Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-26T10:17:46.403Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The classification of the sciences and the quest for interdisciplinarity: a brief history of ideas from ancient philosophy to contemporary environmental science

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2011

G. W. TROMPF*
Affiliation:
School of Letters, Art and Media, and School of Social and Political Sciences, University of Sydney, NSW, Australia2006
*
*Correspondence: Professor Garry Trompf e-mail: [email protected], [email protected]

Summary

Burgeoning acquisition of information about the workings, scope and diversities of the cosmos put serious pressure on 19th-century European intellectuals to classify branches of human knowledge. A challenge presented itself not only to order different subject-areas and disciplines intelligently, or assess them according to apparent degrees of certitude, but also to discover some synthesizing principle by which all the distinctive methods of approaching the world might be viewed in interrelationship. This review shows that such endeavours to classify and unify were traditional procedures, with deep roots going back to antiquity, and they brought coherence to academic programmes through the centuries. As a mark of European modernity, there was a tendency to establish more rational, scientific and secular principles of order, and the consequent tensions between positivistic and holistic styles of approach to science have continued since. Since the beginning of the twentieth century, it is also recognized, the constant subdividing of academic agendas has made the work of classification much less manageable and attractive. If traditional principles to express the unity of knowledge were philosophical, or, in the case of the medieval universities, evoked the oneness of the divine Creation, it is intriguing how planetary survivalism in the present time has pushed environmental science centre-stage as a pivotal point of activity encouraging interdisciplinary collaboration. If varying consideration has been granted to practical subjects (for example agriculture) in the history of knowledge classification, their importance has been clarified by current biospheric predicaments.

Type
THEMATIC SECTION: Interdisciplinary Progress in Environmental Science & Management
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2011

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ampère, A.-M. (1834–1843) Essai sur la philosophie des sciences: ou, exposition d'une classification naturelle de toutes les connaissances humaines. Volumes 1 and 2. Paris, France: Chez Bachelier.Google Scholar
Anderson, L. (1982) Bonnet and the Order of the Known. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.Google Scholar
Bacon, F. (1905 [1605]) The advancement of learning. In: The Philosophical Works, ed. Robertson, J.M., pp. 39176. London, UK: George Routledge and Sons.Google Scholar
Bakar, O. (1998) The Classification of Knowledge in Islam: A Study in Islamic Philosophies of Science. Cambridge, UK: Islamic Texts Society.Google Scholar
Bonnet, C. (1764) Contemplation de la nature. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: M.M. Rey.Google Scholar
Bowler, J. (1996) Life's Splendid Drama: Evolutionary Biology and the Reconstruction of Life's Ancestry, 1860–1940. Chicago, USA: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Brooke, J.H. (1991) Science and Religion: Some Historical Perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Brucker, J.J. (1742–1767) Historia Critica Philosophiae a Mundi Incunabulis ad nostram usque Aetatem Deducta. Volumes 1–6. Leipzig, Germany: Breitkopf.Google Scholar
Buffon, G.L.L. (1785–1790) Histoire naturelle, générale et particulière. Second edition. Volumes 1–37. Zweibrucken, Germany: Sanson & Co.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cohen, R.S. & Wartofsky, M.W., eds (1984) Hegel and the Sciences. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Reidel.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Comte, A. (1830–1842) Cours de philosophie positive. Volumes 1–6. Paris, France: Bachelier.Google Scholar
Crombie, A.C. (1994) Styles of Scientific Thinking in the European Tradition: The History of Argument and Explanation in the Mathematical and Biomedical Sciences and Arts. Volumes 1–3. London, UK: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Cromwell, D. & Levene, M., eds (2007) Surviving Climate Change: The Struggle to Avert Global Catastrophe. London, UK: Pluto.Google Scholar
Deleuze, G. & Guattari, F. (2004) A Thousand Plateaus: Capitalism and Schizophrenia. Third edition. London, UK: Continuum.Google Scholar
De Santa Ana, J., ed. (1998) Sustainability and Globalization. Geneva, Switzerland: WCC.Google Scholar
Didérot, D. & d'Alembert, J. le R., eds (1751–1772) Encyclopédie ou Dictionnaire raisonée des sciences et des métiers. Volumes 1–18. Paris, France: Briasson.Google Scholar
Drexler, H. (2008) Global Warming, Just the Tip of the Iceberg. Sydney, Australia: BookPal.Google Scholar
Eckersley, R. (1992) Environmentalism and Political Theory: Towards an Ecocentric Approach. London, UK: UCL Press.Google Scholar
Evans, G.R. (1980) Old Arts and New Theology: The Beginnings of Theology as an Academic Discipline. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Fara, P. (2004) Pandora's Breeches: Women, Science and Power in the Enlightenment. London, UK: Pimlico.Google Scholar
Glacken, C. (1979) Traces on the Rhodian Shore: Nature and Culture in Western Thought from Ancient Times to the End of the Eighteenth Century. Second edition. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Greaves, R.L. (1969) The Puritan Revolution and Educational Thought: Background for Reform. New Brunswick, NJ, USA: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Greenleaf, M., Leslie, M. & Raylor, T., eds (1994) Samuel Hartlib and the Universal Reformation. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Hall, B.K., ed. (1994) Homology: The Hierarchical Basis of Comparative Biology. San Diego, CA, USA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Hegel, G.W.F. (1905 [1830]) Enzyklopädie der philosophischen Wissenschaften im Grundrisse. Third edition. Leipzig, Germany: Felix Meiner.Google Scholar
Hicks, C.C., Fitzsimmons, C. & Polunin, N.V.C. (2010) Interdisciplinarity in the environmental sciences: barriers and frontiers. Environmental Conservation 37: 464477.Google Scholar
Hobbes, T. (1966 [1651]) The Leviathan: Or the Matter, Forme and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil, ed. Oakeshott, M., London, UK: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Holmes, R. (2009) The Age of Wonder: How the Romantic Generation Discovered the Beauty and Terror of Science. Second edition. London, UK: Harper.Google Scholar
Hunt, R.W. (1948) Introduction to the artes in the XIIth century. In: Studia Mediaevalia, ed. Martin Miscellanea, R.J., pp. 84112. Bruges, Belgium: De Tempel.Google Scholar
Jaeger, W. (1986 [1936–1947]) Paideia: Ideals of Greek Culture. Volumes 1–3. Translated G. Highet. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Jansen, K.L., Drell, J. & Andrews, F., eds (2009) Medieval Italy: Texts in Translation. Philadelphia, USA: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Katsiampoura, G. (2010) Faith or knowledge? Normative relations between religion and science in Byzantine textbooks. Almagest 1: 112122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Knight, D. (1988) The Age of Science: The Scientific World View in the Nineteenth Century. Second edition. Oxford, UK: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Lehmann-Brauns, S. (2004) Weisheit in der Weltgeschichte: Philosophiegeschichte zwischen Barock und Aufklärung. Tübingen, Germany: Niermeyer.Google Scholar
Linzey, A. (2007) Creatures of the Same God: Explorations in Animal Theology. Winchester, UK: Winchester University Press.Google Scholar
Lowry, J.E., Stewart, D.J. & Toorawa, S.M., eds (2004) Law and Education in Medieval Islam: Studies in Memory of Professor George Makdisi. Cambridge, UK: E.J.W. Gibb Memorial Trust.Google Scholar
Lull, R. (1986 [1283]) Blanquerna. Translated Peers, E.A.. London, UK: Dedalus.Google Scholar
Makdisi, G. (1989) Scholasticism and humanism in classical Islam and the Christian West. Journal of the American Oriental Society 109: 175182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Marx, K., Engels, F. & Lenin, V.I. (1972) On Historical Materialism: A Collection. Translated Anon. Moscow, Russia: Progress Publishers.Google Scholar
McLeod, C. (2002) Inventing the Industrial Revolution: The English Patent System, 16601800. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University PressGoogle Scholar
Merkel, D. & Debus, A.G., eds (1988) Hermeticism and the Renaissance: Intellectual History and the Occult in Early Modern Europe. Washington, DC, USA: Folger Shakespeare Library.Google Scholar
Miksa, F. (1998) The DDC: The Universe of Knowledge and the Post-Modern Library. Albany, NY, USA: Forest Press.Google Scholar
Minelli, A., Bonato, A. & Fusco, G., eds (2008) Updating the Linnaean Heritage: Names for Tools for Thinking about Animals and Plants. Special issue of Zootaxa 1950: 1163.Google Scholar
Needham, J. (1954–2008) Science and Civilisation in China. Volumes 1–7. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Needham, J., ed. (1955) Science, Religion and Reality. New York, NY, USA: George Braziller.Google Scholar
Newman, J.H. (1859 [1852]) Discourses on the Scope and Nature of University Education. Dublin, Ireland: James Duffy.Google Scholar
Noble, D.F. (1997) The Religion of Technology. New York, NY, USA: Knopf.Google Scholar
Oken, L. (1833–1842) Allgemeine Naturgeschichte für alle Stände. Volumes 1–7. Stuttgart, Germany: Carl Hoffmann.Google Scholar
O'Leary, D.L. (2001 [1948]) How Greek Science Passed to the Arabs. London, UK: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Passmore, J.A. (1966) Analytical criticisms of traditional philosophies of education. In: Melbourne Studies in Education 1965, ed. French, E.L., pp. 4161. Melbourne, Australia: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
Peirce, C. (1931 [1905]) A detailed classification of the sciences. In: Collected Papers, Volume 1, pp. 160202. Cambridge, MA, USA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Princen, T. (2010) Treading Softly: Paths to Ecological Order. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Polunin, N. & Burnett, J. eds (1993) Surviving with the Biosphere. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Rashdall, H. (1987 [1936]) The Universities of Europe in the Middle Ages. Volumes 1–3. Fourth edition, ed. Powicke, F.M. & Emden, A.B.. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Richards, R.J. (2002) The Romantic Conception of Life: Science and Philosophy in the Age of Goethe. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Ross, D. (1995 [1923]) Aristotle. Sixth edition. London, UK: Routledge.Google Scholar
Rupke, N. (2009) Richard Owen: Biology without Darwin. Second edition. Chicago, IL, USA: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Sedgwick, S. (2008) Kant's Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals: An Introduction. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Sharpe, E.J. (1986) Comparative Religion: A History. Second edition. London, UK: Duckworth.Google Scholar
Shattuck, R. (1996) Forbidden Knowledge: From Prometheus to Pornography. New York, NY, USA: St Martin's.Google Scholar
Smuts, J.C. (1926) Holism and Evolution. New York, NY, USA: J.J. Little and Ives [www document]. URL http://www.questia.com/library/book/holism-and-evolution-by-j-c-smuts.jspGoogle Scholar
Somerville, M. (1877 [1834]) The Connexion of the Physical Sciences. London, UK: John Murray.Google Scholar
Sorabji, R. (2005) The Philosophy of the Commentators. Volumes 1–3. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1891) Essays: Scientific, Political and Speculative. Volumes 1 and 2. Second edition. London, UK: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1890) A System of Synthetic Philosophy, Volume 1: First Principles. London, UK: William and Norgate.Google Scholar
Spencer, H. (1890–1904 [1862–1893]) A System of Synthetic Philosophy. Volumes 1–10. London, UK: Williams and Norgate.Google Scholar
Sprat, T. (1667) The History of the Royal Society. London, UK: ‘TR’.Google Scholar
Stukeley, W. (1836 [1752]) Memoirs of Sir Isaac Newton's Life, ed. White, A.H.. London, UK: Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
Tanner, R.G. (2002) Aristotle's works; the possible origins of the Alexandria Collection. In: The Library of Alexandria: Centre of Learning in the Ancient World, pp. 7991. Cairo, Egypt: American University of Cairo Press.Google Scholar
Thorndike, L. (1934–1954) History of Magic and Experimental Science. Volumes 1–8. New York, NY, USA: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Trompf, G.W. (1969) Radical conservatism in Herbert Spencer's thought. British Journal of Educational Studies 17: 267280.Google Scholar
Trompf, G.W. (1973) The concept of the Carolingian Renaissance. Journal of the History of Ideas 34: 326.Google Scholar
Trompf, G.W. (1977) Social science in historical perspective. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 7: 113138.Google Scholar
Trompf, G.W. (1979–2011) The Idea of Historical Recurrence in Western Thought. Volumes 1 and 2. Berkeley, CA, USA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Trompf, G.W. (1991) On Newtonian history. In: The Uses of Antiquity, ed. Gaukroger, S., pp. 216233. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
Trompf, G.W. (1994) Vico's universe: ‘la Provvedenza’ and ‘la Poesia’ in the new science of Giambattista Vico. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 2: 5586.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Trompf, G.W. (2005a) In Search of Origins: The Beginnings of Religion in Western Theory and Archaeological Practice. Second edition. Slough, UK: New Dawn Press.Google Scholar
Trompf, G.W. (2005b) Isaac Newton and the Kabbalistic Noah: natural law between Mediaevalia and the Enlightenment. Aries 15: 91118.Google Scholar
Trompf, G.W. (2011) On Athanasius Kircher as esoteric thinker and the state of Kircher scholarship. In: Germanus Incredibilus: The Life and Works of Athanasius Kircher, ed. Fletcher, E., Volume 1, pp. xvxxxi. Leiden, The Netherlands: Brill.Google Scholar
Vetter, B. (1906) Die moderne Weltanschauung und der Mensch. Jena, Germany: Gustav Fischer.Google Scholar
Vico, G.-B. (1959 [1744]) La scienza nuova. Third edition. In: Opere, ed. Rossi, P.. Milan, Italy: Rizzoli.Google Scholar
Von Rad, G. (1963) Genesis: A Commentary. London, UK: SCM.Google Scholar
Wagar, W.W. (1982) The Secular Mind: Transformations of Faith in Modern Europe. Essays presented to Franklin L. Baumer. London, UK: Homes & Meier.Google Scholar
Walker, T.D. (1996) Medieval faceted knowledge of classification: Ramon Llull's trees of science. Human Organization 23: 199205.Google Scholar
Walker, D.P. (1972) The Ancient Theology: Christian Platonism from the Fifteenth to the Eighteenth Century. Ithaca, NY, USA: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wallace, A.R. (1903) Man's Place in the Universe: A Study of the Results of Scientific Research in Relation to the Unity or Plurality of Worlds. New York, NY, USA: McCluire, Phillips & Co.Google Scholar
Walzer, M. (1962) Greek into Arabic: Essays on Islamic Philosophy. Oxford, UK: Bruno Cassirer.Google Scholar
Webster, J. (1654) Academiarum Examen, or, The Examination of Academies. London, UK: Giles Calvert.Google Scholar
Weingart, P. & Stehr, N., eds (2000) Practicing Interdisciplinarity. Toronto, Canada: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Weiss, R. (1960) Italian humanism in Western Europe. In: Italian Renaissance Studies, ed. Jacob, E.F., pp. 6993. London, UK: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Whewell, W. (1847) Philosophy of the Inductive Sciences, founded upon their History. Volumes 1 and 2. London, UK: J.W. Parker.Google Scholar
White, P. (2003) Thomas Huxley: Making the ‘Man of Science’. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Wieruszowski, H., ed. (1966) The Medieval University. Princeton, NJ, USA: D. van Nostrand.Google Scholar
Yeo, R. (2001) Encyclopaedic Visions: Scientific Dictionaries and Enlightenment Culture. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar