Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T09:38:19.244Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Integrating conservation and socioeconomic development: the potential of community nurseries in Mexican protected areas

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 August 2019

Adriana L Luna-Nieves ,
Eduardo García-Frapolli ,
Consuelo Bonfil ,
Jorge A Meave  and
Guillermo Ibarra-Manríquez Open the ORCID record for Guillermo Ibarra-Manríquez [Opens in a new window]
Adriana L Luna-Nieves
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Antigua Carretera a Pátzcuaro 8701, Col. Ex Hacienda de San José de La Huerta, C.P. 58190, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico Departamento de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Coyoacán 04510, Ciudad de México, Mexico
Eduardo García-Frapolli
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Antigua Carretera a Pátzcuaro 8701, Col. Ex Hacienda de San José de La Huerta, C.P. 58190, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico
Consuelo Bonfil
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Coyoacán 04510, Ciudad de México, Mexico
Jorge A Meave
Affiliation:
Departamento de Ecología y Recursos Naturales, Facultad de Ciencias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Coyoacán 04510, Ciudad de México, Mexico
Guillermo Ibarra-Manríquez*
Affiliation:
Instituto de Investigaciones en Ecosistemas y Sustentabilidad, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Antigua Carretera a Pátzcuaro 8701, Col. Ex Hacienda de San José de La Huerta, C.P. 58190, Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Guillermo Ibarra-Manríquez, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Community nurseries within natural protected areas (NPAs) represent an attractive option to link biodiversity conservation with socioeconomic development, yet their functioning lacks proper assessment. Here, we analyse the national context of community nurseries in Mexican NPAs and suggest a specific framework to evaluate their viability. First, we examine the impact of a major governmental funding programme on these projects. Next, we conduct a case study in a focal nursery to identify challenges faced by its operation. Despite the large number of community nurseries funded by the programme, current performance indicators are not suitable to assess their viability. In turn, the case study reveals this nursery’s partial success, with a clear contribution to social development but a limited impact on economic improvement and vegetation conservation. Regardless of the characteristics of individual community nurseries, we suggest a framework that is potentially useful for evaluating community nursery viability, which enables agencies to detect problems, find solutions and use resources efficiently, while balancing biodiversity conservation and development.

Keywords

community enterprisesICDPsocioeconomic developmenttropical dry forestviability indicators
Type
Research Paper
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 46 , Issue 4: Thematic Section: Bringing Species and Ecosystems Together with Remote Sensing Tools to Develop New Biodiversity Metrics and Indicators , December 2019 , pp. 310 - 317
Copyright
© Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2019 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adams, WM, Aveling, R, Brockington, D, Dickson, B, Elliott, J, Hutton, J, Roe, D et al. (2004) Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science 306: 1146–1149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Adriansen, HK (2012) Timeline interviews: a tool for conducting life history research. Qualitative Studies 3: 40–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Agol, D, Latawiec, AE, Strassburg, BBN (2014) Evaluating impacts of development and conservation projects using sustainability indicators: opportunities and challenges. Environmental Impact and Assessment Review 48: 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barrett, CB, Arcese, P (1995) Are integrated conservation-development projects (ICDPs) sustainable? On the conservation of large mammals in Sub-Saharan Africa. World Development 23: 1073–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bauch, SC, Sills, EO, Pattanayak, SK (2014) Have we managed to integrate conservation and development? ICDP impacts in the Brazilian Amazon. World Development 64: S135–S148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhringer, A, Ayuk, ET (2003) Farmer nurseries as a catalyst for developing sustainable land use systems in southern Africa. Part B: support systems, early impact and policy issues. Agricultural Systems 77: 203–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Böhringer, A, Ayuk, ET, Katanga, R, Ruvuga, S (2003) Farmer nurseries as a catalyst for developing sustainable land use systems in southern Africa. Part A: nursery productivity and organization. Agricultural Systems 77: 187–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonfil, C, Trejo, I (2010) Plant propagation and the ecological restoration of Mexican tropical deciduous forest. Ecological Restoration 28: 369–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Botha, J, Witkowski, ETF, Cock, J (2006) The South African experience of conservation and social forestry outreach nurseries. Environmental Management 38: 733–749.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brockington, D, Igoe, J, Schmidt-Soltau, K (2006) Conservation, human rights, and poverty reduction. Conservation Biology 20: 250–252.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, J, Waylen, KA, Borgerhoff, M (2012) How national context, project design, and local community characteristics influence success in community-based conservation projects. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 52: 21265–21270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bruner, AG, Gullison, RE, Rice, RE, da Fonseca, GAB (2001) Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science 291: 125–128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Chapela-Mendoza, FJ (2013) Economía de la conservación comunitaria: El aporte de los programas integrados de conservación y desarrollo al resguardo efectivo del patrimonio natural de México . PhD dissertation, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.Google Scholar
Claridge, T (2004) Designing Social Capital Sensitive Participation Methodologies. Social Capital Research White Paper . Dunedin, New Zealand: Social Capital Research.Google Scholar
CONANP (Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas ) (2007) Memoria de la Consulta Pública de la Reserva de la Biosfera Zicuirán-Infiernillo, en el estado de Michoacán . Mexico City, Mexico: Comisión Nacional de Áreas Naturales Protegidas.Google Scholar
CONEVAL (Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo ) (2013) Ficha de Monitoreo del Programa para la Conservación y el Desarrollo (PROCODES) . Mexico City, Mexico: Consejo Nacional de Evaluación de la Política de Desarrollo.Google Scholar
Folke, C, Carpenter, S, Elmqvist, T, Gunderson, L, Holling, CS, Walker, B (2002) Resilience and sustainable development: building and adaptive capacity in a world of transformations. Ambio 5: 437–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Garnett, ST, Sayer, J, du Toit, JT (2007) Improving the effectiveness of interventions to balance conservation and development: a conceptual framework. Ecology and Society 12: 2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gurney, GG, Cinner, J, Ban, NC, Pressey, RL, Pollnac, R, Campbell, SJ, Tasidjawa, S, Setiawan, F (2014) Poverty and protected areas: an evaluation of a marine integrated conservation and development project in Indonesia. Global Environmental Change 26: 98–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía ) (2010) Censo de población y vivienda. Información de interés nacional . Aguascalientes, Mexico: Instituto Nacional de Estadística y Geografía.Google Scholar
Jagawat, H, Verma, DPS (1989) Nurseries in Gujarat, North India: Two Views. Rural Development Forestry Network Paper 9d . London, UK: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Kapos, V, Balmford, A, Aveling, R, Bubb, P, Carey, P, Entwistle, A, Hopkins, J et al. (2008) Calibrating conservation: new tools for measuring success. Conservation Letters 1: 155–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kieffer, M, Burgos, A (2015) Productive identities and community conditions for rural tourism in Mexican tropical dry lands. Tourism Geographies 17: 561–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kremen, C, Merenlender, AM, Murphy, DD (1994) Ecological monitoring: a vital need for integrated conservation and development programs in the tropics. Conservation Biology 8: 388–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leakey, RRB (2018) Converting ‘trade-offs’ into ‘trade-ons’ for greatly enhanced food security in Africa: multiple environmental, economic and social benefits from ‘socially modified crops’. Food Security 10: 505–524.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Luna-Nieves, AL, Meave, JA, Morellato, LP, Ibarra-Manríquez, G (2017) Reproductive phenology of useful Seasonally Dry Tropical Forest trees: guiding patterns for seed collection and plant propagation in nurseries. Forest Ecology and Management 393: 52–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Manfre, C, Rubin, D (2012) Integrating Gender into Forestry Research: A Guide for CIFOR Scientists and Programme Administrators . Bogor, Indonesia: Center for International Forestry Research.Google Scholar
Margoluis, R, Salafsky, N (1998) Measures of Success: Designing, Managing, and Monitoring Conservation and Development Projects . Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
McShane, TO, Hirsch, PD, Trung, TC, Songorwa, AN, Kinzig, A, Monteferri, B, Mutekanga, D et al. (2011) Hard choices: making trade-offs between biodiversity conservation and human well-being. Biological Conservation 144: 966–972.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Melo Gallegos, C (2002) Áreas Naturales Protegidas de México en el Siglo XX . Mexico City, Mexico: Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.Google Scholar
Mistry, J, Berardi, A, Simpon, M, Davis, O, Haynes, L (2010) Using a systems viability approach to evaluate integrated conservation and development projects: assessing the impact of the North Rupununi Adaptive Management Process, Guyana. The Geographical Journal 176: 241–252.Google Scholar
Murgueitio, E, Calle, Z, Uribe, F, Calle, A, Solorio, B (2011) Native trees and shrubs for the productive rehabilitation of tropical cattle ranching lands. Forest Ecology and Management 261: 1654–1663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naughton-Treves, L, Holland, MB, Brandon, K (2005) The role of protected areas in conserving biodiversity and sustaining local livelihoods. Annual Review of Environmental Resources 30: 219–252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Newmark, WD, Hough, JL (2000) Conserving wildlife in Africa: integrated conservation and development projects and beyond: because multiple factors hinder integrated conservation and development projects in Africa from achieving their objectives, alternative and complementary approaches for promoting wildlife conservation must be actively explored. Bioscience 50: 585–592.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Orozco-Quintero, A, Davidson-Hunt, I (2010) Community-based enterprises and the commons: the case of San Juan Nuevo Parangaricutiro, Mexico. International Journal of the Commons 4: 8–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Porter-Bolland, L, Ellis, EA, Guariguata, MR, Ruiz-Mallén, I, Negrete-Yankelevich, S, Reyes-García, V (2012) Community managed forests and forest protected areas: an assessment of their conservation effectiveness across the tropics. Forest Ecology and Management 268: 6–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pulido, MT, Cuevas-Cardona, C (2013) Cactus nurseries and conservation in a Biosphere Reserve in Mexico. Ethnobiology Letters 4: 96–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rodríguez-Jiménez, C, Fernández-Nava, R, Arreguín-Sánchez, M, Rodríguez-Jiménez, A (2005) Plantas vasculares endémicas de la cuenca del río Balsas, México. Polibotánica 20: 73–99.Google Scholar
Roe, D (2008) The origins and evolution of the conservation-poverty debate: a review of key literature, events and policy processes. Oryx 42: 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Salafsky, N, Cauley, H, Balachander, G, Cordes, B, Parks, J, Margoluis, C, Bhatt, S et al. (2001) A systematic test of an enterprise strategy for community-based biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology 15: 1585–1595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shanks, E, Carter, J (1994) The Organization of Small-Scale Tree Nurseries. Studies from Asia, Africa and Latin America . London, UK: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Stocking, M, Perkin, S (1992) Conservation with development: an application of the concept in the Usambara Mountains, Tanzania. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, New Series 17: 337–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vovides, AP, Pérez-Farrera, MA, Iglesias, C (2010) Cycad propagation by rural nurseries in Mexico as an alternative conservation strategy: 20 years on. Kew Bulletin 65: 603–611.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waylen, K, Fischer, A, McGowan, PJK, Thirgood, SJ, Milner-Gulland, EJ (2009) Effect of local cultural context on the success of community-based conservation interventions. Conservation Biology 24: 1119–1129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wells, MP, McShane, TO (2004) Integrating protected area management with local needs and aspirations. Ambio 33: 513–519.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wells, MP, McShane, TO, Dublin, HT, O’Connor, S, Redford, KH (2004) The future of integrated conservation and development projects: building on what works. In: Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work: Towards More Effective Conservation and Development , eds. Wells, MP, McShane, TO, pp. 397–421. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Luna-Nieves et al. supplementary material

Table S2

Download Luna-Nieves et al. supplementary material(File)
File 19.5 KB
Supplementary material: File

Luna-Nieves et al. supplementary material

Table S1

Download Luna-Nieves et al. supplementary material(File)
File 23.6 KB