Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-22T06:19:25.009Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Evaluating outcomes of community-based conservation on Kenyan group ranches with remote sensing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  08 August 2017

DAVID WILLIAMS*
Affiliation:
African Wildlife Foundation, 1400 16th Street, NW, Suite 120, Washington, DC 20036, USA
JAMES H. THORNE
Affiliation:
Information Center for the Environment, Department of Environmental Science and Policy, University of California, Davis, CA, USA
DAUDI SUMBA
Affiliation:
African Wildlife Foundation, Ngong Road, Karen, PO Box 310, 00502 Nairobi, Kenya
PHILIP MURUTHI
Affiliation:
African Wildlife Foundation, Ngong Road, Karen, PO Box 310, 00502 Nairobi, Kenya
NATASHA GREGORY-MICHELMAN
Affiliation:
African Wildlife Foundation, 1400 16th Street, NW, Suite 120, Washington, DC 20036, USA
*
*Correspondence: David Williams email: [email protected]

Summary

Conservationists have adopted community-based conservation (CBC) strategies to support landscape conservation programmes in East Africa, and these projects often involve community development assistance in exchange for a commitment to dedicating a portion of community lands for conservation management. There is, however, a dearth of empirical evidence assessing the effectiveness of CBC conservation programmes. This paper uses sub-metre-resolution satellite imagery to measure land-use change on four Kenyan group ranches that had created CBCs. Each ranch underwent a common participatory planning process that established a land-use plan involving three management zones: conservation, livestock grazing and settlement/cultivation. Using a satellite image time series, we recorded threat-based development – anthropogenic modification of natural areas and the density of structures – for each ranch. We found that CBCs with tourism lodges were more effective at controlling development than the CBCs without a lodge, particularly in the conservation zones and, to a lesser degree, in the grazing zones. We conclude that our use of very-high-resolution satellite imagery offers conservationists a cost-effective, fast and replicable approach to measuring CBC land-use change and that CBC projects can lead to positive conservation results.

Type
Non-Thematic Papers
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Supplementary material can be found online at https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892917000418

References

Asmat, A, Zamzami, S. Z. & Mansor, S. (2012) The use of multi-sensor for illegal human settlement detection. Asian Journal of Environment-Behaviour Studies 3: 7180.Google Scholar
Belward, A. S. & Skøien, J. O. (2015) Who launched what, when and why; trends in global land-cover observation capacity from civilian earth observation satellites. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing 103: 115128.Google Scholar
Blair, A. (2008) Human–Wildlife Conflict in Laikipia North, Kenya: Comparing Official Reports with the Experiences of Maasai Pastoralists. Doctoral dissertation. Montreal, Canada: McGill University.Google Scholar
Boone, R. B., BurnSilver, S. B., Thornton, P. K., Worden, J. S. & Galvin, K. A. (2005) Quantifying declines in livestock due to land subdivision. Rangeland Ecology & Management 58: 523532.Google Scholar
Boyle, S. A., Kennedy, C. M., Torres, J., Colman, K., Pérez-Estigarribia, P. E. & Noé, U. (2014) High-resolution satellite imagery is an important yet underutilized resource in conservation biology. PLoS One 9: e86908.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Brooks, J., Waylen, K. A. & Borgerhoff Mulder, M. (2013) Assessing community-based conservation projects: a systematic review and multilevel analysis of attitudinal, behavioral, ecological, and economic outcomes. Environmental Evidence 2: 2.Google Scholar
BurnSilver, S. B. (2009) Pathways of Continuity and Change: Maasai Livelihoods in Amboseli, Kajiado District, Kenya. Staying Maasai? New York, NY, USA: Springer.Google Scholar
Carroll, R. (1998) World Wildlife Fund (WWF-US) Organizational Overview: Dzanga-Sangha Reserve, Central African Republic. Resource Use in the Trinational Sangha River Region of Equatorial Africa: Histories, Knowledge Forms, and Institutions. New Haven, CT, USA: Yale Forestry and Environmental Studies Bulletin.Google Scholar
Cushman, S. A., Chase, M. & Griffin, C. (2010) Mapping landscape resistance to identify corridors and barriers for elephant movement in southern Africa. In: Spatial Complexity, Informatics, and Wildlife Conservation, pp. 349367. Tokyo, Japan: Springer Japan.Google Scholar
Douglas-Hamilton, I., Krink, T. & Vollrath, F. (2005) Movements and corridors of African elephants in relation to protected areas. Naturwissenschaften 92: 158163.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
ESRI (2012) ArcGIS Desktop: Release 10.1. Redlands, CA, USA: Environmental Systems Research Institute.Google Scholar
Ferraro, P. J. & Pattanayak, S. K. (2006) Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investments. PLoS Biology 4: e105.Google Scholar
Ferraro, P. J. (2009) Counterfactual thinking and impact evaluation in environmental policy. New Directions for Evaluation 2009: 7584.Google Scholar
Fisher, G. B., Amos, C. B., Bookhagen, B., Burbank, D. W. & Godard, V. (2012) Channel widths, landslides, faults, and beyond: the new world order of high-spatial resolution Google Earth imagery in the study of earth surface processes. Special Paper of the Geological Society of America 492: 122.Google Scholar
Flintan, F. & Puyo, D. (2012) Naibunga Conservancy Trust Laikipia, Kenya. Laikipia, Kenya: Naibunga Conservancy.Google Scholar
Gadd, M. E. (2005) Conservation outside of parks: attitudes of local people in Laikipia, Kenya. Environmental Conservation 32: 5063.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Georgiadis, N. J., Olwero, J. N. & Romañach, S. S. (2007) Savanna herbivore dynamics in a livestock-dominated landscape: I. Dependence on land use, rainfall, density, and time. Biological Conservation 137: 461472.Google Scholar
Gertler, P. J., Martinez, S., Premand, P., Rawlings, L. B. & Vermeersch, C. M. (2011) Impact Evaluation in Practice. Washington, DC, USA: World Bank Group.Google Scholar
Graham, M. D., Douglas-Hamilton, I., Adams, W. M. & Lee, P. C. (2009) The movement of African elephants in a human-dominated land-use mosaic. Animal Conservation 12: 445455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Greiner, C. (2012) Unexpected consequences: wildlife conservation and territorial conflict in Northern Kenya. Human Ecology 40: 415425.Google Scholar
Groom, R. J. & Western, D. (2013) Impact of land subdivision and sedentarization on wildlife in Kenya's southern rangelands. Rangeland Ecology & Management 66: 19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henson, A., Williams, D., Dupain, J., Gichohi, H. & Muruthi, P. (2009) The Heartland Conservation Process: enhancing biodiversity conservation and livelihoods through landscape-scale conservation planning in Africa. Oryx 43: 508519.Google Scholar
Hijmans, R. J., Cameron, S. E., Parra, J. L., Jones, P. G. & Jarvis, A. (2005) Very high resolution interpolated climate surfaces for global land areas. International Journal of Climatology 25: 19651978.Google Scholar
IUCN – The World Conservation Union (2007) African Elephant Status Report 2007: An Update from the African Elephant Database. Gland, Switzerland: IUCN.Google Scholar
Jarvis, A., Reuter, H.I. & A. Guevara, N.E. (2008) Hole-filled SRTM for the globe Version 4, available from the CGIAR-CSI SRTM 90m Database [www document]. URL http://srtm.csi.cgiar.orgGoogle Scholar
Kiss, A. (2004) Is community-based ecotourism a good use of biodiversity conservation funds? Trends in Ecology & Evolution 19: 232237.Google Scholar
Kiyiapi, J., Ntiati, P. O., Mwongela, B., Hatfield, R. & Williams, D. (2005) A Community Business: Elerai Ranch and Conservation Area, Kenya. African Wildlife Foundation Working Paper. Nairobi, Kenya: African Wildlife Foundation.Google Scholar
Lamprey, R. H. & Reid, R. S. (2004) Expansion of human settlement in Kenya's Maasai Mara: what future for pastoralism and wildlife? Journal of Biogeography 31: 9971032.Google Scholar
Lamers, M., van der Duim, R., van Wijk, J., Nthiga, R. & Visseren-Hamakers, I. J. (2014) Governing tourism partnerships in Kenya. Annals of Tourism Research 48: 250265.Google Scholar
Lara, S. G. (2011) Impact of Natural Resource Management Programme on Savanah Biodiversity in Three Group Ranches in Laikipia District, Kenya. Doctoral dissertation. Nairobi, Kenya: Kenyatta University.Google Scholar
Lele, S., Wilshusen, P., Brockington, D., Seidler, R. & Bawa, K. (2010) Beyond exclusion: alternative approaches to biodiversity conservation in the developing tropics. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2: 94100.Google Scholar
Litoroh, M., Ihwagi, F. W., Mayienda, R., Bernard, J. & Douglas-Hamilton, I. (2010) Total Aerial Count of Elephants in Laikipia–Samburu Ecosystem in November 2008. Nairobi, Kenya: Kenya Wildlife Service.Google Scholar
Margoluis, R., Stem, C., Salafsky, N. & Brown, M. (2009) Design alternatives for evaluating the impact of conservation projects. New Directions for Evaluation 2009: 8596.Google Scholar
Mascia, M. B., Pailler, S., Thieme, M. L., Rowe, A., Bottrill, M. C., Danielsen, F. & Burgess, N. D. (2014) Commonalities and complementarities among approaches to conservation monitoring and evaluation. Biological Conservation 169: 258267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mureithi, S. M., Verdoodt, A., Njoka, J. T., Gachene, C. K., Warinwa, F. & Van Ranst, E. (2014) Impact of community conservation management on herbaceous layer and soil nutrients in a Kenyan semi-arid Savannah. Land Degradation & Development 27: 18201830.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Muruthi, P. (2005) Human Wildlife Conflict: Lessons Learned from AWF's African Heartlands. Washington, DC, USA: African Wildlife Foundation.Google Scholar
Mwangi, E. (2007) Beyond Group Ranch Subdivision: Collective Action for Livestock Mobility, Ecological Viability, and Livelihoods. Nairobi, Kenya: Kenyatta University.Google Scholar
Nagendra, H., Lucas, R., Honrado, J. P., Jongman, R. H., Tarantino, C., Adamo, M. & Mairota, P. (2013) Remote sensing for conservation monitoring: assessing protected areas, habitat extent, habitat condition, species diversity, and threats. Ecological Indicators 33: 4559.Google Scholar
Noad, T. & Birnie, A. (1990) Trees of Kenya. Washington, DC, USA: CGIAR Systemwide Program on Collective Action and Property Rights (CAPRi).Google Scholar
Oguge, N., Mireri, C. & Onjala, J. (2006) Assessment of Status and Trends of Natural Resource Use in Ewaso Nyiro Basin, Kenya. World Conservation Union (IUCN) Report for DLWEIP. Nairobi, Kenya: United Nations Environmental Program/Dryland Livestock Wildlife Environment Interface Project.Google Scholar
Ogutu, J. O., Piepho, H. P., Said, M. Y., Ojwang, G. O., Njino, L. W., Kifugo, S. C. & Wargute, P. W. (2016). Extreme wildlife declines and concurrent increase in livestock numbers in Kenya: what are the causes? PLoS One 11: e0163249.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Okech, R. N. (2010) Wildlife–community conflicts in conservation areas in Kenya. African Journal on Conflict Resolution 10: 6580.Google Scholar
Olson, D. M., Dinerstein, E., Wikramanayake, E. D., Burgess, N. D., Powell, G. V., Underwood, E. C. et al. (2001) Terrestrial ecoregions of the world: a new map of life on Earth: a new global map of terrestrial ecoregions provides an innovative tool for conserving biodiversity. BioScience 51: 933938.Google Scholar
Pellis, A., Anyango, M. N., Waterreus, S., Lamers, M. A. J. & van der Duim, R. (2014) Tourism Captured by the Poor: Evaluation of Aid Investments in the Tourism Sector of Kenya's ASALs: Final Report. Wageningen, The Netherlands: Wageningen University.Google Scholar
Republic of Kenya (1999) Census Data on Number of Households, Population by Male and Female, Area in Square Kilometers, and Population Density by Sub-location. Nairobi, Kenya: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
Republic of Kenya (2009) Census Data on Number of Households, Population by Male and Female, Area in Square Kilometers, and Population Density by Sub-location. Nairobi, Kenya: Kenya National Bureau of Statistics.Google Scholar
Roe, D., Nelson, F. & Sandbrook, C. (eds.) (2009) Community Management of Natural Resources in Africa: Impacts, Experiences and Future Directions. London, UK: IIED.Google Scholar
Rozemeijer, N. (2001) Community-based Tourism in Botswana, the SNV Experience in Three Community Tourism Projects. Gaborone: Botswana: SNV/CBNRM Support Programme.Google Scholar
Salafsky, N., Cauley, H., Balachander, G., Cordes, B., Parks, J., Margoluis, C. & Margoluis, R. (2001) A systematic test of an enterprise strategy for community-based biodiversity conservation. Conservation Biology 15: 15851595.Google Scholar
SNV (2010) Monitoring the Socioeconomic Impact of the AWF's Conservation Activities in the Koija & Kijabe Group Ranches of the Samburu Heartland: 2010 Impact Report. Nairobi, Kenya: SNV.Google Scholar
Stem, C., Margoluis, R., Salafsky, N. & Brown, M. (2005) Monitoring and evaluation in conservation: a review of trends and approaches. Conservation Biology 19: 295309.Google Scholar
Sumba, D., Warinwa, F., Lenaiyasa, P. & Muruthi, P. (2007) The Koija Starbeds Ecolodge: A Case Study of a Conservation Enterprise in Kenya. AWF Working Papers. Nairobi, Kenya: African Wildlife Foundation.Google Scholar
Thomas, C. W. & Koontz, T. M. (2011) Research designs for evaluating the impact of community-based management on natural resource conservation. Journal of Natural Resources Policy Research 3: 97111.Google Scholar
Western, D. (2001) In the Dust of Kilimanjaro. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Western, D., Russell, S. & Cuthill, I. (2009) The status of wildlife in protected areas compared to non-protected areas of Kenya. PLoS One 4: e6140.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: Image

Williams supplementary material

Figure S1

Download Williams supplementary material(Image)
Image 1.6 MB
Supplementary material: Image

Williams supplementary material

Figure S2

Download Williams supplementary material(Image)
Image 9.6 MB