Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T16:18:25.500Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Design of an Urban Open-space Network for the City of Durban (South Africa)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Debra C. Roberts
Debra C. Roberts
Affiliation:
Manager: Environment, Urban Development Department, PO Box 680, Durban 4000, South Africa. Formerly Lecturer, Department of Geographical and Environmental Sciences, University of Natal.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Global urbanization is proceeding at an alarming rate and is threatening the long-term survival of many important biological resources. Planners in the City of Durban (South Africa), cognizant of this impending environmental crisis, have designed an urban open-space network aimed at preserving a representative and functional example of the previous indigenous landscapes now under threat as a result of development.

Biogeographical principles have been used to produce for Durban a system characterized by maximized reserve size, continuity, and overall minimized system linearity with the lowest edge-to-area ratio possible. Emphasis has also been placed on economic viability and on the importance of community acceptance and participation within the system.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 21 , Issue 1 , Spring 1994 , pp. 11 - 17
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1994

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Botha, W. (1988). Durban's urgent challenge. The Condenser, pp. 4–11, illustr.Google Scholar
Desai, B. (1990). An Environmental Policy for the Pan Africanist Congress of Azania. Discussion document, unpublished: 4 pp.Google Scholar
Diamond, J.M. (1975). The island dilemma: lessons of modern bio-geographic studies for the design of natural preserves. Biological Conservation, 7, pp. 129–46, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Director Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department (1989). D'MOSS: Durban Metropolitan Open Space System. Parks, Beaches and Recreation Department, Durban, South Africa: 96 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Goldstein, E.L., Gross, M. & DeGraaf, R.M. (1982). Wildlife and greenspace planning in medium-scale residential developments. Urban Ecology, 7, pp. 201–14, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huntley, B., Siegfried, R. & Sunter, C. (1989). South African Environments into the 21st Century. Human & Rousseau/ Tafelberg, Cape Town, South Africa: 127 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Irwin, P. (1990). What is environmental education? Conserva, 5, pp. 4–5.Google Scholar
Lawson, L. (1991). The ghetto and the greenbelt: The environmental crisis in the urban areas. Pp. 46–63 in Going Green: People, Politics and the Environment in South Africa (Eds Cock, J. & Koch, E.). Oxford University Press, Cape Town, South Africa: 262 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Ledger, J. (1991). Biodiversity, the basis of life: South Africa's endangered species. Pp. 230–41 in Going Green: People; Politics and the Environment in South Africa (Eds Cock, J. & Koch, E.). Oxford University Press, Cape Town, South Africa: 262 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
MacArthur, R.H. & Wilson, E.O. (1967). The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA: xi + 203 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Noss, R.F. (1987). Corridors in real landscapes: a reply to Simberloff and Cox. Conservation Biology, 1, pp. 158–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poynton, J.C. (1961). Biogeography of south-east Africa. Nature (London), 189, pp. 801–3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Poynton, J.C. & Roberts, D.C. (1985). Urban open-space planning in South Africa: a biogeographical perspective. South African Journal of Science, 81, pp. 33–7, illustr.Google Scholar
Roberts, D.C. (1990). An Open-space Survey of Municipal Durban. Unpublished PhD thesis. University of Natal, Durban, South Africa: xiii + 513 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Rutherford, M.C. & Westfall, R.H. (1986). Biomes of Southern Africa—an Objective Categorization. (Memoirs of the Botanical Survey of South Africa No. 54.) Botanical Research Institute, Pretoria, South Africa: v + 98 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Simberloff, D.S. & Cox, J. (1987). Consequences and costs of conservation corridors. Conservation Biology, 1, pp. 63–71, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sisulu, M. & Sangweni, S. (1990). Future Environment Policy for a Changing South Africa. African National Congress, discussion document, unpublished: 20 pp.Google Scholar
Town Planning Branch [of City Engineer's Department, Durban] (1987). Umgeni South District Scheme Review. City Engineer's Department, Durban, South Africa: viii + 63 pp.Google Scholar
Town Planning Branch [of City Engineer's Department, Durban] (1989). The City-Region Planning Initiative. City Engineer's Department, Durban, South Africa: viii + 66 pp.Google Scholar
Westfall, R.H., Staden, J.M. van & Panagos, M.D. (1987). Predictive species-area relations and determination of subsample size for vegetation sampling in the Transvaal Waterberg. South African Journal of Botany, 53, pp. 44–8, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whyte, W.H. (1968). The Last Landscape. Doubleday, New York, NY, USA: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Wilson, E.O. (Ed.) (1989). Biodiversity. National Academy Press, Washington, DC, USA: xiii + 521 pp., illustr.Google Scholar