Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-pwrkn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-12T18:45:23.693Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Regeneration Methods for Tropical High-forests*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Philip R. O. Kio
Affiliation:
Senior Lecturer, Department of Forest Resources Management, University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria.

Extract

Changes taking place in the natural tropical forests are intricate, and the ecological processes which they entail are only gradually becoming understood. Human interference in these processes frequently leads to unforeseen consequences, silvicultural treatments being apt to be applied long before much is known about the characteristics of the constituent species and the particular successional phases on which treatments have been imposed.

Perturbations create gaps of varying sizes. Both regeneration in the gaps and the latter's restoration to a state of equilibrium, depend on their size and the intensity of the disturbance. Deflected successions may occur in sensitive ecosystems whereby progress towards vegetational climax is permanently interrupted. In Africa, the human impact on the natural vegetation has been more severe and for a much longer period than in either the Amazon or in large areas of the Indo-Malaysian rain-forest.

Apart from the limitations of existing silvicultural techniques for inducing regeneration and promoting growth, vital management decisions are commonly based on the results of regeneration sampling. But this traditional sampling technique does not make sufficient use of the indications provided by Iiocourt's ‘living space’ theory. However, modified procedures which can easily be undertaken and which assign more appropriate areas of occupation to individual seedlings, saplings, poles, and trees in the stand, provide more realistic estimates of the overall stocking. Though much damage is done to saplings and poles by the felling of large trees, the severity of damage is related more to the number of trees felled than to the basal area or volume removed. However, research into effects of alternative logging regimes (monocyclic versus poly cyclic) is required to resolve, for particular forest types, the issue of appropriate management/silvicultural prescriptions.

On the basis of silvicultural research in Nigeria, tentative conclusions have been reached that the growth of a residual stand after exploitation can be accelerated by shelterwood treatments. In particular, climber cutting and opening of the canopy by poisoning are effective treatments in promoting recruitment of saplings and poles from seedlings, and their subsequent growth and survival. Controlled logging can be as effective as a poisoning operation to remove shade-casting, uneconomic emergents, and if substituted for such shelterwood poisoning could reduce the expense of implementing forest treatment.

In forest management, account must be taken of differing capacities for growth between different species—especially in response to different silvicultural treatments. Thus in the experiments discussed, heavy poisoning promoted greater increments than selective poisoning, though the difference was not statistically significant.

Type
Main Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Baur, G. N. (1964). The Ecological Basis of Rainforest Management. Forestry Commission of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia: xiv + 499 pp., 58 figs.Google Scholar
Dawkins, H. C. (1958). The management of natural tropical high forest with special reference to Uganda. Imperial Forestry Inst. Paper No. 34, 155 pp.Google Scholar
Evans, G. C. (1939). Ecological studies in the rain forest of Southern Nigeria, II. The atmospheric environmental conditions. J. Ecol., 26, pp. 436–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fontaine, R. G. (1976). The Impact upon the Environment of Forestry Practices in Tropical Moist Forests. FAO (Committee on Forest Development in the Tropics, 4th session, November 1976), Rome, Italy: FO:FDT/76/8 (b), 20 pp.Google Scholar
Hall, J. B. (1977). Forest types in Nigeria: An analysis of preexploitation forest enumeration data. J. Ecol., 65, 187–99.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, J. B. & Swaine, M. D. (1976). Classification and ecology of closed-canopy forest in Ghana. J. Ecol., 64, pp. 913–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keay, R. W. J. (1949). An Outline of Nigerian Vegetation. Federal Ministry of Information, Lagos, Nigeria: [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
Keay, R. W. J. (1959). An Outline of Nigerian Vegetation, 3rd edn.Federal Ministry of Information, Lagos, Nigeria: [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
Keay, R. W. J. (1961). Increment in Okomu Forest Reserve, Benin. Nig. For. Info. Bull. (n.s.), No. 11, 27 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Kio, P. R. O. (1978). Stand Development in Naturally Regenerated Forest in South-western Nigeria. Ph.D. Thesis, Ibadan, Nigeria: xxxvii + 594 pp., illustr., mimeogr.Google Scholar
Kira, T. & Ogawa, H. (1971). Assessment of primary production in tropical and equatorial forests. Productivity of forest ecosystems. Proc. Brussels Symposium 1969, UNESCO [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
Loetsch, F., Zohrer, F. & Haller, K. E. (1973). Forest Inventory Vol. II. BLV Verlagsgesellschaft München-Bern-Wien: xxiv + 469 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Nwoboshi, L. C. (1979). Tropical Silviculture: Principles and Techniques. University of Ibadan, Ibadan, Nigeria: iii + 370 pp., illustr., mimeogr.Google Scholar
Palmer, J. R. (1975). Selective logging and regeneration problems. In Patterns of Use of the Tropical Forest Ecosystem. UNESCO State of Knowledge Report on Tropical and Subtropical Ecosystems. [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
Poore, M. E. D. (1976). The Values of the Tropical Moist Forest Ecosystems and the Environmental Consequences of Their Removal FAO (Committee on Forest Development in the Tropics, 4th Session, November 1976), Rome, Italy: FO:FDT/76/8 (a), 39 pp.Google Scholar
Richards, P. W. (1952). The Tropical Rain Forest: An Ecological Study. University Press, Cambridge, England, UK: xviii + 450 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Richards, P. W. (1977). Tropical forests and woodlands: An overview. Agro-Ecosystems, 3, pp. 225–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steenis, C. J. van (1958). Rejuvenation as a factor for judging the status of vegetation types: the biological nomad theory. Pp. 212–8 in Study of Tropical Vegetation. Proc. Kandy Symposium, UNESCO, Paris, France: 226 pp.Google Scholar
Stern, K. & Roche, L. (1974). Genetics of Forest Ecosystems. (Ecological Studies No. 6.) Springer-Verlag, Berlin, West Germany: x + 330 pp., illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Synnott, T. J. (1975). Factors Affecting the Regeneration and Growth of Seedlings of Entandrophragma utile (Davy & Sprague) Sprague. Ph.D. thesis, Makerere University, Kampala, Uganda: 224 pp., mimeogr.Google Scholar
Troup, R. S. (1952). Silvicultural Systems, 2nd edn. Ed. Jones, E. W., Clarendon Press, Oxford, England, UK: xv + 216 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
UNESCO (1978). Tropical Forest Ecosystems. A state-of-knowledge report, UNESCO, Paris, France: 683 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Vincent, A. J. (1961). A critical review of the sampling practice integrated with present-day Malayan silviculture. Mal For., 24, pp. 1931.Google Scholar
Whitmore, T. C. (1975). Tropical Rain Forest of the Far East. Clarendon Press, Oxford, England, UK: xiii + 282 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Wyatt-Smith, J. (1963). Manual of Malayan Silviculture for Inland Forests, Vol. 1. (Malayan Forest Records, No. 23, III, 15/54.) Malayan Forest Service, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: x + 603 pp., illustr.Google Scholar