Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-05T16:10:07.621Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Obstacles to Effective Management of Conflicts Between National Parks and Surrounding Human Communities in Developing Countries

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

John L. Hough
John L. Hough
Affiliation:
Visiting Lecturer, Wildland Management Center, School of Natural Resources, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109, USA.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Conflicts between national parks and their surrounding human communities are apparently disfunctional for both. Both groups would appear to have incentives to resolve or at least reduce these conflicts. A major difficulty is the achievement of ready communication and trust between the powerful urban-based park authorities and the rural, possibly illiterate, local human populations who may have suffered at the hands of the park authorities in the past. Because of their greater power, the national park authorities are in the best position to take the first steps towards establishing trust—by making some positive concessions, and binding themselves in some way to real, rather than token, local participation in decision-making.

Local elected officials with responsibilities both to their local electorate and to the objectives of central government, might be suitable agents for bringing the various parties together. When once effective communication is established, the early identification of areas of common interest, and positive actions to promote these, will continue the trust-building process and enable more difficult issues to be addressed. The identification, in advance, of options or alternatives that appear to be mutually beneficial, ‘positive sum’ solutions, will facilitate this and provide incentives for the initial participation of all parties.

This approach to protected areas management will require new skills and training for park staff—in social and political as well as biological skills. It will also require a shift in the ruling paradigm of protected areas. The concept of national parks as inviolate havens of untouched Nature, controlled by an all-powerful central government agency, will have to give way to concepts of conservation through careful manipulation to achieve both conservation and local human development objectives. Although this approach is being hailed by conservation leaders through such worthy devices as Biosphere Reserves (Batisse, 1982), these concepts do not yet seem to have the international status that is required for their extensive adoption, nor do they necessarily build conflict-management processes into the management regime.

The approach suggested above is not without risk both to park authorities and to the local human communities; but clarification of both conservation and development objectives should reduce such a risk and help to identify the information and analytical needs for working towards a mutually beneficial solution.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 15 , Issue 2 , Summer 1988 , pp. 129 - 136
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bacow, L.S. & Wheeler, M.W. (1984). Environmental Dispute Resolution. Plenum Press, New York, NY, USA: xv + 372 pp., illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batcher, M.S. (1984). Partnerships for protection. National Parks, 58 (9/10), p. 25.Google Scholar
Batisse, M. (1982). The Biosphere Reserve: A tool for environmental conservation and management. Environmental Conservation, 9(2), pp. 101–11, 8 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bell, R.H.V. & McShane-Caluzi, E. (Eds) (1986). Conservation and Wildlife Management in Africa. US Peace Corps, Washington, DC, USA: xxiv + 646 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Berwick, S. (Ed.) (1984). A Demonstration of Systems Analysis for Development Planning. International Institute for Environment and Development, Washington, DC, USA: ii + 137 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Bidol, P. & Crowfoot, J. (in press). Toward an interactive process for siting national parks in developing nations. In P.C. West & S. Brechin (Eds), q.v.Google Scholar
Bowonder, B. (1983). Environmental management conflicts in developing countries: An analysis. Environmental Management, 7(3), pp. 211–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brownrigg, L.A. (1985). Native cultures and protected areas: Management options. Pp. 33–44 in Culture and Conservation: The Human Dimension in Environmental Planning (J.A. McNeely & D. Pitt). Croom Helm, Dover, New Hampshire, USA: xi + 308 pp.Google Scholar
Bunting, B.W. & Wright, R.M. (1986). Annapurna National Park: The Nepal action plan for joining human values and conservation of a mountain ecosystem. Pp. 63–9 –in People and Protected Areas in the Hindu Kush-Himalaya (Eds McNeely, J.A., Thorsell, J.W. & Chalise, S.R.). King Mahendra Trust for Nature Conservation & International Centre for Integrated Mountain Development, Kathmandu, Nepal: iii + 186 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Calhoun, J.B. (1972). Plight of the Ik and Kaiadilt is seen as a chilling possible end for Man. Smithsonian, 3(8), pp. 26–33, illustr.Google Scholar
Callimanopulos, D. (Ed.) (1982). The tourist trap: Who's getting caught? Cultural Survival Quarterly, 6(3), pp. 3–35, illustr.Google Scholar
Carpenter, S. & Kennedy, W.J.D. (1985). Managing environmental conflict by applying common sense. Negotiation Journal, 1(2), pp. 62–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chambers, R. (1983). Rural Development: Putting the Last First. Longman, New York, NY, USA: 246 pp.Google Scholar
Child, B. (1984). Managing wildlife for people in Zimbabwe. Pp. 118–23 in McNeely & Miller, q.v.Google Scholar
Croft, T.A. (1981). Lake Malawi National Park: A case study in conservation planning, Parks, 6(3), pp. 7–11, illustr.Google Scholar
Dandekar, H. & Feldt, A. (1984). Simulation/Gaming in Third World Development Planning. Simulation & Games, 15(3), pp. 297–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Deihl, C. (1985). Wildlife and the Maasai. Cultural Survival Quarterly, 9(1), pp. 37–40, illustr.Google Scholar
Eidsvik, H.K. (1985). Biosphere Reserves in concept and practise. Pp. 8–19 in Proceedings of the Conference on the Management of Biosphere Reserves, November 27–29. 1984 (Ed. J.D. Peine). Uplands Field Research Laboratory, Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Gatlinburg, Tennessee, USA: 207 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Eidsvik, H.K. (1987). Categories Revision: A Review and a Proposal (Draft). IUCN-CNPPA, Gland, Switzerland: 20 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Fisher, R. & Ury, W. (1981). Getting to Yes: How To Negotiate Without Giving In. Houghton Mifflin, Boston, Massachusetts, USA: xiii + 133 pp.Google Scholar
Frankel, O.H. & Soule, M.E. (1981). Conservation and Evolution. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, UK: viii + 327 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Freeman, D.H. (1972). Politics and planning and the problem of public confidence: A sociology of conflict approach. Proceedings of the Society of American Foresters National Convention 1972. [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
Gilpin, M.E. & Soule, M.E. (1986). Minimum viable populations: Processes of species extinction. Pp. 19–34 in Soule (1986), q.v.Google Scholar
Glick, D. & Betancourt, J. (1983). The Rio Platano Biosphere Reserve: Unique resource, unique alternative. Ambio, 12 (3/4), pp. 168–73, illustr.Google Scholar
Goldstein, S. (1986). Cultural Issues in Mediation—A Literature Review. PCR Working Paper 1986–1, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii, USA: 44 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Halffter, G. (1981). The Mapimi Biosphere Reserve: Local participation in conservation and development. Ambio, 10 (2/3), pp. 93–6, illustr.Google Scholar
Harroy, J.-P. (1968). The development of the national park movement. Pp. 17–34 in The Canadian National Parks: Today and Tomorrow (Eds Nelson, J.C. & Scace, R.C.). Studies in Land Use History and Landscape Change, National Park Series No. 3, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada: vii + 1027 pp., illustr. (2 vols).Google Scholar
Hill, M. (1983). Kakadu National Park and the aboriginals: Partners in protection. Ambio, 12(3/4), pp. 158–67, illustr.Google Scholar
Hough, J.L. (1984). An approach to an integrated land use system on Michiru Mountain, Malawi. Parks, 9(3/4), pp. 1–3, illustr.Google Scholar
Hough, J.L. (1986 a). A Framework for Valuing Wildlands in the Miombo Woodland Biome of Southern Africa. Unpublished MS thesis, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA: 160 pp. + maps (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Hough, J.L. (1986 b). Management alternatives for increasing dry season base flow in the Miombo woodlands of Southern Africa. Ambio, 15(6), pp. 341–6, illustr.Google Scholar
Hough, J.L. (MS.). Indigenous People and the Grand Canyon National Park: A Case Study for the 21st International Park Seminar. School of Natural Resources, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA: 19 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Hough, J.L. (in press). Social impact assessment: its role in protected area planning and management. In West & Brechin, q.v.Google Scholar
IUCN-CNPPA (1984). Categories, objectives and criteria for protected areas. Pp. 47–53 in McNeely & Miller, q.v.Google Scholar
Lusigi, W. J. (1981). New approaches to wildlife conservation in Kenya. Ambio, 10(2/3), pp. 87–92, illustr.Google Scholar
Lusigi, W. J. (1984). Future directions for the Afrotropical Realm. Pp. 37–146 in McNeely & Miller, q.v.Google Scholar
McCloskey, M. (1984). Wilderness and the World Conservation Establishment. Paper in Northwest Wilderness Conference, Sierra Club, Washington, DC, USA: 9 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
MacKinnon, J. & , K., Child, G. & Thorsell, J. (1986). Managing Protected Areas in the Tropics. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland: xvi + 295 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
McNeely, J.A. (1984). Protected areas are adapting to new realities. Pp. 1–7 in McNeely & Miller, q.v.Google Scholar
McNeely, J.A. (1986). Protected Areas and Human Ecology: How National Parks can Contribute to Sustaining Societies of the 22nd Century. 12 pp. Manuscript for Conservation 2100 Conference.Google Scholar
McNeely, J.A. & Miller, K.R. (Eds) (1984). National Parks, Conservation and Development: The Role of Protected Areas in Sustaining Society. Smithsonian Institution, Washington, DC, USA: xiii + 825 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Manring, N., West, P.C. & Bidol, P. (1986). Social Impact Assessment and Environmental Conflict Management: The Potential for Integration and Applications in Forest Dependent Communities. School of Natural Resources, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA: 22 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Marcus, P.A. (1981). A procedure for assessing environmental disputes. Pp. 34–47 in Environmental Conflict Working Papers (Eds Marcus, P.A. & Emerich, W.M.). American Arbitration Association & Clark McGlennon Inc., New York, NY, USA: vii + 66 pp.Google Scholar
Mascarenhas, A. (1983). Ngorongoro: A challenge to conservation and development. Ambio, 12(3/4), pp. 146–52, illustr.Google Scholar
Miller, K.R. (1982). Planning National Parks for Ecodevelopment. School of Natural Resources, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA: 624 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Mishra, H.R. (1984). A delicate balance: Tigers, rhinoceros, tourists and park management vs. the needs of the local people in Royal Chitwan National Park. Pp. 197–205 in McNeely & Miller, q.v.Google Scholar
Mphande, J.N.B. & Jamusana, H.S. (1986). Culling of Nyala Antelopes in Lengwe National Park, Malawi. Pp. 255–77 in Bell & McShane-Caluzi, q.v.Google Scholar
Peters, R.L. & Darling, J.D.S. (1985). The greenhouse effect and Nature Reserves. BioScience, 35(11), pp. 707–17, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ramakrishna, K. (1985). The emergence of environmental law in the developing countries: A case study of India. Ecology Law Quarterly, 12(4), pp. 707–35.Google Scholar
Raval, S. (in press). The Gir National Park and the Maldharis: Beyond ‘setting’ aside. In West & Brechin, q.v.Google Scholar
Rothman, J. (1974). Planning and Organising for Social Change: Action Principles from Social Science Research. Columbia University Press, New York, NY, USA: 628 pp.Google Scholar
Scott, J.C. (1976). The Moral Economy of the Peasant: Rebellion and Subsistence in Southeast Asia. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut, USA: 246 pp.Google Scholar
Sherpa, M.N. (1987). People, Park Problems and Challenges in the Annapurna Conservation Area in Nepal. Paper to International Symposium on Protected Landscapes, Grange-over-Sands, England, UK: 23 pp. (typescr.).Google Scholar
Soule, M.E. (Ed.) (1986). Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity. Sinauer, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA: xiii + 584 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Sue, D.W. (1986). Quoted in Goldstein, q.v.Google Scholar
Susskind, L. & Weinstein, A. (1980). Towards a theory of environmental dispute resolution. Environmental Affairs, 9(31), pp. 311–37.Google Scholar
Swem, T.R. & Cahn, R. (1984). The politics of parks in Alaska: Innovative planning and management approaches for new protected areas. Pp. 518–23 in McNeely & Miller, q.v.Google Scholar
Thorsell, J.W. (1984). Managing Protected Areas in Eastern Africa: A Training Manual. College of African Wildlife Management, Mweka, Tanzania: 105 pp.Google Scholar
West, P.C. & Brechin, S. (Eds) (in press). Resident Populations and National Parks in Developing Nations: Interdisciplinary Perspectives and Policy Implications. University of Arizona Press, Tucson, Arizona, USA.Google Scholar
Western, D. (1984). Amboseli National Park: Human values and the conservation of a Savannah ecosystem. Pp. 93–100 in McNeely & Miller, q.v.Google Scholar