Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-m6dg7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-03T01:09:00.419Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Why the Ganga (Ganges) Could Not be Cleaned

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Devendra Swaroop Bhargava
Devendra Swaroop Bhargava
Affiliation:
Professor (Environmental), Department of Civil Engineering, University of Roorkee, Roorkee, UP 247 667, India.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Short Communications & Reports
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 19 , Issue 2 , Summer 1992 , pp. 170 - 172
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Basin Sub-Basin Inventory of Water Pollution, the Ganga Basin Part II (excluding the Yamuna Sub-Basin) (1982–1983). Assessment and Development Study of River Basin Series. ADSORBS/7/1982–83, Central Board for the Prevention and Control of Water Pollution, New Delhi, India: 204 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Bhargava, D.S. (1982 a). Coagulating Capacity of Ganga at Kanpur. 9–11 09 Int. Symp. on Food Industries and the Environment, Budapest, Proc. pp. 133–41 (also in Developments in Food Science, Elsevier Science Publishers, Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1984) [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
Bhargava, D.S. (1982 b). Usefulness of Ganga. J. Indian Water Works Assn. 14(3), pp. 235–41.Google Scholar
Bhargava, D.S. (1982 c). Upgradation of Ganga quality at Kanpur, J. Inst. Public Health Engrs, India, 1982(3), pp. 11–4.Google Scholar
Bhargava, D.S. (1983 a). Most rapid BOD assimilation in Ganga and Yamuna rivers. J. Envtl Engg, Am. Soc. Civil Engrs, 109(1), Proc. No. 17674, pp. 174–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhargava, D.S. (1983 b). Use of water quality index for river classification and zoning of Ganga river. Envtl Polln, Ser. B (England), 6(1), pp. 51–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhargava, D.S. (1983 c). Very low altitude remote-sensing of the water-quality of rivers. Photogrm. Eng. & Rem. Sensing, Am. Soc. Photogm., 49(6), pp. 805–9.Google Scholar
Bhargava, D.S. (1983 d). A light-penetration model for the rivers Ganga and Yamuna. Int. J. for Dev. Tech. (England), 1(3), pp. 199–205.Google Scholar
Bhargava, D.S. (1984 a). Water quality survey of the Ganges. Asn Envt (Philippines), 6(1), pp. 4–6.Google Scholar
Bhargava, D.S. (1984 b). Exploitation of the extremely high self-purifying abilities of the Ganges for its pollution abatement strategies. J. Ins. Pub. Hlth Engrs (India), 1984(4), pp. 22–7 (Tech. Sessn III).Google Scholar
Bhargava, D.S. (1985 a). Variations in quality in the Ganges. Eff. & Wat. Trtmt J. (England), 25(2), pp. 61–5.Google Scholar
Bhargava, D.S. (1985 b). Water quality variations and control technology of Yamuna River, Envtl Polln, Sr. A (England), 37(4), pp. 355–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhargava, D.S. (1985 c). Expression for drinking water supply standards. J. Env. Eng., Am. Soc. Civil Engrs, 111(3), pp. 304–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhargava, D.S. (1985 d). Risk assessment for pilgrims. J. Env. Eng. Div., Instn Engrs (India), 65(3), pp. 99–101.Google Scholar
Bhargava, D.S. (1985 e). Technology of rationally setting effluent standards for water pollution administration. J. Env. Eng. Div., Instn Engrs (India), 66(1), pp. 12–5.Google Scholar
Bhargava, D.S. (1986 a). Models for polluted streams subject to fast purification. Wat. Res. (England), 20(1), pp. 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhargava, D.S. (1986 b). Monographs for DO sag parameters in streams. J. Env. Eng. Div., Inst. Engrs (India), 66(2), pp. 39–44.Google Scholar
Bhargava, D.S. (1986 c). DO sag model for extremely fast river purification. J. Env. Eng., Am. Soc. Civil Engrs, 112(3), pp. 572–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bhargava, D.S. (1986 d). Monographs for stream pollution assessment. J. Env. Eng. Div., Inst. Engrs (India), 66(3), pp. 74–9.Google Scholar
Bhargava, D.S. (1986 e). Modelling for compounded DO sags. Civil Eng. Trans., Instn Engrs (Australia), CE-26(3), pp. 222–30.Google Scholar
Bhargava, D.S. (1987 a). Rational and accurate stream BOD prediction in a complex multiwastewater-outfalls system. J. Env. Eng. Div., Instn Engrs (India), 67(3), pp. 50–4.Google Scholar
Bhargava, D.S. (1987 b). Exploitability of the River Kali, the most polluted tributary of the Ganges. Asn Envt. (Philippines), 9(3), pp. 28–37.Google Scholar
Bhargava, D.S. (1987 c). Nature and the Ganga. Environmental Conservation, 14(4), pp. 307–18 & 328, 4 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chaudhuri, N., Chakrabarty, S.P., Basu, D. & Makhijani, S.D. (1986). Delineation of water quality at the upper reaches of Ganga-forming tributaries. J. Inst. Public Health Engrs. (India), 1986(1), pp. 1–14.Google Scholar
Hankin, E.H. (1896). The bacterial action of water on the Ganges and Yamuna Rivers on cholera microbes. Annales de l'Institut Pasteur, pp. 511–7. (Reproduced in Man in India, 18, pp. 135–52, 1938).Google Scholar
Singh, R. (1974). Ganga: Sacred River of India: Photographs. Perennial Press, Hong Kong, iv + 122 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Singh, R. (1980). Kumbh Mela. R.V. Pandit, Hong Kong: ii + 86 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Streeter, H.W. & Phelps, E.E. (1925). A study of the pollution and natural purification of the Ohio rivers. US Public Health Service Bull., 146 [not available for checking].Google Scholar