Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-cphqk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T06:00:49.611Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Socioeconomic context of land use and land cover change in Mexican biosphere reserves

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 December 2009

FERNANDA FIGUEROA ,
VÍCTOR SÁNCHEZ-CORDERO ,
JORGE A. MEAVE  and
IRMA TREJO
FERNANDA FIGUEROA*
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, AP 70–153, México 04510, DF, Mexico
VÍCTOR SÁNCHEZ-CORDERO
Affiliation:
Departamento de Zoología, Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, AP 70–153, México 04510, DF, Mexico
JORGE A. MEAVE
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México 04510, DF, Mexico
IRMA TREJO
Affiliation:
Instituto de Geografía, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, AP 20–850, México 04510, DF, Mexico
*
*Correspondence: Fernanda Figueroa e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Land use/land cover change (LULC) is a major threat to natural protected areas worldwide. This paper explores the relationships between four estimated LULC parameters for 17 Mexican biosphere reserves (BRs) for 1993–2002 on a GIS platform, and ten socioeconomic factors obtained from census data. These relationships were tested through linear correlations and multivariate analysis. BRs showed lower human demographic pressure, but higher population dispersion, social marginality, percentage of rain-fed agriculture area, and dependence upon agriculture and cattle compared to nationwide values. BRs also varied in their indigenous population, and showed cattle overpopulation, and low immigration and road density. Socioeconomic factors explained 87% of LULC variation. High population and road density, cattle overpopulation and low percentage indigenous population were related to percentage of transformed area (2002). Conversely, small population and road density, large proportion of indigenous population and high dependency on agriculture and cattle, were related to the rate of change in transformed area (1993–2002). High human population growth and urban concentration occurred when BRs suffered higher LULC than their corresponding ecoregions. Including socioeconomic conditions prevailing in BRs and their influence on LULC in reserve management and rural development planning will improve strategies for the confluence of conservation and development goals.

Keywords

agriculturebiodiversity conservationcattle densityconservation effectivenessdeforestationdevelopmentnatural protected areaspopulationsocioeconomic marginalitysocioenvironmental analysis
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 36 , Issue 3 , September 2009 , pp. 180 - 191
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2009

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alarcón-Chaires, P. (2006) Riqueza ecológica versus pobreza social. Contradicciones y perspectivas del desarrollo indígena en Latinoamérica. In: Pueblos Indígenas y Pobreza. Enfoques Multidisciplinarios, ed. Cimadamore, A.D., Eversole, R. & McNeish, J., pp. 41–70. Buenos Aires, Argentina: CLACSO.Google Scholar
Angelsen, A. & Kaimowitz, D. (1999) Rethinking the causes of deforestation: lessons from economic models. The World Bank Research Observer 14: 73–98.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Antinori, C. & Bray, D. (2005) Community enterprises as entrepreneurial firms: economic and institutional perspectives from Mexico. World Development 33: 1529–1543.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Asbjornsen, H. & Ashton, M.S. (2002) Community forestry in Oaxaca, Mexico. Journal of Sustainable Forestry 15: 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, E.B. (1997) The economic determinants of land degradation in developing countries. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B 352: 891–899.Google Scholar
Barbier, E.B. (2000) Links between economic liberalization and rural resource degradation in the developing regions. Agricultural Economics 23: 299–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barbier, E.B. & Burgess, J.C. (2001) The economics of tropical deforestation. Journal of Economic Surveys 15: 413–433.Google Scholar
Benhin, J.K. (2006) Agriculture and deforestation in the tropics: a critical theoretical and empirical review. Ambio 35: 9–16.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bilsborrow, R.E. & Okoth-Ogendo, H.W.O. (1992) Population driven changes and agricultural intensification in developing countries. In: Population and Environment. Rethinking the Debate, ed. Arizpe, L., Stone, M.P. & Major, D.C., pp. 171–207. San Francisco, USA: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Brandon, K., Gorenflo, L.J., Rodrigues, A.S.L. & Waller, R.W. (2005) Reconciling biodiversity conservation, people, protected areas, and agricultural suitability. World Development 33: 1403–1418.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bray, D.B., Merino-Pérez, L., Negrero-Castillo, P., Segura-Warnholtz, G., Torres-Rojo, J.M. & Vester, H.F.M. (2003) Mexico's community-managed forests as a global model for sustainable landscapes. Conservation Biology 17: 672–677.Google Scholar
Brooks, J.S., Franzen, M.A., Holmes, C.M., Grote, M.N. & Borgerhoff-Mulder, M. (2006) Testing hypotheses for the success of different conservation strategies. Conservation Biology 20: 1528–1538.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Bruner, A.G., Gullison, R.E., Rice, R.E. & da Fonseca, G.A.B. (2001) Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 291: 125–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Calva, J.L. (1993) El modelo de desarrollo agropecuario impulsado mediante le Ley Agraria y el TLC. In: Alternativas para el Campo Mexicano Volume 1, ed. Calva, J.L., pp. 15–42. Mexico City, Mexico: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung & Fontamara, PUALUNAM.Google Scholar
Carey, C., Dudley, N. & Stolton, S. (2000) Squandering Paradise? Gland, Switzerland: World Wide Fund for Nature.Google Scholar
Carr, D.L. (2004 a) Ladino and Q'eqchí Maya land use and land clearing in the Sierra de Lacandon National Park, Petén, Guatemala. Agriculture and Human Values 21: 171–179.Google Scholar
Carr, D.L. (2004 b) Proximate population factors and deforestation in tropical agricultural frontiers. Population and Environment 25: 585–612.Google Scholar
Carr, D.L. (2006) A tale of two roads: land tenure, poverty, and politics on the Guatemalan frontier. Geoforum 37: 94–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carr, D.L. (2009) Population and deforestation: why rural migration matters. Progress in Human Geography 33: 355–378.Google Scholar
Carr, D.L., Suter, L. & Barbieri, A. (2005) Population dynamics and tropical deforestation: state of the debate and conceptual challenges. Population and Environment 27: 89–113.Google Scholar
Challenger, A. (1998) Utilización y Conservación de los Ecosistemas Terrestres de México. Mexico City, Mexico: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México – Sierra Madre.Google Scholar
Chase, T.N., Pielke, R.A., Kittel, T.G.F., Nemani, R.R. & Running, S.W. (2000) Simulated impacts of historical land cover changes on global climate in northern winter. Climate Dynamics 16: 93–105.Google Scholar
Chapela, G. & Barkin, D. (1995) Monarcas y Campesinos. Estrategia de Desarrollo Sustentable en el Oriente de Michoacán. Mexico City, Mexico: Centro de Ecología y Desarrollo.Google Scholar
Chowdhury, R.R. & Turner, B.L. (2006) Reconciling agency and structure in empirical analysis: smallholder land use in the southern Yucatán, México. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 96: 302–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CONABIO (2001) Mapa de Grado de Marginación a Nivel Localidad, 1995. Mexico City, Mexico: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad.Google Scholar
CONANP (2003) Mapa de Áreas Naturales Protegidas Federales de México, 1:250,000. Mexico City, Mexico: Secretaría de Medio Ambiente, Recursos Naturales y Pesca.Google Scholar
CONAPO (1991) Índices de Marginación Municipal 1990. Mexico City, Mexico: Consejo Nacional de Población.Google Scholar
CONAPO (2001) Índices de Marginación Municipal 2000. Mexico City, Mexico: Consejo Nacional de Población.Google Scholar
COTECOCA & SARH (1988) Memorias de Coeficientes de Agostadero, Años 1972–1986. Mexico City, Mexico: Secretaría de Agricultura y Recursos Hidráulicos.Google Scholar
Dale, V.H., Pearson, S.M., Offerman, H.L. & O'Neill, R.V. (1994) Relating patterns of land-use change to faunal biodiversity in the Central Amazon. Conservation Biology 8: 1024–1036.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Janvry, A. & Sadoulet, E. 2001. Income strategies among rural households in Mexico: the role of off-farm activities. World Development 29: 467–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
de Sherbinin, A. & Freudenberger, M. (1998) Migration to protected areas and buffer zones: can we stem the tide? Parks 8: 38–53.Google Scholar
de Sherbinin, A., Carr, D., Cassels, S. & Jiang, L. (2007) Population and Environment. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 32: 5.1–5.29Google Scholar
Deininger, K. & Minten, B. (2002) Determinants of deforestation and the economics of protection: an application to Mexico. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84: 943–960.Google Scholar
Durand, J. (2007) Origen y destino de una migración centenaria. In: El País Trasnacional. Migración Mexicana y Cambio Social a Través de la Frontera, ed. Ariza, M. & Portes, A., pp: 55–81. Mexico City, Mexico: Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Ervin, J. (2003 a) Protected area assessments in perspective. Bioscience 53: 819–822.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ervin, J. (2003 b) Rapid assessment of protected area management effectiveness in four countries. Bioscience 53: 833–841.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Figueroa, F. & Sánchez-Cordero, V. (2008) Effectiveness of natural protected areas to prevent land use and land cover change in Mexico. Biodiversity and Conservation 17: 3223–3240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geist, H.J. & Lambin, E.F. (2002) Proximate and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. Biosicience 52: 143–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ghimire, K.B. & Pimbert, M.P. (1997) Social Change and Conservation. London, UK: Earthscan Publications.Google Scholar
Gómez-Pompa, A. & Kaus, A. (1992) Taming the wilderness myth. In: The Great Wilderness Debate, ed. Callicot, J.B. & Nelson, M.P., pp. 293–313. Athens, Georgia, USA: The University of Georgia Press.Google Scholar
Gotelli, N.J. & Ellison, A.M. (2004) A Primer of Ecological Statistics. Sunderland, MA, USA: Sinauer.Google Scholar
Haenn, N. (2000) ‘Biodiversity is Diversity in Use’. Community-Based Conservation in the Calakmul Biosphere Reserve. Arlington, Virginia, USA: USAID & The Nature Conservancy.Google Scholar
Halffter, G. (1984) Conservation, development and local participation. In: Ecology in Practice: Ecosystem Management, ed. di Castri, F., Baker, F.W.G. & Hadley, M., pp. 428–436. Dublin, Ireland: Tycooly International Publishing.Google Scholar
Hayes, T.M. (2006) Parks, people, and forest protection: an institutional assessment of effectiveness. World Development 34: 2064–2075.Google Scholar
Harvey, C.A., Komar, O., Chazdon, R., Ferguson, B.G., Finegan, B., Griffith, D.M., Martínez-Ramos, M., Morales, H., Nigh, R., Soto-Pinto, L., Van Breugel, M. & Wishnie, M. (2008) Integrating agricultural landscapes with biodiversity conservation in the Mesoamerican hotspot. Conservation Biology 22: 8–15.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hockings, M. (1998) Evaluating management of protected areas: integrating planning and evaluation. Environmental Management 22: 337–345.Google Scholar
Hockings, M. (2003) Systems for assessing the effectiveness of management in protected areas. Bioscience 53: 823–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houghton, R.A., Hackler, J.L. & Lawrence, K.T. (1999) The US carbon budget: contributions from land-use change. Science 285: 574–578.Google Scholar
INE (1995) Atlas de las Reservas de la Biosfera y Otras Áreas Naturales Protegidas. Mexico City, Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Ecología.Google Scholar
INEGI (1991) XI Censo General de Población y Vivienda 1990. Aguascalientes, Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática.Google Scholar
INEGI (1993) Carta de Uso del Suelo y Vegetación, Serie 2, 1:250,000. Aguascalientes, Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática.Google Scholar
INEGI (1994) VII Censo Agrícola-Ganadero. Aguascalientes, Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática.Google Scholar
INEGI (2000) Mapa de Carreteras de México. Aguascalientes, Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática.Google Scholar
INEGI (2001 a) Mapa de Municipios de México, 2000. Aguascalientes, Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática.Google Scholar
INEGI (2001 b) XII Censo General de Población y Vivienda 2000. Aguascalientes, Mexico: Instituto de Nacional Estadística, Geografía e Informática.Google Scholar
INEGI (2005) Conjunto de Datos Vectoriales de Uso de Suelo y Vegetación, 1:250,000, Serie 3. Aguascalientes, Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Estadística, Geografía e Informática.Google Scholar
INEGI, CONABIO & INE (2007) Mapa de Ecorregiones Terrestres de México, 1:1,000,000. Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad, Mexico City, Mexico.Google Scholar
Islam, K.R. & Weil, R.R. (2000) Land use effects on soil quality in a tropical forest ecosystem of Bangladesh. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment 79: 9–16.Google Scholar
Kinnard, M.F., Sanderson, E.W., O'Brien, T.G., Wibisono, H.T. & Woolmer, G. (2003) Deforestation trends in a tropical landscape and implications for endangered large mammals. Conservation Biology 17: 245–257.Google Scholar
Lambin, E.F., Turner, B.L., Helmut, J.G., Agbola, S.B., Angelsen, A., Bruce, J.W., Coomes, O.T., Dirzo, R., Fischer, G., Folke, C., George, P.S., Homewood, K., Imbernon, J., Leemans, R., Li, X., Moran, E.F., Mortimore, M., Ramakrishnan, P.S., Richards, J.F., Skanes, H., Steffen, W., Stone, G.D., Svedin, U., Veldkamp, T.A., Vogel, C. & Xu, J. (2001) The causes of land-use and land-cover change: moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change 11: 261–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leff, E. (2004) Saber Ambiental. Sustentabilidad, Racionalidad, Complejidad, Poder. Mexico City, Mexico: Siglo XXI, PNUMA, CEIICH & UNAM.Google Scholar
Lidlaw, R.K. (2000) Effects of habitat disturbance and protected areas of mammals of peninsular Malaysia. Conservation Biology 14: 1639–1648.Google Scholar
Little, P. D. (1994) The link between participation and improved conservation: a review of issues and experiences. In: Natural Connections. Perspectives in Community Based Conservation, ed. Western, D., Wright, R.M. & Strum, S.C., pp. 347–372. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Mäki, S., Kalliola, R. & Vuorinen, K. (2001) Road construction in the Peruvian Amazon: process, causes and consequences. Environmental Conservation 28: 199–214.Google Scholar
Mas, J. (2005) Assessing protected area effectiveness using surrounding (buffer) areas environmentally similar to the target area. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 105: 69–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Merino-Pérez, L. & Bray, D.B. (2004) La experiencia de las Comunidades Forestales en México. Mexico City, Mexico: Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales, Instituto Nacional de Ecología & Consejo Civil Mexicano para la Silvicultura Sostenible.Google Scholar
MVSP (2007) MVSP (Multivariate Statistical Package), version 3.1. Kovach Computing Services.Google Scholar
Mwamfupe, D. (1998) Demographic impacts on protected areas in Tanzania and option for action. In: Population and Parks, ed. de Sherbinin, A., pp: 3–14. Gland, Switzerland: International Union for the Conservation of Nature.Google Scholar
Nadal, A. (2003) Natural protected areas and social marginalization in Mexico. CEESP Occasional Papers 1: 2–25.Google Scholar
Nepstad, D., Schwartzman, S., Bamberger, B., Santilli, M., Ray, D., Schlesinger, P., Lefebvre, P., Alencar, A., Prinz, E., Fiske, G. & Rolla, A. (2006) Inhibition of Amazon deforestation and fire by parks and indigenous lands. Conservation Biology 20: 65–73.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Pearce, D. (1990) Población, pobreza y medio ambiente. Pensamiento Iberoamericano 18: 223–258.Google Scholar
Pebley, A.R. (1998) Demography and the environment. Demography 35: 377–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Perz, S.G. (2002) The changing social contexts of deforestation in the Brazilian Amazon. Social Science Quarterly 83: 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pressey, R.L., Wish, G.L., Barret, T.W. & Watts, M.E. (2002) Effectiveness of protected areas in north-eastern New South Wales: recent trends is six measures. Biological Conservation 106: 57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rao, M., Rabinowitz, A. & Khaing, S.T. (2002) Status review of the protected area system in Myanmar, with recommendations for conservation planning. Conservation Biology 16: 360–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reyes-Hernández, H., Cortina, S., Perales, H., Kauffer, E. & Pat, J.M. (2003) Efecto de los subsidios agropecuarios y apoyos gubernamentales sobre la deforestación durante el periodo 1990–2000 en la región de Calakmul, Campeche, México. Investigaciones Geográficas 51: 88–106.Google Scholar
Riezebos, H.T. & Loerts, A.C. (1998) Influence of land use change and tillage practice on soil organic matter. Soil and Tillage Research 49: 271–275.Google Scholar
Roberts, B. & Hamilton, E. (2007) La nueva geografía de la emigración: zonas emergentes de atracción y expulsión, continuidad y cambio. In: El País Trasnacional. Migración Mexicana y Cambio Social a Través de la Frontera, ed. Ariza, M. & Portes, A., pp: 83–118. Mexico City, Mexico: Instituto de Investigaciones Sociales, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Román-Cuesta, R.M. & Martínez-Vilalta, J. (2006) Effectiveness of protected areas in mitigating fire within their boundaries: case study of Chiapas, Mexico. Conservation Biology 20: 1074–1086.Google Scholar
Sánchez-Cordero, V., Illoldi-Rangel, P., Linaje, M., Sarkar, S. & Peterson, A.T. (2005) Deforestation and extant distributions of Mexican endemic mammals. Biological Conservation 126: 465–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sarukhán, J. & Dirzo, R. (1992) México ante los Retos de la Biodiversidad. Mexico City, Mexico: Comisión Nacional para el Conocimiento y Uso de la Biodiversidad.Google Scholar
SPSS (2004) SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) for Windows, version 13.0. Apache Software Foundation.Google Scholar
Stocks, A., McMahan, B. & Taber, P. (2007) Indigenous, colonists, and government impacts on Nicaragua's Bosawas Reserve. Conservation Biology 21: 1495–1505.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ter Braak, C. J. F. (1996) Ordination. In: Data Analysis in Community and Landscape Ecology, ed. Jongman, R.H.G., ter Braak, C. J. F. & van Tongeren, O.F.R., pp: 91–173. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Toledo, V.M. (1991) Bio-economic costs. In: Development or Destruction. Deforestation and Cattle Ranching in Latin America, ed. Downing, T., pp: 67–93. San Francisco, California, USA: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Toledo, V.M., Alarcón-Chaires, P., Moguel, P., Olivo, M., Cabrera, A., Leyequien, E. & Rodríguez-Aldabe, A. (2002) Pueblos indios y biodiversidad. Biodiversitas 7: 1–8.Google Scholar
Tucker, C.M. (2004) Community institutions and forest management in Mexico's Monarch Butterfly Reserve. Society and Natural Resources 17: 569–587.Google Scholar
Tuirán, R. (2004) La nueva era de las migraciones. Características de la migración internacional en México. Mexico City, Mexico: Consejo Nacional de Población.Google Scholar
Vandermeer, J. & Perfecto, I. (2007) The agricultural matrix and a future paradigm for conservation. Conservation Biology 21: 274–277Google Scholar
Velázquez, A., Torres, A. & Bocco, G. (2003) Las Enseñanzas de San Juan. Investigación Participativa para el Manejo de Recursos Naturales. Mexico City, Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Ecología, Secretaría de Medio Ambiente y Recursos Naturales.Google Scholar
Vitousek, P.M., Mooney, H.A., Lubchenco, J. & Melillo, J.M. (1997) Human domination of earth's ecosystems. Science 277: 494–499.Google Scholar
WWF (2004) Are Protected Areas Working? An Analysis of Forest Protected Areas by WWF. Gland, Switzerland: World Wide Fund for Nature.Google Scholar