Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T02:03:47.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Roadside Birds in Punjab (India): Relation to Mortality from Vehicles

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Manjit S. Dhindsa ,
Jaswinder S. Sandhu ,
P.S. Sandhu  and
H.S. Toor
Manjit S. Dhindsa
Affiliation:
Ornithologist, Department of Zoology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004, India.
Jaswinder S. Sandhu
Affiliation:
Assistant Professor (Wildlife), Department of Forestry & Natural Resources, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004, India.
P.S. Sandhu
Affiliation:
Assistant Ornithologist, Department of Zoology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004, India.
H.S. Toor
Affiliation:
Professor & Head, Department of Zoology, Punjab Agricultural University, Ludhiana 141 004, India.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Roadside bird mortality is a new environmental dimension in developing countries. With the recent increase in the number of high-speed cars and the simultaneous improvement of roads in India, bird-car strikes and the resultant bird mortality are becoming important. To know how many species frequent roads in Punjab and thus may be prone to be killed by fast vehicles, we censused birds along 420 km of roads of different widths and traffic volumes from a vehicle moving at 50–60 km per hour. We also counted birds along transects c. 1 km away from roads, for comparison.

In all, 35 species of birds were recorded on the road proper or within 3 m of either edge. Common Myna (Acridotheres trisitis) was the most abundant species (34.8% of all birds), followed by House Sparrow (Passer domesticus) (29.5%), Ring Dove (Streptopelia decaocto) (13.1%), and House Crow (Corvus splendens) (9.7%). These four species together accounted for c. 87% of the total of all bird species. The off-road community consisted of 68 species. The species-richness of granivorous, insectivorous, omnivorous, and some other birds, was less on or near roads than in the off-road transects, but within each community, species having different feeding habits were in similar proportions. About 93% of the total birds on or near roads (as against 66% off-road) were either granivorous or omnivorous.

Our results suggested that granivorous birds are attracted, but insectivorous and other birds are repelled, by roads. Omnivores were equally abundant on and off roads. Food (such as spilled grain) seemed to be the main factor attracting birds to roads. Species diversity and equitability of the bird community on roads (1.82 and 0.51, respectively) were less than those off-roads (3.11 and 0.74, respectively). Wider roads had lower species-diversity and equitability, probably because of the greater volume of traffic on them compared with narrower roads. Species richness and bird abundance seemed not to be affected by roadwidth. Bird mortality on roads is discussed, along with the possibility of roads acting as “ecological traps” for foraging birds.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 15 , Issue 4 , Winter 1988 , pp. 303 - 310
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bailey, J.A. (1984). Principles of Wildlife Management. John Wiley & Sons. New York, NY, USA: x + 373 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Brown, R.J., Brown, M.N. & Pesotto, B. (1986). Birds killed on some secondary roads in Western Australia. Corella, 10, pp. 118–22, 2 figs.Google Scholar
Carrick, R. (1963). Ecological significance of territory in the Australian Magpie Gymnorhina tibicens. Proc. XIII Int. Orn. Cong., pp. 740–53.Google Scholar
Case, R.M. (1978). Interstate highway road-killed animals: a data source for biologists. Wildl. Soc. Bull., 6, pp. 8–13.Google Scholar
Cooke, A.S. (1980). Observations on how close certain passerine species will tolerate an approaching human in rural and suburban areas. Biol. Conserv., 18, pp. 85–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dhindsa, M.S. (1984). Status of avian fauna in Punjab and its management. Pp. 68–77 in Status of Wildlife in Punjab (Eds Atwal, A.S., Bains, S.S. & Dhindsa, M.S.). Indian Ecological Society, Ludhiana, Punjab, India: xxxiv + 194 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Dhindsa, M.S., & Boag, D.A. (in press). Influence of age on the flushing distance of marked and unmarked Black-billed Magpies. Ornis Scand., 20, 2 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunthorn, A.A. & Errington, F.P. (1964). Casualties among birds along a selected road in Wiltshire. Bird Study, 11, pp. 168–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fremlin, J. (1985). Why do birds collide with cars? New Sci., 106(1463), pp. 60–1, fig.Google Scholar
Gates, J.E. & Gysel, L.W. (1978). Avian nest dispersion and fledging success in field-forest ecotones. Ecology, 59, pp. 871–83, 3 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holbrook, H.T. & Vaughan, M.R. (1985). Influence of roads on turkey mortality. J. Wildl. Manage, 49, pp. 611–4, 2 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jonkers, D.A. & Vries, G.W. de (1977). Verkeersslachtoffers under de Fauna. Zeist, Nederlandse Vereninging tot Bescherming van Vogels. [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
Krebs, C.J. (1978). Ecology: the Experimental Analysis of Distribution and Abundance, 2nd edn.Harper & Row, New York. NY, USA: xxvi + 678 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R.H. (1972). Geographical Ecology: Patterns in the Distribution of Species. Harper & Row, New York, NY, USA: 320 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R.H. & MacArthur, J.W. (1961). On bird species diversity. Ecology, 42. pp. 594–8, 3 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mader, H.J. (1984). Animal habitat isolation by roads and agricultural fields. Biol. Conserv., 29. pp. 81–96, 6 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nankinov, D.N. & Todorov, N.M. (1983). Bird casualties on highways. Sov. J. Ecol., 14, pp. 288–93. fig.Google Scholar
Odum, E.P. (1971). Fundamentals of Ecology, 3rd edn.W.B. Saunders Co., Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. USA: xiv + 574 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Oxley, D.J., Fenton, M.B. & Carmody, G.R. (1974). The effects of roads on populations of small mammals. J. Appl. Ecol., 11, pp. 51–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patrick, R. (1963). The structure of diatom communities under varying ecological conditions. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci., 108. pp. 353–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Reed, D.F. & Woodward, T.N. (1975). Deer-vehicle accidents. Colorado Game Res. Rev., pp. 8–12.Google Scholar
Toor, H.S., Kaur, H. & Dhindsa, M.S. (1986). Community structure and feeding ecology of birds at a grain store in Punjab (India). Trop. Sci., 26, pp. 233–47, 5 figs.Google Scholar
Veen, J. (1973). De Verstoring van weidevogelpopulaties. Stedeb, en Volkshuisv., 53, pp. 16–26.Google Scholar
Vestjens, W.J.M. (1973). Wildlife mortality on a road in New South Wales. Emu, 73, pp. 107–12, 2 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, N.M., Brooks, R.R. & Roberts, E. (1978). Blood lead levels in sheep exposed to automotive emissions. Bull. Environ. Contam. Toxicol., 20, pp. 44–51, 5 figs.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Whitford, P.C. (1985). Bird behavior in response to the warmth of blacktop roads. Trans. Wis. Acad. Sci. Arts Lett., 73. pp. 135–43, 2 figs.Google Scholar
Zande, A.N. van der, Keurs, W.J. Ter & Weijden, W.J. van der (1980). The impact of roads on the densities of four species in an open-field habitat: evidence of a long-distance effect. Biol. Conserv., 18, pp. 299–321. 6 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zar, J.H. (1984). Biostatistical Analysis, 2nd edn.Prentice Hall. Englewood Cliffs, N.J., USA: xvi + 718 pp., illustr.Google Scholar