Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:21:35.388Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Optimal Management of Karst Sites with Cave Fauna Protection

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Raymond Tercafs
Raymond Tercafs
Affiliation:
Senior Research Associate of the National Fund for Scientific Research, Conseil Scientifique des Sites, Université de Liège, Bâtiment B 11, Sart Tilman, B-4000 Liège, Belgium.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

An optimal management of large Karst sites, with emphasis on the conservation of cave fauna while allowing recreational use, is proposed. A detailed study of the relative biological value of each section in a reference cave, the east Belgian ‘Grottes de Han’ Cave, was made in comparison with 40 others in Belgium.

Computer analysis provided a selection of optimal routes through the Cave. Each different route reflects the synthetic coefficients derived to weight biological and aesthetic values. This method of optimal cave resource control, developed to prevent deterioration in underground environments, can also be applied to other natural sites visited by humans.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , Summer 1988 , pp. 149 - 158
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bertuglia, C.S., Ramasco, E. & Taddei, R. (1977). Contributio alla formazione di una methodologia per l'organizzatione di un sistema di parchi regionali. Atti delle Giornate Associazione Italiana Ricerca Operativa (Parma), pp. 408–21.Google Scholar
Bertuglia, C.S., Taddei, R. & Leonardi, G. (1980). The optimal management of natural recreational resources: a mathematical model. Environment and Planning, 12, pp. 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Block, G. de (1973). De l'étude et de la protection des Chauvesouris en Belgique. Bull. Inform. Equipe Spél. Bruxelles, 57. pp. 24–31.Google Scholar
Bryan, E. (1976). Surveying Caves. The British Cave Research Association, Bridgewater, Somerset, England, UK: xv + 83 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Culver, D. (1982). Cave Life, Evolution and Ecology. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massassuchets, USA: viii + 190 pp., illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delhez, F. & Chardez, D. (1970). Protozoaires des grottes de Belgique. Ann. Spéléo., 25, pp. 107–37.Google Scholar
Fish, C.B. & Bury, R.L. (1981). Wilderness visitor management diversity and agency policies. J. For., 79. pp. 608–12.Google Scholar
Groot, R.S. de (1983). Tourism and conservation in the Galápagos Islands. Biological Conservation, 26(4), pp. 291–300, map.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton-Smith, E. (1970). Biological aspects of cave conservation. J. Sydney Speleol. Soc., 14, pp. 157–64.Google Scholar
Hoinville, G. & Berthoud, R. (1970). Indentifying and evaluating trade-off preferences: An analysis of environmental/accessibility priorities. Social and Community Planning Research (London), 322 pp. [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
Howarth, F.G. (1983). Ecology of cave arthropods. Ann. Rev. Entomol., 28, pp. 365–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hubart, J.M. (1973). Urgence d'une protection des avernes et biotopes souterrains de Belgique. Natur. Belges, 54, pp. 141–54.Google Scholar
Juberthie, C., Delay, E. & Bouillon, M. (1981). Sur l'existence d'un milieu souterrain superficiel en zone calcaire. Colloque de Biospéologie, La Chapelle en Vercors. Mém. Biospéol., 8. pp. 77–93.Google Scholar
Leleup, L. (1945). Présence d'une race brachyptère et de forte taille de Trechus obtusus Erick. (Coleoptera carabidae) dans la grotte de Han. Bull. Soc. Entomol. Belg., 81, pp. 229–31.Google Scholar
Leruth, R. (1939). La biologie du domaine souterrain et la faune cavernicole de Belgique. Mém. Musée Roy. Hist. Nat. Belg., 87, 507 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
O'Connor, J. (1974). Ecological basis for conservation. In Conservation Practice (Eds Warren, A. & Goldsmith, F.B.). John Wiley & Sons, London, England, UK: xi + 512 pp. illustr. [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
O'Hanlon, P.W. & Sinden, J.A. (1978). Scope for valuation of environmental goods: comment. Land Economics, 54. pp. 381–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pendse, D. & Wyckoff, J.B. (1974 a). Scope for valuation of environmental goods. Land Economics, 50, pp. 89–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pendse, D. & Wyckoff, J.B. (1974 b). Environmental goods: determination of preferences and trade-off values. J. Leisure Res., 6, pp. 64–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tercafs, R. (1985). Une banque de données informatisées des milieux karstiques de Belgique. Ann. Soc. Géol. Belg., 108, pp. 137–40.Google Scholar
Tercafs, R. (1987). La conservation de la faune cavernicole: apport de la simulation, aspects écologiques. Ann. Soc. Roy. Zool. Belg., 117, pp. 3–14.Google Scholar
Thinès, G. & Tercafs, R. (1972). Atlas de la Vie Souterraine: Les Animaux Cavernicoles. A. de Visscher, Bruxelles, Belgium, and Boubée, Paris, France: 160 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Vandenbroeck, E., Martel, E. & Rahir, E. (1910). Les Cavernes et les Rivières Souterraines de la Belgique. Lamertin, Bruxelles, Belgium: 1592 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Vandersleyen, P. (1970). Atlas des Grottes de Belgique, 3 parties. P. Vandersleyen, Bruxelles, Belgium: 45 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Vendrix, J. (1961). Un Triclade nouveau pour la faune beige: Existence de Phagocata vitta (Dugès) Hyman dans le domaine souterrain. Ann. Lab. Souter. Han-sur-Lesse, 2, pp. 11–5.Google Scholar
Washburne, R.F. (1981). Carrying capacity assessment and recreational use in the National Wilderness Preservation System. Soil Water Conser., 36, pp. 162–6.Google Scholar