Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T21:08:55.684Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEW AND CASE STUDIES: Is Urban Marsh Sustainability Compatible with the Clean Water Act?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 February 2015

Beth Ravit ,
Judith S. Weis  and
Daniel Rounds
Beth Ravit*
Affiliation:
Codirector, Center for Urban Environmental Sustainability (CUES), Department of Environmental Sciences, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey
Judith S. Weis
Affiliation:
Department of Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, Newark, New Jersey
Daniel Rounds
Affiliation:
Department of Landscape Architecture, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
*
Address correspondence to: Beth Ravit, Department of Environmental Sciences, School of Environmental and Biological Sciences, Rutgers University, 14 College Farm Road, New Brunswick, NJ 08901; (phone) 848-932-5752; (fax) 732-932-8644; (e-mail) [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

The United States (US) Army Corps of Engineers and US Environmental Protection Agency share responsibility for regulating placement of fill material in coastal wetlands and open waters. However, achieving the goal of no net wetland loss has been difficult, particularly in urban regions where development pressures and environmental conditions have exacerbated wetland losses. Despite protections provided in the Clean Water Act, one significant wetland category is threatened by adherence to the rules regarding no discharge of fill: low-lying coastal wetlands subject to the effects of a changing climate, including rising sea level, higher storm surges, and flooding. Without inland migration or accretion of new sediments, coastal wetlands will be lost unless marsh surface elevations are raised. The northeastern US coastline is a hot spot that may be especially vulnerable to sea-level rise. To explore current restoration policy, three case studies were examined: Jamaica Bay, New York, disappearing marshes; Jersey City, New Jersey, Lincoln Park West marsh; and Kane Wetland Mitigation Bank in the New Jersey Meadowlands District. Questions related to projected sea-level rise, ecological topography and adjacencies, or the potential for extreme storm events and surges were not addressed in the designs of these recent restorations. Although placement of fill materials in wetlands, marshes, or open water can create unanticipated consequences, if there is stringent regulatory oversight and a transparent public process, allowing placement of fill to preserve coastal wetlands could increase coastal resiliency. We suggest that the greater danger is failing to acknowledge the predicted effects of a changing climate. Permitting decisions must take into account broader geographic areas, expanded time frames, and projected effects of climate change.

Environmental Practice 17: 46–56 (2015)

Type
Features
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 17 , Supplement 1 , March 2015 , pp. 46 - 56
Copyright
© National Association of Environmental Professionals 2015 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Boon, J.D. 2012. Evidence of Sea Level Acceleration at U.S. and Canadian Tide Stations, Atlantic Coast, North America. Journal of Coastal Research 28(6):1437–1445.Google Scholar
Brouwer, G. 2002. New Jersey Misses Mark in Mitigation. Civil Engineering 72(6):28.Google Scholar
Dahl, T.E., and Allord, G.J.. 1999. History of Wetlands in the Conterminous United States [Technical Aspects of Wetlands]. US Geological Survey (USGS) Water Supply Paper 2425. USGS, Washington, DC. Available at http://water.usgs.gov/nwsum/WSP2425/history.html (accessed October 29, 2012).Google Scholar
EarthMark. 2008, September. Statement of Qualifications and Lease Proposal for the Richard P. Kane Natural Area Wetland Mitigation Bank. Submitted to the Meadowlands Conservation Trust (MCT). MCT, Lyndhurst, NJ. Available at http://www.mitigationbank.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=72&Itemid=59.Google Scholar
EarthMark. 2013. Kane Mitigation Bank Fact Sheet. Available at http://www.mitigationbank.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=72&Itemid=59 (accessed February 6, 2013).Google Scholar
Federal Register . 2002. Rules and Regulations 67(90):31129–31143.Google Scholar
Finkl, C.W. 1996. What Might Happen to America’s Shorelines If Artificial Beach Replenishment Is Curtailed: A Prognosis for Southeastern Florida and Other Sandy Regions along Regressive Coasts. Journal of Coastal Research 12(1):R3–R9.Google Scholar
Gornitz, V., Couch, S., and Hartig, E.K.. 2002. Impacts of Sea Level Rise in the New York City Metropolitan Area. Global and Planetary Changes 32(1):61–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hartig, E.K., Gornitz, V., Kolker, A., Mushacke, F., and Fallon, D.. 2002. Anthropogenic and Climate-Change Impacts on Salt Marshes of Jamaica Bay, New York City. Wetlands 22(1):71–89.Google Scholar
Hedrick, C. 2000. March. State, Territory, and Commonwealth Beach Nourishment Programs: A National Overview, W. Millhouser and J. Lukens (Eds.). Technical Document No. 00-01. Office of Ocean and Coastal Resource Management (OCRM) Program Policy Series. OCRM, National Ocean Service, National Oceanic & Atmospheric Administration, US Department of Commerce, Washington, DC, 118 pp. Available at http://coastalmanagement.noaa.gov/resources/docs/finalbeach.pdf (accessed May 14, 2013).Google Scholar
Hough, P., and Robertson, M.. 2009. Mitigation under Section 404 of the Clean Water Act: Where It Comes From, What It Means. Wetlands Ecologic Management 17(1):15–33.Google Scholar
Jones, A.S., Bosch, C., and Strange, E.. 2009. Vulnerable Species: The Effects of Sea Level Rise on Coastal Habitats. In Coastal Sensitivity to Sea Level Rise: A Focus on the Mid-Atlantic Region, J.G. Titus (Coordinating Lead Author), K.E. Anderson, D.R. Cahoon, D.B. Gesch, S.K. Gill, B.T. Gutierrez, E.R. Thieler, and S.J. Williams (Lead Authors). US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington DC, pp. 43–56. Available at http://papers.risingsea.net/coastal-sensitivity-to-sea-level-rise-5-vulnerable-species.html (accessed July 1, 2013).Google Scholar
Karl, T.R., Melillo, J.M., and Peterson, T.C. (Eds.). 2009. Global Climate Change Impacts in the United States. Cambridge University Press, New York, 188 pp. Available at http://downloads.globalchange.gov/usimpacts/pdfs/climate-impacts-report.pdf (accessed October 20, 2012).Google Scholar
Kennish, M.J. 2001. Coastal Salt Marsh Stems in the U.S.: A Review of Anthropogenic Impacts. Journal of Coastal Research 17(3):731–748.Google Scholar
Kirshen, P., Watson, C., Douglas, E., Gonitz, A., Lee, J., and Tian, Y.. 2008. Coastal Flooding in the Northeastern United States due to Climate Change. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change (Special issue: Assessment of Climate Change, Impacts, and Solutions in the Northeast United States) 13(5–6):437–451. Available at http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11027-007-9130-5 (accessed July 1, 2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Louis Berger Group (LBG). 2011. Lincoln Park Wetland Restoration Project Monitoring Plan: Jersey City, Hudson County, New Jersey. Submitted to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Office of Natural Resource Restoration, Trenton, NJ, and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Restoration Center, Highlands, NJ. Prepared by the Louis Berger Group, Inc., Morristown, NJ.Google Scholar
Louis Berger Group (LBG). 2012. Lincoln Park Wetland Restoration Year 2 Monitoring Report: Jersey City, Hudson County, New Jersey. Submitted to New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection Office of natural Resource Restoration, Trenton, NJ, and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Restoration Center, Highlands, NJ. Prepared by the Louis Berger Group, Inc., Morristown, NJ.Google Scholar
Mazzei, V.J. Jr. 2010. Engineering Report. NJDEP Kane Mitigation Bank Project Files. Obtained through an Open Public Records Act (OPRA) request to the New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, April 15, 2013.Google Scholar
National Research Council (NRC). 2001. National Research Council: Compensating for Wetland Losses Under the Clean Water Act. National Academies Press, Washington, DC, 348 pp.Google Scholar
New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection (NJDEP). 1997. October. The Management and Regulation of Dredging Activities and Dredged Material in New Jersey’s Tidal Waters. NJDEP, Trenton, NJ, 121 pp. Available at https://rucore.libraries.rutgers.edu/rutgers-lib/35173/ (accessed December 30, 2014).Google Scholar
Nicholls, R.J. 2003. Case Study on Sea-Level Rise Impacts, ENV/EPOC/GSP(2003)9/FINAL. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development, Paris, 32 pp.Google Scholar
Nicholls, R.J., and Cazenave, A.. 2010. Sea-Level Rise and Its Impact on Coastal Zones. Science 328(5985):1517–1520.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Nussbaum, A. 2009. A Windfall from Waste. NorthNewJersey.com, August 10. Available at http://www.northjersey.com/news/environment/a-windfall-from-waste-1.995013 (accessed July 1, 2013).Google Scholar
Richard P. Kane Mitigation Bank . 2013. http://www.mitigationbanking.org/pdfs/rpkmb.pdf (accessed February 6, 2013).Google Scholar
Ruhl, J.B., and Gregg, R.J.. 2001. Integrating Ecosystem Services into Environmental Law: A Case Study of Wetland Mitigation Banking. Stanford Environmental Law Journal 20:365–392. Available at http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=1354787 (accessed October 10, 2012).Google Scholar
Sallenger, A.H. Jr., Doran, K.S., and Howd, P.A.. 2012. Hotspot of Accelerated Sea-Level Rise on the Atlantic Coast of North America. Nature Climate Change 2(12):884–888.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scavia, D., Field, J.C., Boesch, D.F., Buddenmeier, R.W., Burkett, V., Cayan, D.R., Fogarty, M., Garwell, M.A., Howarth, R.W., Mason, C., Reed, D.J., Royer, T.C., Sallenger, A.H., and Titus, J.G.. 2002. Climate Change Impacts on U.S. Coastal and Marine Ecosystems. Estuaries 25(2):149–164.Google Scholar
Slott, J.M., Murray, A.B., and Ashton, A.D.. 2010. Large-Scale Responses of Complex-Shaped Coastlines to Local Shoreline Stabilization and Climate Change. Journal of Geophysical Research-Earth Surface 115(F3) F03033 (20 pp.), doi:1029/2009JF001486.Google Scholar
Stammermann, R., and Piasecki, M.. 2012. Influence of Sediment Availability, Vegetation, and Sea Level Rise on the Development of Tidal Marshes in the Delaware Bay: A review. Journal of Coastal Research 28(6):1536–1549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stive, M.J.F., Nicholls, R.J., and Devriend, H.J.. 1991. Sea-Level Rise and Shore Nourishment: A Discussion. Coastal Engineering 16(1):147–163.Google Scholar
Strauss, B.H., Ziemlinski, R., Weiss, J.I., and Overpeck, J.T.. 2012. Tidally Adjusted Estimates of Topographic Vulnerability to Sea Level Rise and Flooding for the Contiguous United States. Environmental Research Letters 7(1):014033 (12 pp.), doi:10.1088/1748-9326/12/014033.Google Scholar
Titus, J.G. (Coordinating Lead Author), Anderson, K.E., Cahoon, D.R., Gesch, D.B., Gill, S.K., Gutierrez, B.T., Thieler, E.R., and Williams (Lead Authors), S. J., for the Climate Change Science Program (CCSP). 2009. Coastal Sensitivity to Sea Level Rise: A Focus on the Mid-Atlantic Region. A Report by the US CCSP and the Subcommittee on Global Change Research. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C., 320 pp. Available at http://downloads.globalchange.gov/sap/sap4-1/sap4-1-final-report-all.pdf.Google Scholar
Tol, R.S.J., Klein, R.J.T., and Nicholls, R.J.. 2008. Towards Successful Adaptation to Sea-Level Rise along Europe’s Coasts. Journal of Coastal Research 24(2):433–442.Google Scholar
Törnqvist, T.E., and Meffert, D.J.. 2008. Sustaining Coastal Urban Ecosystems. Nature Geoscience 1(12):805–807.Google Scholar
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2011, October 1. Sea-Level Change Considerations for Civil Works Programs. Circular 1165-2-212, expires September 30, 2013. USACE, Washington, DC, 32 pp. Available at http://planning.usace.army.mil/toolbox/library/ECs/EC11652212Nov2011.pdf Google Scholar
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2013a. Fact Sheet—Lincoln Park West, NJ. USACE, New York. http://www.nan.usace.army.mil/Media/FactSheets/FactSheetArticleView/tabid/11241/Article/8324/fact-sheet-lincoln-park-west-nj.aspx (accessed February 6, 2013).Google Scholar
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2013b. Fact Sheet—New York & New Jersey Harbor (50 Ft Deepening). USACE, New York. http://www.nan.usace.army.mil/Media/FactSheets/FactSheetArticleView/tabid/11241/Article/8427/fact-sheet-new-york-new-jersey-harbor-50-ft-deepening.aspx (accessed February 6, 2013).Google Scholar
US Army Corps of Engineers (USACE). 2013c. Regulatory In-Lieu Fee and Bank Information Tracking System. USACE, Washington, DC. Available at https://rsgisias.crrel.usace.army.mil/ribits/f?p=107:10:4927008929032337::NO::P10_BANK_ID:1745 (accessed February 22, 2013).Google Scholar
Weinstein, M.P., and Weishar, L.L.. 2002. Beneficial Use of Dredged Material to Enhance the Restoration Trajectories of Formerly Diked Lands. Ecological Engineering 19(3):187–201.Google Scholar
Williams, S.J. 2013. Sea-Level Rise Implications for Coastal Regions. Journal of Coastal Research (Special Issue: Understanding and Predicting Change in the Coastal Ecosystems of the Northern Gulf of Mexico) 63:184–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Yin, J., Schlesinger, M.E., and Stouffer, R.J.. 2009. Model Projections of Rapid Sea-Level Rise on the Northeast Coast of the United States. Nature Geoscience 2(4):262–266.Google Scholar
Yozzo, D.J., Wilber, P., and Will, R.J.. 2004. Beneficial Use of Dredged Material for Habitat Creation, Enhancement, and Restoration in New York–New Jersey Harbor. Journal of Environmental Management 73(1):39–52.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zervas, C. 2009. December. Sea Level Variations of the United States 1854–2006. NOAA Technical Report NOS CO-OPS 053. US Department of Commerce National Ocean Service Center for Operational Oceanographic Products and Services, Silver Spring, MD, 194 pp. Available at http://tidesandcurrents.noaa.gov/publications/Tech_rpt_53.pdf Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Ravit supplementary material

Ravit supplementary material 1

Download Ravit supplementary material(File)
File 28.7 KB