Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T19:48:05.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The status of anthropogenic threat at the people-park interface of Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  10 March 2009

WILLIAM OLUPOT ,
ROBERT BARIGYIRA  and
COLIN A. CHAPMAN
WILLIAM OLUPOT*
Affiliation:
Institute of Tropical Forest Conservation, PO Box 44, Kabale, Uganda Wildlife Conservation Society (Uganda Program), Plot 802, Mitala, Kiwafu Road, Kansanga, PO Box 7487, Kampala, Uganda
ROBERT BARIGYIRA
Affiliation:
Institute of Tropical Forest Conservation, PO Box 44, Kabale, Uganda
COLIN A. CHAPMAN
Affiliation:
Department of Anthropology and McGill School of Environment, 855 Sherbrooke Street West, McGill University Montreal, Quebec, CanadaH3A 2T7 Wildlife Conservation Society, Bronx, New York, USA
*
*Correspondence: Dr William Olupot, Wildlife Conservation Society (Uganda Program), Plot 802, Mitala, Kiwafu Road, Kansanga, PO Box 7487, Kampala, Uganda Tel: +256 772 591834 (mobile) e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Effective management of anthropogenic threats is key to sustaining biological diversity in protected areas. Types and distribution of threats to Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda were investigated to assess the Park's status 12 years after it was upgraded from a forest reserve to a national park. Bwindi, like many tropical forested parks, is surrounded by dense human populations. Threats were quantified in 104 1-km edge-interior transects set around the Park. The distribution of threats was patchy and was most common within 300–350 m of the edge. The commonest threat was harvesting of wood and poles. Other threats included occurrence of exotic species, degradation of adjacent habitat fragments and high impact of problem animals on some of the neighbouring communities. The fact that threats were primarily associated with the edges of the Park, when previously they were widespread throughout the Park, suggests that illegal resource harvesting has been reduced since the forest was upgraded to a national park. Park legislation, enforcement and related conservation efforts have been effective, and there should be increased effort to manage the people-park interface. Edge-based assessments appear to be useful for quantifying threats to protected areas and identifying areas in which they are concentrated.

Keywords

disturbanceforesttropicsedgesconservationpeople-park interactionsUganda
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 36 , Issue 1 , March 2009 , pp. 41 - 50
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allen, J.C. & Barnes, D.F. (1985) The causes of deforestation in developing countries. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 75: 163–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ambrose, J.P. & Bratton, S.P. (2005) Trends in landscape heterogeneity along the borders of Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Conservation Biology 4: 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bounoua, L., DeFries, R., Collatz, G.J., Sellers, P. & Khan, H. (2002) Effects of land cover conversion on surface climate. Climatic Change 52: 29–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, A.G., Gullison, R.E., Rice, R.E. & da Fonseca, G.A.B. (2001) Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 291: 125–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Byers, J.E., Reichard, S., Randall, J.M., Parker, I.M., Smith, C.S., Lonsdale, W.M., Atkinson, I.A.E., Seastedt, T.R., Williamson, M., Chornesky, E. & Hayes, D. (2002) Directing research to reduce impacts of non-indigenous species. Conservation Biology 16: 630–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carmago, J.L.C. & Kapos, V. (1995) Complex edge effects on soil moisture and microclimate in Central Amazonian forest. Journal of Tropical Ecology 11: 205–221.Google Scholar
Chapman, C.A. & Peres, C. (2001) Primate conservation in the new millennium: the role of scientists. Evolutionary Anthropology 10: 16–33.3.0.CO;2-O>CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cochrane, M.A. (2003) Fire science for rainforests. Nature 421: 913–919.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Collins, J.L. (1986) Smallholder settlement of tropical South America: the social causes of ecological destruction. Human Organization 45: 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Croze, H. (1974) The Seronera bull problem. I. The bulls. East African Wildlife Journal 12: 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Antonio, C.M. & Meyerson, L.A. (2002) Exotic plant species as problems and solutions in ecological restoration: a synthesis. Restoration Ecology 10: 703–713.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeFries, R., Hansen, M., Townshend, J.R.G., Janetos, A.C. & Loveland, T.R. (2000) A new global 1km data set of percent tree cover derived from remote sensing. Global Change Biology 6: 247–254.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeVault, T.L., Beasly, J.C., Humberg, L.A., MacGowan, B.J., Retamosa, M.I. & Rhodes, O.E. Jr (2007) Intrafield patterns of crop damage to corn and soybeans in northern Indiana. Human-Wildlife Conflicts 1: 205–213.Google Scholar
Eggeling, W.J. (1951) The Indigenous Trees of the Uganda Protectorate. Entebbe, Uganda and Glasgow, UK: The Government Printer and MacLehose & Company Limited, The University Press: 327 pp.Google Scholar
Elton, C.S. (1958) The Ecology of Invasions by Animals and Plants. London, UK: Methuen: 181 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ewers, R.M. & Laurance, W.F. (2006) Scale-dependent patterns of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Environmental Conservation 33: 203–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Forrest, J.L., Sanderson, E.W., Wallace, R., Lazzo, T.M.S., Cerveró, L.H.G. & Coppolillo, P. (2008) Patterns of land cover change in and around Madidi National Park, Bolivia. Biotropica 40: 285–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gehlhausen, S.M., Schwartz, M.W. & Augspurger, C.K. (2000) Vegetation and microclimatic edge effects in two mixed-mesophytic forest fragments. Vegetatio 147: 21–35.Google Scholar
Hamilton, A.C. (1976) The significance of patterns of distribution shown by forest plants and animals in tropical Africa for the reconstruction of the Upper Pleistocene palaeoenvironments: a review. In: Palaeoecology of Africa, the Surrounding Islands, and Antarctica, ed. van Zinderen-Bakker, E.M. Sr, pp. 63–97. Cape Town, South Africa: Balkema.Google Scholar
Heinen, J.T. (1993) Park-people relations in Koshi Tappu wildlife reserve, Nepal. Environmental Conservation 20: 25–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holz, S. & Placci, G. (2005) Stimulating natural regeneration. In: ForestRestoration in Landscapes Beyond Planting Trees, ed. Mansourian, S., Vallauri, D. & Dudley, N., pp. 250–256. New York, USA: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Howard, P.C. (1991) Nature Conservation in Uganda's Tropical Forest Reserves. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Hudak, A.T. & Wessman, C.A. (2000) Deforestation in Mwanza District, Malawi from 1981 to1992 as determined from Landsat MSS Imagery. Applied Geography 20: 155–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ite, W.E. & Adams, W.M. (1998) Forest conversion, conservation forestry in Cross River State, Nigeria. Applied Geography 18: 301–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Laurance, W.F. & Bierregaard, R.O. Jr (1997) Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management, and Conservation of Fragmented Communities. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press: 616 pp.Google Scholar
Mayaux, P., Gradi, G.D. & Malingreau, J.P. (2000) Central African forest cover revisited: a multisatellite analysis. Remote Sensing and Environment 71: 183–196.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Murcia, C. (1995) Edge effects in fragmented forests: implications for conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 10: 58–62.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Naughton-Treves, L. (1997) Farming the forest edge: vulnerable places and people around Kibale National Park. The Geographical Review 87: 27–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naughton-Treves, L., Treves, A., Chapman, C.A. & Wrangham, R. (1998) Temporal patterns of crop-raiding by primates: linking food availability in croplands and adjacent forest. Journal of Applied Ecology 35: 596–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton-Griffiths, M. (1979) The influence of grazing, browsing, and fire on the vegetation dynamics of the Serengeti. In: Serengeti Dynamics of an Ecosystem, ed. Sinclair, A.R.E. & Norton-Griffiths, M., pp 310–352. Chicago, IL, USA: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
Olupot, W. (2009) A variable edge effect on trees of Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda, and its bearing on measurement parameters. Biological Conservation 142: 789–797.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Olupot, W., Barigyira, R. & McNeilage, A.J. (2009) Edge-related variation in medicinal and other ‘useful’ wild plants of Bwindi Impenetrable National Park, Uganda. Conservation Biology (in press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reaser, J.K., Meyerson, L.A., Cronk, Q., De Poorter, M., Eldrege, L.G., Green, E., Kairo, M., Latasi, P., Mack, R.N., Mauremootoo, J., O'Dowd, D., Orapa, W., Sastroutomo, S., Saunders, A., Shine, C., Thrainsson, S. & Vaiutu, L. (2007) Ecological and socioeconomic impacts of invasive alien species in island ecosystems. Environmental Conservation 34: 98–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Robbins, P., McSweeney, K., Waite, T. & Rice, J. (2006) Even conservation rules are made to be broken: implications for biodiversity. Environmental Management 37: 162–169.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Simberloff, D. (1996) Impacts of introduced species in the United States. Consequences: National Implications of Environmental Change 2: 13–22.Google Scholar
Sivrikaya, F., Cakir, G., Kadiogullari, A.I., Kele, S., Baskent, E.Z. & Terzioglu, S. (2007) Evaluating land use/land cover changes and fragmentation in the Camili Forest Planning Unit of northeastern Turkey from 1972 to 2005. Land Degradation and Development 18: 383–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tole, L. (1998) Sources of deforestation in tropical developing countries. Environmental Management 22: 19–33.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tole, L. (2002) Habitat loss and anthropogenic disturbance in Jamaica's Hellshire Hills area. Biodiversity and Conservation 11: 575–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Totland, O., Nyeko, P., Bjerknes, A.L., Hegland, S.J. & Nielsen, A. (2005) Does forest gap size affect population size, plant size, reproductive success and pollinator visitation in Lantana camara, a tropical invasive shrub? Forest Ecology and Management 215: 329–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Turton, S.M. & Freiburger, H.J. (1997) Edge and aspect effects on the microclimate of a small tropical forest remnant on the Atherton Tableland, Northeastern Australia. In: Tropical Forest Remnants: Ecology, Management, and Conservation of Fragmented Communities, ed. Laurance, W.F. & Bierregaard, R.O. Jr, pp. 45–54. Chicago, IL, USA: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Vascouscelos, M.J.P., Biai, J.C.M., Araujo, A.A. & Diniz, M.A. (2002) Land cover change in two protected areas of Guinea-Bissau (1956–1996). Applied Geography 22: 139–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vitousek, P.M., D'Antonio, C.M., Loope, L.L., Rejmanek, M. & Westbrooks, R. (1997) Introduced species: a significant component of human-caused global change. New Zealand Journal of Ecology 21: 1–16.Google Scholar
Westman, W.E., Strong, L.L. & Wilcox, B.A. (1989) Tropical deforestation and species endangerment: the role of remote sensing. Landscape Ecology 3: 97–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilcove, D.S., Rothstein, D., Dubow, J., Phillips, A. & Losos, E. (1998) Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. BioScience 48: 607–617.CrossRefGoogle Scholar