Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-19T07:29:18.907Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Heterogeneity in fishers' and managers' preferences towards management restrictions and benefits in Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 July 2012

TIMOTHY R. MCCLANAHAN ,
CAROLINE A. ABUNGE  and
JOSHUA E. CINNER
TIMOTHY R. MCCLANAHAN*
Affiliation:
Wildlife Conservation Society, Marine Programs, Bronx, NY 10460, USA
CAROLINE A. ABUNGE
Affiliation:
Coral Reef Conservation Project, PO Box 99470, Mombasa 80107, Kenya
JOSHUA E. CINNER
Affiliation:
Australian Research Council Centre of Excellence for Coral Reef Studies, James Cook University, Townsville, Queensland, Australia
*
*Correspondence: Dr Timothy McClanahan Tel: +254 734 774 225 e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Increasing the chances that resource users engage in and comply with management regulations is a continual problem for many conservation initiatives globally. This is particularly common when resource users perceive more personal costs than benefits from specific management actions. Analysis of interviews with managers and fishers from 22 landing sites along the coast of Kenya indicated how key stakeholders perceived the scale of benefits and costs from different management strategies. Potential underlying causes of divergent perceptions towards different management tools were evaluated, including marine protected areas, no-take fisheries closures, gear use, minimum size of fish caught and species restrictions. The analysis identified three distinct opinion groups: (1) a group of nine landing sites that scaled their preference for most management restrictions neutral to low, with exceptions for minimum sizes of captured fish and gear restrictions; (2) a group of eight landing sites that scaled their preference for the above and species restrictions and closed season higher, and were more neutral about closures and marine protected areas; and (3) a group containing four landing sites and the managers’ offices that rated their preference for the above and closed areas and marine protected areas as high. Logistic regression was used to examine whether these groups differed in wealth, education, age, perceptions of disparity in benefits, dependence on fishing and distance to government marine protected areas. The most frequent significant factor was the resource users’ perceived disparity between the benefits of the management to themselves and their communities, with the benefits to the government. Consequently, efforts to reduce this real or perceived disparity are likely to increase adoption and compliance rates. Most widespread positively-viewed restrictions, such as gear use and minimum size of fish, should be promoted at the national level while other restrictions may be more appropriately implemented at the community level.

Keywords

authorityco-managementdemocracyfisheries regulationsgovernancelocal ecological knowledgesocioecological systems
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 357 - 369
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Allison, E.H. & Ellis, F. (2001) The livelihoods approach and management of small-scale fisheries. Marine Policy 25: 377–388.Google Scholar
Aswani, S. (2005) Customary sea tenure in Oceania as a case of rights-based fishery management: does it work? Reviews in Fish Biology and Fisheries 15: 285–307.Google Scholar
Aswani, S. & Hamilton, R. (2004) Integrating indigenous ecological knowledge and customary sea tenure with marine and social science for conservation of bumphead parrotfish (Bolbometopon muricatum) in the Roviana Lagoon, Solomon Islands. Environmental Conservation 31: 69–83.Google Scholar
Ault, J.S., Smith, S.G., Luo, J., Monaco, M.E. & Appeldoorn, R.S. (2008) Length-based assessment of sustainability benchmarks for coral reef fishes in Puerto Rico. Environmental Conservation 35: 221–231.Google Scholar
Barrett, C.B., Reardon, T. & Webb, P. (2001) Nonfarm income diversification and household livelihood strategies in rural Africa: concepts, dynamics and policy implications. Food Policy 26: 315–331.Google Scholar
Beddington, J.R., Agnew, D.J. & Clark, C.W. (2007) Current problems in the management of marine fisheries. Science 316: 1713–1716.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Béné, C., Belal, E., Baba, M.O., Ovie, S., Raji, A., Malasha, I., Njaya, F., Andi, M.N., Russell, A. & Neiland, A. (2009) Power struggle, dispute and alliance over local resources: analyzing ‘democratic’ decentralization of natural resources through the lenses of africa inland fisheries. World Development 37: 1935–1950.Google Scholar
Christie, P. (2004) Marine protected areas as biological successes and social failures in southeast Asia. American Fisheries Society Symposium 42: 155–164.Google Scholar
Christie, P., McCay, B.J., Miller, M.L., Lowe, C., White, A.T., Stoffle, R., Fluharty, D.L., McManus, L.T., Chuenpagdee, R., Pomeroy, C., Suman, D.O., Blount, B.G., Huppert, D., Eisma, R.L.V., Oracion, E., Lowry, K. & Pollnac, R.B. (2003) Toward developing a complete understanding: a social science research agenda for marine protected areas. Fisheries 28: 22–26.Google Scholar
Cinner, J.E. & Bodin, Ö. (2010) Livelihood diversification in tropical coastal communities: a network-based approach to analyzing ‘livelihood landscapes’. PLoS ONE 5: e11999 [www document]. URL http://www.plosone.org/article/info%3Adoi%2F10.1371%2Fjournal.pone.0011999Google Scholar
Cinner, J.E., Daw, T. & McClanahan, T.R. (2009) Socioeconomic factors that affect artisanal fishers’ readiness to exit a declining fishery. Conservation Biology 23: 124–130.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cinner, J.E., Folke, C., Daw, T. & Hicks, C.C. (2011) Responding to change: using scenarios to understand how socioeconomic factors may influence amplifying or dampening exploitation feedbacks among Tanzanian fishers. Global Environmental Change 21: 7–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cinner, J.E., McClanahan, T.R. & Wamukota, A. (2010) Differences in livelihoods, socioeconomic characteristics, and knowledge about the sea between fishers and non-fishers living near and far from marine parks on the Kenyan coast. Marine Policy 34: 22–28.Google Scholar
Cinner, J.E., McClanahan, T.R., MacNeil, M.A., Graham, N.A.J., Daw, T.M., Mukminin, A., Feary, D.A., Rabearisoa, A.L., Wamukota, A., Jiddawi, N., Campbell, S.J., Baird, A.H., Januchowski-Hartley, F.A., Hamed, S., Lahari, R., Marove, T. & Kuange, J. (2012) Comanagement of coral reef social-ecological systems. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 109 (14): 5219–5222.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Cocklin, C., Craw, M. & Mcauley, I. (1998) Marine reserves in New Zealand: use rights, public attitudes, and social impacts. Coastal Management 26: 213–231.Google Scholar
Ellis, F. (1998) Household strategies and rural livelihood diversification. Journal of Development Studies 35: 1–38.Google Scholar
Ellis, F. (2000) The determinants of rural livelihood diversification in developing countries. Journal of Agricultural Economics 51: 289–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelcich, S., Edwards-Jones, G., Kaiser, M.J. & Castilla, J.C. (2006) Co-management policy can reduce resilience in traditionally managed marine ecosystems. Ecosystems 9: 951–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelcich, S., Godoy, N. & Castilla, J.C. (2009) Artisanal fishers’ perceptions regarding coastal co-management policies in Chile and their potentials to scale-up marine biodiversity conservation. Ocean and Coastal Management 52: 424–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gelcich, S., Kaiser, M.J., Castilla, J.C. & Edwards-Jones, G. (2008) Engagement in co-management of marine benthic resources influences environmental perceptions of artisanal fishers. Environmental Conservation 35: 36–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gutierrez, N.L., Hilborn, R. & Defeo, O. (2011) Leadership, social capital and incentives promote successful fisheries. Nature 470: 386–389.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Halpern, B.S., Lester, S.E. & Kellner, J.B. (2010) Spillover from marine reserves and the replenishment of fished stocks. Environmental Conservation 36: 268–276.Google Scholar
Halpern, B.S. & Warner, R.R. (2003) Review paper. Matching marine reserve design to reserve objectives. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences 270: 1871–1878.Google Scholar
Hicks, C.C., McClanahan, T.R., Cinner, J.E. & Hills, J.M. (2009) Trade-offs in values assigned to ecological goods and services associated with different coral reef management strategies. Ecology and Society 14: art10 [www document]. URL http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol14/iss1/art10/Google Scholar
Hilborn, R. (2007) Defining success in fisheries and conflicts in objectives. Marine Policy 31: 153–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, S.K. & Marynowski, S.B. (1997) Public attitudes and knowledge about ecosystem management on department of defense land in Florida. Conservation Biology 11: 770–781.Google Scholar
Jentoft, S. (2003) Co-management: the way forward. Fish and Fisheries 26: 1–16.Google Scholar
Jentoft, S., McCay, B.J. & Wilson, D.C. (1998) Social theory and fisheries co-management. Marine Policy 22: 423–436.Google Scholar
Kuperan, K. & Sutinen, J.G. (1998) Blue water crime: deterrence, legitimacy, and compliance in fisheries. Law and Society Review 32: 309–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClanahan, T.R. (1999) Is there a future for coral reef parks in poor tropical countries? Coral Reefs 18: 321–325.Google Scholar
McClanahan, T.R. (2007) Management of area and gear in Kenyan coral reefs. In: Fisheries Management: Progress towards Sustainability, ed. McClanahan, T.R. & Castilla, J.C., pp. 166–185. London, UK: Blackwell Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClanahan, T.R. (2010) Effects of fisheries closures and gear restrictions on fishing income in a Kenyan coral reef. Conservation Biology 24: 1519–1528.Google Scholar
McClanahan, T.R., Cinner, J., Kamukuru, A.T., Abunge, C. & Ndagala, J. (2008) Management preferences, perceived benefits and conflicts among resource users and managers in the Mafia Island Marine Park, Tanzania. Environmental Conservation 35: 340–350.Google Scholar
McClanahan, T.R., Davies, J. & Maina, J. (2005 a) Factors influencing resource users and managers’ perceptions towards marine protected area management in Kenya. Environmental Conservation 32: 42–49.Google Scholar
McClanahan, T.R., Glaesel, H., Rubens, J. & Kiambo, R. (1997) The effects of traditional fisheries management on fisheries yields and the coral-reef ecosystems of southern Kenya. Environmental Conservation 24: 105–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McClanahan, T.R., Maina, J. & Davies, J. (2005 b) Perceptions of resource users and managers toward fisheries management options in Kenyan coral reefs. Fisheries Management and Ecology 12: 105–112.Google Scholar
McClanahan, T.R., Mwaguni, S. & Muthiga, N.A. (2005 c) Management of the Kenyan coast. Ocean and Coastal Management 48: 901–931.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehta, J.N. & Heinen, J.T. (2001) Does community-based conservation shape favorable attitudes among locals? An empirical study from Nepal. Environmental Management 28: 165–177.Google Scholar
Napier, V.R., Branch, G.M. & Harris, J.M. (2005) Evaluating conditions for successful co-management of subsistence fisheries in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. Environmental Conservation 32: 165–177.Google Scholar
Nazarea, V., Rhoades, R., Bontoyan, E. & Flora, G. (1998) Defining indicators that make sense to local people: intra-cultural variation in perceptions of natural resources. Human Organization 57: 159–170.Google Scholar
Nelson, R.H. (1995) Sustainability, efficiency, and God: economic values and the sustainability debate. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 26: 135–154.Google Scholar
O'Connor, M.I., Bruno, J.F., Gaines, S.D., Halpern, B.S., Lester, S.E., Kinlan, B.P. & Weiss, J.M. (2007) Temperature control of larval dispersal and the implications for marine ecology, evolution, and conservation. Proceedings of the National Academic Sciences USA 104: 1266–1271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Ostrom, E. (1990) Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ostrom, E. (2007) A diagnostic approach for going beyond panaceas. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 104: 15181–15187.Google Scholar
Picard, C.H. (2003) Post-apartheid perceptions of the Greater St Lucia Wetland Park, South Africa. Environmental Conservation 30: 182–191.Google Scholar
Pollnac, R.B., Crawford, B.R. & Gorospe, M.L.G. (2001) Discovering factors that influence the success of community-based marine protected areas in the Visayas, Philippines. Ocean and Coastal Management 44: 683–710.Google Scholar
Pomeroy, R.S., Ratner, B.D., Hall, S.J., Pimoljinda, J. & Vivekanandan, V. (2006) Coping with disaster: Rehabilitating coastal livelihoods and communities. Marine Policy 30: 786–793.Google Scholar
Richardson, E.A., Kaiser, M.J. & Edwards-Jones, G. (2005) Variation in fishers’ attitudes within an inshore fishery: implications for management. Environmental Conservation 32: 213–225.Google Scholar
Russ, G.A. & Alcala, A.C. (2004) Marine reserves: long-term protection is required for full recovery of predatory fish populations. Oecologia (Berlin) 138: 622–627.Google Scholar
Sall, J., Lehmaan, A. & Creighton, L. (2001) JPM Start Statistics. Duxbury, CA, USA: Thomson Learning.Google Scholar
Shanks, A.L., Grantham, B.A. & Carr, M.H. (2003) Propagule dispersal distance and the size and spacing of marine reserves. Ecological Applications 13: S159–169.Google Scholar
Thomassin, A., White, C.S., Stead, S.S. & David, G. (2010) Social acceptability of a marine protected area: the case of Reunion Island. Ocean and Coastal Management 53: 169–179.Google Scholar
Vandeperre, F., Higgins, R.M., Sánchez-Meca, J., Maynou, F., Goñi, R., Martín-Sosa, P., Pérez-Ruzafa, A., Afonso, P., Bertocci, I., Crec'hriou, R., D'Anna, G., Dimech, M., Dorta, C., Esparza, O., Falcón, J.M., Forcada, A., Guala, I., Le Direach, L., Marcos, C., Ojeda-Martínez, C., Pipitone, C., Schembri, P.J., Stelzenmüller, V., Stobart, B. & Santos, R.S. (2010) Effects of no-take area size and age of marine protected areas on fisheries yields: a meta-analytical approach. Fish and Fisheries 12: 412–426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walley, C.J. (2004) Rough Waters: Nature and Development in an East African Marine Park. Princeton, USA: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weeks, R., Russ, G.R., Alcala, A.C. & White, A.T. (2010) Effectiveness of marine protected areas in the Philippines for biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology 24: 531–540.Google Scholar
Wells, S., Samoilys, M., Makoloweka, S. & Kalombo, H. (2010) Lessons learnt from a collaborative management programme in coastal Tanzania. Ocean and Coastal Management: 1–8.Google Scholar
White, C., Kendall, B.E., Gaines, S., Siegel, D.A. & Costello, C. (2008) Marine reserve effects on fishery profit. Ecology Letters 11: 370–379.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Wood, L.J., Fish, L., Laughren, J. & Pauly, D. (2008) Assessing progress towards global marine protection targets: shortfalls in information and action. Oryx 42: 340–351.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

McClanahan et al. supplementary material

Appendices

Download McClanahan et al. supplementary material(File)
File 835 KB