Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-06T04:59:41.512Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

COMMENTARY: Implementing Regional Sustainability Initiatives: Lessons from the United States Department of Defense

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  07 June 2011

Elizabeth Keysar
Elizabeth Keysar*
Affiliation:
Concurrent Technologies Corporation, Johnstown, Pennsylvania.
*
Elizabeth Keysar, Concurrent Technologies Corporation, 100 CTC Drive, Johnstown, PA 15904-1935; (phone) 770-631-0137; (e-mail) [email protected]
Get access

Abstract

Many sustainable development goals require collaboration among agencies and stakeholders at the regional scale in order to motivate and enable action. The need for regional-scale institutions to facilitate this collaboration has resulted in innovative activities by the United States Department of Defense (DoD). This article reviews the recent experiences of the DoD in the context of existing literature on collaborative natural resource management and finds many common challenges. Even though collaboration at this scale is difficult and there are few hard and fast rules for success, lessons from the DoD can help advance the state of practice. The question remains whether large public organizations like the DoD can institutionalize these newer collaborative approaches and make the necessary long-term commitments that are necessary for success.

Environmental Practice 13:1–11 (2011)

Type
Features
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 13 , Issue 2 , June 2011 , pp. 90 - 100
Copyright
Copyright © National Association of Environmental Professionals 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brunner, R.D., Steelman, T.A., Coe-Juell, L., Cromley, C.M., Edwards, C.M., and Tucker, D.W.. 2005. Adaptive Governance: Integrating Science, Policy, and Decision Making. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, 319 pp.Google Scholar
Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations and Environment) (DUSD/I&E). 2008a. Readiness and Environmental Protection Initiative Second Annual Report to Congress. DUSD/I&E, Washington, DC, 80 pp.Google Scholar
Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations and Environment) (DUSD/I&E). 2008b. 2008 Report to Congress on Sustainable Ranges. DUSD/I&E, Washington, DC, 280 pp.Google Scholar
Deputy Under Secretary of Defense (Installations and Environment) (DUSD/I&E). 2010. 2010 Report to Congress on Sustainable Ranges. DUSD/I&E, Washington, DC, 422 pp.Google Scholar
Dewar, M., and Epstein, D.. 2007. Planning for “Megaregions” in the United States. Journal of Planning Literature 22(2):108–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Doppelt, B. 2003. Leading Change toward Sustainability: A Change Management Guide for Business, Government and Civil Society. Greenleaf, Sheffield, UK, 272.Google Scholar
Durant, R.F. 2007. The Greening of the U.S. Military: Environmental Policy, National Security and Organizational Change. Georgetown University Press, Washington, DC, 298 pp.Google Scholar
Eberly, C., and Keating, J.. 2006. Birds and Bombs: How Bird Conservation Planning and Military Mission Work Together. Federal Facilities Environmental Journal 17(1):51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Evans, B., Joas, M., Sundback, S., and Theobald, K.. 2006. Governing Local Sustainability. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 49(6):849–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keysar, E. 2009. Army Sustainability Retrospective Report. Army Environmental Policy Institute, Washington, DC, 80 pp.Google Scholar
Lachman, B., Wong, A., and Resetar, S.A.. 2007. The Thin Green Line: An Assessment of DoD's Readiness and Environmental Protection Initiative to Buffer Installation Encroachment. RAND National Defense Research Institute, Arroyo Center, Santa Monica, CA, 253 pp.Google Scholar
McCall, T. 2001. How to Succeed in Winning and Maintaining Public Support for Military Testing and Training in the United States. Federal Facilities Environmental Journal 12(3):89–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Toole, L.J. Jr. 2004. Implementation Theory and the Challenge of Sustainable Development: The Transformative Role of Learning. In Governance for Sustainable Development: The Challenge of Adapting Form to Function, Lafferty, W.M., ed. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, 42–65 pp.Google Scholar
Scholz, J.T., and Stiftel, B., eds. 2005. Adaptive Governance and Water Conflict: New Institutions for Collaborative Planning. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, 300 pp.Google Scholar
Scott, J.W. 2007. Smart Growth as Urban Reform: A Pragmatic “Recoding” of the New Regionalism. Urban Studies 44(1):15–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sears, D.W., and Lovan, W.R.. 2006. Encouraging Collaboration in Rural America. Public Administration Review 66(Suppl.):153–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wondolleck, J.M., and Yaffee, S.L.. 2000. Making Collaboration Work: Lessons from Innovation in Natural Resource Management. Island Press, Washington, DC, 277 pp.Google Scholar