Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T10:06:00.319Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Institutional choice and local legitimacy in community-based forest management: lessons from Cameroon

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  12 August 2010

H. CAROLYN PEACH BROWN  and
JAMES P. LASSOIE
H. CAROLYN PEACH BROWN*
Affiliation:
Environmental Studies, University of Prince Edward Island, Charlottetown, PEI, CanadaC1A 4P3
JAMES P. LASSOIE
Affiliation:
Department of Natural Resources, College of Agricultural and Life Sciences, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA
*
*Correspondence: Dr H. Carolyn Peach Brown e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Decentralization of forest management has become a common policy globally which has allowed communities to regain rights removed through colonization and central state management of forests. However, socioeconomic and environmental outcomes of such community-based forest management schemes have been mixed. Studies have shown the importance of institutions in influencing the success of these new governance arrangements. Based on an extensive literature review supplemented by qualitative research, using focus groups and semi-structured interviews, conducted in nine villages in the humid forest zone comprising three community forests, this research investigated the successes and challenges from decentralization of forest management in Cameroon. A key constraint on success was the inappropriate institutional structure at the local level with responsibility to manage community forests. Community forest management committees with no internally recognized legitimacy and dominated by local elites had replaced roles once played by traditional authorities. Qualitative research showed that in the humid forest zone of Cameroon, the system of accountability for forest resources, prior to the enactment of community forest legislation, included those with historical traditional cultural authority, in the form of clan or lineage heads, as well as the village chief, a legacy of colonial power. Village chiefs or other members of the village council are also selected on the basis of their good moral character. Community forest management committees that are a hybrid of customary authorities and other representatives of the population chosen following the criteria for local legitimacy may capture the best of historical social regulation and build on it so that the local committee may be seen as being accountable to the local population. Since such hybrid institutions are not without their risks, it is important that these institutions be accountable to a local democratic government to further increase their transparency and accountability. Models of community-based natural resource management that incorporate culturally appropriate requirements of legitimacy and accountability in crafting local institutions may have more success in accomplishing both socioeconomic and environmental goals.

Keywords

AfricaCamerooncommunity forestsdecentralizationtraditional authorities
Type
THEMATIC SECTION: Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM): designing the next generation (Part 2)
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 37 , Issue 3: Thematic section. Community-based natural resource management (CBNRM): Designing the next generation (Part 2) , September 2010 , pp. 261 - 269
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2010

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Agrawal, A., Chatre, A. & Hardin, R. (2008) Changing governance of the world's forests. Science 320: 1460–1462.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Akinola, S.R. (2007) Knowledge generation, political action and African development: a polycentric approach. International Journal of African Renaissance Studies - Multi-, Inter- and Transdisciplinarity 2 (2): 217–238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Blaikie, P. (2006) Is small really beautiful? Community-based natural resource management in Malawi and Botswana. World Development 11: 1942–1957.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, D., Malla, Y., Schreckenberg, K. & Springate-Baginski, O. (2002 a) From supervising ‘subjects' to supporting ‘citizens': recent developments in community forestry in Asia and Africa. Natural Resource Perspectives 75: 1–4.Google Scholar
Brown, D., Schreckenberg, K., Shepherd, G. & Wells, A. (2002 b) Forestry as an Entry Point for Governance Reform. ODI Forestry Briefing, Number 1. London, UK: Overseas Development Institute.Google Scholar
Brown, H.C.P. (2005) Governance of non-wood forest products and community forests in the humid forest zone of Cameroon. Ph.D. thesis, Natural Resources, Cornell University, Ithaca, USA.Google Scholar
Brown, H.C.P., Buck, L. & Lassoie, J.P. (2008) Governance and social learning in the management of non-wood forest products in community forests in Cameroon. International Journal of Agricultural Resources, Governance and Ecology 7 (3): 256–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, H.C.P., Wolf, S.A. & Lassoie, J.P. (2007) An analytic approach to structuring co-management of community forests in Cameroon. Progress in Development Studies 7 (2): 135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, B.M., Shackleton, S. & Wollenberg, E. (2003) Overview: institutional arrangements for managing woodlands. In: Policies and Governance Structures in Woodlands of Southern Africa, ed. Kowero, G., Campbell, B.M. & Sumaila, U.R., pp. 9–15. Jakarta, Indonesia: CIFOR.Google Scholar
Cleuren, H. (2001) Paving the Road for Forest Destruction, Key Actors and Driving Forces of Tropical Deforestation in Brazil, Ecuador and Cameroon. Leiden, the Netherlands: CNWS Publications.Google Scholar
Colfer, C.J.P., ed. (2005) The Complex Forest: Communities, Uncertainty, and Adaptive Collaborative Management. Washington, DC, USA: Resources for the Future/CIFOR.Google Scholar
Dangol, S. (2005) Participation and decisionmaking in Nepal. In: The Equitable Forest: Diversity, Community, and Resource Management, ed. Colfer, C.J.P., pp. 54–71. Washington, DC, USA: Resources for the Future.Google Scholar
De Blas, D.E., Ruiz Pérez, M., Sayer, J.A., Lescuyer, G., Nasi, R. & Karsenty, A. (2009) External influences on and conditions for community logging management in Cameroon. World Development 37 (2): 445–456.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Delville, P.L., Toulmin, C., Colin, J.-P. & Chauveau, J.-P. (2002) Negotiating Access to Land in West Africa: A Synthesis of Findings from Research on Derived Rights to Land. London, UK: International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar
Diaw, M.C. (1997) Si, Nda Bot and Ayong: shifting cultivation, land use and property rights in Southern Cameroon. Rural Development Forestry Network 21e: 1–28.Google Scholar
Diaw, M.C. (1998) From sea to forest: an epistemology of otherness and institutional resilience in non conventional economic systems. ‘Crossing Boundaries,’ the seventh annual conference of the International Association for the Study of Common Property, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, June 10–14, 1998 [www document]. URL http://www.indiana.edu/~iascp/Final/diaw.pdfGoogle Scholar
Diaw, M.C., Mekoulou, H.A. & Dikongue, E. (1999) Gestion communautaire des ressources forestières: evolution des concepts et mutations institutionnelles dans la zone de forêt humide du Cameroun. Bulletin Arbres, Forêts et Communautés Rurales 17: 13–23.Google Scholar
Djeumo, A. (2001) The development of community forests in Cameroon: origins, current situation and constraints. Rural Development Forestry Network 25b: 1–16.Google Scholar
Edmunds, D. & Wollenberg, E., eds (2003) Local Forest Management: The Impacts of Devolution Policies. London, UK: Earthscan Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Edmunds, D., Wollenberg, E., Contreras, A.P., Dachang, L., Kelkar, G., Nathan, D., Sarin, M. & Singh, N.M. (2003) Introduction. In: Local Forest Management: The Impacts of Devolution Policies, ed. Edmunds, D. & Wollenberg, E., pp. 1–19. London, UK: Earthscan Publications Ltd.Google Scholar
Ekoko, F. (2000) Balancing politics, economics and conservation: the case of the Cameroon forestry law reform. Development and Change 31: 131–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Etoungou, P. (2003) Decentralization viewed from inside: the implementation of community forests in East Cameroon. In: Environmental Governance in Africa Working Papers, ed. Ribot, J.C., pp. 1–28. Washington, DC, USA: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Gregerson, H., Contreras-Hermosilla, A., White, A. & Phillips, L. (2005) Forest governance in federal systems: an overview of experiences and implications for decentralization. In: The Politics of Decentralization: Forests, Power and People, ed. Colfer, C.J.P. & Capistrano, D., pp. 13–31. London, UK: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Kayambazinthu, D., Matose, F., Kajembe, G. & Nemarundwe, N. (2003) Institutional arrangements governing natural resource management of the miombo woodland. In: Policies and Governance Structures in Woodlands of Southern Africa, ed. Kowero, G., Campbell, B.M. & Sumaila, U.R., pp. 45–64. Jakarta, Indonesia: CIFOR.Google Scholar
Kellert, S.R., Mehta, J.N., Ebbin, S.A. & Lichtenfeld, L.L. (2000) Community natural resource management: promise, rhetoric, and reality. Society and Natural Resources 13: 705–715.Google Scholar
Kyed, H.M. & Buur, L. (2007) Introduction: traditional authority and democratization in Africa. In: State Recognition and Democratization in Sub-Saharan Africa, ed. Buur, L. & Kyed, H.M., pp. 1–28. New York, NY, USA: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
Larson, A.-M. (2002) Natural resources and decentralization in Nicaragua: are local governments up to the job? World Development 30 (1): 17–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Larson, A.M. (2005) Democratic decentralization in the forestry sector: lessons from Africa, Asia and Latin America. In: The Politics of Decentralization: Forests, Power and People, ed. Colfer, C.J.P. & Capistrano, D., pp. 32–62. London, UK: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Larson, A.M. & Ribot, J.C. (2007) The poverty of forestry policy: double standards on an uneven playing field. Sustainability Science 2: 189–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lemos, M.C. & Agrawal, A. (2006) Environmental governance. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 31: 297–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lewis, D. (2002) Civil society in African contexts: reflections on the usefulness of a concept. Development and Change 33 (4): 569–586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mapedza, E. (2007) Traditional authority: accountability and governance in Zimbabwe. In: State Recognition and Democratization in Sub-Saharan Africa, ed. Buur, L. & Kyed, H.M., pp. 183–207. New York, NY, USA: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ministry of Environment and Forests (1998) Manual of the Procedures for the Attribution, and Norms for the Management, of Community Forests. Yaoundé, Cameroon: Government of Cameroon.Google Scholar
Mvondo, S.A. (2006) Decentralized forest resources and access of minorities to environmental justice: an analysis of the case of the Baka in southern Cameroon. International Journal of Environmental Studies 63 (5): 681–689.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, F. & Agrawal, A. (2008) Patronage or participation? Community-based natural resource management reform in Sub-Saharan Africa. Development and Change 39 (4): 557–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (1999) Self-governance and forest resources. CIFOR Occasional Paper 20. Bogor, Indonesia.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyono, P.R. (2004 a) Institutional deficit, representation, and decentralized forest management in Cameroon. In: Environmental Governance in Africa Working Papers, ed. Ribot, J.C., pp. 1–36. Washington, DC, USA: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Oyono, P.R. (2004 b) One step forward, two steps back? Paradoxes of natural resources management decentralisation in Cameroon. Journal of Modern African Studies 42 (1): 91–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyono, P.R. (2004 c) The social and organisational roots of ecological uncertainties in Cameroon's forest management decentralisation model. European Journal of Development Research 16 (1): 174–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyono, P.R. (2005 a) The foundations of the conflit de langage over land and forests in southern Cameroon. African Study Monographs 26 (3): 115–144.Google Scholar
Oyono, P.R. (2005 b) From diversity to exclusion for forest minorities in Cameroon. In: The Equitable Forest: Diversity and Community in Sustainable Resource Management, ed. Colfer, C.J.P., pp. 113–130. Washington, DC, USA: Resources for the Future/CIFOR.Google Scholar
Oyono, P.R. (2005 c) Profiling local-level outcomes of environmental decentralizations: the case of Cameroon's forests in the Congo Basin. Journal of Environment and Development 14 (2): 1–21.Google Scholar
Oyono, P.R. (2005 d) The social and organisational roots of ecological uncertainties in Cameroon's forest management decentralisation model. In: Democratic Decentralisation through a Natural Resource Lens, ed. Ribot, J.C. & Larson, A.M., pp. 174–191. Oxon, UK: RoutledgeGoogle Scholar
Oyono, P.R. (2006) Acteurs locaux, représentation et 'politics' des éco-pouvoirs dans le Cameroun rural post-1994. Canadian Journal of Development Studies 27 (2): 163–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyono, P.R. & Efoua, S. (2006) La représentation environnementale au Cameroun: une exploration des liens entre les choix institutionnnels, la démocratie local et les résultats de la gestion décentralisée des forets. Africa Development 31 (2): 149–184.Google Scholar
Oyono, P.R. & Temple, L. (2003) Métamorphose des organisations rurales au Cameroun. Revue Internationale de l'Economie Sociale 288: 68–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oyono, P.R., Ribot, J.C. & Larson, A.M. (2006) Green and black gold in rural Cameroon: natural resources for local governance, justice and sustainability. In: Environmental Governance in Africa Working Papers, ed. Ribot, J.C., pp. 1–88. Washington, DC, USA: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Pagdee, A., Kim, Y.-S. & Daugherty, P.J. (2006) What makes community forest management successful: a meta-study from community forests throughout the world. Society and Natural Resources 19 (1): 33–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Patton, M.Q. (2002) Qualitative Research and Evaluation Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Ribot, J.C. (2002) Democratic Decentralization of Natural Resources: Institutionalizing Popular Participation. Washington, DC, USA: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Ribot, J.C. (2004) Waiting for Democracy: The Politics of Choice in Natural Resource Decentralization. Washington, DC, USA: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Ribot, J.C. (2008) Building Local Democracy through Natural Resource Interventions: An Environmentalist's Responsibility. Washington, DC, USA: World Resources Institute.Google Scholar
Ribot, J.C. & Oyono, P.R. (2005) The politics of decentralization. In: Towards a New Map of Africa, ed. Wisner, B., Toulmin, C. & Chitiga, R., pp. 205–228. London, UK: Earthscan.Google Scholar
Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1998) Basics of Qualitative Research. Thousand Oaks, CA, USA: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
Sunderlin, W.D. (2006) Poverty alleviation through community forestry in Cambodia, Laos, and Vietnam: an assessment of the potential. Forest Policy and Economics 8: 386–396.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tacconi, L. (2007) Decentralization, forests and livelihoods: theory and narrative. Global Environmental Change 17: 338–348.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vabi, M.B., Ngwasiri, C.N., Galega, P.T. & Oyono, R.P. (2000) The Devolution of Forest Management Responsibilities to Local Communities: Context and Implementation Hurdles in Cameroon. Yaoundé, Cameroon: World Wide Fund for Nature, Cameroon Programme Office.Google Scholar
Van Den Berg, J. & Biesbrouck, K. (2000) The Social Dimensions of Rainforest Management in Cameroon: Issues for Co-management. Tropenbos-Cameroon Series, Kribi, Cameroon: The Tropenbos-Cameroon Program.Google Scholar
White, A. & Martin, A. (2002) Who Owns the World's Forests? Forest Tenure and Public Forests in Transition. Washington, DC, USA: Forest Trends.Google Scholar
World Bank (2008) Forests Sourcebook: Practical Guidance for Sustaining Forests in Development Cooperation. Washington, DC, USA: The World Bank.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Brown supplementary material

Appendix.doc

Download Brown supplementary material(File)
File 48.1 KB