Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gvvz8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T19:01:38.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

COMMENTARY: Cooperative Modeling Lessons for Environmental Management

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 April 2007

Kristan Cockerill ,
Vincent C. Tidwell ,
Howard D. Passell  and
Leonard A. Malczynski
Kristan Cockerill
Affiliation:
Sustainable Development Program, Appalachian State University, Boone, North Carolina
Vincent C. Tidwell
Affiliation:
Geosciences and Environment Center, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Howard D. Passell
Affiliation:
Geosciences and Environment Center, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Leonard A. Malczynski
Affiliation:
Geosciences and Environment Center, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, New Mexico
Get access

Abstract

Environmental practitioners may find cooperative modeling an effective tool to address complex environmental management needs. The method involves convening a multidisciplinary team to collaboratively construct a system dynamics model. Advances in computational tools have made this technique increasingly effective because the process and the product allow individuals to better understand the complexity inherent in the system being studied. The authors describe four cooperative modeling projects and document some of the “lessons learned” from these experiences. Two of these projects were largely academic and team members were all professionals who agreed to work together to build a model. The other two teams were convened to contribute to water management processes. One of these emanated from a regional planning exercise and the team included professionals and volunteers from the public. The final project team presented includes professionals, members of the public, and government agency personnel. Like any multidisciplinary effort, the teams encountered communication challenges. The overarching lessons derived from these efforts are that teams can never pay too much attention to group dynamics and that the proximity to a “real” management decision does influence the cooperative modeling process. Recommendations to others embarking on a cooperative modeling effort include reviewing the literature regarding previous projects; establishing clear guidelines for team interaction early in the project; and remaining flexible, to allow the project to evolve.

Type
FEATURES & REVIEWS
Information
Environmental Practice , Volume 9 , Issue 1 , March 2007 , pp. 28 - 41
Copyright
© 2007 National Association of Environmental Professionals

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ackoff, R. L. 2001. OR: After the Post Mortem. System Dynamics Review 17(4):341–346.Google Scholar
Berkes, F., and C. Folke. 1998. Linking Social and Ecological Systems for Resilience and Sustainability. In Linking Social and Ecological Systems: Management Practices and Social Mechanisms for Building Resilience, F. Berkes, C. Folke and J. Colding, eds. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 1–25.
Blumenthal, D., and J. L. Jannink. 2000. A Classification of Collaborative Management Methods. Ecology and Society 4(2). Also available at http://www.consecol.org/vol4/iss2/art13.Google Scholar
Brookshire, D. S., D. Coursey, V. C. Tidwell, and C. Broadbent. 2006. Water Banking and Leasing: Institutional Design and Integrated Modeling. III International Symposium on Transboundary Waters Management, Barcelona, May 30–June 2.
Cockerill, K., H. Passell, and V. Tidwell. 2006. Cooperative Modeling: Building Bridges between Science and the Public. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 42(2):457–471.Google Scholar
Connick, S., and J. E. Innes. 2003. Outcomes of Collaborative Water Policy Making: Applying Complexity Thinking to Evaluation. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 46(2):177–197.Google Scholar
Costanza, R., and M. Ruth. 1998. Using Dynamic Modeling to Scope Environmental Problems and Build Consensus. Environmental Management 22(2):183–195.Google Scholar
Ford, A. 1999. Modeling the Environment: An Introduction to System Dynamics Modeling of Environmental Systems. Island Press, Washington, DC, 401 pp.
Forrester, J. W. 1961. Industrial Dynamics. The MIT Press, Cambridge, 464 pp.
Forrester, J. W. 1993. System Dynamics and the Lessons of 35 Years. In A Systems Approach to Policymaking, K. B. DeGreene, ed. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 199–240.
Gray, B., and L. L. Putnam. 2003. Means to What End? Conflict Management Frames. Environmental Practice 5(3):239–246.Google Scholar
Gunderson, L. H., and C. S. Holling, eds. 2002. Panarchy: Understanding Transformations in Human and Natural Systems. Island Press, Washington, DC, 507 pp.
Holling, C. S. 1995. What Barriers? What Bridges? In Barriers and Bridges to the Renewal of Ecosystems and Institutions, L. H. Gunderson, C. S. Holling and S. S. Light, eds. Columbia University Press, New York, 3–34.
Keough, H. L., and D. J. Blahna. 2006. Achieving Integrative, Collaborative Ecosystem Management. Conservation Biology 20(5):1373–1382.Google Scholar
Klein, J. 1990. Interdisciplinarity: History, Theory and Practice. Wayne State University Press, Detroit, 331 pp.
Koontz, T. M., T. A. Steelman, J. Carmin, K. S. Korfmacher, C. Moseley, and C. W. Thomas. 2004. Collaborative Environmental Management: What Roles for Government? Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, 210 pp.
Lee, K. N. 1993. Compass and Gyroscope: Integrating Science and Politics for the Environment. Island Press, Washington, DC, 243 pp.
Lorie, M. A., and H. E. Cardwell. 2006. Collaborative Modeling for Water Management. Southwest Hydrology 5(4):26–27.Google Scholar
McNamara, L., J. Chermak, K. Cockerill, J. Jarrett, S. Kelly, P. Kobos, L. Malczynski, G. Newman, K. Pallachula, H. Passell, V. C. Tidwell, J. G. Turnley, and P. Van Bloeman Waanders. 2004. Modeling the Transfer of Land and Water from Agricultural to Urban Uses in the Middle Rio Grande Basin, New Mexico. SAND2004-5218, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 54 pp.
Meadows, D., D. Meadows, J. Randers, and W. W. Behrens III 1972. Limits to Growth: A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind. Universe Books, New York, 205 pp.
Moxey, A., and B. White. 1998. NELUP: Some Reflections on Undertaking and Reporting Interdisciplinary River Catchment Modelling. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 41(3):397–402.Google Scholar
Mullner, S. A., W. A. Hubert, and T. A. Wesche. 2001. Evolving Paradigms for Landscape-Scale Renewable Resource Management in the United States. Environmental Science & Policy 4(1):39–49.Google Scholar
Newell, B., C. L.Crumley, N. Hassan, E. F. Lambin, C. Pahl-Wostl, A. Underdal, and R. Wasson. 2005. A Conceptual Template for Integrative Human-Environment Research. Global Environmental Change 15(4):299–307.Google Scholar
Nicolson, C. R., A. M. Starfield, G. P. Kofinas, and J. A. Kruse. 2002. Ten Heuristics for Interdisciplinary Modeling Projects. Ecosystems 5(4):376–384.Google Scholar
Palmer, R. N., A. M. Keyes, and S. Fisher, 1993. Empowering Stakeholders through Simulation in Water Resources Planning. In Water Management in the 90's: A Time for Innovation, Proceedings of the 20th Anniversary Conference K. Hon, ed. American Society of Civil Engineers, New York, 451–454.
Policansky, D. 1999. Interdisciplinary Problem Solving: The National Research Council. Policy Sciences 32(4):385–391.Google Scholar
Rouwette, E. A. J. A., J. A. M. Vennix, and T. van Mullekom. 2002. Group Model Building Effectiveness: A Review of Assessment Studies. System Dynamics Review 18(1):5–45.Google Scholar
Selin, S., and C. Chavez. 1995. Developing a Collaborative Model for Environmental Planning and Management. Environmental Management 19(2):189–195.Google Scholar
Selin, S. W., M. A. Schuett, and D. Carr. 2000. Modeling Stakeholder Perceptions of Collaborative Initiative Effectiveness. Society and Natural Resources 13(8):735–745.Google Scholar
Snow, C. P. 1998 (1959). The Two Cultures. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 107 pp.
Stave, K. A. 2002. Using System Dynamics to Improve Public Participation in Environmental Decisions. System Dynamics Review 18(2):139–167.Google Scholar
Sterman, J. D. 2000. Business Dynamics, Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World. McGraw-Hill, Boston, 982 pp.
Tidwell, V. C., L. A. Malczynski, H. D. Passell, W. J. Peplinski, M. D. Reno, J. Chermak, D. Brookshire, J. Thacher, K. Grimsrud, C. Broadbent, J. Hanson, J. F. Roach, E. Vivoni, C. Aragon, H. Hallett, K. Cockerill, and D. Coursey. 2006. Integrated System Dynamics Toolbox for Water Resources Planning. SAND2006-7676, Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque, NM, 312 pp.
Tidwell, V. C., H. D. Passell, S. H. Conrad, and R. P. Thomas. 2004. System Dynamics Modeling for Community-Based Water Planning: Application to the Middle Rio Grande. Aquatic Sciences 66(4):357–372.Google Scholar
van den Belt, M. 2004. Mediated Modeling: A System Dynamics Approach to Environmental Consensus Building. Island Press, Washington, DC, 296 pp.
van Eeten, M. J. G., D. P. Loucks, and E. Roe. 2002. Bringing Actors Together around Large-Scale Water Systems: Participatory Modeling and Other Innovations. Knowledge, Technology & Policy 14(4):94–108.Google Scholar
Vennix, J. A. M. 1996. Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics. Wiley, New York, 312 pp.
Vennix, J. A. M. 1999. Group Model-Building: Tackling Messy Problems. System Dynamics Review 15(4):379–401.Google Scholar
Videira, N., P. Antunes, R. Santos, and S. Gamito. 2003. Participatory Modelling in Environmental Decision-Making: The Ria Formosa Natural Park Case Study. Journal of Environmental Assessment Policy and Management 5(3):421–447.Google Scholar
Walker, B., S. Carpenter, J. Anderies, N. Abel, G. Cumming, M. Janssen, L. Lebel, J. Norberg., G. D. Peterson, and R. Pritchard. 2002. Resilience Management in Social-Ecological Systems: A Working Hypothesis for a Participatory Approach. Conservation Ecology 6(1). Also available at http://www.consecol.org/vol6/iss1/art14.Google Scholar
Wear, D. N. 1999. Challenges to Interdisciplinary Discourse. Ecosystems 2(4):299–301.Google Scholar
Wierzbicki, A. P. 2007. Modelling as a Way of Organizing Knowledge. European Journal of Operational Research 176(1):610–635.Google Scholar
Wondolleck, J. M., B. Gray, and T. Bryan. 2003. Us versus Them: How Identities and Characterizations Influence Conflict. Environmental Practice 5(3):207–213.Google Scholar