Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T18:30:44.342Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The United States' Nuclear Defense Industry

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Roland J. Lamarine
Roland J. Lamarine
Affiliation:
Department of Health and Community Services, California State University, Chico, California 95929-0505, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Short Communications & Reports
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 15 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1988 , pp. 264 - 266
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

American Public Health Association (1986). Sagan stirs session against nuclear arms. The Nation's Health (Washington, DC), 10/11, p. 3, illustr.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly INC. (1981). Environment and Health. Congressional Quarterly Inc., Washington, DC, USA: 127 pp.Google Scholar
Coyle, D., Finaldi, L., Greenfield, E., Hamilton, M., Hedemann, E., McDonnell, W., Resnikoff, M., Scarlott, J. & Tichenor, J. (1988). Deadly Defense: Military Radioactive Landfills. Radioactive Waste Campaign, New York, NY, USA: 169 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Day, B. & Waitzjin, H. (1985). The medical profession and nuclear war: A social history. Journal of the American Medical Association, 254, pp. 644–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Elliot, T.S. (1952). P. 287 in A Little Treasury of Modern Poetry (Ed. Williams, Oscar). Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, NY, USA: Hi + 843 pp.Google Scholar
GAO (1985 a). Environment, Safety, and Health: Information on Three Ohio Defense Facilities. US General Accounting Office Report No. GAO/RCED-86-51FS, Washington, DC, USA: 57 pp.Google Scholar
GAO (1985 b). Environment, Safety, and Health:Environment and Workers Could Be Better Protected at Ohio Defense Plants. US General Accounting Office Report No. GAO/RCED-86-61, Washington, DC, USA: 43 pp.Google Scholar
GAO (1986 a). Nuclear Safety: Safety Analysis Reviews for DOE's Defense Facilities Can Be Improved. US General Accounting Office Report No. GAO/RCED-86-175, Washington, DC, USA: 27 pp.Google Scholar
Gao (1986 b). Nuclear Energy: Environmental Issues at DOE's Defense Facilities. US General Accounting Office Report No. GAO/RCED-86-192, Washington, DC, USA: 49 pp.Google Scholar
Geesaman, D.P. (1971). Plutonium and the energy decision. Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists, 27, 09, pp. 33–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Healy, M. (1986). The DOE: The Pentagon's adopted little brother. U.S. News & World Report (Washington, DC), 09 29, p. 35, illustr.Google Scholar
Krass, A.S., Boskma, P., Elzen, B. & Smit, W.A. (1983). Uranium Enrichment and Nuclear Weapon Proliferation. Taylor & Francis, London, England, UK: 270 pp.Google Scholar
Lown, B. (1986). Humankind at the brink: A physician's message. Public Health Reviews, 14, pp. 1–13.Google Scholar
Roemer, R. (1987). APHA strikes blow for peace. The Nation's Health (Washington, DC), 03, p. 2, illustr.Google Scholar
Westing, A.H. (1987). The ecological dimension of nuclear war. Environmental Conservation, 14(4), pp. 295–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar