Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-8bhkd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:15:48.675Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

ENVIRONMENTAL REVIEWS AND CASE STUDIES: The National Park Service Visual Resource Inventory: Capturing the Historic and Cultural Values of Scenic Views

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  30 August 2016

Robert G. Sullivan  and
Mark E. Meyer
Robert G. Sullivan*
Affiliation:
Environmental Scientist, Environmental Science Division EVS/240, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, Illinois
Mark E. Meyer*
Affiliation:
Renewable Energy Visual Resource Specialist, Air Resources Division, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Denver, Colorado.
*
Addresses correspondence to: Robert G. Sullivan, Environmental Science Division EVS/240, Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL 60439; (phone) 630-252-6182; (fax) 630-252-6090; (e-mail) [email protected];
Mark Meyer, Air Resources Division, U.S. Department of the Interior, National Park Service, Denver, CO 80225; (phone) 303-969-2818; (fax) 303-969-2822; (e-mail) [email protected].
Get access

Abstract

Several United States (US) federal agencies have developed visual resource inventory (VRI) and management systems that reflect specific agency missions and visual resource management objectives. These programs have varied in the degree to which they incorporate historic and cultural elements and values into the scenic inventory process. The recent nationwide expansion of renewable energy and associated transmission development is causing an increase in visual impacts on both scenic and historic/cultural resources. This increase has highlighted the need for better integration of visual and historic/cultural resource assessment and management activities for land use planning purposes. The US Department of the Interior National Park Service (NPS), in response to concerns arising from potential scenic impacts from renewable energy, electric transmission, and other types of development on lands and waters near NPS units, has developed a VRI process for high-value views both within and outside NPS unit boundaries. The NPS VRI incorporates historic and cultural elements and values into the scenic resource inventory process and provides practical guidance and metrics for successfully integrating historic and cultural concerns into the NPS’s scenic resource conservation efforts. This article describes the NPS VRI process and compares it with the VRI processes of the US Department of the Interior Bureau of Land Management and the US Department of Agriculture Forest Service, with respect to the incorporation of historic and cultural values. The article discusses why a scenic inventory approach that more robustly integrates the historic and cultural values of the landscape is essential for NPS landscapes, and for fulfillment of NPS’s mission. Inventories are underway at many NPS units, and the results indicate that the VRI process can be used successfully to capture important historic and cultural resource information and incorporate that information into the assessment of the scenic values of views within and outside NPS units.

Environmental Practice 18: 166–179 (2016)

Type
Features
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 18 , Issue 3 , September 2016 , pp. 166 - 179
Copyright
© National Association of Environmental Professionals 2016. This is a work of the U.S. Government and is not subject to copyright protection in the United States. 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bureau of Land Management. 1984. Visual Resource Management, BLM Manual Handbook 8400, Release 8-24. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Bureau of Land Management. 1986, January. Visual Resource Inventory, BLM Manual Handbook 8410-1, Release 8-28. U.S. Department of the Interior, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Forest Service. 1995. Landscape Aesthetics: A Handbook for Scenery Management, Agriculture Handbook Number 701. United States Department of Agriculture, United States Government Printing Office, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
Kulesza, C., Le, Y., and Hollenhorst, S.J.. 2013. National Park Service Visitor Perceptions & Values of Clean Air, Scenic Views, & Dark Night Skies; 1988-2011. Natural Resource Report NPS/NRSS/ARD/NRR–2013/632. National Park Service, Fort Collins, CO.Google Scholar
Meyer, M., and Sullivan, R.. 2016. The National Park Service Visual Resource Program: Supporting Parks in Scenery Conservation. Presented at the National Association of Environmental Professionals Annual Conference, April 11–14, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
National Park Service (NPS). 2015. National Park Service Overview. Available at http://www.nps.gov/aboutus/upload/NPS-Overview-2015-update-11-16-15-2.pdf.Google Scholar
National Park Service Organic Act, U.S. Code 16. 1916. 39 stat 535.Google Scholar
Sullivan, R.G., Kirchler, L., Lahti, T., Roché, S., Beckman, K., Cantwell, B., and Richmond, P.. 2012a. Wind Turbine Visibility and Visual Impact Threshold Distances in Western Landscapes. Presented at the National Association of Environmental Professionals 37th Annual Conference, May 21–24, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
Sullivan, R.G., Kirchler, L., McCoy, C., McCarty, J., Beckman, K., and Richmond, P.. 2012b. Visual Impacts of Utility-scale Solar Energy Facilities on Southwestern Desert Landscapes. Presented at the National Association of Environmental Professionals 37th Annual Conference, May 21–24, Portland, OR.Google Scholar
Sullivan, R., and Abplanalp, J.M.. 2013. Utility‐Scale Solar Energy Facility Visual Impact Characterization and Mitigation: Project Report. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL., 67pp.Google Scholar
Sullivan, R., Abplanalp, J., Cantwell, B., and Beckman, K.. 2013a. Potential Visual Impacts of Utility-Scale Solar Energy Development within Solar Energy Zones on Selected Viewpoints in Death Valley and Joshua Tree National Parks, and El Camino Real De Tierra Adentro National Historic Trail. ANL/EVS/R-12/6, June. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL.Google Scholar
Sullivan, R.G., Kirchler, L., Cothren, J., and Winters, S.. 2013b. Offshore Wind Turbine Visibility and Visual Impact Threshold Distances. Environmental Practice 15(1):33–49.Google Scholar
Sullivan, R., Abplanalp, J., Lahti, S., Beckman, K., Cantwell, B., and Richmond, P.. 2014. Electric Transmission Visibility and Visual Contrast Threshold Distances in Western Landscapes. Presented at the National Association of Environmental Professionals, 39th Annual Conference, April 7–10, 2014, St. Petersburg, FL.Google Scholar
Sullivan, R.G., and Abplanalp, J.M.. 2015. Visibility and Visual Characteristics of the Ivanpah Solar Electric Generating System Power Tower Facility: Project Final Report. Argonne National Laboratory, Argonne, IL.Google Scholar