Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-8ctnn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T09:44:42.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Enhancing geomorphic and biologic functions and values on backshores and dunes of developed shores: a review of opportunities and constraints

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  09 May 2011

KARL F. NORDSTROM ,
NANCY L. JACKSON ,
NICHOLAS C. KRAUS ,
TIMOTHY W. KANA ,
RANDY BEARCE ,
LYNN M. BOCAMAZO ,
DONALD R. YOUNG  and
HARRY A. DE BUTTS
KARL F. NORDSTROM*
Affiliation:
Institute of Marine and Coastal Sciences, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901–8521, USA
NANCY L. JACKSON
Affiliation:
Department of Chemistry and Environmental Science, New Jersey Institute of Technology, Newark, NJ, 07102, USA
NICHOLAS C. KRAUS
Affiliation:
US Army Engineer Research and Development Center, Coastal and Hydraulics Laboratory, Vicksburg, MS 39180–6199, USA
TIMOTHY W. KANA
Affiliation:
Coastal Science and Engineering, Columbia SC 29202–8056, USA
RANDY BEARCE
Affiliation:
Coastal and Land Use Compliance and Enforcement, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection, Trenton, NJ 08625–0420, USA
LYNN M. BOCAMAZO
Affiliation:
US Army Engineer District, New York, 26 Federal Plaza, New York, NY, 10278–0090, USA
DONALD R. YOUNG
Affiliation:
Department of Biology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, VA, 23284, USA
HARRY A. DE BUTTS
Affiliation:
Borough of Avalon, Avalon, NJ, 08202, USA
*
*Correspondence: Professor Karl F. Nordstrom Tel: +1 732 932 6555 ext. 502 Fax: +1 732 932 8578 e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

This article identifies ways to overcome impediments to restoring natural features on developed shores where human-use functions are the dominant driving forces. Suggestions are made for (1) incorporating natural features and natural dynamism into beach nourishment projects; (2) addressing constraints in size and space; (3) reducing the impact of human actions and elements in the landscape; (4) integrating endangered species programmes; (5) overcoming impediments to implementing restoration projects; (6) conducting post-construction evaluations and actions; (7) obtaining public support; and (8) addressing regulatory issues. Beach nourishment projects can better mimic natural landforms, while protecting infrastructure and habitat, creating space for dunes, and providing sediment for dune building. Dunes can have more value as habitat if sub-environments representative of natural gradients are accommodated. Greater human effort will be required to maintain both dynamic and stable zones for habitat, and these zones may be restricted to smaller scales. Controls can be placed on human actions, such as raking the beach, driving on the beach, walking through the dune, emplacing more structures than necessary and introducing exotic vegetation for landscaping. Regulatory restrictions that now prevent environmentally friendly actions can be eased, and adaptive management and education programmes can be implemented.

Keywords

Beach nourishmentcoastal erosiondunesenvironmental regulationsrestorationshore protection
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 38 , Issue 3 , September 2011 , pp. 288 - 302
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Anders, F.J. & Leatherman, S.P. (1987) Effects of off-road vehicles on coastal foredunes at Fire Island, New York, USA. Environmental Management 11: 45–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Andersen, U.V. (1995) Resistance of Danish coastal vegetation types to human trampling. Biological Conservation 71: 223–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arens, S. M. (1996) Rates of aeolian transport on a beach in a temperate humid climate. Geomorphology 17: 3–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arens, S.M., Slings, Q. & de Vries, C.N. (2004) Mobility of a remobilised parabolic dune in Kennemerland, The Netherlands. Geomorphology 59: 175–188.Google Scholar
Bauer, B.O. & Davidson-Arnott, R.G.D. (2002) A general framework for modeling sediment supply to coastal dunes including wind angle, beach geometry, and fetch effects. Geomorphology 49: 89–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Baye, P. (1990) Ecological history of an artificial foredune ridge on a northeastern barrier spit. In: Proceedings of the Symposium on Coastal Sand Dunes, ed. Davidson-Arnott, R.G.D., pp. 389–403. Ottawa, Canada: National Research Council Canada.Google Scholar
Bocamazo, L.M., Grosskopf, W.G. & Buonuiato, F.S. (2011) Beach nourishment, shoreline change and dune growth at Westhampton Beach, New York, 1996–2009. Journal of Coastal Research (in press).Google Scholar
Bonner, A.E. (1988) Pedestrian walkover form and eolian sediment movement at Fire Island, New York. Shore and Beach 56 (1): 23–27.Google Scholar
Boorman, L.A. & Fuller, R.M. (1977) Studies on the impact of paths on the dune vegetation at Winterton, Norfolk, England. Biological Conservation 12: 203–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bortz, B.M. (1991) Pre-storm and post-storm hurricane planning in Nags Head, North Carolina. Coastal Zone 91, ed. Magoon, O.T., Converse, H., Tippie, V., Tobin, L.T. & Clark, D., pp. 1034–1045. New York, NY, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
Breton, F., Esteban, P. & Miralles, E. (2000) Rehabilitation of metropolitan beaches by local administrations in Catalonia: new trends in sustainable coastal management. Journal of Coastal Conservation 6: 97–106.Google Scholar
Brown, A.C. & McLachlan, A. (2002) Sandy shores ecosystems and the threats facing them: some predictions for the year 2025. Environmental Conservation 29: 62–77.Google Scholar
CSE (2003) Bogue Banks Beach Nourishment Project: Phase 2: Town of Emerald Isle, North Carolina. Final Report Volume I for Town of Emerald Isle. Coastal Science and Engineering, Columbia, SC, USA.Google Scholar
CSE (2004) Bogue Banks, North Carolina. Survey Report 2004. Monitoring Report for Carteret County Shore Protection Office. Coastal Science and Engineering, Columbia, SC, USA.Google Scholar
CSE (2008) Isle of Palms Beach Restoration Project. Final Report for City of Isle of Palms. Coastal Science and Engineering, Columbia, SC, USA.Google Scholar
Cohen, J.B., Houghton, L.M. & Fraser, J.D. (2009) Nesting density and reproductive success of piping plovers in response to storm- and human-created habitat changes. Wildlife Monographs 173 (1): 1–24.Google Scholar
Colombini, I. & Chelazzi, L. (2003) Influence of marine allochthonous input on sandy beach communities. Oceanography and Marine Biology: an Annual Review 41: 115–159.Google Scholar
d'Angremond, K., van den Berg, E.J.F. & de Jager, J.H. (1992) Use and behavior of gabions in coastal protection. In: Coastal Engineering: Proceedings of the Twenty-third Coastal Engineering Conference, ed. Edge, B.L., pp. 1748–1757. New York, NY, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
Davidson-Arnott, R.G.D., MacQuarrie, K. & Aagaard, T. (2005) The effect of wind gusts, moisture content and fetch length on sand transport on a beach. Geomorphology 68: 115–129.Google Scholar
Dean, R.G. (1988) Realistic economic benefits from beach nourishment. In: Proceedings Twenty first International Conference on Beach Nourishment, pp. 1558–1572. New York, NY, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
Dean, R.G. (2002) Beach Nourishment: Theory and Practice. River Edge, NJ, USA: World Scientific.Google Scholar
Defeo, O., McLachlan, A., Schoeman, D.S., Schlacher, T.A., Dugan, J., Jones, A., Lastra, M. & Scapini, F. (2009) Threats to sandy beach ecosystems: a review. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 81: 1–12.Google Scholar
De Lillis, M., Costanzo, L., Bianco, P.M. & Tinelli, A. (2005) Sustainability of sand dune restoration along the coast of the Tyrrhenian Sea. Journal of Coastal Conservation 10: 93–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dette, H.-H. & Raudkivi, A.J. (1994) Beach nourishment and dune protection. In: Coastal Engineering: Proceedings of the Twenty-fourth Coastal Engineering Conference, ed. Edge, B.L., pp. 1934–1945. New York, NY, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
Doody, J.P. (2001) Coastal Conservation and Management: an Ecological Perspective. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dugan, J.E. & Hubbard, D.M. (2010) Loss of coastal strand habitat in southern California: the role of beach grooming. Estuaries and Coasts 33: 67–77.Google Scholar
Dugan, J.E., Hubbard, D.M., McCrary, M.D. & Pierson, M.O. (2003) The response of macrofauna communities and shorebirds to macrophyte wrack subsidies on exposed sandy beaches of southern California. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 58S: 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eastwood, D.A. & Carter, R.W.G. (1981) The Irish dune consumer. Journal of Leisure Research 13: 273–281.Google Scholar
Ehrenfeld, J.G. (1990) Dynamics and processes of barrier island vegetation. Aquatic Science 2: 437–480.Google Scholar
Elias, S.P., Fraser, J.D. & Buckley, P.A. (2000) Piping plover brood foraging ecology on New York barrier islands. Journal of Wildlife Management 64: 346–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fischer, D.L. (1989) Response to coastal storm hazard: short-term recovery versus long-term planning. Ocean and Shoreline Management 12: 295–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
FitzGerald, D.M. (1994) Shoreline processes and damages resulting from the Halloween Eve storm of 1991 along the north and south shores of Massachusetts Bay, USA. Journal of Coastal Research 10: 113–132.Google Scholar
Foster-Smith, J., Birchenough, A.C., Evans, S.M. & Prince, J. (2007) Human impacts on Cable Beach, Broome (Western Australia). Coastal Management 35: 181–194.Google Scholar
Godfrey, P.J. & Godfrey, M.M. 1981. Ecological effects of off-road vehicles on Cape Cod. Oceanus 23: 56–67.Google Scholar
Grafals-Soto, R. & Nordstrom, K.F. (2009) Sand fences in the coastal zone: intended and unintended effects. Environmental Management 44: 420–429.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Hallermeier, R.J. (1987) Applying large replicas of shore erosion by storms. In: Coastal Sediments 87, ed. Kraus, N.C., pp. 1415–1429. New York, NY, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
Hanson, H., Larson, M., & Kraus, N.C. (2010) Calculation of beach change under interacting cross-shore and longshore processes. Coastal Engineering 57: 610–619.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Headland, J.R. (1992) Design of protective dunes at Dam Neck, Virginia. In: Proceedings Coastal Engineering Practice, ed. Hughes, S.A., pp. 251–267. New York, NY, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
Headland, J.R., Alfageme, S., Smith, E. & Kotulak, P. (2007) Coastal structure design for beach protection and sand retention: practical aspects. In: Proceedings Coastal Sediments '07, ed. Kraus, N.C. & Rosati, J.D., pp. 2432–2445. New York, NY, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
Hickman, T. & Cocklin, C. (1992) Attitudes toward recreation and tourism development in the coastal zone: a New Zealand case study. Coastal Management 20: 269–289.Google Scholar
Higgs, E.S. (2003) Nature by Design: People, Natural Process, and Ecological Restoration. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Houser, C. (2009) Synchronization of transport and supply in beach-dune interaction. Progress in Physical Geography 33: 733–746.Google Scholar
Jackson, N.L. & Nordstrom, K.F. (1999) Spatial variation in source characteristics and aeolian trapping rates on a beach. In: Coastal Sediments 99, ed. Kraus, N.C. & McDougal, W.G., pp. 1198–1206. New York, NY, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
Jackson, N.L. Nordstrom, K.F., Saini, S. & Smith, D.R. (2010) Effects of nourishment on the form and function of an estuarine beach. Ecological Engineering 36: 1709–1718.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kana, T.W. (1990) Conserving South Carolina beaches through the 1990s: a case for beach nourishment. Report. SC Coastal Council, Charleston, SC, USA.Google Scholar
Kana, T.W. (1993) The profile volume approach to beach nourishment. In: Beach Nourishment Engineering and Management Considerations, ed. Stauble, D.K. & Kraus, N.C., pp. 176–190. New York, NY, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
Kana, T.W., White, T.E., Forman, J.W. Jr & McKee, P.M. (2002) Shoreline erosion along Bogue Banks, North Carolina. In: Solutions to Coastal Disasters 02, ed. Ewing, L. & Wallendorf, L., pp. 561–575. New York, NY, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
Kraus, N.C. (2006) Understanding piping plover population dynamics through mathematical model, with applications to Northern Assateague Island, Maryland, and Long Island, New York barrier beaches. Shore and Beach 72 (1): 3–9.Google Scholar
Kriebel, D.L & Dean, R.G. (1985) Numerical simulation of time-dependent beach and dune erosion. Coastal Engineering 9: 221–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kriesel, W., Keeler, A. & Landry, C. (2004) Financing beach improvements: comparing two approaches on the Georgia coast. Coastal Management 32: 433–447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Loegering, J.P. & Fraser, J.D. (1995) Factors affecting piping plover chick survival in different brood-rearing habitats. Journal of Wildlife Management 59: 646–655.Google Scholar
Maslo, B. & Lockwood, J.L. (2009) Evidence-based decisions on the use of predator exclosures in shorebird conservation. Biological Conservation 142: 3213–3218.Google Scholar
Mather, A.S. & Ritchie, W. (1977) The Beaches of the Highlands and Islands of Scotland. Perth, UK: Countryside Commission for Scotland.Google Scholar
Mauriello, M.N. (1989) Dune maintenance and enhancement: a New Jersey example. In: Coastal Zone 89, ed. Magoon, O.T., Converse, H., Minor, D., Tobin, L.T. & Clark, D., pp. 1023–1037. New York, NY, USA: American Society of Civil Engineers.Google Scholar
McLachlan, A. (1985) The biomass of macro- and interstitial fauna on clean and wrack-covered beaches in western Australia. Estuarine Coastal and Shelf Science 21: 587–599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Miller, D.L., Thetford, M. & Yager, L. (2001) Evaluating sand fence and vegetation for dune building following overwash by Hurricane Opal on Santa Rosa Island, Florida. Journal of Coastal Research 17: 936–948.Google Scholar
Mitteager, W.A., Burke, A. & Nordstrom, K.F. (2006) Landscape features and restoration potential on private shorefront lots in New Jersey, USA. Journal of Coastal Research SI39: 891–898.Google Scholar
Moreno-Casasola, P. (2004) A case study of conservation and management of tropical sand dune systems: La Mancha-El Llano. In: Coastal Dunes, Ecology and Conservation, ed. Martínez, M.L. & Psuty, N.P., pp. 319–333. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Moss, D. & McPhee, D.P. (2006) The impacts of recreational four-wheel driving on the abundance of the ghost crab (Ocypode cordimanus) on a subtropical sandy beach in SE Queensland. Coastal Management 34: 133–140.Google Scholar
National Research Council (1995) Beach Nourishment and Protection. Washington, DC, USA: National Academy Press.Google Scholar
Nordstrom, K.F. (2000) Beaches and Dunes of Developed Coasts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nordstrom, K.F. (2008) Beach and Dune Restoration. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nordstrom, K.F. & Gares, P.A. (1990) Changes in the volume of coastal dunes in New Jersey, USA, Ocean and Shoreline Management 13: 1–10.Google Scholar
Nordstrom, K.F. & Mauriello, M.N. (2001) Restoring and maintaining naturally-functioning landforms and biota on intensively developed barrier islands under a no-retreat scenario. Shore and Beach 69 (3): 19–28.Google Scholar
Nordstrom, K.F., Lampe, R. & Vandemark, L.M. (2000) Re-establishing naturally-functioning dunes on developed coasts. Environmental Management 25: 37–51.Google Scholar
Nordstrom, K.F., Gamper, U., Fontolan, G., Bezzi, A. & Jackson, N.L. (2009 a) Characteristics of coastal dune topography and vegetation in environments recently modified using beach fill and vegetation plantings, Veneto, Italy. Environmental Management 44: 1121–1135.Google Scholar
Nordstrom, K.F., Jackson, N.L. & de Butts, H.L. (2009 b) A proactive programme for managing beaches and dunes on a developed coast: a case study of Avalon, New Jersey, USA, In: Beach Management: Principles and Practice, ed. Williams, A. & Micallef, A., pp. 307–316. London, UK: Earth Scan.Google Scholar
Priskin, J. (2003) Physical impacts of four-wheel drive related tourism and recreation in a semi-arid, natural coastal environment. Ocean and Coastal Management 46: 127–155.Google Scholar
Ruz, M.-H. & Meur-Ferec, C. (2004) Influence of high water levels on Aeolian sand transport: upper beach/dune evolution on a macrotidal coast, Wissant Bay, northern France. Geomorphology 60: 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Shipman, H. (2001) Beach nourishment on Puget Sound: a review of existing projects and potential applications. In: Puget Sound Research 2001, pp. 1–8. Olympia, WA, USA: Puget Sound Water Quality Action Team.Google Scholar
Shows, E.W. (1978) Florida's coastal setback line: an effort to regulate beachfront development. Coastal Zone Management Journal 4: 151–164.Google Scholar
Speybroek, J., Bonte, D., Courtens, W., Gheskiere, T., Grootaert, P., Maelfait, J.-P., Mathys, M., Provoost, S., Sabbe, K., Steinen, E.W.M., van Lancker, V., Vincx, M. & Degraer, S. (2006) Beach nourishment: an ecologically sound coastal defence alternative? A review. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 16: 419–435.Google Scholar
Thieler, R.E. & Young, R.S. (1991) Quantitative evaluation of coastal geomorphological changes in South Carolina after Hurricane Hugo. Journal of Coastal Research SI8: 187–200.Google Scholar
Titus, J.G. (1990) Greenhouse effect, sea level rise, and barrier islands: case study of Long Beach Island, New Jersey. Coastal Management 18: 65–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
USACE (2000) Planning Guidance Notebook. Engineer Regulation ER 1105–2-100, April 22, 2000, Department of the Army, US Army Corps of Engineers, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
USFWS (1996) Piping plover (Charadrius melodus), Atlantic Coast population, revised recovery plan. Report. Hadley, Massachusetts, USA.Google Scholar
USFWS (2002) Biological opinion on the effects of completion of Sections I and II of the Atlantic Coast of New Jersey Beach Erosion Control Project, Sea Bright to Manasquan, Monmouth County, New Jersey on the piping plover (Charadrius melodus) and seabeach amaranth (Amaranthus pumilus). Report. New Jersey Field Office, Pleasantville, USA.Google Scholar
USFWS (2005) Biological opinion on the effects of federal beach nourishment activities along the Atlantic Coast of New Jersey within the US Army Corps of Engineers, Philadelphia District on the piping plover (Charadrius melodus) and seabeach amaranth (Amaranthus pumilus). Report. New Jersey Field Office, Pleasantville, USA.Google Scholar
van Boxel, J.H., Jungerius, P.D., Kieffer, N. & Hampele, N. (1997) Ecological effects of reactivation of artificially stabilized blowouts in coastal dunes. Journal of Coastal Conservation 3: 57–62.Google Scholar
van der Meulen, F., Bakker, T.W.M. & Houston, J.A. (2004) The costs of our coasts: examples of dynamic dune management from western Europe. In: Coastal Dunes, Ecology and Conservation, ed. Martínez, M.L. & Psuty, N.P., pp. 259–277. Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
Vestergaard, P. & Hansen, K. (1992) Changes in morphology and vegetation of a man-made beach-dune system by natural processes. In: Coastal Dunes: Geomorphology, Ecology and Management for Conservation, ed. Carter, R.W.G., Curtis, T.G.F. & Sheehy-Skeffington, M.J., pp. 165–176. Rotterdam, The Netherlands: A.A. Balkema.Google Scholar
Wiedemann, A.M. & Pickart, A. (1996) The Ammophila problem on the northwest coast of North America. Landscape and Urban Planning 34: 287–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wooton, L.S., Halsey, S.D., Bevaart, K., McGough, A., Ondreicka, J. & Patel, P. (2005) When invasive species have benefits as well as costs: managing Carex kobomugi (Asiatic sand sedge) in New Jersey's coastal dunes. Biological Invasions 7: 1017–1027.Google Scholar
Zelo, I., Shipman, H. & Brennan, J. (2000) Alternative Bank Protection Methods for Puget Sound Shorelines. Ecology Publication #00-06-012. Olympia, WA, USA: Washington Department of Ecology.Google Scholar