Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:47:55.905Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Use and Non-use Values in the Conservation of Ichkeul National Park, Tunisia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

David H.L. Thomas ,
Fethi Ayache  and
G. Edward Hollis
David H.L. Thomas
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London WCIH 0AP, England, UK
Fethi Ayache
Affiliation:
Direction de l'Environnement Agricole, Ministère de l'Agriculture, 1002 Tunis Belvédère, Tunisia
G. Edward Hollis
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London WCIH 0AP, England, UK.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Non-use existence values are now widely considered to be an important justification for conservation in developed countries. Using the same approach to promote conservation in less-developed and developing countries, with their normally severe economic and social problems, is often wholly inappropriate, as existence values in less-developed and developing countries are usually very small. Conservation on grounds of ethics and aesthetics is a luxury which many of those latter countries do not feel able to afford, or often genuinely cannot.

The establishment of the Ichkeul National Park in northern Tunisia was based primarily on non-use, existence values, but the survival of its wetlands is now threatened by a programme of dam construction. However, the Lake and marshes of Ichkeul have a number of important values and functions. These include livestock grazing on the marshes, the Lake's fisheries, the existing and potential value of the Park as a tourist resource, the role of the rivers in water-table recharge, and the function of the marshes in the ‘free’ treatment of sewage and purification of water. It can be shown that the economic gains from taking measures to prevent degradation of the wetland, namely by releases of water from the dams to maintain the marshes, would outweigh the economic benefits from the use of water in agricultural irrigation, and effectively maintain much of the international significance of the National Park and its surroundings.

It is suggested that promotion of conservation in lessdeveloped countries is likely to meet with much greater success if economic arguments, based on a site's usevalues, are given priority in the approach of conservation organizations from developed countries. The significance of non-use values to nationals of the less-developed and many developing countries is still very minor, although, as their living standards improve, such prospects are likely to improve also. In many instances at least, by raising due awareness of the economic use-values of natural systems, it will be possible to provide a good case for a site's conservation.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 18 , Issue 2 , Summer 1991 , pp. 119 - 130
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1991

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adamus, P.R. & Stockwell, L.T. (1983). A Method for Wetland Functional Assessment. US Federal Highway Administration Report (FHWA-IP-82–23), 2 vols. [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
Amami, S. El (1983). Changing concepts of water management in Tunisia. Impact of Science on Society, 1, pp. 57–64.Google Scholar
DEGTH (1976). Projet d'Aménagement Hydro-agricole de Rhezala: Projet de Rapport Definitif. Ministère de l'Agriculture, Tunis, Tunisia: 44 pp. (mimeographed).Google Scholar
DEGTH; SCET; CNEA (1982). Plan Director des Eaux du Nord, deuxième tranche: Medjez-Tebourba, Mateur et Sedjenane: Volume 1. Rapport Général, Ministère de l'Agriculture, Tunis, Tunisia: 67 pp. (mimeographed).Google Scholar
Drijver, C.A. & Marchand, M. (1986). Taming the floods: Environmental aspects of floodplain development in Africa. Nature and Resources, 22(4), pp. 17–29, illustr.Google Scholar
Farnworth, E.G., Tidrick, T.H., Jordan, C.F. & Smathers, W.M. (1981). The value of natural ecosystems: An economic and ecological framework. Environmental Conservation, 8(4), pp. 275–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcourt, A.M., Pennington, H. & Weber, A.W. (1986). Public attitudes to wildlife and conservation in the Third World. Oryx, 20, pp. 152–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hollis, G.E. (1986). The Modelling and Management of the Internationally Important Wetland at Garaet El Ichkeul, Tunisia. (IWRB Special Publication No. 4.) IWRB, Slimbridge, Gloucestershire, England, UK: 121 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Infield, M. (1988). Attitudes of a rural community towards conservation and a local Conservation Area in Natal, South Africa. Biological Conservation, 45, pp. 21–46, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leopold, A. (1968). A Sand County Almanac and Sketches Here and There. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA: quoted in Pearce, D. (1987), (q.v.).Google Scholar
Maltby, E. (1986). Waterlogged Wealth. Earthscan: International Institute for Environment and Development, London, England, UK, and Washington DC, USA: 127 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Ministere de L'Agriculture (1987). Septième Plan de Développement économique et social 1987–1991. Ministère de l'Agriculture et Pêche, Tunis, Tunisia: 127 pp. (mimeographed).Google Scholar
Pearce, D. (1987). Economic values and the natural environment. Discussion Papers in Economics, No. 87–08, University College London, England, UK: 20 pp.Google Scholar
Pearsall, S.H. (1984). In absentia benefits of Nature preserves: A review. Environmental Conservation, 11(1), pp. 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
SCET (1982). Annexe A.2.4. Digue de ceinture du lac Ichkeul. Etude d'une deuxième variante. 71 pp. (mimeographed).Google Scholar
Thomas, D.H.L. (1989). Irrigation and Drainage Development Adjacent to the Ichkeul National Park, Tunisia. Report from University College London for the Commission of the European Communities (DGXII) under contract EV4V.0158.UK(H). University College London, London, England, UK: viii + 119 pp., illustr. (mimeographed).Google Scholar
United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization [cited as UNESCO] (1972). Convention Concerning the Protection of the World Cultural and Natural Heritage.Google Scholar