Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-d8cs5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-27T12:45:52.911Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Role of Nepal's Royal Chitwan National Park in Meeting the Grazing and Fodder Needs of Local People

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Uday R. Sharma  and
William W. Shaw
Uday R. Sharma
Affiliation:
Chief, Planning Division, Ministry of Forests and Environment, Baban Mahal, Kathmandu, Nepal, Formerly Chief Warden, Royal Chitwan National Park
William W. Shaw
Affiliation:
Professor, School of Renewable Natural Resources, 325 Biological Sciences Building, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona 85721, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

It has been increasingly accepted that park management policies in some countries should allow for limited access to park resources by the local people to meet their subsistence and cultural needs. However, too much access to the natural resources of a park may simply cause people to rely on the park resource and manage their own lands less intensively than hitherto.

The issue of illegal livestock-grazing and fodder-cutting in Royal Chitwan National Park (RCNP) by local people is examined. The study area was comprised of 16 village units having an estimated population of 148, 404 people in 21, 621 households. Despite the presence of a large number of armed guards, the data from interviews with farmers indicated that illegal livestock-grazing and fodder-cutting in RCNP were prevalent. In the spring season, grazing intensity on the Park was higher than in other seasons, whereas cutting of fodder was intense in both winter and spring seasons.

The actual monitoring of 11 patches (totalling 365 ha) of grasslands or savanna for a calendar year inside the Park but near its boundary, indicated that illegal grazing averaged 4.1 head per ha (3.0 cattle, 0.9 buffalo, and 0.2 sheep/goats). In addition, the livestock biomass was found to be increasing by 2.36% per annum in Park-adjoining villages. There is some evidence that villagers adapt their livestock practices in response to the availability (illegal) of grazing in, and fodder-removal from, the Park.

The pressures for illegal access to park resources will continue to grow and eventually will exceed the capacity of the resource to recover from harvest. The best approach to resolve this illegal livestock grazing issue is neither strict protection nor widely-expanded access. The Park should consistently work to induce a gradual behavioural change, on the part of the farmers, to stall-feed livestock from fodder originating from their own farms and/or from community plantation.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 20 , Issue 2 , Summer 1993 , pp. 139 - 142
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1993

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Berwick, S.H. & Jordan, P.A. (1971). First report of the Yale—Bombay Natural History Society studies of the wild ungulates at the Gir Forest, Gujarat, India. Journal of Bombay Natural History Society, 68, pp. 412–23.Google Scholar
Boserup, E. (1965). The Conditions of Agricultural Growth; the Economics of Agrarian Change under Population Pressure. Aldine, Chicago, Illinois, USA: 124 pp.Google Scholar
Bromley, D.W. & Cernea, M.M. (1989). The Management of Common Property Natural Resources: Some Conceptual and Operational Fallacies. (World Bank Discussion Papers, 57.) The World Bank, Washington, DC, USA: 65 pp.Google Scholar
Dasmann, R.F. (1984). The relationship between protected areas and indigenous peoples. Pp. 667–71 in McNeely J.A. & Miller K.R. (q.v.).Google Scholar
Feeny, D., Berkes, F., McCay, B.J. & Acheson, J.M. (1990). The tragedy of the commons: twenty-two years later. Human Ecology, 18(1), pp. 1–19.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Fox, J.M. (1983). Managing Public Lands in a Subsistence Economy: The Perspective from a Nepali Village. PhD dissertation, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA: 246 pp.Google Scholar
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, pp. 1243–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Harris, M. (1966). The cultural ecology of India's sacred cattle. Current Anthropology, 7(1), pp. 51–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heinen, Joel T. (1993). Park-people relations in Kosi Tappu Wildlife Reserve, Nepal: a socio-economic analysis. Environmental Conservation, 20(1), pp. 25–34, 2 figs and 6 tables.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
His Majesty's Government of Nepal (HMGN) Ministry of Forests and Soil Conservation (1988). Master Plan for the Forestry Sector, Nepal, Main Report. Kathmandu, Nepal: xxii + 292 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Lehmkuhl, J.F. (1989). The Ecology of a South-Asian Tall-grass Community. PhD dissertation, University of Washington, USA: 213 pp.Google Scholar
Lehmkuhl, J.F., Upreti, R.K. & Sharma, U.R. (1988). National parks and local development: grasses and people in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Environmental Conservation, 15(2), pp. 143–8, 4 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Machlis, G.E. & Ticknell, D.L. (1985). The State of the World's Parks: An International Assessment for Resource Management Policy. Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, (USA): xiv + 131 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
McNeely, J.A. (1984). Introduction: protected areas and adapting to new realities. Pp. 1–7 in McNeely J.A. & Miller K.R. (q.v.).Google Scholar
McNeely, J.A. & Miller, K.R. (Eds) (1984). National Parks, Conservation and Development. Smithsonian Institution Press, Washington, DC, USA: xiii + 825 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Netting, R. McC. (1976). What alpine peasants have in common: observations on communal tenure in a Swiss village. Human Ecology, 4(2), pp. 135–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Netting, R. McC. (1986). Cultural Ecology, 2nd edn.Waveland Press, Prospect Heights, Illinois, USA: xi + 631 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Runge, C.F. (1986). Common property and collective action in economic development, in Proceedings of the Conference on Common Property Resource Management (21–2604 1985). National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Seidensticker, J. (1976). Ungulate populations in Chitwan Valley, Nepal. Biological Conservation, 10, pp. 183–210.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, U.R. (1990). An overview of park-people interactions in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. Landscape and Urban Planning, 19, pp. 133–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sharma, U.R. (1991). Park-People Interactions in Royal Chitwan National Park, Nepal. PhD dissertation, University of Arizona, Tucson, Arizona, USA: 275 pp.Google Scholar
Zube, E.H. (1986). Local and extra-local perceptions of national parks and protected areas. Landscape and Urban Planning, 13, pp. 11–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar