Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T21:09:29.314Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Training the New Conservationist: Cross-disciplinary Education in the 1990s

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Susan K. Jacobson  and
John G. Robinson
Susan K. Jacobson
Affiliation:
Assistant Director, Program for Studies in Tropical Conservation, Department of Wildlife and Range Sciences, 118 Newins-Ziegler Hall, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA
John G. Robinson
Affiliation:
Director, Program for Studies in Tropical Conservation, 118 Newins-Ziegler Hall, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida 32611, USA. Present address: Director, Wildlife Conservation International, New York Zoological Society, Bronx, NY 10460, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The need for an integrated approach to ecological conservation and natural resource development is becoming widely recognized as environmental and social problems become more and more acute with human population pressures and depletion of resources. While a number of academic programmes addressing environmental problems have been operating for several decades, comprehensive approaches that integrate conservation with development issues are only just beginning to occur. These innovative, cross-disciplinary problem-solving approaches still face a number of traditional constraints to successful programme development. Obstacles occur in every major aspect of academia — including structure, communication, reward systems, research, curriculum, and evaluation.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 17 , Issue 4 , Winter 1990 , pp. 319 - 327
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1990

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batie, S.S. (1989). Presidential address, AAEA Summer Meeting, 07 30 – 08 2, Baton Rouge, Louisiana (unpublished, contact the Author, Department of Agricultural Economics, Virginia Polytechnic Institute, Blacksburg, Virginia 24060, USA): 43 pp. (typescr.).Google Scholar
Birnbaum, P.H. (1979). Academic interdisciplinary research: problems and practice. R & D Management, 10(1), pp. 17–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bridgewater, P.B. & McDonald, R.J. (1983–1984). Evaluating multidisciplinary programs. Journal of Environmental Education, 15(2), pp. 28–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Caldwell, L.K. (1984). Environmental studies: discipline or metadiscipline? The Environmental Professional, 5, pp. 247–59.Google Scholar
Downs, C.R. (1976). The Harmoniously Confused World. Center for Environmental Quality Publication, Michigan State University, Lansing, Michigan, USA: 39 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Emmelin, L. (1977). Environmental education at university level. Ambio, 6(4), pp. 201–9.Google Scholar
Fuller, K. (1989). Solicitation letter to World Wildlife Fund — US membership. World Wildlife Fund — US, 1250 24th Street, NW, Washington, DC 20037, USA: 2 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Hare, F.K. (1970). How should we treat environment? Science, 167 (23 01), pp. 352–5.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hill, B. (1976). Multi-disciplinary courses — mush or muscle? The Australian University (05), pp. 48–57.Google Scholar
Kerr, C. (1963). [Cited in Hill (1976); not available for checking.]Google Scholar
Long, F.A. (1971). Interdisciplinary problem-oriented research in the university. Science, 171 (12 03), p. 961.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lusigi, W.J. (1988). The new resources manager. Pp. 42–52 in World Wilderness Congress, 1987, Denver, Colorado, For the Conservation of Earth (Ed. Vance, M.). Fulcrum Inc., Golden, Colorado, USA: iii + 218 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
McEvoy, J. (1972). Multi- and interdisciplinary research — problems of initiation, control, integration and reward. Policy Sciences, 3, pp. 201–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mar, B.W., Newell, W.T. & Saxberg, B.O. (1976). Interdisciplinary research in the university setting. Environmental Science and Technology, 10, pp. 650–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Office of Technology Assessment, US Congress (1987). Technologies to Maintain Biological Diversity (OTA-F-330). US Government Printing Office, Washington, DC, USA: 54 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
O'Riordan, T.J. (1988). The politics of sustainability. Pp. 29–50 in Sustainable Environmental Management (Ed. Turner, R.K.). Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA: ix + 292 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Payne, R. & Pearson, A. (1979). Conference report — interdisciplinary research groups: an international comparison of their organization and management. R. & D. Management, 10(1), pp. 35–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pignataro, L.J. & McShane, W.R. (1979). Interdisciplinary research — transcending departmental conflicts. Engineering Education, 69, pp. 349–51.Google Scholar
Sigma Xi, The Scientific Research Society (1988). Removing the Boundaries: Perspectives on Cross-disciplinary Research. (Final Report on an Inquiry into Cross-disciplinary Science.) Sigma Xi, New Haven, Connecticut, USA: 81 pp.Google Scholar
Stoddard, E.R. (1982). Multidisciplinary research funding: a ‘Catch 22’ enigma. The American Sociologist, 17, pp. 210–6.Google Scholar
Wolman, M.G. (1977). Interdisciplinary education: a continuing experiment. Science, 198 (25 11), pp. 800–4.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
World Bank (1985). Environmental requirements of the World Bank. The Environmental Professional, 7, pp. 205–12.Google Scholar
World Wildlife Fund (1980). Strategy for Training in Natural Resources and Environment: A Proposal for Development of Personnel and Institutions in Latin America and the Caribbean. World Wildlife Fund Publ., Washington, DC, USA: xxi + 416 pp., illustr.Google Scholar