Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-13T02:54:26.876Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Commentary: Hazardous Pesticides in Developing Countries: A Case Study of Zambia, Africa

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 July 2009

Janeane Gilbreath  and
Anne Steinemann
Janeane Gilbreath
Affiliation:
City Planning Program, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta
Anne Steinemann*
Affiliation:
City Planning Program, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta
*
Associate Professor, City Planning Program, 245 4th Street, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA 30332-0155; (fax) 404-894-1628; (e-mail) [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

The article examines the environmental, public health, and management problems associated with developing countries' use of hazardous pesticides. Results from an in-depth case study of Zambia, Africa, provide insights from rural farmers and government officials, and reveal the economic, political, and social factors entangled with the environmental and human health risks of pesticides. The study suggests that problems will intensify unless the incentives, practices, and regulations concerning hazardous pesticides are reformed. Recommended reforms include stronger international and national regulatory systems that emphasize improved risk communication, and culturally sensitive training programs that emphasize alternatives to pesticides and in-country research.

Type
Features & Reviews
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 2 , Issue 4 , December 2000 , pp. 311 - 317
Copyright
Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2000

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Davis, M. 1998. Personal communication, 11–06. Project Coordinator, The Pesticides Trust, Eurolink Centre.Google Scholar
FASE (Foundation for Advancements in Science and Education). 1998. FASE Research Report: Pesticide Exports from US Ports, 1995–1996. W. Alton Jones Foundation, Los Angeles, California, 18 pp.Google Scholar
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 1990. Pesticide Management. International Code of Conduct on the Distribution and Use of Pesticides. Rome, Italy, 25 pp.Google Scholar
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 1998. Pesticide Management. FAO/OECD Pesticide Risk Reduction Survey. Plant Protection Service, Pesticide Management Unit, 15 pp.Google Scholar
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). 2000. The Problem of Obsolete Pesticides. http://www.fao.org/waicent/search/default.asp (search for obsolete pesticides). 07–07.Google Scholar
Hertzman, T., and Akerblom, M., eds. 1995. Agrochemical Pesticides in the SADC Region. Report No. 35, US EPA, Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substance, Washington, DC, 14 pp.Google Scholar
Manda, N. 1998. Personal communication, 02–12. Inspector in Pesticides and Toxic Substances Unit, Environmental Council of Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia.Google Scholar
NCTZ (National Coordinating Team, Zambia). 1995. National Chemical Management Profile—Zambia, Lusaka, Zambia, 80 pp.Google Scholar
PAN (Pesticide Action Network). 1990. Dirty Dozen Pesticide Fact Sheets. San Francisco, California, 31 pp.Google Scholar
PAN (Pesticide Action Network). 1995. Demise of the Dirty Dozen. San Francisco, California, 3 pp.Google Scholar
PANNA (Pesticide Action Network North America). 1998. New International Agreement on Hazardous Pesticides, http://www.igc.org/panna. 04–10.Google Scholar
PANNA (Pesticide Action Network North America). 1999a. Global Meeting on Persistent Organic Pollutants. http://www.igc.org/panna. 27–01.Google Scholar
PANNA (Pesticide Action Network North America). 1999b. Increase in US Export of Hazardous Pesticides, http://www.igc.org/panna. 27–01.Google Scholar
PANNA (Pesticide Action Network North America). 1999c Worldwide Pesticide Sales Increase in 1995. http://www.igc.org/panna. 27–01.Google Scholar
Smith, C. 1999. Personal Communication, 26–01. Director of FASE Pesticide Project, Foundation for Advancements in Science and Education.Google Scholar
The Convention. 2000. The Convention on the Prior Informed Consent Procedure for Certain Hazardous Chemicals and Pesticides in International Trade. http://irptc.unep.ch/pic. 23–06.Google Scholar
UNEP and FAO. 1997. New or Modified Import Decisions received between 1.1.97 and 30.06.97. PIC Circular VII, 75 pp.Google Scholar
USEPA (United States Environmental Protection Agency). 1998. Agreement to Provide Chemical Information to Developing Countries Supported by EPA. Earth Vision News Reports, Washington, DC, 1 p.Google Scholar
Wyrwal, G. 2000. Personal communication, 27–06. Director of Plant Protection Service, Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome, Italy.Google Scholar