Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T03:11:08.909Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Balancing artificial light at night with turtle conservation? Coastal community engagement with light-glow reduction

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  22 July 2014

RUTH L. KAMROWSKI ,
STEPHEN G. SUTTON ,
RENAE C. TOBIN  and
MARK HAMANN
RUTH L. KAMROWSKI*
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia
STEPHEN G. SUTTON
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia
RENAE C. TOBIN
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia
MARK HAMANN
Affiliation:
School of Earth and Environmental Sciences, James Cook University, Townsville, QLD 4811, Australia
*
*Correspondence: Ms Ruth L. Kamrowski Tel: +61 488 535923 Fax: +61 748 715581 e-mail: [email protected]
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Summary

Artificial lighting is a significant threat to biodiversity. Although efforts to reduce lighting are crucial for species’ conservation efforts, management is challenging because light at night is integral to modern society and light use is increasing with population and economic growth. The development and evaluation of appropriate light management strategies will require positive public support, and a comprehensive understanding of public engagement with light pollution. This is the first study to examine public engagement with reducing light at night for the protection of a threatened species. A community campaign to reduce artificial light use was initiated in 2008 to protect marine turtles at a globally significant nesting beach. Semi-structured questionnaires assessed community engagement with light-glow reduction, using an existing theoretical constraints framework. Despite high levels of cognitive and affective engagement (knowledge and concern), behavioural engagement (action) with light reduction in this community was limited. Community perceptions of light reduction were dominated by ‘uncertainty and scepticism’ and ‘externalizing responsibility/blame’, implying that behavioural engagement in this community may be increased by addressing these widely-held perceptions using modified campaign materials and/or strategic legislation. Further refinement of the theoretical constraints framework would better guide future empirical and conceptual research to improve understanding of public engagement with critical environmental issues.

Keywords

behaviourcommunity engagementconservationconstraintslight pollutionmarine turtles
Type
Papers
Information
Environmental Conservation , Volume 42 , Issue 2 , June 2015 , pp. 171 - 181
Copyright
Copyright © Foundation for Environmental Conservation 2014 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Australian Bureau of Statistics (2013) 2011 census quickstats: Bargara SSC30106 [www document]. URL http://www.censusdata.abs.gov.au/census_services/getproduct/census/2011/quickstat/SSC30106 Google Scholar
Ballantyne, R., Packer, J. & Sutherland, L.A. (2011) Visitors’ memories of wildlife tourism: implications for the design of powerful interpretive experiences. Tourism Management 32: 770–779.Google Scholar
Bamberg, S., Ajzen, I. & Schmidt, P. (2003) Choice of travel mode in the theory of planned behavior: the roles of past behavior, habit, and reasoned action. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 25: 175–187.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bamberg, S. & Schmidt, P. (2003) Incentives, morality, or habit? Predicting students’ car use for university routes with the models of Ajzen, Schwartz, and Triandis. Environment and Behaviour 35: 264–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Barschel, N., Bruce, R., Haggitt, D., Lichter, B. & McCray, J. (2013) Sea turtle friendly lighting: a model ordinance for local governments and model guidelines for incorporation into governing documents of planned communities: condominiums, cooperatives and homeowners’ associations. Report. The Conservation Clinic, University of Florida Levin College of Law, on behalf of the Sea Turtle Conservancy, Florida, USA.Google Scholar
Beckmann, S.C. (2005) In the eye of the beholder: Danish consumer-citizens and sustainability. In: Consumers, Policy and the Environment A Tribute to Folke Ölander, ed. Grunert, K.G. & Thøgersen, J., pp. 265–299. Berlin, Germany: Springer.Google Scholar
Berry, M., Booth, D.T. & Limpus, C.J. (2013) Artificial lighting and disrupted sea-finding behaviour in hatchling loggerhead turtles (Caretta caretta) on the Woongarra coast, south-east Queensland, Australia. Australian Journal of Zoology 61: 137–145.Google Scholar
Bixler, R.D. & Floyd, M.F. (1997) Nature is scary, disgusting, and uncomfortable. Environment and Behaviour 29: 443–467.Google Scholar
Blake, J. (1999) Overcoming the ‘value-action gap’ in environmental policy: tensions between national policy and local experience. Local Environment 4: 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, T.J., Ham, S.H. & Hughes, M. (2010) Picking up litter: an application of theory-based communication to influence tourist behaviour in protected areas. Journal of Sustainable Tourism 18: 879–900.Google Scholar
Butler, K.R. (1997) Coastal protection of sea turtles in Florida. Journal of Land Use & Environmental Law 13: 399.Google Scholar
Cha, J., Lee, J., Lee, W., Jung, J., Lee, K., Han, J. & Gu, J. (2014) Policy and status of light pollution management in Korea. Lighting Research and Technology 46: 78–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cinzano, P., Falchi, F. & Elvidge, C.D. (2001) The first world atlas of the artificial night sky brightness. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society 328: 689–707.Google Scholar
Dolan, K.A. & Holbrook, T.M. (2001) Knowing versus caring: the role of affect and cognition in political perceptions. Political Psychology 22: 27–44.Google Scholar
Elvidge, C., Sutton, P., Baugh, K., Ziskin, D., Ghosh, T. & Anderson, S. (2011) National trends in satellite observed lighting: 1992–2009. Remote Sensing 3: 1–17.Google Scholar
Elvidge, C., Ziskin, D., Baugh, K., Tuttle, B., Ghosh, T., Pack, D., Erwin, E. & Zhizhin, M. (2009) A fifteen year record of global natural gas flaring derived from satellite data. Energies 2: 595–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Falchi, F., Cinzano, P., Elvidge, C.D., Keith, D.M. & Haim, A. (2011) Limiting the impact of light pollution on human health, environment and stellar visibility. Journal of Environmental Management 92: 2714–2722.Google Scholar
Fischer, A. & Young, J.C. (2007) Understanding mental constructs of biodiversity: implications for biodiversity management and conservation. Biological Conservation 136: 271–282.Google Scholar
Fischle, M. (2000) Mass response to the Lewinsky scandal: motivated reasoning or bayesian updating? Political Psychology 21: 135–159.Google Scholar
Gallaway, T., Olsen, R.N. & Mitchell, D.M. (2010) The economics of global light pollution. Ecological Economics 69: 658–665.Google Scholar
Gaston, K.J., Bennie, J., Davies, T.W. & Hopkins, J. (2013) The ecological impacts of nighttime light pollution: a mechanistic appraisal. Biological Reviews 88: 912–927.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gaston, K.J., Davies, T.W., Bennie, J. & Hopkins, J. (2012) Reducing the ecological consequences of night-time light pollution: options and developments. Journal of Applied Ecology 49: 1256–1266.Google Scholar
Ham, S.H., Weiler, B., Hughes, M., Brown, T., Curtis, J. & Poll, M. (2008) Asking visitors to help: research to guide strategic communication for protected area management. Sustainable Tourism CRC, Queensland, Australia [www document]. URL http://www.sustainabletourismonline.com/161/strategic-communication/asking-visitors-to-help-research-to-guide-strategic-communication-for-protected-area-management Google Scholar
Hölker, F., Moss, B., Griefahn, W., Kloas, C.C., Voigt, D., Henckel, A., Hänel, P.M., Kappeler, S., Völker, A., Schwope, S., Franke, D., Uhrlandt, J., Fischer, R., Klenke, C., Wolter, C. & Tockner, K. (2010 a) The dark side of light: a transdisciplinary research agenda for light pollution policy. Ecology and Society 15: 13.Google Scholar
Hölker, F., Wolter, C., Perkin, E.K. & Tockner, K. (2010 b) Light pollution as a biodiversity threat. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 25: 681–682.Google Scholar
Huebner, R.B. & Lipsey, M.W. (1981) The relationship of three measures of locus of control to environment activism. Basic and Applied Social Psychology 2: 45–58.Google Scholar
Jacobson, S.K. & McDuff, M.D. (1998) Conservation education. In: Conservation Science and Action, ed. Sutherland, W.J., pp. 237–255. Oxford, UK, Blackwell Science.Google Scholar
Johnson, S.D., Neal, P.R., Peter, C.I. & Edwards, T.J. (2004) Fruiting failure and limited recruitment in remnant populations of the hawkmoth-pollinated tree Oxyanthus pyriformis subsp. pyriformis (Rubiaceae). Biological Conservation 120: 31–39.Google Scholar
Kamrowski, R.L., Limpus, C., Jones, R., Anderson, S. & Hamann, M. (2014) Temporal changes in artificial light exposure of marine turtle nesting areas. Global Change Biology doi: 10.1111/gcb.12503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamrowski, R.L., Limpus, C., Moloney, J. & Hamann, M. (2012) Coastal light pollution and marine turtles: assessing the magnitude of the problem. Endangered Species Research 19: 85–98.Google Scholar
Limpus, C. (1985) A study of the loggerhead turtle, Caretta caretta, in Queensland. PhD thesis, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.Google Scholar
Limpus, C. & Kamrowski, R.L. (2013) Ocean-finding in marine turtles: the importance of low horizon elevation as an orientation cue. Behaviour 150: 863–893.Google Scholar
Lorenzoni, I., Nicholson-Cole, S. & Whitmarsh, L. (2007) Barriers perceived to engaging with climate change among the UK public and their policy implications. Global Environmental Change 17: 445–459.Google Scholar
Lyytimäki, J. (2013) Nature's nocturnal services: light pollution as a non-recognised challenge for ecosystem services research and management. Ecosystem Services 3: e44–e48.Google Scholar
Lyytimäki, J. & Rinne, J. (2013) Voices for the darkness: online survey on public perceptions on light pollution as an environmental problem. Journal of Indo-European Studies 10: 127–139.Google Scholar
Macey, W.H. & Schneider, B. (2008) The meaning of employee engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology 1: 3–30.Google Scholar
Mazor, T., Levin, N., Possingham, H.P., Levy, Y., Rocchini, D., Richardson, A.J. & Kark, S. (2013) Can satellite-based night lights be used for conservation? The case of nesting sea turtles in the Mediterranean. Biological Conservation 159: 63–72.Google Scholar
McDonald, R.I. & Fielding, K.S. (2010) Community reactions to the ‘Cut the Glow to Help Turtles Go’ campaign. Report submitted to Queensland Parks and Wildlife Service, Department of Environment and Resource Management, Australia.Google Scholar
McDonald, R.I., Fielding, K.S. & Louis, W.R. (2014) Conflicting social norms and community conservation compliance. Journal for Nature Conservation 22: 212–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKenzie-Mohr, D. (2000) Fostering sustainable behavior through community-based social marketing. American Psychologist 55: 531.Google Scholar
McKenzie-Mohr, D. & Smith, W. (1999) Fostering Sustainable Development. An Introduction to Community-Based Social Marketing. Washington, DC, USA: Academy for Educational Development and Gabriola Island, BC, Canada, New Society Publishers.Google Scholar
Moser, S.C. (2010) Communicating climate change: history, challenges, process and future directions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change 1: 31–53.Google Scholar
Neil, K. & Wu, J. (2006) Effects of urbanization on plant flowering phenology: a review. Urban Ecosystems 9: 243–257.Google Scholar
Ockwell, D., Whitmarsh, L. & O’Neill, S. (2009) Reorienting climate change communication for effective mitigation forcing people to be green or fostering grass-roots engagement? Science Communication 30: 305–327.Google Scholar
Ouellette, J.A. & Wood, W. (1998) Habit and intention in everyday life: the multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin 124: 54–74.Google Scholar
Paulhus, D.L. (1984) Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46: 598.Google Scholar
Pudmenzky, C. (2013) In Queensland, what legislative changes or modifications need to be implemented in relation to light pollution problems for nesting sea turtles and hatchlings? Queensland parliamentary internship research report. University of Southern Queensland, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
Rich, C. & Longcore, T. (2006) Ecological Consequences of Artificial Night Lighting. Washington, DC, USA: Island Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, K. (2013) An assessment of ‘turtle friendly’ lights on the sea finding behaviour of loggerhead sea turtles (Caretta caretta) at Mon Repos, Queensland. Honours thesis. University of Queensland, Queensland, Australia.Google Scholar
Salmon, M. (2003) Artificial night lighting and sea turtles. Biologist 50: 163–168.Google Scholar
Senko, J., Schneller, A.J., Solis, J., Ollervides, F. & Nichols, W.J. (2011) People helping turtles, turtles helping people: understanding resident attitudes towards sea turtle conservation and opportunities for enhanced community participation in Bahia Magdalena, Mexico. Ocean and Coastal Management 54: 148–157.Google Scholar
Stark, H., Brown, S., Wong, K., Sturtz, J., Elvidge, C., Pollack, I., Ryerson, T., Dube, W., Wagner, N. & Parrish, D. (2011) City lights and urban air. Nature Geoscience 4: 730–731.Google Scholar
Steckenreuter, A. & Wolf, I. (2013) How to use persuasive communication to encourage visitors to pay park user fees. Tourism Management 37: 58–70.Google Scholar
Stern, P.C. (2000) Psychology and the science of human-environment interactions. American Psychologist 55: 523–530.Google Scholar
Stevens, R.G. (2009) Light-at-night, circadian disruption and breast cancer: assessment of existing evidence. International Journal of Epidemiology 38: 963–970.Google Scholar
Sutton, S. & Tobin, R. (2011) Constraints on community engagement with Great Barrier Reef climate change reduction and mitigation. Global Environmental Change 21: 894–905.Google Scholar
Tanner, C. (1999) Constraints on environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology 19: 145–157.Google Scholar
Tisdell, C. & Wilson, C. (2001) Wildlife-based tourism and increased support for nature conservation financially and otherwise: evidence from sea turtle ecotourism at Mon Repos. Tourism Economics 7: 233–249.Google Scholar
Trigg, L.J., Perlman, D., Perry, R.P. & Janisse, M.P. (1976) Anti-pollution behavior a function of perceived outcome and locus of control. Environment and Behavior 8: 307–313.Google Scholar
Tucker, P. (1999) Normative influences in household waste recycling. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 42: 63–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitmarsh, L., O’Neill, S. & Lorenzoni, I. (2011) Engaging the Public With Climate Change: Behaviour Change and Communication. London, UK: Earthscan Ltd. Google Scholar
Whitmarsh, L., O’Neill, S. & Lorenzoni, I. (2013) Public engagement with climate change: what do we know and where do we go from here? International Journal of Media and Cultural Politics 9: 7–25.Google Scholar
Witherington, B. & Martin, R.E. (2000) Understanding, assessing, and resolving light-pollution problems on sea turtle nesting beaches, second edition. Technical Report TR-2, Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, Marine Research Institute, St Petersburg, FL, USA [www document]. URL http://research.myfwc.com/publications/publication_info.asp?id=39080 Google Scholar