Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T21:01:25.972Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Environmental and Economic Dilemmas for Farm-households in Africa: When ‘Low-input Sustainable Agriculture’ Translates to ‘High-cost Unsustainable Livelihoods’

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Allan R.C. Low
Allan R.C. Low
Affiliation:
Agricultural Planning Adviser, Department of Planning, Ministry of Agriculture, Private Bag 13184, Windhoek, Namibia.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Calls for small-scale farmers to move away from the use of purchased inputs in order to make farming more environmentally sustainable are being increasingly voiced on the strength of ecological arguments. These arguments, backed up by technical information on natural resource-loss or degradation, and by descriptions of sustainable indigenous systems which use few external inputs, are often persuasive. However, they can also be simplistic and misleading.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 21 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1994 , pp. 220 - 224
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Barbier, E.B. (1990). Natural resource degradation: policy, economics and management. Pp. 43–57 in Development Research: the Environmental Challenge. Overseas Development Institute, London, England, UK: vi + 228 pp.Google Scholar
Becker, G.S. (1965). A theory of the allocation of time. Economic Journal, 75, pp. 493–517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Belshaw, D., Blaikie, P. & Stocking, M. (1990). Identifying key land degradation issues and applied research priorities. Pp. 66–91 in Development Research: The Environmental Challenge. Overseas Development Institute, London, England, UK: vi + 228 pp.Google Scholar
Binswanger, H.P., Evenson, R.E., Florencio, C.A. & White, N.F. (Eds) (1980). Rural Household Studies in Asia. Singapore University Press, Singapore: xii + 369 pp.Google Scholar
Bolt, R. & Silavwe, M. (1988). Farming Systems and Household Economy in the Northern Province Plateau Region ARPT Trials Areas. ARPT (NP) Economic Studies Nr 2, Misamfu Regional Research Station, Kasumu, Zambia: 62 pp.Google Scholar
Elwell, H.A. (1991). A need for low input sustainable farming systems, The Zimbabwe Science News, 25(4), pp. 31–7.Google Scholar
Hecht, S. (1992). Indigenous soil management in the Latin American tropics: neglected knowledge of native people. Pp. 129–41 in van der, Werf E. (Ed.), Let Farmers Judge. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, England, UK: vii + 208 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
IBRD (1980). Lesotho Agricultural Sector Review. Washington, DC, USA: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Ikpi, A. (1992). Household time allocation — the ultimate determinant of improved agricultural technology adoption in Nigeria: an empirical activity interphase impact model. Pp. 481–501 in Sustainable Agricultural Development: the Role of International Cooperation. Dartmouth, Aldershot, England, UK: xv + 704 pp.Google Scholar
Low, A.R.C. (1986). Agricultural Development in Southern Africa: Farm-household Economics and the Food Crisis. James Currey, London, England, UK: xiii + 217 pp., illustr. and tables.Google Scholar
Moock, J.L. (Ed.) (1986). Understanding Africa's Rural Households and Farming Systems. Westview Special Studies on Africa, Westview Press, Boulder, Colorado, USA: xiv + 234 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Oelhaf, R.C. (1978). Organic Agriculture; Economic and Ecological Comparisons with Conventional Methods. Halstead Press, New York, NY, USA: xii + 271 pp.Google Scholar
Poincelot, R.P. (1986). Towards a More Sustainable Agriculture. Avi Publishing Co., Westport, Massachusetts, USA: 241 pp.Google Scholar
Sanchez, P.A. & Benites, J.R. (1987). Low-input cropping for acid soils of the humid tropics. Science, 238, pp. 1521–7.Google Scholar
Shumba, E.M. (1989 a). Maize technology research in Mangwende, a high potential communal area environment in Zimbabwe, Part 2: the on-farm experimental programme. CIMMYT, Farming Systems Bulletin, 1, pp. 1–13, tables.Google Scholar
Shumba, E.M. (1989 b). Maize technology research in Mangwende, a high potential communal area environment in Zimbabwe, Part 3: farmer assessment and implications for research and extension, CIMMYT, Farming Systems Bulletin, 2, pp. 1–15.Google Scholar
Singh, I., Squire, L. & Strauss, J. (Eds) (1986). A survey of agricultural household models: recent findings and policy implications. World Bank Economic Review, 1(1), pp. 149–79.Google Scholar
Tiffin, M. (1990). Sustainable resource management and project planning. Pp. 92–102 in Development Research: the Environmental Challenge. Overseas Development Institute, London, England, UK: vi + 228 pp.Google Scholar
Vosi, S.A., Reardon, T. & Uriff, W. von (1991). Agricultural Sustainability, Growth and Poverty Alleviation: Issues and Policies. Proceedings of IFPRI/DSE Conference, Feldafing, Germany: 518 pp.Google Scholar
Werf, E. van der (1992). Can ecological agriculture meet the Indian farmer's needs? Pp. 175–85 in van der, Werf E. (Ed.), Let Farmers Judge. Intermediate Technology Publications, London, England, UK: vii + 208 pp., illustr.Google Scholar