Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T09:13:17.174Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Land-use Conflicts with Natural Vegetation in the United States

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Jeffrey M. Klopatek ,
Richard J. Olson ,
Craig J. Emerson  and
Jan L. Joness
Jeffrey M. Klopatek
Affiliation:
Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, U.S.A.
Richard J. Olson
Affiliation:
Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, U.S.A.
Craig J. Emerson
Affiliation:
Computer Sciences Division, Union Carbide Corporation Nuclear Division, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830, U.S.A.
Jan L. Joness
Affiliation:
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, Virginia 22904, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

There exists no current inventory of how much of the United States is occupied by natural vegetation, nor how much area is covered by particular plant communities. In this study, the potential existing vegetation-cover of the United States was determined by using a computer algorithm that was developed to subtract extant landuse data from the potential natural vegetation. This was done on a county-by-county basis for the 48 conterminous States.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 6 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1979 , pp. 191 - 199
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1979

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Austin, M. E. (1965). Land Resource Regions and Major Land Areas of the United States. USDA Soil Conserv. Serv. Agric. Handbook No. 296. 82 pp.Google Scholar
Barr, A. J., Goodnight, J. H., Sall, J. P. & Helwig, J. I. (1976). A User's Guide to SAS 76. Sas Institute, Sparks Press, Raleigh, North Carolina: 329 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Burgess, R. L. (1965). Potential vegetation of the United States [Book review]. Ecology, 46, pp. 568–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Darnell, R. M., Lemon, P. C., Neuhold, J. M. & Ray, G. C. (1974). Natural Areas and Their Role in Land and Water Resource Preservation. Amer. Inst. Biol. Sci., Conservation of Ecosystems Program. Final Report to the National Science Foundation, 286 pp. + Appendix.Google Scholar
Delcourt, H. R. & Delcourt, P. A. (1974). Primeval magnolia-holly—beech climax in Louisiana. Ecology, 55, pp. 638–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delcourt, H. R. & Delcourt, P. A. (1977). Presettlement magnolia-beech climax of the Gulf Coastal Plain: Quantitative evidence from the Apalachicola river bluffs, northcentral Florida. Ecology, 58, pp. 1085–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dideriksen, R. I., Hidlebaugh, A. R. & Schmude, K. O. (1977). Potential Cropland Study. USDA Soil Conservation Service Statistical Bull. No. 578, 104 pp.Google Scholar
Forest-Range Task Force (1972). The Nation's Range Resources—A Forest-range Environmental Study. USDA Forest Resource Rep. No. 19, 147 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Frey, H. T. (1973). Major Uses of Land in the United States: Summary for 1969. USDA Agric. Econ. Rep. No. 27, 42 pp.Google Scholar
Garrison, G. A., Bjugstad, G. A., Duncan, D. A., Lewis, M. E. & Smith, D. R. (1977). Vegetation and Environmental Features of Forest and Range Ecosystems. USDA Forest Service, Agric. Handbook No. 475, 68 pp., illustr. + map.Google Scholar
Hamlin, C. L. & Goodenough, W. H. (1978). Archiving remotely-sensed data. Science, 202, p. 9.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kaul, R. B. (1975). Vegetation of Nebraska (circa 1850). Conservation and Survey Division, Inst. Agric. Nat. Res., The University of Nebraska-Lincoln, Lincoln, Nebraska: map.Google Scholar
Klopatek, J. M., Kitchings, J. T., Kumar, K. D. & Olson, R. J. (in press). An Ecological Analysis of the U.S. Forest Service's RARE-II Sites. ORNL/TM-6813. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee.Google Scholar
Küchler, A. W. (1964). Manual to Accompany the Map—Potential Natural Vegetation of the Conterminous United States. Amer. Geogr. Soc. Spec. Pub. No. 36, 39 pp. + Appendix.Google Scholar
Lindsey, A. A. (1968). Role of the individual ecologist in natural area preservation. BioScience, 18, pp. 421–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Long, R. W. (1974). Future of rangelands in the United States. J. Range Manage. 27, pp. 253–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marschner, F. J. (1974). The Original Vegetation of Minnesota. North-Central Forest Experiment Station, Forest Service, USDA, St. Paul, Minnesota: map.Google Scholar
North-Central Regional Technical Committee (1960). Soils of the North-central Region of the United States. North-Central Regional Publ. No. 76, Univ. of Wis. Agric. Exp. Station Bull. No. 544, Madison, Wisconsin: 192 pp., illustr. + map.Google Scholar
Odum, E. P. (1970). Optimum population and environment: A Georgia microcosm. Current History, 58, pp. 355–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Odum, E. P. & Odum, H. T. (1972). Natural areas and necessary components of Man's total environment. Pp. 178–89, in 37th N. Amer. Wildl. Res. Conf. Wildl. Manage. Inst., Washington, D.C.: 348 pp.Google Scholar
Olson, R. J. & Strand, R. H. (1978). Management of diverse environmental data with SAS. Proc. 3rd Annu. Conf. SAS User's Group International, Las Vegas, Nevada, 30 01–1 02 1978: 320 pp.Google Scholar
Romancier, R. M. (1974). Natural area programs. J. For., 72, pp. 37–42.Google Scholar
Tie [The Institute of Ecology] (1972). Man and the Living Environment. University of Wisconsin Press, Madison, Wisconsin: 261 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
USDA [U.S. Department of Agriculture] (1971). National Inventory of Soil and Water Conservation Needs, 1967. USDA Soil Conservation Service Stat. Bull. No. 461, 211 pp.Google Scholar
USFS (U.S. Forest Service) (1972). Aspen: Symposium Proceedings. USDA Forest Service Gen. Tech. Rep. NC-1. North-Central For. Exp. Sta., St Paul, Minnesota, 154 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
USFS (U.S. Forest Service) (1973). The Outlook for Timber in the United States. USDA Forest Resource Rep. No. 20, 367 pp.Google Scholar
USFS (U.S. Forest Service) (1978). RARE-II: Draft Environmental Statement. Roadless Area Review and Evaluation. USDA Forest Service, 06 1978, 112 pp., illustr. + 2 maps.Google Scholar
USGS (U.S. Geological Survey) (1970). Potential natural vegetation of the United States (map). Pp. 89–92 in The National Atlas of the United States of America. USGS, Washington, D.C.:417 pp., illustr.Google Scholar