Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T20:42:32.207Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Eco-bursaries as incentives for conservation around Arabuko-Sokoke Forest, Kenya

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 2012

MICHELLE M. JACKSON  and
LISA NAUGHTON-TREVES
MICHELLE M. JACKSON*
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, 431 Birge Hall, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
LISA NAUGHTON-TREVES
Affiliation:
Department of Geography, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, USA
*
*Correspondence: Dr Michelle M. Jackson Tel: +1 828 734 4460 e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Incentives used to encourage local residents to support conservation range from integrated conservation and development projects (ICDPs), which indirectly connect improved livelihoods with biodiversity protection, to direct payments for ecosystem services (PES). A unique hybrid between these two strategies, the Arabuko-Sokoke Schools and Ecotourism Scheme (ASSETS), provides secondary-school bursaries to encourage stewardship of a biodiverse highly-imperiled Kenyan forest. Household surveys and semi-structured interviews were used to assess the effectiveness of ASSETS by comparing attitudes and perceptions toward the forest among scheme beneficiaries and non-beneficiaries. The most commonly identified benefit of the forest was resource extraction (for example fuelwood), followed by ecosystem services (such as source of rain). Those in favour of forest clearing tended not to be ASSETS beneficiaries, were less-educated, and were less likely to mention ecosystem services and tourism as forest benefits. ASSETS appears to shape pro-conservation attitudes among beneficiaries and foster a sense of responsibility toward the forest. Challenges for ASSETS are similar to those faced by many conservation and development projects, namely unsteady funding and the risk that the extremely poor may be overlooked. ASSETS may serve as an effective hybrid between the PES and ICDP approaches, and such educational support provides a promising conservation incentive.

Keywords

attitudesconservationKenyapark-people relationshipsperceptionsprotected areas
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 39 , Issue 4 , December 2012 , pp. 347 - 356
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2012

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Kenya, A Rocha (2008) The Arabuko-Sokoke Schools and Eco-Tourism Scheme (ASSETS). Technical Report. A Rocha Kenya, Watamu, Kenya.Google Scholar
Adams, W.M., Aveling, R., Brockington, D., Dickson, B., Elliott, J., Hutton, J., Roe, D., Vira, B. & Wolmer, W. (2004) Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty. Science 306: 1146–1149.Google Scholar
Adams, W.M. & Hutton, J. (2007) People, parks and poverty: political ecology and biodiversity conservation. Conservation and Society 5: 147.Google Scholar
Agrawal, A. & Redford, K. (2006) Poverty, development, and biodiversity conservation: shooting in the dark? Wildlife Conservation Society Working Paper No. 26, Wildlife Conservation Society, New York, NY, USA [www document]. URL http://archive.wcs.org/media/file/wcswp26.pdfGoogle Scholar
Ajzen, I., Fishbein, M. & Heilbroner, R.L. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Allendorf, T., Swe, K.K., Oo, T., Htut, Y., Aung, M., Allendorf, K., Hayek, L.A., Leimgruber, P. & Wemmer, C. (2006) Community attitudes toward three protected areas in Upper Myanmar (Burma). Environmental Conservation 33: 344–352.Google Scholar
Archabald, K. & Naughton-Treves, L. (2001). Tourism revenue-sharing around national parks in Western Uganda: early efforts to identify and reward local communities. Environmental Conservation 28: 135–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
ASFMT (2002) Arabuko-Sokoke Strategic Forest Management Plan 2002–2027. Kenya Wildlife Services, Kenya and Birdlife International, UK [www document]. URL http://www.birdlife.org/action/ground/arabuko/arabuko_sokoke_plan.pdfGoogle Scholar
ASSETS (2011) Arabuko-Sokoke Schools and Ecotourism Scheme ASSETS, Kenya [www document]. URL http://www.assets-kenya.org/Google Scholar
Barrett, C.B., Travis, A.J. & Dasgupta, P. (2011) On biodiversity conservation and poverty traps. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 108: 13907–13912.Google Scholar
Brockington, D. & Schmidt-Soltau, K. (2004) The social and environmental impacts of wilderness and development. Oryx 38: 140–142.Google Scholar
Browne-Nunez, C. & Jonker, S.A. (2008) Attitudes toward wildlife and conservation across Africa: a review of survey research. Human Dimensions of Wildlife 13: 47–70.Google Scholar
Byron, N. & Arnold, M. (1999) What futures for the people of the tropical forest? World Development 27: 789–805.Google Scholar
Campbell, L.M. & Vainio-Mattila, A. (2003) Participatory development and community-based conservation: opportunities missed for lessons learned? Human Ecology 31: 417–438.Google Scholar
Child, B. (1996) The practice and principles of community-based wildlife management in Zimbabwe: the CAMPFIRE programme. Biodiversity and Conservation 5: 369–398.Google Scholar
Corbera, E., Kosoy, N. & Tuna, M.M. (2007) Equity implications of marketing ecosystem services in protected areas and rural communities: case studies from Meso-America. Global Environmental Change 17: 265–380.Google Scholar
Ferraro, P. & Kiss, A. (2002) Direct payments for biodiversity conservation. Science 298: 1718–1719Google Scholar
Ferraro, P. & Simpson, R.D. (2002). The cost-effectiveness of conservation payments. Land Economics 78: 339–353.Google Scholar
Fiallo, E.A. & Jacobson, S.K. (1995) Local communities and protected areas: attitudes of rural residents towards conservation and Machalilla National Park, Ecuador. Environmental Conservation 22: 241–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fisher, B. & Christopher, T. (2007) Poverty and biodiversity: measuring the overlap of human poverty and the biodiversity hotspots. Ecological Economics 62: 93–101.Google Scholar
Fitzgibbon, C.D., Mogaka, H. & Fanshawe, J.H. (1995) Subsistence hunting in Arabuko-Sokoke Forest, Kenya, and its effects on mammal populations. Conservation Biology 9: 1116–1126.Google Scholar
Gavin, M.C., Solomon, J.N. & Blank, S.G. (2010) Measuring and monitoring illegal use of natural resources. Conservation Biology 24: 89–100.Google Scholar
Gordon, I. & Ayiemba, W. (2003) Harnessing butterfly biodiversity for improving livelihoods and forest conservation: the Kipepeo Project. The Journal of Environment and Development 12: 82.Google Scholar
Grieg-Gran, M., Porras, I. & Wunder, S. (2005) How can market mechanisms for forest environmental services help the poor? Preliminary lessons from Latin America. World Development 33: 1511–1527.Google Scholar
Gubbi, S., Linkie, M. & Leader-Williams, N. (2008) Evaluating the legacy of an integrated conservation and development project around a tiger reserve in India. Environmental Conservation 35: 331–339.Google Scholar
Gunatilake, H.M. (1998) The role of rural development in protecting tropical rainforests: evidence from Sri Lanka. Journal of Environmental Management 53: 273–292.Google Scholar
Hegde, R. & Enters, T. (2000) Forest products and household economy: a case study from Mudumalai Wildlife Sanctuary, Southern India. Environmental Conservation 27: 250–259.Google Scholar
Infield, M. & Namara, A. (2001) Community attitudes and behavior towards conservation: an assessment of a community conservation programme around Lake Mburo National Park, Uganda. Oryx 35: 48–60.Google Scholar
Jack, B.K., Kousky, C. & Sims, K.R.E. (2008) Designing payments for ecosystem services: lessons from previous experience with incentive-based mechanisms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 105: 9465–9470.Google Scholar
Karanth, K.K. & DeFries, R. (2011) Nature-based tourism in Indian protected areas: new challenges for park management. Conservation Letters 4: 137–149.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maundu, P. (1993) Socio-economic survey and forest attitude report of the community bordering Arabuko-Sokoke Forest and Game Reserve.Kipepeo Project Technical Report, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Maundu, P., Sojah, L. & Klili, G. (1997) Report on the impact of the Kipepeo Project on the economic status and forest attitude of the community bordering Arabuko-Sokoke Forest Reserve. Kipepeo Project Technical Report, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
McClanahan, T., Davies, J. & Maina, J. (2005) Factors influencing resource users and managers’ perceptions towards marine protected area management in Kenya. Environmental Conservation 32: 42–49.Google Scholar
Milne, S. & Niesten, E. (2009) Direct payments for biodiversity conservation in developing countries: practical insights for design and implementation. Oryx 43: 530–541.Google Scholar
Mogaka, H., Simons, G., Turpie, J., Emerton, L. & Karanja, F. (2001) Economic aspects of community involvement in sustainable forest management in Eastern and Southern Africa.Report of the IUCN Eastern Africa Program, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Mogaka, H.R. (1991) Local utilisation of Arabuko-Sokoke Forest Reserve. IUCN Eastern Africa Program Technical Report, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Myers, N., Mittermeier, R.A., Mittermeier, C.G., da Fonseca, G.A.B. & Kent, J. (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403: 853–858.Google Scholar
Nature Canada (2011) Bird conservation: bringing hope to Haiti [www document]. URL http://naturecanada.ca/bird_cons_haiti.aspGoogle Scholar
Naughton-Treves, L. (1997) Farming the forest edge: vulnerable places and people around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Geographical Review 87: 27–46.Google Scholar
Naughton-Treves, L. (1998) Predicting patterns of crop damage by wildlife around Kibale National Park, Uganda. Conservation Biology 12: 156–168.Google Scholar
Naughton-Treves, L. & Treves, A. (2005) Socio-ecological factors shaping local support for wildlife: crop-raiding by elephants and other wildlife in Africa. In: People and Wildlife: Conflict or Coexistence? ed. Woodroffe, R., Thirgood, S. & Rabinowitz, A., pp. 252–277. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Newmark, W.D. (2008) Isolation of African protected areas. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6: 321–328.Google Scholar
Newmark, W.D. & Hough, J.L. (2000) Conserving wildlife in Africa: integrated conservation and development projects and beyond. BioScience 50: 585–592.Google Scholar
Ngala, D. (2010) Monitoring important bird areas in the Arabuko-Sokoke Forest. Friends of Arabuko-Sokoke Forest Technical Report, Nairobi, Kenya.Google Scholar
Niesten, E. & Rice, R. (2004) Sustainable forest management and conservation incentive agreements. The International Forestry Review 6: 56–60.Google Scholar
O'Connell-Rodwell, C.E., Rodwell, T., Rice, M. & Hart, L.A. (2000) Living with the modern conservation paradigm: can agricultural communities co-exist with elephants? A five-year case study in East Caprivi, Namibia. Biological Conservation 93: 381–391.Google Scholar
Peluso, N.L. (1992) Rich Forests, Poor People: Resource Control and Resistance in Java. Berkley, CA, USA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Petheram, L. & Campbell, B.M. (2010) Listening to locals on payments for environmental services. Journal of Environmental Management 91: 1139–1149.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
R Development Core Team (2008) >R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.R:+A+language+and+environment+for+statistical+computing.+R+Foundation+for+Statistical+Computing,+Vienna,+Austria.>Google Scholar
Robinson, J.G. & Redford, K.H. (2004) Jack of all trades, master of none: inherent contradictions among ICDP approaches. In: Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work: Towards More Effective Conservation and Development, ed. McShane, T.O., & Wells, M., pp. 10–34. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Romero, C. & Andrade, G.I. (2004) International conservation organizations and the fate of local tropical forest conservation initiatives. Conservation Biology 18: 578–580.Google Scholar
Schwartzman, S., Moreira, A. & Nepstad, D. (2000) Rethinking tropical forest conservation: perils in parks. Conservation Biology 14: 1351–1357.Google Scholar
Sinclair, A.J., Collins, S.A. & Spaling, H. (2011) The role of participant learning in community conservation in the Arabuko-Sokoke Forest, Kenya. Conservation and Society 9: 42–53.Google Scholar
Spiteri, A. & Nepal, S.K. (2006) Incentive-based conservation programs in developing countries: a review of some key issues and suggestions for improvements. Environmental Management 37: 1–14.Google Scholar
Swallow, B.M., Kallesoe, M.F., Iftikhar, U.A., van Noordwijk, M., Bracer, C., Scherr, S.J., Raju, K., Poats, S.V., Duraiappah, A.K. & Ochieng, B.O. (2009) Compensation and rewards for environmental services in the developing world: framing pan-tropical analysis and comparison. Ecology and Society 14: 26.Google Scholar
TDA (2011) The TDA educational scholarship program [www document]. URL http://www.tetepare.org/tetepare-scholarship-program.htmlGoogle Scholar
VandeGriend, R. (2007) Monitoring the impact of ASSETS on Arabuko-Sokoke Forest and Mida Creek. A Rocha Kenya Technical Report, A Rocha Kenya, Watamu, Kenya.Google Scholar
Wang, S.W., Lassoie, J.P. & Curtis, P.D. (2006) Farmer attitudes towards conservation in Jigme Singye Wangchuck National Park, Bhutan. Environmental Conservation 33: 148–156.Google Scholar
Wells, M., McShane, T.O., Dublin, H.T., O'Connor, S. & Redford, K. (2006) The future of integrated conservation and development projects: building on what works. In: Getting Biodiversity Projects to Work, ed. McShane, T.O. & Wells, M., pp. 394–421. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Wunder, S. (2007) The efficiency of payments for environmental services in tropical conservation. Conservation Biology 21: 48–58.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: File

Jackson supplementary Appendix

Jackson supplementary Appendix

Download Jackson supplementary Appendix(File)
File 64.5 KB