Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-s22k5 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-11T05:05:43.778Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Recent Themes in Conservation Philosophy and Policy in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Fred T. Wildes
Fred T. Wildes
Affiliation:
Joint Doctoral Studies Program in Geography, San Diego State University, San Diego, California 92182, USA, and University of California at Santa Barbara, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

A key characteristic of conservation in the United States is the dichotomy between two main philosophies. One of these is anthropocentric and utilitarian, advocating the wise use of Nature and natural resources, while the other is basically ecocentric, as it espouses principles of nonuse and preservation. This dualism has existed since the early days of the conservation movement, when the formerly uncontrolled use of a supposedly limitless natural environment finally gave way to a policy of resource management which was designed to conserve Nature and resource availability within the framework of human utilization. Generally opposed to this historically dominant paradigm were those who believed in preserving Nature for its own sake, and who have laboured over the years to modify and ameliorate the prevalent, central pattern.

After a period of relative unconcern, conservation underwent a resurgence as part of the environmental movement of the 1960s and 1970s. Environmental quality was the key concern, being highlighted by problems of pollution and degradation of the natural habitat. While providing the impetus for some broad environmental and conservation measures, this central focus directed primary attention to setting the problems. The traditional dominance of utilitarian resource management was maintained, relying on our managerial and scientific skills to address heightened environmental concerns. The era also spawned a number of other philosophies and themes. These have included a renewed sense of the ethics and spirituality of Nature, the emergence of ecology as a publicly-recognized-as-important field of science, ‘greener’ ecocentric movements, theories advocating more radical change, neo-Marxist theory on the relationship between Man and Nature, and various themes on limiting environmental growth and stress especially imposed by everincreasing human numbers.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 22 , Issue 2 , Summer 1995 , pp. 143 - 150
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1995

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abram, D. (1985). The perceptual implications of Gaia. The Ecologist, 15(3), pp. 96–103.Google Scholar
Attfield, R. (1991). The Ethics of Environmental Concern, 2nd edn. University of Georgia Press, Athens, Georgia, USA: xxiii + 249 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bookchin, M. (1990). The Philosophy of Social Ecology. Black Rose Books, Montreal, Quebec, Canada: 198 pp.Google Scholar
Boulding, K.E. (1966). The Economics of the coming Spaceship Earth. Pp. 3–14 in Environmental Quality in a Growing Economy (Ed. Jarret, H.). Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore, Maryland, USA: xv + 173 pp.Google Scholar
Burgess, R. (1978). The concept of Nature in Geography and Marxism. Antipode, 10(2), pp. 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burton, I. (1968). The quality of the environment: a review. The Geographical Review, 58(3), pp. 472–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Callicott, J.B. (1984). Non-anthropocentric value theory and environmental ethics. American Philosophical Quarterly, 21, pp. 299–309.Google Scholar
Callicott, J.B. (1986). On the intrinsic value of nonhuman species. Pp. 138–72 in The Preservation of Species (Ed. Norton, B.G.). Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ, USA: xi + 305 pp.Google Scholar
Carson, R. (1962). Silent Spring. Houghton Mifflin Company, New York, NY, USA: 368 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Commoner, B. (1971). The Closing Circle. Alfred A. Knopf, New York, NY, USA: 326 pp.Google Scholar
Cooper, T. (1990). Green Christianity. Hodder & Stoughton Publishers, London, England, UK: 282 pp.Google Scholar
Dearden, P. (1989). Wilderness and Our Common Future. Natural Resources Journal, 29, pp. 205–21.Google Scholar
Devall, B. (1980). The Deep Ecology Movement. Natural Resources Journal, 20, pp. 299–322.Google Scholar
Devall, B. & Sessions, G. (1984). The development of natural resources and the integrity of Nature. Environmental Ethics, pp. 293–322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, P.R. (1968). The Population Bomb. Ballantine Books, New York, NY, USA: 223 pp.Google Scholar
Evernden, N. (1993). The Natural Alien, 2nd edn. University of Toronto Press, Toronto, Ontario, Canada: xiii +172 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, W. (1984). Deep Ecology: a new philosophy of our time? The Ecologist, 14(5–6), pp. 194–204.Google Scholar
Glacken, C.J. (1956). The origins of the conservation philosophy. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation, XI(2). Reprinted as pp. 158–63 in Readings in Resource Management and Conservation (Eds I. Burton & R.W. Kates) (1965). University Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA: xi + 609 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Glacken, C.J. (1967). Traces on the Rhodian Shore: Nature and Culture in Western Thought from Ancient Times to the End the Eighteenth Century. University of California Press, Berkeley, California, USA: xxviii + 763 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hardin, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, pp. 1243–8.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Herfindahl, O.C. (1961). What is Conservation? Three Studies Minerals Economics. Resources for the Future, Washington, DC, USA. Reprinted as pp. 229–36 in Readings in Resource Management and Conservation (Eds I. Burton & R.W. Kates) (1965). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA: xi + 609 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
IUCN/UNEP/WWF (1991). Caring for the Earth: A Strategy for Sustainable Living. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources/United Nations Environmental Programme/World Wildlife Fund, Gland, Switzerland: iv + 228 pp.Google Scholar
Kates, R.W. (1967). The pursuit of beauty in the environment. Landscape, 16(2), pp. 21–5.Google Scholar
Kay, J. (1988). Concepts of Nature in the Hebrew Bible. Environmental Ethics, 10, pp. 309–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
King, Y. (1989). The ecology of feminism and the feminism of ecology. Pp. 18–28 in Healing the Wounds: The Promise Ecofeminism (Ed. Plant, J.). New Society Publishers, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA: xii + 262 pp.Google Scholar
Lee, D.C. (1980). On the Marxian view of the relationship between Man and Nature. Environmental Ethics, 2, pp. 3–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leopold, A. (1949). A Sand County Almanac. Oxford University Press, New York, NY, USA: xiii + 226 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Lewis, M.W. (1992). Green Delusions: An Environmentalist Critique of Radical Environmentalism. Duke University Press, Durham, North Carolina, USA: viii + 288 pp.Google Scholar
Lovelock, J.E. (1979). Gaia: A New Look at Life on Earth. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, UK: xi + 157 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Manning, R.E. (1989). The Nature of America: visions and revisions of wilderness. Natural Resources Journal, 29, pp. 25–40.Google Scholar
Marsh, G.P. (1864). Man and Nature, or Physical Geography as Modified by Human Action. Scribners, New York, NY, USA: xix + 577 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McConnell, G. (1954). The Conservation Movement — past and present. Western Political Quarterly, VII. Reprinted as pp. 189–201 in Readings in Resource Management and Conservation (Eds I. Burton & R.W. Kates) (1965). University of Chicago Press, Chicago, Illinois, USA: xi + 609 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
McKean, R.N. (1973). Growth Vs. No Growth: an evaluation. Daedalus, 102(4), pp. 207–27.Google Scholar
Meadows, D.H., Meadows, D.L., Randers, J. & Behrens, W.W. (1972). The Limits to Growth. Universe Books, New York, NY, USA: 197 pp.Google Scholar
Miller, K.R., Furtado, J., Klenn, C. de, McNeely, J.A., Myers, N., Soule, M.E. & Trexler, M.C. (1985). Issues on the preservation of biological diversity. Pp. 337–62 in The Global Possible (Ed. Repetto, R.). Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA: xv + 538 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Nash, R.F. (1989). The Rights of Nature: A History of Environmental Ethics. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin, USA: xiii + 290 pp.Google Scholar
National Environmental Policy Act (cited as NEPA) (1969). US Code, Parts 4321, et seq., 1988 edn, pp. 963–91. [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
Norton, B.G. (1986). Conservation and preservation: a conceptual rehabilitation. Environmental Ethics, 8, pp. 195–220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Norton, B.G. (1991). Towards Unity Among Environmentalists. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, UK: xvi + 287 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Oelschlaeger, M. (1991). The Idea of Wilderness. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA: xii + 477 pp.Google Scholar
O'Riordan, T. (1988). The politics of sustainability. Pp. 29–50 in Sustainable Environmental Management: Principles and Practice (Ed. Turner, R.K.). Belhaven Press, London, England, UK: ix + 292 pp.Google Scholar
O'Riordan, T. (1989). The challenge for environmentalism. Pp. 77–104 in New Models in Geography: the Political-Economy Perspective (Eds Peet, R. & Thrift, N.). Unwin Hyman, London, England, UK: xviii + 365 pp., illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Passmore, J. (1974). Man's Responsibility for Nature. Charles Scribner's Sons, New York, NY, USA: x + 213 pp.Google Scholar
Peet, J.R. (1985). An introduction to Marxist geography. Journal of Geography, 84(1), pp. 5–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pinchot, G. (1910). The Fight for Conservation. University of Washington Press, Seattle, Washington, USA: xxvii + 152 pp.Google Scholar
Plumwood, V. (1992). Feminism and ecofeminism; beyond the dualistic assumptions of Women, Men and Nature. The Ecologist, 22(1), pp. 8–13.Google Scholar
Redclift, M. (1984). Development and the Environmental Crisis. Methuen & Company, London, England, UK: 149 pp.Google Scholar
Redclift, M. (1992). The meaning of sustainable development. Geoforum, 23(1), pp. 395–403.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, W.E. (1990). The ecology of sustainable development. The Ecologist, 20(1), pp. 18–23.Google Scholar
Rolston, H. III, (1988). Environmental Ethics: Duties to and Values in the Natural World. Temple University Press, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA: xiii + 391 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Rolston, H. III, (1989). Philosophy Gone Wild. Prometheus Books, Buffalo, NY, USA: 269 pp.Google Scholar
Rose, H.M. (1971). Conservation in the United States. Pp. 3–17 in Conservation of Natural Resources, 4th edn (Ed. Smith, G.H.). John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY, USA: 685 pp.Google Scholar
Schneider, S.H. (1990). Debating Gaia. Environment, 32(4), pp. 5–9, 29–32.Google Scholar
Shrader-Frechette, K. (1985). Environmental ethics and global imperatives. Pp. 97–127 in The Global Possible (Ed. Repetto, R.). Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA: xv + 538 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Simon, T.W. (1990). Varieties of ecological dialectics. Environmental Ethics, 12, pp. 211–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slatyer, R.O. (1991). Conservation in our changing world. Environmental Conservation, 18(1), pp. 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Smith, N. & O'Keefe, P. (1980). Geography, Marx and the concept of Nature. Antipode, 12(2), pp. 79–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stegner, W. (1990). It all began with conservation. Smithsonian, 21(1), pp. 34–43.Google Scholar
Stone, C.D. (1974). Should Trees Have Standing? Toward Legal Rights for Natural Objects. William Kaufmann, Los Altos, California, USA: xvii + 102 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Talbot, L.M. (1984). The World Conservation Strategy. Pp. 3–15 in Sustaining Tomorrow: A Strategy for World Conservation and Development (Eds Thibodeau, F.R. & Field, H.H.). University Press of New England, Hanover, New Hampshire, USA: 186 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Udall, S.L. (1963). The Quiet Crisis. Holt, Rinehart & Winston, New York, NY, USA: xiii + 209 pp.Google Scholar
White, L. Jr., (1967). The historical roots of our ecological crisis. Science, 155, pp. 1203–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
World Commission on Environment and Development (cited as WCED) (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, UK: xv + 383 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Young, J. (1990). Post Environmentalism. Belhaven Press, London, England, UK: x + 225 pp.Google Scholar