Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-r5fsc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-25T06:19:45.662Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Best Practicable Environmental Option (BPEO): A Case-study in Partial Bureaucratic Adaptation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  24 August 2009

Timothy O'Riordan
Timothy O'Riordan
Affiliation:
Professor, School of Environmental Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, England, UK
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Best Practicable Environmental Option (BPEO) is an invention, peculiar to the British approach to pollution-control, that should have wider application than at present. As the British have developed the idea, BPEO will initially be geared to the mix of residuals emanating from specially-scheduled processes. The aim is so to integrate the residuals' stream that the ultimate environmental alteration is minimized in an optimal but realistic manner. The concept is polluter-orientated—not policy-, planning-, or environmentally-, directed—the aim being so to encase a pollution emitter in a single but comprehensive regulatory envelope that, ideally, best technology, best management, and best science, combine to produce the most efficient and least-offensive discharges.

This paper analyses the genesis of the idea of BPEO, and examines the influence of the growing power of European Community environmental directives on its development and interpretation. For BPEO to work, more fundamental reforms to UK regulatory agencies and legislation will be required. These reforms relate to greater openness and documentation, to a more participatory form of judgement with innovations in economic auditing, and to a more explicit accountability through Parliament and the courts, than are currently practised.

Bureaucracies adapt only slowly, however. So far the British have moved a little way to recognizing the realities of the BPEO approach, but nowhere nearly far enough. BPEO is a philosophy that is close to the practice of sustainable development. Placed in a broader planning and policy context, BPEO has great significance for ecologically-sustainable practices. However, that prospect lies beyond any present proposals for administrative reorganization, and only imaginative experimentation, led by an enlightened and determined private sector, seems at all likely to create the changes in attitude and procedure that would be necessary to incorporate BPEO within a practical programme of ecologically sustainable development.

Type
Main Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 16 , Issue 2 , Summer 1989 , pp. 113 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Ashby, E. & Anderson, M. (1981). The Politics of Air Pollution. Clarendon Press, Oxford, England. UK: viii + 178 pp. illustr.Google Scholar
Brimblecombe, P. (1987). The Big Smoke: A History of Air Pollution in London since Mediaeval Times. Methuen. London. England, UK: xiv + 185 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Brundtland Commission (1987). Our Common Future. Oxford University Press, Oxford, England, UK: xv + 384 pp. [Subsequent edition was of 400 pp. without indication of authorship or prelims.]Google Scholar
Conservation Foundation (1985). New Perspectives on Pollution Control: Cross-media Problems. The Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC, USA: x + 88 pp.Google Scholar
Department of the Environment (cited as DoE) (1986). Air Pollution Control in Great Britain: Review and Proposals. DoE, London, England, UK: 41 pp.Google Scholar
Department of the Environment (cited as DoE) (1988 a). Integrated Pollution Control: A Consultation Paper. DoE. London, England, UK: 29 pp.Google Scholar
Department of the Environment (cited as DoE) (1988 b). Inputs of Dangerous Substances to Water: Proposals for a Unified System of Control. DoE, London, England, UK: 20 pp.Google Scholar
Douglas, M. (1987). How Institutions Think. Syracuse University Press, Syracuse, NY, USA: x + 184 pp.Google Scholar
Elkington, J. & Burke, T. (1987). The Green Capitalists: Industry's Search for Environmental Excellence. Gollancz, London. England, UK: xi + 258 pp.Google Scholar
Frankel, M. (1974). The Alkali Inspectorate: The Control of Industrial Air Pollution. Social Audit, Campaign for Freedom of Information, 3 Endsleigh Street, London WC1H ODD. England. UK: 40pp.Google Scholar
Haigh, N. (1988). EEC Environmental Policy and Britain. Longmans. London, England, UK: xiii + 380 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. (1987). BPEO and waste management engineering to land. Pp. 38–59 in Best Practicable Environmental Option: Towards a new Jerusalem? (Ed. Tromans, Stephen). UK Environmental Law Association, Imperial College, London, England, UK: [not available for checking].Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. & Thomas, J.M. (1984). Enforcing Pollution. Kluwer-Nijholt, Boston, Massachusetts, USA: xiv + 201 pp.Google Scholar
Hays, S. (1987). Beauty. Health and Permanence: American Environmental Politics 1945–1985. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, England, UK: xv + 629 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
House of Lords European Community Committee (1987–1988). Correspondence with Ministers. [1st Report.] HMSO, London, England, UK: 15 pp.Google Scholar
Irwin, F.H. (in press). Integrated Pollution Control: Dealing with Cross Media Problems. The Conservation Foundation, Washington, DC, USA.Google Scholar
Luckin, B. (1986). Pollution and Control: A Social History of the Thames in the Nineteenth Century. Adam Helger, Bristol, England, UK: x + 189 pp. illustr.Google Scholar
Macrory, R. (1983). Environmentalism in the courts. (Eds O'Riordan, T. & Turner, R.K.). Pp. 153–68 in Progress in Resource Management and Environmental Planning. John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, England, UK.Google Scholar
Moltke, K. Von 1988). The Versorgeprinzep in West German environment policy. Pp. 57–72 in Royal Commission… (1988), q.v.Google Scholar
O'Riordan, T. & Wynne, R. (1987). Regulating environmental risks. (Eds Keindorfer, P. & Kunreuther, H.). Pp.381–410 in Insuring and Managing Hazardous Risks. Springer Verlag, Berlin, West Germany. [Not available for checking.]Google Scholar
Porritt, J. & Winner, D. (1988). The Coming of the Greens. Collins Fontana, London, England, UK: 287 pp., illustr.Google Scholar
Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (1976). Air Pollution Control: An Integrated Approach. Fifth Report, Cmnd 6371, HMSO, London, England, UK: 130 pp.Google Scholar
Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution (1988). Best Practicable Environmental Option. Twelfth Report, Cmnd 310, HMSO, London, England, UK: 72 pp.Google Scholar
Taylor, S. (1984). How Bureaucracies Think. Stanford University Press, Stanford, California, USA: viii + 320 pp.Google Scholar
Turner, R.K. (1988). Sustainable Environmental Management: Principles and Prospects. Bellhaven Press, London, England, UK: xi + 292 pp., illustr.Google Scholar