Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-p9bg8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T00:48:33.892Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

William Y. Brown
William Y. Brown
Affiliation:
Senior Scientist, Environmental Defense Fund, 1525 18th Street NW, Washington, DC 20036, USA; Member, Antarctic Section, State Department Advisory Committee on Oceans and International Environmental and Scientific Affairs.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Recognizing the recency of establishment of the conservation principles in Article II of the Convention on the Conservation of Antarctic Marine Living Resources, and that no current analysis can be definitive or should pretend to be, the following preliminary conclusions stem from this paper:

1. The three principles of Article II of the Convention should be read as complementary guides in pursuing the overall goal of preserving the natural marine ecosystems of the Antarctic while also allowing some degree of harvest.

2. Sound implementation of the principles requires subdivision of the Convention area. The six baleen whale Areas designated by the International Whaling Commission are one possibility, but poorly justified ecologically. Priority should be given to identifying geographic divisions that rest upon a more sound and more finely-constructed ecological foundation.

3. Management indicator species and depleted species should be identified as soon as possible, and sampled periodically for appropriate life-history statistics in each agreed-upon subdivision of the Antarctic marine complex of ecosystems. The statistics appropriate for such monitoring are likely to vary with different species, and should generally be those parameters that are least sensitive to environmental fluctuations in general and most sensitive to changes in resource availability.

4. A substantial portion of each ecologically differentiated area should be completely protected from harvest and associated activities.

5. Harvest effort in portions of such areas open to exploitation should be regulated differentially, in order to facilitate assessment of the effects of harvest pursuant to an agreed-upon experimental design.

6. Harvest of krill and other species should be so regulated in any open area that the harvest is consistent with the maintenance or restoration of the harvested species, indicator species, and depleted species to levels of greatest net annual increment or above, defined with respect to initial population size.

7. Article II's principle of reversibility should address adaptive change resulting from artificial selection as well as ecological change. A methodology for correlating harvest practices with rates of reversal of the effects of harvest should be developed for harvested species, indicator species, and depleted species. No alien species should be introduced into Antarctica unless its existence there can be easily terminated.

8. As soon as possible, a limit should be placed on the allowable annual rate of increase of krill harvest by Man.

9. Basic research on Antarctic marine ecosystems should be enhanced, even though the research may have no obvious application to stable recruitment or to reversibility of change.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 10 , Issue 3 , Autumn 1983 , pp. 187 - 196
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Ad Hoc Us Scientific Working Group on the Antarctic (1979). Second Workshop Report. Convened by the Department of State, held in Washington, DC, USA, 17–19 04 1979. Unpublished: 25 pp., appendixes (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Ad Hoc Us Scientific Working Group on the Antarctic (1982). Fourth Workshop Report. Convened by the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, held in Washington, DC, USA, 16–17 03 1982. Unpublished: 29 pp., appendixes (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Batisse, M. (1980). The Relevance of MAB. Environmental Conservation, 7(3), pp. 179–84, fig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Batisse, M. (1982). The biosphere reserve: A tool for environmental conservation and management. Environmental Conservation, 9(2), pp. 101–11, 8 figs.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beddington, J.R. & May, R.M. (1982). The harvesting of interacting species in a natural ecosystem. Scientific American, 247(5), pp. 62–9, fig.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bengtson, J.L. (1978). Review of Information Regarding the Conservation of Living Resources of the Antarctic Marine Ecosystem. US Marine Mammal Commission Contract Report MM8AD055, Washington, DC, USA: 148 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Botkin, D.B. & Sobel, M.J. (1977). Optimum Sustainable Marine Mammal Populations. US Marine Mammal Commission Contract Report MM7AC003, Washington, DC, USA: 126 pp., illustr. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Council on Environmental Quality (1980) The Eleventh Annual Report of the Council on Environmental Quality. GPO, Washington, DC, USA: xxxiii + 298 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Everson, I. (1977). The Southern Ocean: the Living Resources of the Southern Ocean. (FAO Rept GLO/SO/77/1.) Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy: 156 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Frankel, O.H. (1981). Genetic diversity, ecosystem conservation, and evolutionary responsibility. (Paper 3/10.) Presented at an UNESCO-ICSU Conference-Exhibit on Ecology in Practice, held in Paris, France, 22–29 September 1981. UNESCO, Paris, France: 17 pp., illustr. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Franklin, I.R. (1980). Evolutionary change in small populations. Pp. 135–49 in Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective (Ed. Soulé, M.E. & Wilcox, B.A.). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA: xv + 395 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Green, K.A. (1977). Role of Krill in the Antarctic Marine Ecosystem. US Dept of State Contract Report 1722–720248, Washington, DC, USA: v + 34 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Gulland, J.A. (1970). The development of the resources of the Antarctic seas. Pp. 217–23 in Vol. 1 of Antarctic Ecology (Ed. Holdgate, M.W.). Academic Press, New York, NY, USA: xx + 604 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Holt, S.J. & Talbot, L.M. (1978). New Principles for the Conservation of Wild Living Resources. (Wildlife Monograph No. 59, The Wildlife Society.) Allen Press, Lawrence, Kansas, USA: 33 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
IUCN (1980). 1980 United Nations List of National Parks and Equivalent Reserves. International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources, Gland, Switzerland: iii + 119 pp.Google Scholar
Laws, R.M. (1977). Seals and whales in the Southern Ocean. Phil. Trans. Roy. Soc. Lond. B, 279, pp. 81–96.Google Scholar
Mackintosh, N.A. (1970). Whales and krill in the twentieth century. Pp. 195–212 in Vol. 1 of Antarctic Ecology (Ed. Holdgate, M.W.). Academic Press, New York, NY, USA: xx + 604 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Marine Mammal Commission (1976). The Concept of Optimum Sustainable Populations. Marine Mammal Commission, Washington, DC, USA: 10 pp.Google Scholar
Marine Mammal Commission (1982). Annual Report of the Marine Mammal Commission, Calendar Year 1981: A Report to Congress. Marine Mammal Commission, Washington, DC, USA: 10 pp.Google Scholar
Marr, J.W.S. (1962). The natural history and geography of the Antarctic Krill (Euphausia superba). Discovery Rep., 32, pp. 33–464.Google Scholar
Moiseev, P. A. (1970). Some aspects of the commercial use of krill resources of the Antarctic seas. Pp. 213–6 in Vol. 1 of Antarctic Ecology (Ed. Holdgate, M.W.). Academic Press, New York, NY, USA: xx + 604 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Northwest and Alaska Fisheries Center (1980). Report of the Workshop on Ecosystem Simulation Models and their Application to Fishery Management. Convened by the National Marine Fisheries Service, US Department of Commerce, and held in Seattle, Washington, USA, 29 04–1 05 1980. Unpublished: 26 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Paine, R.T. (1981). Truth in ecology. Bull. Ecol. Soc. of America, 62, pp. 256–8.Google Scholar
SCAR/SCOR (1977). Biological Investigations of Marine Antarctic Systems, Vol. 1: Research Proposals. (Working group convened by S.Z. El Sayed, College Station, Texas, USA.) Scientific Committee on Antarctic Research/Scientific Committee on Oceanic Research, Working Group 54, Cambridge, England, UK: 75 pp.Google Scholar
Siderits, K. & Radtke, R.E. (1977). Enhancing forest wildlife habitat through diversity. Pp. 425–34 in Proc. 42nd North Amer. Wild. Conf. Wildlife Management Institute, Washington, DC, USA: 523 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Soulé, M.E. (1980). Thresholds for survival: maintaining fitness and evolutionary potential. Pp. 151–69 in Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-Ecological Perspective (Ed. Soulé, M.E. & Wilcox, B.A.). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts, USA: xv + 395 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Southern Ocean Convention Workshop on Management of Antarctic Marine Organisms (1980). Report and Recommendations. Center for Environmental Education, Washington, DC, USA: 33 pp.Google Scholar
US Forest Service (1980). Forest Service Policy, Goals, and Objectives for Wildlife and Fish Habitat Management in the 1980s. US Forest Service, Washington, DC, USA: 7 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Zenkovich, B.A. (1970). Whales and plankton in Antarctic waters. Pp. 183–90 in Vol. 1 of Antarctic Ecology (Ed. Holdgate, M.W.). Academic Press, New York, NY, USA: xx + 604 pp., illustr.Google Scholar