Indices of Disproportionate Impact

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 March 2014

Ryan Holifield
Ryan Holifield*
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
*
Address correspondence to: Ryan Holifield¸ Assistant Professor, Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin, PO Box 413, Milwaukee, WI 53201; (phone) 1-414-229-4868; (fax) 1-414-229-3981; (e-mail) [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

To comply with President Bill Clinton’s Executive Order 12898 addressing environmental justice, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has been working for over two decades to develop consistent indices and screening tools to measure disproportionate impact and identify environmental justice communities. Its efforts have been complicated by methodological problems, divergent interpretations of policy, and concerns about the misuse of such screening tools. This review of recent scholarship and developments in EPA environmental justice policy proposes that instead of a single index of disproportionate impact associated with a single type of environmental justice community, regulatory agencies should aim to produce screening tools that incorporate multiple indices of impact and a diverse typology of environmental justice communities. It argues that adopting such an approach would not only better reflect the environmental justice movement’s emphasis on difference and diversity, but also produce more effective and acceptable screening tools that are less susceptible to misuse.

Environmental Practice 16: 77–86 (2014)

Type
Features
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 16 , Issue 1 , March 2014 , pp. 77 - 86
Copyright
© National Association of Environmental Professionals 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barzyk, T.M., White, B.M., Millard, M., Martin, M., Perlmutt, L.D., Harris, F., Nguyen, P., Walts, A., and Geller, A.. 2011. Linking Socio-economic Status, Adverse Health Outcome, and Environmental Pollution Information to Develop a Set of Environmental Justice Indicators with Three Case Study Applications. Environmental Justice 4(3):171–177.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bowen, W.M. 2001. Environmental Justice through Research-Based Decision-Making. New Directions in Public Administration. Garland, New York, 256 pp.Google Scholar
Bowen, W.M. 2002. An Analytical Review of Environmental Justice Research: What Do We Really Know? Environmental Management 29(1):3–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bowen, W.M., Salling, M.J., Haynes, K.E., and Cyran, E.J.. 1995. Toward Environmental Justice: Spatial Equity in Ohio and Cleveland. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 85(4):641–663.Google Scholar
Brender, J.D., Maantay, J.A., and Chakraborty, J.. 2011. Residential Proximity to Environmental Hazards and Adverse Health Outcomes. American Journal of Public Health 101(Suppl. 1):S37–S52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brulle, R.J., and Pellow, D.N.. 2006. Environmental Justice: Human Health and Environmental Inequalities. Annual Review of Public Health 27:103–124.Google Scholar
Burger, J., and Gochfeld, M.. 2011. Conceptual Environmental Justice Model for Evaluating Chemical Pathways of Exposure in Low-Income, Minority, Native American, and Other Unique Exposure Populations. American Journal of Public Health 101(Suppl. 1):S64–S73.Google Scholar
Chakraborty, J., Maantay, J.A., and Brender, J.D.. 2011. Disproportionate Proximity to Environmental Health Hazards: Methods, Models, and Measurement. American Journal of Public Health 101(Suppl. 1):S27–S36.Google Scholar
Clinton, W. 1994. February 11. Executive Order 12898: Federal Actions to Address Environmental Justice in Minority Populations and Low-Income Populations. Federal Register 59(32). Available at http://www.archives.gov/federal-register/executive-orders/pdf/12898.pdf (accessed January 22, 2013).Google Scholar
Cutter, S.L. 1995. Race, Class and Environmental Justice. Progress in Human Geography 19(1):111–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cutter, S.L., Holm, D., and Clark, L.. 1996. The Role of Geographic Scale in Monitoring Environmental Justice. Risk Analysis 16(4):517–526.Google Scholar
Federal Highway Administration (FHWA). 2013. Environmental Justice: The Facts. FHWA, Washington, DC. http://www.fhwa.dot.gov/environment/environmental_justice/facts/ (accessed January 22, 2013).Google Scholar
Fredericks, S.E. 2011. Monitoring Environmental Justice. Environmental Justice 4(1):63–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gochfeld, M., and Burger, J.. 2011. Disproportionate Exposures in Environmental Justice and Other Populations: The Importance of Outliers. American Journal of Public Health 101(Suppl. 1):S53–S63.Google Scholar
Harris, S., and Harper, B.. 2006. A Native American Exposure Scenario. Risk Analysis 17(6):789–795.Google Scholar
Harris, S., and Harper, B.. 2011. A Method for Tribal Environmental Justice Analysis. Environmental Justice 4(4):231–237.Google Scholar
Holifield, R. 2001. Defining Environmental Justice and Environmental Racism. Urban Geography 22(1):78–90.Google Scholar
Holifield, R. 2004. Neoliberalism and Environmental Justice in the United States Environmental Protection Agency: Translating Policy into Managerial Practice in Hazardous Waste Remediation. Geoforum 35(3):285–297.Google Scholar
Holifield, R. 2012a. The Elusive Environmental Justice Area: Three Waves of Policy in the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Environmental Justice 5(6):293–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holifield, R. 2012b. Environmental Justice as Recognition and Participation in Risk Assessment: Negotiating and Translating Health Risk at a Superfund Site in Indian Country. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 102(3):591–613.Google Scholar
Kumeh, T. 2010. A Less Toxic Environment for Environmental Justice? Mother Jones, February 1. Available at http://www.motherjones.com/blue-marble/2010/02/EPA-toxic-waste-Kettleman (accessed May 31, 2013).Google Scholar
Landale, N., and Oropesa, R.S.. 2002. White, Black, or Puerto Rican? Racial Self-Identification among Mainland and Island Puerto Ricans. Social Forces 81(1):231–254.Google Scholar
Lewis, T., and Bennett, S.. 2013. The Juxtaposition and Spatial Disconnect of Environmental Justice Declarations and Actual Risk: A New Method and Its Application to New York State. Applied Geography 39:57–66.Google Scholar
Liu, F. 2000. Environmental Justice Analysis: Theories, Methods, and Practice. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 367 pp.Google Scholar
Maantay, J. 2002. Mapping Environmental Injustices: Pitfalls and Potential of Geographic Information Systems in Assessing Environmental Health and Equity. Environmental Health Perspectives 110(Suppl. 2):161–171.Google Scholar
Martinez, S. 2006. Don’t Dump on Us! Voices from the Earth 7(2). Available at http://www.sric.org/voices/2006/v7n2/dump.php (accessed May 31, 2013).Google Scholar
McMaster, R.B., Leitner, H., and Sheppard, E.. 1997. GIS-based Environmental Equity and Risk Assessment: Methodological Problems and Prospects. Cartography and Geographic Information Science 24(3):172–189.Google Scholar
Mohai, P., and Saha, R.. 2006. Reassessing Racial and Socioeconomic Disparities in Environmental Justice Research. Demography 43(2):383–399.Google Scholar
National Environmental Justice Advisory Council (NEJAC). 2004, 16 April. Transcript, USEPA NEJAC Committee Meeting, New Orleans, LA. Available at http://www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/resources/publications/nejac/nejacmtg/transcript-neworleans-041604.pdf (accessed January 24, 2013).Google Scholar
National Environmental Justice Advisory Council (NEJAC). 2007, September 18 and 19. Transcript, USEPA NEJAC Committee Meeting, Baltimore, MD. Available at http://www.epa.gov/compliance/ej/resources/publications/nejac/nejacmtg/nejac-meet-trans-091807.pdf and http://www.epa.gov/compliance/ej/resources/publications/nejac/nejacmtg/nejac-meet-trans-091907.pdf (accessed January 24, 2013).Google Scholar
National Environmental Justice Advisory Council (NEJAC). 2010, May. Nationally Consistent Environmental Justice Screening Approaches. NEJAC, Washington, DC, 109 pp (21 pp. + appendices). Available at http://www.epa.gov/compliance/ej/resources/publications/nejac/ej-screening-approaches-rpt-2010.pdf (accessed January 23, 2014).Google Scholar
Payne-Sturges, D., Turner, A., Wignall, J., Rosenbaum, A., Dederick, E., and Dantzker, H.. 2012. A Review of State-Level Analytical Approaches for Evaluating Disproportionate Environmental Health Impacts. Environmental Justice 5(4):173–187.Google Scholar
Rose, L., Davila, N., Tzoumis, K., and Doenges, D.. 2005. Environmental Justice Analysis: How Has It Been Implemented in Draft Environmental Impact Statements? Environmental Practice 7(4):235–245.Google Scholar
Sadd, J.L., Pastor, M., Morello-Frosch, R., Scoggins, J., and Jesdale, B.. 2011. Playing It Safe: Assessing Cumulative Impact and Social Vulnerability through an Environmental Justice Screening Method in the South Coast Air Basin, California. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 8(5):1441–1459.Google Scholar
Schlosberg, D. 1999. Environmental Justice and the New Pluralism: The Challenge of Difference for Environmentalism. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 223 pp.Google Scholar
Schlosberg, D. 2007. Defining Environmental Justice: Theories, Movements, and Nature. Oxford Scholarship Online. Oxford University Press, Oxford, 256 pp.Google Scholar
Stanley, A. 2009. Just Space or Spatial Justice? Difference, Discourse, and Environmental Justice. Local Environment 14(10):999–1014.Google Scholar
Szasz, A., and Meuser, M.. 1997. Environmental Inequalities: Literature Review and Proposals for New Directions in Research and Theory. Current Sociology 45(3):99–120.Google Scholar
Taylor, D.E. 2000. The Rise of the Environmental Justice Paradigm: Injustice Framing and the Social Construction of Environmental Discourses. American Behavioral Scientist 43(4):508–580.Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2004, November. Toolkit for Assessing Potential Allegations of Environmental Injustice. Report EPA 300-R-04-002. USEPA, Washington, DC, 167 pp. Available at http://www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/resources/policy/ej-toolkit.pdf (accessed January 24, 2013).Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2011, September. Plan EJ 2014. USEPA, Washington, DC, 189 pp. Available at http://www.epa.gov/compliance/ej/resources/policy/plan-ej-2014/plan-ej-2011-09.pdf (accessed January 24, 2013).Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2012. The Environmental Justice Strategic Enforcement Assessment Tool. USEPA, Washington, DC, http://www.epa.gov/environmentaljustice/resources/policy/ej-seat.html (accessed January 24, 2013).Google Scholar
US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) Office of the Inspector General. 2004, Evaluation Report: EPA Needs to Consistently Implement the Intent of the Executive Order on Environmental Justice. Report 2004-P-00007. USEPA, Washington, DC, 67 pp. Available at http://www.epa.gov/oig/reports/2004/20040301-2004-P-00007.pdf (accessed January 22, 2013).Google Scholar
Walker, G. 2009. Beyond Distribution and Proximity: Exploring the Multiple Spatialities of Environmental Justice. Antipode 41(4):614–636.Google Scholar
Walker, G. 2012. Environmental Justice: Concepts, Evidence, and Politics. Routledge, London, 256 pp.Google Scholar