Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-28T11:07:39.919Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Campesinos and Conservation in the Central Andes: Indigenous Herding and Conservation of the Vicuña

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Wayne Bernhardson
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Efforts to protect the wild Vicuña, an endangered relative of the domesticated Llama and Alpaca of the central Andes, and to increase the species' numbers, have been more successful in achieving technical wildlife management goals than in complementing agro-pastoral activities of the indigenous peoples of the region. In both Pampa Galeras National Reserve in Peru and in Lauca National Park in Chile, lack of consultation with native pastoralists, whose lands the reserves occupy, reflects weak commitment to broader social and economic goals on the part of national authorities, as well as the inadequacy of international technical assistance in involving local communities in such projects.

Specifically, those projects have neglected to consider the importance of local patterns of land tenure, which are only in small part communal, and of economic differentiation with those communities. At the same time, authorities have controlled or monitored access to such subsistence resources as pasture and fuel for local residents, while failing to offer short-term alternatives for economic opportunity. This is in contrast to the free hand enjoyed by energy and agricultural irrigation projects such as those which benefit Chile's Atacama port of Arica. Continuation of such policies jeopardizes long-term success of wildlife protection as well as the economic future of the region's human inhabitants.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 13 , Issue 4 , Winter 1986 , pp. 311 - 318
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Banker, S. (1977). And now good news: endangered species is saved. Smithsonian, 7(10), pp. 60–4, illustr.Google Scholar
Barker, M.L. (1980). National parks, conservation, and agrarian reform in Peru. Geographical Review, 70, pp. 1–18, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bernhardson, W. (1982). Natural Resources in an Andean Pastoral Economy: the Aymara of Parinacota, Chile. Unpublished M.A. thesis, Department of Geography, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA: iv + 151 pp., illustr. (typescr.).Google Scholar
Cobo, B. (1979) [1653]. History of the Inca Empire. University of Texas Press, Austin & London: xxii + 279 pp., 3 maps.Google Scholar
CONAF (Corporación Nacional Forestal) (undated). Parques Nacionales de Chile. (Departamento de Conservatión del Medio Ambiente Publicatión No. 2.) Ministerio de Agricultura, Santiago, Chile: 35 pp. (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
Custred, G. (1977). Las punas de los Andes centrales. Pp. 55–85 in Pastores de Puna: Uywamichiq Punarnakuna (Ed. Ochoa, J. Flores). Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, Lima, Peru: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Dahl, G. & Hjort, A. (1976). Having Herds: Pastoral Herd Growth and Household Economy. University of Stockholm Department of Social Anthropology, Stockholm Studies in Social Anthropology 2, 335 pp.Google Scholar
Díaz, M. Saito, Figueroa, M. Carrascal & Villalón L.R., Toledo (1977). Estudio agro-socio-económico de la comunidad de Lucanas. PEURV, Ministerio de Agricultura y Alimentatión, Pampa Galeras, Peru: 169 pp., tables.Google Scholar
Dougnac, F. (1975). La legislatión aplicable a los indígenas del Norte Grande chileno. Norte Grande, 1(3–4), pp. 437–44.Google Scholar
Ellenberg, H. (1958). Wald Oder Steppe? die natürliche Pflanzendecke der Anden Perus. Die Umschau, 21, pp. 645–8 & 679–81.Google Scholar
Ellenberg, H. (1979). Man's influence on tropical mountain ecosystems in South America. Journal of Ecology, 67, pp. 401–16, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Henderson, K. (1970 MS). The Puna and Man. Unpublished MS. Department of Geography, University of California, Berkeley, California, USA: 35 pp., map, figures (mimeogr.).Google Scholar
IUCN (International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources) (1979). Vicuña cull backed by IUCN and WWF. IUCN Bulletin, 10(8–9), pp. 69 & 77, illustr.Google Scholar
IUCN (1981). IUCN/WWF position statement on Vicuña. IUCN Bulletin, 12(3–4), pp. 12–13, fig.Google Scholar
Keller, C. (1946). El departamento de Arica. Santiago, Ministerio de Economía y Comercio, Secretaria General del Censo Economico, Censo Económico Nacional, Vol. I: 334 pp., 3 maps, tables, figures, photographs.Google Scholar
Mar, J. Matos (1976). Comunidades indígenas del área andina. Pp. 179–217, in Hacienda, comunidad, y campesinado en el Peru: (Ed. Mar, J. Matos). Instituto de Estudios Peruanos, Lima, Peru: 390 pp.Google Scholar
Matos Mar, J.—see Mar, J. Matos.Google Scholar
Norton-Griffiths, M. & Torres, H. (1980). Evaluation of Ground and Aerial Census Work in Pampa Galeras, Peru. World Wildlife Fund/International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources Evaluation Mission Report, Nairobi, Kenya: 110 pp., map, figures, tables.Google Scholar
PEURV (Proyecto Especial para la Utilización Racional de la Vicuña), (UNDATED). Plan Nacional para la Utilización Racional de la Vicuña. Ministerio de Agricultura y Alimentatiñn, Lima, Peru: 182 pp., 7 maps, tables.Google Scholar
Saito, Díaz M. — see Díaz, M. Saito.Google Scholar
Torres, H. (1983). Distributión y Conservatión de la Vicuña (Vicugna vicugna). (Informe Especial No. 1.) IUCN South American Camelid Specialist Group, Species Survival Commission, Gland, Switzerland: 20 pp.Google Scholar
Torres, H., Hernández, L., Weber, C., Palma, R. & Buch, K. von (1978). Plan de Manejo del Parque Nacional Lauca. CONAF Publicatión Técnica No. 6, Arica, Chile: 84 pp., map.Google Scholar
Troll, C. (1959). Die tropischen Gebirge—ihre dreidimensionale klimatische und pflanzengeographische Zonierung. Bonner Geographische Abhandlungen, 25, pp. 1–93.Google Scholar
Webster, S. (1973). Native pastoralism in the Andes. Ethnology, XII, pp. 115–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weischet, W. (1975). Las condiciones climáticas del desierto de Atacama como el desierto mas extremo de la tierra. Norte Grande, 1(3–4), pp. 363–73, 3 maps, illustr.Google Scholar
White, S. (1982). Origin of a Plant Formation Mosaic, Eastern Andes, Perú. Paper presented at annual meeting of the Association of American Geographers, San Antonìo, Texas, USA: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Winnie, W. (1965). Communal land tenure in Chile. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 54, pp. 67–86, 4 maps, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, A.C.S. (1963). ‘Los bofedales’—alkaline cushion-bog peats of the semi-arid Chilean altiplano. Pacific Viewpoint, 4(2), pp. 189–93, illustr.CrossRefGoogle Scholar