Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-jn8rn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:29:16.531Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Human-carnivore coexistence: factors influencing stakeholder attitudes towards large carnivores and conservation in Zimbabwe

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  23 December 2020

Esther van der Meer Open the ORCID record for Esther van der Meer [Opens in a new window]  and
Hans Dullemont
Esther van der Meer*
Affiliation:
Cheetah Conservation Project Zimbabwe, PO Box 204, Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe Department of Forest Resources and Wildlife Management, National University of Science and Technology, PO Box AC 939, Ascot, Bulawayo, Zimbabwe
Hans Dullemont
Affiliation:
Cheetah Conservation Project Zimbabwe, PO Box 204, Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe
*
Author for correspondence: Dr Esther van der Meer, Email: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Promoting human-carnivore coexistence is a main component of carnivore conservation. Coexistence programmes are usually informed by attitudinal studies that evaluate intended behaviour towards carnivores. This questionnaire survey assesses attitudes of governmental and non-governmental conservation stakeholders in Zimbabwe towards living with carnivores, large carnivore species and the conservation of wildlife, and determines whether being part of coexistence programmes (CAMPFIRE, TFCAs) positively affects attitudes. Stakeholder attitudes were most positive when employment was directly related to wildlife and stakeholders had knowledge about and exposure to carnivores. Stakeholders who depend on livestock and/or had little knowledge about and less exposure to carnivores were most negative, this included governmental stakeholders responsible for natural resource management. Positive attitudes were largely based on the aesthetic and economic value of carnivores, while negative attitudes were based on the fear of livestock loss and perceived danger to humans. Subsistence farmers were the most negative stakeholders, as such, the focus on this group to promote coexistence seems justified. However, although some stakeholders were more positive in CAMPFIRE areas or TFCAs, CAMPFIRE and TFCAs failed to improve attitudes of subsistence farmers, which highlights a need to evaluate and adapt these programmes.

Keywords

African wild dogattitudescarnivore conservationcheetahhuman-wildlife coexistencelarge carnivoresleopardlionspotted hyaenaZimbabwe
Type
Research Paper
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 48 , Issue 1 , March 2021 , pp. 48 - 57
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of Foundation for Environmental Conservation

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ballouard, JM, Provost, G, Barré, D, Bonnet, X (2012) Influence of a field trip on the attitude of schoolchildren toward unpopular organisms: an experience with snakes. Journal of Herpetology 46: 423–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
CAMPFIRE (2013) CAMPFIRE Profile, July 2013. Harare, Zimbabwe: Communal Areas Management Programme for Indigenous Resources.Google Scholar
CITES (2019) Showcasing Implementation of Zimbabwe’s National Elephant Management Plan (2015–2020) and its National Action Plan. CoP18 Inf. 32. Geneva, Switzerland: Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species of Wild Fauna and Flora.Google Scholar
Dickman, A, Marchini, S, Manfredo, M (2013) The human dimension in addressing conflict with large carnivores. In: Key Topics in Conservation Biology 2, eds. Macdonald, DW and Willis, KJ, pp. 110–126. London, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dijksterhuis, A and Bargh, JA (2001) The perception-behavior expressway: automatic effects of social perception on social behaviour. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology 33: 1–40.Google Scholar
Ensminger, J (1990) Co-opting the elders: the political economy of state incorporation in Africa. American Anthropologist 92: 662–675.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Epstein, S (1994) Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist 49: 709–724.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
EU (2014) Larger than Elephants, Inputs for the Design of an EU Strategic Approach to Wildlife Conservation in Africa. Brussels, Belgium: European Commission.Google Scholar
Feilen, KL, Guillen, RR, Vega, J, Savage, A (2018) Developing successful conservation education programs as a means to engage local communities in protecting cotton-top tamarins (Saguinus oedipus) in Columbia. Journal of Nature Conservation 4: 44–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glikman, JA, Vaske, JJ, Bath, AJ, Giucci, P, Boitani, L (2012) Resident’s support for wolf and bear conservation: the moderating influence of knowledge. European Journal of Wildlife Research 58: 295–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Groom, RJ, Funston, PJ, Mandisodza, R (2014) Surveys of lions Panthera leo in protected areas in Zimbabwe yield disturbing results: what is driving the population collapse. Oryx 48: 385–393.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katerere, Y, Hill, R, Moyo, S (2001) A Critique of Transboundary Natural Resource Management in Southern Africa. Paper no.1. IUCN-ROSA Series on Transboundary Natural Resource Management. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Kuo, HI, Chen, CC, Tseng, WC, Ju, LF, Huang, BW (2008) Assessing impacts of SARS and Avian Flu on international tourism demand to Asia. Tourism Management 29: 917–928.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Lindsey, PA, Havemann, CP, Lines, R, Palazy, L, Price, AE, Retief, TA, Rhebergen, T, Van der Waal, C (2013) Determinants of persistence and tolerance of carnivores on Namibian ranches: implications for conservation on Southern African private lands. PLoS ONE 8: 52458.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Linnell, JDC, Swenson, JE, Andersen, R (2001) Predators and people: conservation of large carnivores is possible at high human densities if management policy is favourable. Animal Conservation 4: 345–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Logan, BI, Moseley, WG (2002) The political ecology of poverty alleviation in Zimbabwe’s Communal Areas Management Programme for Indigenous Resources (CAMPFIRE). Geoforum 33: 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Munthali, SM (2007) Transfrontier conservation areas: integrating biodiversity and poverty alleviation in Southern Africa. Natural Resources Forum 31: 51–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peace Parks, Foundation (2009) Integrated Development Plan: Zimbabwean Component of the Kavango-Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area. Stellenbosch, South Africa: Peace Parks Foundation.Google Scholar
Pooley, JA, O’Connor, M (2000) Environmental education and attitudes: emotions and beliefs are what is needed. Environment and Behavior 32: 711–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ripple, WJ, Estes, JA, Beschta, RL, Wilmers, CC, Ritchie, EG, Hebblewhite, M, Berger, J et al. (2014) Status and ecological effects of the world’s largest carnivores. Science 343 doi: 10.1126/science.1241484.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Romañach, SS, Lindsey, PA, Woodroffe, R (2007) Determinants of attitudes towards predators in central Kenya and suggestions for increasing tolerance in livestock dominated landscapes. Oryx 41: 185–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Røskaft, E, Händel, B, Bjerke, T, Kaltenborn, BP (2007) Human attitude towards large carnivores in Norway. Wildlife Biology 13: 172–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Slagle, KM, Bruskotter, JT, Wilson, RS (2012) The role of affect in public support and opposition to wolf management. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 17: 44–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
St John, FA, Keane, AM, Edwards-Jones, G, Jones, L, Yarnell, RW, Jones, JP (2012) Identifying indicators of illegal behaviour: carnivore killing in human-managed landscapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 279: 804–812.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Tarrant, MA, Bright, AD, Cordell, HK (1997) Attitudes toward wildlife species protection: assessing moderating and mediating effects in the value-attitude relationship. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 2: 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, R (2009) Community-based natural resource management in Zimbabwe: the experience of CAMPFIRE. Biodiversity and Conservation 18: 2563–2583.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tchakatumba, PK, Gandiwa, E, Mwakiwa, E, Clegg, B, Nyasha, S (2019) Does the CAMPFIRE programme ensure economic benefits from wildlife to households in Zimbabwe? Ecosystems and People 15: 119–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorn, D, Green, M, Marnewick, K, Scott, DM (2015) Determinants of attitudes to carnivores: implications for mitigating human-carnivore conflict on South African farmland. Oryx 49: 270–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Meer, E (2018) Carnivore conservation under land use change: the status of Zimbabwe’s cheetah population after land reform. Biodiversity and Conservation 27: 647–663.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Meer, E (2016) The cheetahs of Zimbabwe: distribution and population status 2015. CCPZ, Victoria Falls, Zimbabwe doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.36719.84648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Van der Meer, E, Badza, M, Ndhlovu, A (2016) Large carnivores as tourism flagship species for the Zimbabwe component of the Kavango Zambezi Transfrontier Conservation Area. African Journal of Wildlife Research 46: 121–134.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Winterbach, HEK, Winterbach, CW, Somers, MJ, Hayward, MW (2013) Key factors and related principles in the conservation of large African carnivores. Mammal Review 43: 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Woodroffe, R, Ginsberg, JR (1998) Edge effects and the extinction of populations inside protected areas. Science 280: 2126–2128.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Zanamwe, C, Gandiwa, E, Muboko, N, Kupika, OL, Mukamuri, BB (2018) Ecotourism and wildlife conservation-related enterprise development by local communities within Southern Africa: perspectives from the greater Limpopo Transfrontier Conservation, South-Eastern Lowveld, Zimbabwe. Cogent Environmental Science 4: 1531463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ZPWMA (2018) National Conservation Action Plan for Cheetahs and Wild Dog in Zimbabwe. Harare Zimbabwe: Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority.Google Scholar
ZPWMA (2012) Preliminary Report for Leopards in Zimbabwe. Harare, Zimbabwe: Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

van der Meer and Dullemont supplementary material

van der Meer and Dullemont supplementary material

Download van der Meer and Dullemont supplementary material(File)
File 643.4 KB