Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T06:22:28.906Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

On the Quality and Some Ecological Effects of Wastewater Effluents from Two Chemical Industrial Plants in Pakistan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Khalid Hamid Sheikh  and
Saeed Ahmad
Khalid Hamid Sheikh
Affiliation:
Professor, Department of Botany, University of the Punjab, New Campus, Lahore, Pakistan; Honorary Administrator, World Wildlife Fund Pakistan, P.O. Box 1312, Lahore, Pakistan
Saeed Ahmad
Affiliation:
Research Assistant, Department of Botany, University of the Punjab, New Campus, Lahore, Pakistan.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Four samples of water were taken for analysis from Kala Shah Kaku Industrial Estate, near Lahore, Pakistan. These were:

I) ‘Pure’ water of the channel Dek Nullah,

II) Wastewater of Ravi Rayon Limited,

III) Wastewater of Ittehad Chemicals, and

IV) Dek Nullah ‘polluted’ water after the discharge into it of wastewater from two industries, namely Ravi Rayon Limited and Ittehad Chemicals.

The analysis of these waters showed that sample I was the best in quality (medium-salinity and low-sodium water: C2-S1), sample II was of the quality class C3-S1 (high-salinity and low-sodium water), sample III was found to be of the poorest quality (very-high-salinity and very-high-sodium water: C4-S4), while sample IV was of relatively bad quality (high-salinity and mediumsodium water: C3-S2). Only the wastewater of Ittehad Chemicals had some sediment in it, the qualitative analysis of which showed the presence of oxalates, sodium, iron, and magnesium.

The study of planktonic biota in Dek Nullah ‘pure’ and ‘polluted’ waters showed that they were more diverse in the former than in the latter; indeed, unless Bacteria are classed as fauna, there was no representative of these last in the ‘polluted’ water.

The industrial wastewater effluents are being discharged into Dek Nullah, and this ‘polluted’ water is being used for irrigation by the farmers operating along its downstream course. The effects of this water on Rice germination were studied, and it was found that such germination was significantly greater in Dek Nullah ‘pure’ water than in its ‘polluted’ water.

Dek Nullah ‘polluted’ water may deteriorate further with time, as more and more wastes are added to it, and it may have deleterious effects on soils when used for irrigation purposes—causing salinity and sodicity problems unless proper management techniques are adopted.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 8 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1981 , pp. 229 - 234
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1981

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

American Public Health Association (1976). Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater (14th edn). American Public Health Association, Washington, DC: xxxix + 1193 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Ayers, A. D. & Hayward, H. E. (1948). A method for measuring the effects of soil salinity on seed germination with observations on several crop-plants. Proc. Soil Sci. Soc.Amer., 13, pp. 224'6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ayers, R. S. & Westcot, D. W. (1976). Water Quality for Agriculture. Irrigation and Drainage Paper 29, FAO, Rome, Italy: xiii + 97 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Ayers, A. D., Brown, J. W. & Wadleigh, C. H. (1952). Salt tolerance of barley and wheat in soil plots receiving several salinization régimes. Agron. J., 44, pp. 307–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aziz, J. A. & Sheikh, M. I. (1974). Biological Treatment of a Local Paper-mill Waste. Report No. 004-04-74, Institute of Public Health Engineering and Research, University of Engineering and Technology, Lahore: 6 pp., (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Dewey, D. R. (1960). Salt tolerance of twenty-five strains of Agropyron. Agron. J., 52, pp. 631–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
El-Zahab, A. A. A. (1971). Salt tolerance of eight Egyptian cotton varieties, I: At germination stage. Z. Acker und Pflanzenbau, 133, pp. 299–307.Google Scholar
George, L. Y. & Williams, W. A. (1964). Germination and respiration of Barley, Strawberry Clover and Ladino Clover seeds in salt solutions. Crop Sci., 4, pp. 450–2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, H. E. & Bernstein, L. (1958). Plant growth relationship on salt-affected soils. Bot. Rev., 24, pp. 548–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hayward, H. E. & Wadleigh, C. H. (1949). Plant growth on saline and alkali soils. Advan. Agron., 1, pp. 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Khan, S. S. & Sheikh, K. H. (1976). Effects of different levels of salinity on seed germination and growth of Capsicum annuum L. Biologia, 22, pp. 15–25.Google Scholar
Painter, H. A. (1971). Chemical, physical and biological characteristics of wastes and waste effluents. Pp. 329–60 in Water and Water Pollution Handbook Vol. 1 (Ed. Ciaccio, L. L.). Marcel Dekker, New York, NY: xix + 449 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Rainwater, F. H. & Thatcher, L. L. (1960). Methods for Collection and Analysis of Water Samples. U.S. Geological Survey, Water-supply Paper No. 1454, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC: ix + 301 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Rhoades, J. D. & Bernstein, L. (1971). Chemical, physical and biological characteristics of irrigation and soil water. Pp. 141–222 in Water and Water Pollution Handbook Vol. 1 (Ed. Ciaccio, L. L.). Marcel Dekker, New York, NY: xix + 449 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Scarpino, P. V. (1971). Bacterial and viral analysis of water and wastewater. Pp. 639–751 in Water and Water Pollution Handbook Vol. 2 (Ed. Ciaccio, L. L.). Marcel Dekker, New York, NY: ix + 800 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Sheikh, K. H. & Irshad, M. (1980). Wastewater effluents from a tannery: their effects on soil and vegetation in Pakistan. Environmental Conservation, 7(4), pp. 319–24, 2 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S.D.A. (1954). Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils. Agriculture Handbook No. 60, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington, DC: vii + 160 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Vogel, A. I. (1957). A Textbook of Macro and Semimicro Qualitative Inorganic Analysis (4th edn.). Longmans, Green, London, England, UK: xv + 663 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Wilhm, J. F. (1975). Biological indicators of pollution. Pp. 375–400 in River Ecology (Ed. Whitton, B. A.). Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford, England, UK: x + 725 pp., illustr.Google Scholar