No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
Progress or Catastrophe: Whither Our World?*
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 24 August 2009
Extract
It is my intention, in the following remarks, first to review briefly the present state of the environment as a world issue in relation to the other major issues which, today, bear upon the prospects for the human future. Secondly, I would like to advance the premise that it is possible to think positively about the human future and to point up some of the principal elements which I believe will be necessary to make that positive vision of the future a reality.
The environmental issue has evolved rapidly in the less-than-three years since the United Nations Conference on the Human Environment, which was held in Stockholm, Sweden, in June 1972. Most notably—and largely as a result of what we nowadays commonly refer to simply as ‘Stockholm’—it has become a truly global issue in the sense that virtually all governments and peoples throughout the world have now acknowledged it as an issue of importance to themselves, and have taken at least the first steps to establish national environmental policies and machinery to carry them out. In the developing countries in particular, there has been a literal explosion of interest based primarily on the larger concept of environment and its relationship to development which emerged from the Stockholm Conference.
- Type
- Main Papers
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1975
References
Cloudsley-Thompson, J. L. (1974). The expanding Sahara. Environmental Conservation, 1(1), pp. 3–13, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dasmann, R. F., Milton, J. P. & Freeman, P. H. (1973). Ecological Principles for Economic Development. John Wiley, London, etc.: ix + 252 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Doxiadis, C. A. (1975). The ecological types of space that we need. Environmental Conservation, 2(1), pp. 3–13, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ehrlich, P. R. & Ehrlich, A. H. (1972). Population, Resources, Environment, 2nd edn. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco: xiv + 509 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Ehrlich, P. R., Ehrlich, A. H. & Holdren, J. P. (1973). Human Ecology Problems and Solutions. W. H. Freeman, San Francisco: xi + 304 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Goldsmith, E., Allen, R., Allaby, M., Davull, J. & Lawrence, S. (1972). A Blueprint for Survival. Tom Stacey, London: 173 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Helliwell, D. R. (1975). Discount rates and environmental conservation. Environmental Conservation, 2(3), 3 pp.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meadows, D. H., Meadows, D. L., Randers, J. & Behrens, W. W. III, (1972). The Limits to Growth. A Potomac Associates Book: A Report for the Club of Rome's Project on the Predicament of Mankind. Universe Books, New York: 205 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
N., Polunin (Ed.) (1972). The Environmental Future: Proceedings of the first International Conference on Environmental Future… Macmillan, London & Basingstoke, and Barnes & Noble, New York: xiv + 660 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Polunin, N. (1974). Thoughts on some conceivable ecodisasters. Environmental Conservation, 1(3), pp. 177–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stone, P. [B.] (1973). Did We Save the Earth at Stockholm? Earth Island, London: viii + 203 pp.Google Scholar
Strong, M. S. (1973). One year after Stockholm: an ecological approach to management. Foreign Affairs, 51, pp. 690–707.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ward, B. & Dubos, R. (1972). Only One Earth: The Care and Maintenance of a Small Planet. W.W. Norton, New York: xxv + 225 pp.Google Scholar