Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-23T13:34:51.228Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Ecology and Restoration of Mangrove Shorelines in Florida

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Howard J. Teas
Howard J. Teas
Affiliation:
Professor of Biology, University of Miami, P. O. Box 249118, Coral Gables, Florida 33124, U.S.A.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Mangroves play an important role in estuarine ecological systems as well as in shoreline protection. Such large areas of mangroves have been lost by dredging, land-filling, and other means, that it has become important to develop techniques for restoring or replacing them. Such techniques are needed both for the sake of restoring the mangroves as a valuable shoreline habitat and to estimate their monetary value, which must at least equal the restoration cost.

It is accordingly suggested that future destruction of mangroves be permitted only if they are subsequently replaced at the same site or at some appropriately developed alternative site.

Mangroves have been planted at several sites in Florida, and planting success has been evaluated. Mangroves of several sizes have been planted at a variety of sites that differed in shoreline energy, tidal depth, root-parasite prevalence, substrate type, salinity, and public access. Counts and measurements made after periods of up to 4 years indicated that shoreline energy, tidal depth, and vandalism, were the most important factors limiting mangrove establishment and survival.

Planting costs were estimated from collecting and planting by research assistants and from estimates of the price of larger (3-years-old) nursery-grown trees. Planting cost estimates were $462/acre ($1,140/ha) for unrooted Red Mangrove propagules spaced 3 feet (91 cm) apart, $1,017/acre ($2,500/ha) for established Red, Black, or White, Mangrove seedlings spaced 3 feet (91cm) apart; and $87,500/acre ($216,130/ha) for 3-years-old trees of Red, Black, or White, Mangroves spaced 4 feet (123 cm) apart.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 4 , Issue 1 , Spring 1977 , pp. 51 - 58
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1977

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bacon, P. R. (1970) The Ecology of Caroni Swamp, Trinidad. Central Statistical Office, Trinidad: 68 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Bowman, H. H. M. (1917). Ecology and physiology of the Red Mangrove. Proc. American Philosophical Society, 56, pp. 589–672, illustr.Google Scholar
Carlton, J. M. (1974). Land-building and stabilization by mangroves. Environmental Conservation, 1(4), pp. 285–94, 7 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, M. R., Burns, L. A., Cavinder, T. R., Dugger, K. R., Fore, P. L., Hicks, D. B., Revells, H. L. & Schmidt, T. W. (1973). Ecosystem Analysis of the Big Cypress Swamp. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Pub. 904/9–74–002, Atlanta, Georgia: 376 pp.Google Scholar
Chardon, R. E. (1976). A geographic history of the Biscayne Bay area. Pp. 235–45 in Biscayne Bay: Past, Present and Future (Ed. Thorhaug, A.). University of Miami Sea Grant Special Report No. 5, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida: vi + 315 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Conover, D. O. & Reid, G. K. (1975). Distribution of the boring isopod Sphaeroma terebrans. Florida Scientist, 38, pp. 65–72.Google Scholar
Craighead, F. C. (1971). The Trees of South Florida, I. University of Miami Press, Coral Gables, Florida: xvi + 212 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Davis, J. H. (1940). The ecology and geologic role of mangroves in Florida. Carnegie Inst. Washington, Papers from the Tortugas Laboratory, 32(16), pp. 307–409.Google Scholar
Detweiler, T. E., Dunstan, F. M., Lewis, R. R. & Fehring, W. K. (1975). Patterns of secondary succession in a mangrove community, Tampa Bay, Florida. Pp. 52–81 in Proc. Second Annual Conference on Restoration of Coastal Vegetation in Florida (Ed. Lewis, R. R.). Hillsborough Community College, Tampa, Florida: 203 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Hou, Ding (1958). Rhizophoraceae. Flora Malesiana, 5, pp. 429–93.Google Scholar
Garbisch, E. W., Woller, P. B., Bostian, W. J. & Mccallum, R. J. (1975). Biotic techniques for shore stabilization. Pp. 405–26 in Estuarine Research, Vol. II: Geology and Engineering (Ed. Cronin, L. E.). Academic Press, New York: 587 pp.Google Scholar
Golley, F. B. & Lieth, H. (1972). The bases of tropical production. Pp. 1–26 in Tropical Ecology (Ed. Golley, F. B. & Misra, R.). University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia: 418 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Hannan, J. (1975). Aspects of Red Mangrove reforestation in Florida. Pp. 112–21 in Proc. Second Annual Conference on Restoration of Coastal Vegetation in Florida (Ed. Lewis, R. R.). Hillsborough Community College, Tampa, Florida: 203 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Harshberger, J. W. (1914). The vegetation of South Florida. Trans. Wagner Free Inst., 7, pp. 49–189.Google Scholar
Heald, E. J., Odum, W. E. & Tabb, D. C. (1974). Mangroves in the estuarine food-chain. Pp. 182–9 in Environments of South Florida: Present and Past (Ed. Gleason, P. J.). Miami Geological Society, 4600 Rickenbacker Causeway, Miami, Florida: vi + 452 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Hicks, D. B. & Burns, L. A. (1975). Mangrove metabolic response to alterations of natural freshwater drainage to southwestern Florida estuaries. Pp. 238–55 in Proc. International Symposium on the Biology and Management of Mangroves, Vol. I (Ed. Walsh, J., Snedaker, S. C. & Teas, H. J.). Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida: x + 887 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Idyll, C. P., Tabb, D. C. & Yokel, B. J. (1968). The value of estuaries to shrimp. Proc. Marsh and Estuary Management Symposium, July 1967, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana, pp. 83–90.Google Scholar
Kinch, J. C. (1975). Efforts in marine vegetation in artificial habitat. Pp 102–11 in Proc. Second Annual Conference on Restoration of Coastal Vegetation in Florida (Ed. Lewis, R. R.). Hillsborough Community College, Tampa, Florida: 203 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Lewis, R. R. & Dunstan, F. M. (1975). The possible role of Spartina alterniflora Loisel. in establishment of mangroves in Florida. Pp. 82–100 in Proc. Second Annual Conference on Restoration of Coastal Vegetation in Florida (Ed. Lewis, R. R.). Hillsborough Community College, Tampa, Florida: 203 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Maccaughey, V. (1917). The mangrove in the Hawaiian Islands. Hawaiian Forestry Agr., 14, pp. 361–6.Google Scholar
Mcgill, J. T. (1959). Coastal classification maps. Pp. 1–22 in Second Coastal Geography Conference (Ed. Russell, R. J.). Coastal Studies Institute, Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, Louisiana: 472 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Mcmillan, C. (1971). Environmental factors affecting seedling establishment of the Black Mangrove on the central Texas Coast. Ecology, 52(5), pp. 927–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Macnae, W. (1968). A general account of the fauna and flora of mangrove swamps in the Indo–West Pacific region. Pp. 73–270 in Advances in Marine Biology, 6, Academic Press, New York: x + 406 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Odum, E. P. & Cruz, A. A. de la (1967). Particulate organic detritus in a Georgia salt-marsh–estuarine ecosystem. Pp. 383–8 in Estuaries (Ed. Lauf, G. H.). Am. Assoc. Adv. Sci., Pub. 83: xv + 757 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Odum, W. E. (1971). Pathways of energy flow in a south Florida estuary. Univ. of Miami Sea Grant Bull., 7, 162 pp.Google Scholar
Odum, W. E. & Heald, E. J. (1972). Trophic analyses of an estuarine mangrove community. Bull. Mar. Sci., 22(3), pp. 671–738.Google Scholar
Pulver, T. R. (1975). Suggested mangrove transplanting techniques. Pp. 122–31 in Proc. Second Annual Conference on Restoration of Coastal Vegetation in Florida (Ed. Lewis, R. R.). Hillsborough Community College, Tampa, Florida: 203 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Rabinowitz, D. (1975). Planting experiments in mangrove swamps of Panama. Pp. 385–93 in Proc. International Symposium on Biology and Management of Mangroves, Vol. II (Ed. Walsh, G. E., Snedaker, S. C. & Teas, H. J.). Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida: x + 877 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Rehm, A. E. (1976). The effects of the wood-boring isopod Sphaeroma terebrans on the mangrove communities of Florida. Environmental Conservation, 3(1), pp. 47–57, 8 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rehm, A. E. & Humm, H. J. (1973). Sphaeroma terebrans: A threat to the mangroves of southwestern Florida. Science, 182, pp. 173–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savage, T. (1972). Florida mangroves as shoreline stabilizers. Florida Dept Nat. Resources, Professional Paper Series, No. 19, 46 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Schuster, W. H. (1952). Fish culture in brackish-water ponds of Java. Indo–Pacific Fisheries Comm. Spec. Publ. 1, pp. 1–143.Google Scholar
Simon, J. L. (1974). Tampa Bay estuarine system—synopsis. Florida Scientist, 37(4), pp. 217–44.Google Scholar
Tabb, D. C., Manning, R. B. & Dubrow, D. L. (1962). The ecology of northern Florida Bay and adjacent estuaries. State of Florida, Board of Conservation, Tech. Series No. 39, 81 pp.Google Scholar
Teas, H. J. (1974). Mangroves of Biscayne Bay. Dade County Report, Dade County Public Works Department, 909 S.E. First Avenue, Miami, Florida: 107 pp., illustr. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Teas, H. J. (1976). Productivity of Biscayne Bay mangroves. Pp. 103–12 in Biscayne Bay: Past, Present and Future (Ed. Thorhaug, A.). University of Miami Sea Grant Special Report No. 5, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida: vi + 315 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Teas, H. J., Jurgens, W. & Kimball, M. C. (1975). Plantings of Red Mangrove (Rhizophora mangle L.) in Charlotte and St Lucie Counties, Florida. Pp. 132–61 in Proc. Second Annual Conference on Restoration of Coastal Vegetation in Florida (Ed. Lewis, R. R.). Hillsborough Community College, Tampa, Florida: 203 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Teas, H. J., Wanless, H. R. & Chardon, R. (1976). Effects of Man on the shore vegetation of Biscayne Bay. Pp. 133–56 in Biscayne Bay: Past, Present and Future (Ed. Thorhaug, A.). University of Miami Sea Grant Special Report No. 5, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida: vi + 315 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Woolfenden, G. E. & Schreiber, R. W. (1973). The common birds of the saline habitats of the eastern Gulf of Mexico: Their distribution, seasonal status, and feeding ecology. Pp. 1–22 of IIIJ in A Summary of Knowledge of the Eastern Gulf of Mexico (Ed. Jones, J., Ring, R. E., Rinkel, M. O. & Smith, R. E.). The State University System of Florida, Institute of Oceanography, St Petersburg, Florida: 604 pp., illustr.Google Scholar